Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

State-Dependent Processing of Sensory Stimuli by Thalamic Reticular Neurons

Jed A. Hartings, Simona Temereanca and Daniel J. Simons
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 2003, 23 (12) 5264-5271; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-05264.2003
Jed A. Hartings
Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simona Temereanca
Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. Simons
Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Heterogeneity of spontaneous and stimulus-evoked spike patterns in RT. A–F, Raster plots of single-unit responses; each panel shows a separate unit. For each unit 10 