Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Ectopic Expression in the Giant Fiber System ofDrosophila Reveals Distinct Roles for Roundabout (Robo), Robo2, and Robo3 in Dendritic Guidance and Synaptic Connectivity

Tanja A. Godenschwege, Julie H. Simpson, Xiaoliang Shan, Greg J. Bashaw, Corey S. Goodman and Rodney K. Murphey
Journal of Neuroscience 15 April 2002, 22 (8) 3117-3129; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-08-03117.2002
Tanja A. Godenschwege
1Department of Biology, Morrill Science Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie H. Simpson
2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoliang Shan
1Department of Biology, Morrill Science Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Greg J. Bashaw
2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Corey S. Goodman
2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodney K. Murphey
1Department of Biology, Morrill Science Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Wild-type expression pattern of Robo and Slit in pupae. A, Schematic of the morphology of the GF within the fly CNS. Boxes indicate the regions of the brain and the thoracic ganglion depicted in B–D.B, Control adult (UAS-lacZ/+;A307/+) CNS whole-mount preparation stained for β-gal using immunohistochemistry. It displays the wild-type GFs showing their distinct dendritic arbors (top, arrow) and cell bodies (top, arrowhead) in the brain, as well as their axons projecting in T2, where they make a characteristic lateral bend (bottom, arrow). C, CNS whole-mount preparation at ∼20% of pupal development stained for Slit using immunohistochemistry. Note the strong Slit detection in the suboesophageal ganglion and in the thorax localized in the area of the midline glia (arrows). D, CNS whole-mount preparation at ∼30% of pupal development stained for Robo using immunohistochemistry. Note that Robo is detected throughout the neuropil with the exception of weak or no staining at the midline (arrow). Scale bar, 20 μm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Coexpression of wild-type Comm rescues Robo2-induced lateral displacement. A, Expression of dominant negativeUAS-robocΔ using the A307 driver results in a midline crossing of the GF axons in the target area (arrow). B, Expression ofUAS-commwt using the A307 driver results in a collapse of the GF at the midline. The GF axons wrap around each other and cross the midline (arrow). The GF bends appear to be normal (arrowheads). C, Coexpression of wild-type UAS-comm and UAS-robo2 using A307 results in GFs with a normal lateral position. In approximately one-third of the specimens, the GF is seen to cross the midline once in the target area, as seen in this specimen (arrow).D, Coexpression ofUAS-commcΔ, lacking the intracellular domain, and UAS-robo2 using A307 results in a lateral displacement of the GF, as seen whenUAS-robo2 alone is expressed in the GF (compare with Fig. 3C). Asterisks indicate that these extensions have been also seen in A307, UAS-lacZ/+ control flies (Allen et al., 1998) and are therefore probably attributable to a nonspecific effect in these recombinant flies. Scale bar, 20 μm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Overexpression of Robo, Robo2, and Robo3 causes lateral displacement of the GF. A, Control adult (UAS-lacZ/+;A307/+) CNS whole-mount preparation stained for β-gal using immunohistochemistry. This specimen illustrates control GF axons projecting into T2, where they make a characteristic lateral bend (arrows). When UAS-robo(B), UAS-robo2(C), and UAS-robo3(D) were expressed in the GF, they revealed a differential strength in their ability to push the GF axons laterally. Note that expression of Robo3 can induce lateral displacement (asterisks) in the connective before reaching the thoracic ganglion. Additional terminal branches of the axon were occasionally observed when UAS-robo,UAS-robo2, or UAS-robo3 was ectopically expressed in the giant fiber using either driver (B,arrow). E1, ben-like termination in a specimen expressing Robo [A307/+;(2×)UAS-robo/+] exclusively presynaptically. The ending is swollen or tapered (arrows).E2, ben-like termination in a specimen expressing Robo [c17/+;(2×)UAS-robo/+]. In this case, the ending is swollen (arrows). F, Quantification of the lateral position of the axons. The location of the axon in each specimen was determined relative to the midline and the lateral edge of the ganglion. This distance was divided into 13 intervals, and each GF axon was scored for the relative position of the axon just anterior to the bend (white scale).Black scale bar, 20 μm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Physiology of the GF circuit. A, Schematic depiction of the two methods of stimulation as well as the method for recording from the TTM muscle. Brain stimulation was used to activate the GF; thoracic stimulation was used to excite the TTMn directly. B, Schematic of the GF and the TTMn with approximate conduction times. The estimated response latency is shown for brain (0.8 msec) as well as thoracic stimulation (0.6 msec).C, Responses of control (C1) and Robo gain-of-function (C2–C5) flies to brain and thoracic stimulation. Note that c17/+;UAS-robo/+ and A307/+;UAS-robo/+ flies have an increased response latency (1.4 and 1.9 msec) and are not able to follow repetitive stimulation at 100 Hz (C2, C3). Some Robo gain-of-function flies (A307/+;UAS-robo/+) show no response to brain stimulation (C4, asterisk), but thoracic stimulation reveals that the neuromuscular junction of the TTMn is normal (C5).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Weak or laterally displaced GF→TTMn synapses are dye-coupled. A, Schematic of the morphology of the GF (black) and the TTMn (dark gray) within the thoracic portion of the CNS. The box indicates the regions of the thoracic ganglion depicted in B, C.B, Retrograde staining of the TTMn in a specimen expressing Robo [c17/+;(2×)UAS-robo] with a physiologically determined weakened GF→TTMn synapse. Note that the TTMn is dye-coupled to the GF. C, Specimen expressing Robo [c17/+;(2×)UAS-robo] with a physiologically determined wild-type GF→TTMn synapse. Note that the TTMn is dye-coupled to the laterally displaced GF. Scale bar, 20 μm.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Robo mediates dendritic repulsion of the TTMn, but Robo2 and Robo3 do not. Whole-mount preparations of the thoracic ganglion of late pupas (50–75%) were stained for β-gal using immunohistochemistry. A, Example of a control motor neuron (UAS-lacZ/shakB-Gal4). cb, Cell body; ax, axon; ld, lateral dendrite; md, medial dendrite. B, Overexpression of Robo disrupts dendrite formation in the TTMn. The medial dendrite does not reach the midline (arrows), and the lateral dendrite is often missing (asterisk). The genotype is UAS-lacZ/shakB-Gal4;UAS-robo-myc/+.C, Expression of Robo2 or Robo3 has no effect on the TTMn dendrites (example only shown forUAS-lacZ/shakB-Gal4;UAS-robo2-myc/+). As in wild type, the medial TTMn dendrite reaches the midline (arrow). Scale bar, 20 μm.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Ectopic GF→TTMn synapses in flies expressing Robo or Robo2 presynaptically and postsynaptically. A, Simultaneous expression of robo presynaptically and postsynaptically (shakB-Gal4/c17,UAS-lacZ;UAS-robo2-myc/+) at ∼70% of pupal development. On the right, the GF contacts the TTMn dendrite more lateral than usual where a thickening of the dendrite and the GF terminal can be seen, presumably representing the ectopic synapse (black arrow). The medial TTMn dendrite extends beyond the contact and reaches the midline (arrowheads). The left GF first grows laterally (white arrows), contacts the TTMn neurite (white arrowhead), and than grows along the medial dendrite from lateral to medial (black arrow). B, C, Examples of specimens expressing Robo presynaptically and postsynaptically. Specimens with the genotypeshakB-Gal4/c17,UAS-lacZ;(2×)UAS-robodissected at 50–80% of pupal development are shown. B, The GF turns at the midline and grows toward the stunted medial dendrite of the TTMn (black arrow). C, In this example, the right GF grows toward and contacts the stalled dendrite ∼30 μm lateral to the midline (black arrow). The left GF displays aben-like ending (black arrow) ∼10 μm from the midline and does not contact the TTMn dendrite (white arrow). Scale bars, 20 μm.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Protein distribution of Robo and Robo2 in the GF and the TTMn. A1, Localization of anti-myc staining when Robo-myc was expressed under the control of A307 (A307/+;UAS-robo-myc/+). Note the staining in the somata (arrowheads) but only very weakly in dendrites (arrow). A2, Robo-myc localization in the axons of the same specimen as in A1. Note the staining in the presynaptic terminal (arrowheads).A3, Robo-myc localization in the motor neurons at ∼50% of pupal development (the genotype isshakB-Gal4/+;UAS-robo-myc/+). Note the very dense label in the dendrites (arrows) and the fact that the medial dendrites never reach the midline (asterisk). The axons (arrowhead) and somata are more weakly labeled. A4, Example of Robo-myc localization in motor neurons at ∼70% of development (shakB-Gal4/+;UAS-robo-myc/+). B1, B2, Localization of anti-myc staining when Robo2-myc was expressed by A307 (B1, A307/+;UAS-robo2-myc/+; B2, A307/A307;UAS-robo2-myc/+). The somata (B1, arrowheads) and axons are labeled weakly, and the presynaptic terminal is labeled slightly more strongly (B2, arrowheads), but the dendrites could not be detected. Note the increased background and processes of unknown neurons in A1, A2 in comparison with B1, B2. B3, Localization of Robo2-myc in the TTMn. Note the strongest labeling in the dendrites (arrows) and the lowest in the axons (arrowhead). Although the label is much weaker, the same differential distribution appears to occur for Robo-myc as for Robo2-myc. The genotype isshakB-Gal4/+;UAS-robo2-myc/+.B4, An increase of Robo2-myc protein in theshakB-Gal4/shakB-Gal4;UAS-robo2-myc/UAS-robo2- myc specimen exhibits the same pattern of expression and, although stronger, still does not deflect the lateral TTMn dendrite from the midline. Scale bars, 20 μm.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of anatomical and physiological phenotypes induced by Robo, Robo2, and Robo3 expression in the GF

    Genotype1-aAnatomyPhysiology
    nLateral deflection (% GFs)Lateral position (μm)ben-like (% GFs)nLatency ± SEM (msec)Normal synapse (% flies)1-bWeak synapse (% flies)1-cNo synapse (% flies)1-d
    c17/+50010170.91  ± 0.0210000
    c17/+;UAS-robo-myc/+26291.414320.98  ± 0.1180220
    c17/+;(2×)UAS-robo/+50762.214531.23  ± 0.1568302
    c17/+;UAS-robo2-myc/+30441.60160.85  ± 0.0310000
    c17/+;UAS-robo3/+16571.90110.9  ± 0.0210000
    c17/+;UAS-roboΔC2+3/+39131.10500.89  ± 0.069280
    A307/+50010380.89  ± 0.0210000
    A307/+;UAS-robo-myc/+331003.327221.81  ± 0.20324523
    A307/+;(2×)UAS-robo/+551003.626251.55  ± 0.26363628
    A307/+;UAS-roboΔC/+22015131.02  ± 0.0277230
    A307/+;UAS-roboΔC2+3/+271003.34211.00  ± 0.1060319
    A307/+;UAS-robo2-myc/+551004.70150.8  ± 0.0310000
    A307;UAS-robo2-myc +; UAS-robo2-myc201005.00130.92  ± 0.0210000
    A307/+;UAS-robo3/+271005.40140.94  ± 0.0886140
    A307/+;UAS-comm20010110.81  ± 0.0373270
    • ↵F1-a For anatomy, the flies also contained a UAS-lacZ either on X or on the second chromosome.

    • ↵F1-b A normal synapse is defined as response latency ≤1 msec and follow stimuli up to 100 Hz.

    • ↵F1-c A weak synapse is defined as response latency >1 msec or do not follow stimuli given at 100 Hz.

    • ↵F1-d These animals showed no response to brain stimulation, but thoracic stimulation of these specimen revealed that the neuromuscular junction response is normal.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Summary of anatomical and physiological phenotypes induced by Robo, Robo2, and Robo3 expression in the TTMn

    Genotype2-aAnatomyPhysiology
    nDisrupted dendrites (% TTMs)nLatency ± SEM (msec)Normal synapse (% flies)2-bWeak synapse (% flies)2-cNo synapse (% flies)2-d
    ShakB-Gal4/+500200.86  ± 0.0210000
    ShakB-Gal4/+;UAS-robo-myc/+40100111.79  ± 0.1601000
    ShakB-Gal4/+;(2×)UAS-robo/+21100142.09  ± 0.050937
    ShakB-Gal4/+;UAS-roboΔC2+3/+28100122.00  ± 0.2108317
    ShakB-Gal4/+;UAS-robo2-myc/+200140.93  ± 0.0310000
    ShakB-Gal4;UAS-robo2-myc200180.93  ± 0.029460
    ShakB-Gal4;UAS-robo2-myc
    ShakB-Gal4/+;UAS-robo3/+220140.91  ± 0.039370
    ShakB-Gal4/+;UAS-roboΔC/+150 70.87  ± 0.0110000
    ShakB-Gal4/UAS-comm200 80.89  ± 0.0210000
    ShakB-Gal4/UAS-comm;UAS-robo/+230NDNDNDNDND
    ShakB-Gal4/UAS-comm;(2×)UAS-robo/+250150.90  ± 0.029370
    • ND, Not determined.

    • ↵F2-a For anatomy, the flies also contained a UAS-lacZ either on X or on the second chromosome.

    • ↵F2-b A normal synapse is defined as response latency ≤1 msec and follow stimuli up to 100 Hz.

    • ↵F2-c A weak synapse is defined as response latency >1 msec or do not follow stimuli given at 100 Hz.

    • ↵F2-d These animals showed no response to brain stimulation, but thoracic stimulation of these specimen revealed that the neuromuscular junction response is normal.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Summary of anatomical and physiological phenotypes induced by Robo, Robo2, and Robo3 presynaptic and postsynaptic expression in the GF and the TTMn

    Genotype3-aAnatomyPhysiology
    nLateral deflection (% GFs)ben-like (% GFs)Disrupted dendrites (% TTMs)nLatency ± SEM (msec)Normal synapse (% flies)3-bWeak synapse (% flies)3-cNo synapse (% flies)3-d
    A307/+, (2×)UAS-robo/+5510026251.55  ± 0.26363628
    ShakB-Gal4/+, (2×)UAS-robo/+21––100142.09  ± 0.050937
    ShakB-Gal4/A307, (2×)UAS-robo/+3010046100231.64  ± 0.20223048
    A307/+,UAS-robo2-myc/+551000150.80  ± 0.0310000
    ShakB-Gal4/+,UAS-robo2-myc/+20––0140.93  ± 0.0310000
    ShakB-Gal4/A307,UAS-robo2-myc/+1710000190.95  ± 0.0310000
    • ↵F3-a For anatomy, the flies also contained a UAS-lacZ either on X or on the second chromosome.

    • ↵F3-b A normal synapse is defined as response latency ≤1 msec and follow stimuli up to 100 Hz.

    • ↵F3-c A weak synapse is defined as response latency >1 msec or do not follow stimuli given at 100 Hz.

    • ↵F3-d These animals showed no response to brain stimulation, but thoracic stimulation of these specimen revealed that the neuromuscular junction response is normal.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 22 (8)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 22, Issue 8
15 Apr 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ectopic Expression in the Giant Fiber System ofDrosophila Reveals Distinct Roles for Roundabout (Robo), Robo2, and Robo3 in Dendritic Guidance and Synaptic Connectivity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Ectopic Expression in the Giant Fiber System ofDrosophila Reveals Distinct Roles for Roundabout (Robo), Robo2, and Robo3 in Dendritic Guidance and Synaptic Connectivity
Tanja A. Godenschwege, Julie H. Simpson, Xiaoliang Shan, Greg J. Bashaw, Corey S. Goodman, Rodney K. Murphey
Journal of Neuroscience 15 April 2002, 22 (8) 3117-3129; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-08-03117.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Ectopic Expression in the Giant Fiber System ofDrosophila Reveals Distinct Roles for Roundabout (Robo), Robo2, and Robo3 in Dendritic Guidance and Synaptic Connectivity
Tanja A. Godenschwege, Julie H. Simpson, Xiaoliang Shan, Greg J. Bashaw, Corey S. Goodman, Rodney K. Murphey
Journal of Neuroscience 15 April 2002, 22 (8) 3117-3129; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-08-03117.2002
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • axon
  • dendrites
  • guidance
  • giant fiber
  • Drosophila
  • roundabout
  • Robo
  • Slit
  • synapse
  • commissureless

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Estrogen Modulates the Visceromotor Reflex and Responses of Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons to Colorectal Stimulation in the Rat
  • Sp1 and Sp3 Are Oxidative Stress-Inducible, Antideath Transcription Factors in Cortical Neurons
  • Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Regulates the Induction of Long-Term Potentiation through Extracellular Signal-Related Kinase-Independent Mechanisms
Show more ARTICLE

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • Change of Spiny Neuron Structure in the Basal Ganglia Song Circuit and Its Regulation by miR-9 during Song Development
  • Neddylation E1 obligatory subunit Nae1 is critical to neuromuscular junction development and maintenance
  • Developmental Changes in Brain Cellular Membrane and Energy Metabolism: A Multi-Occasion 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.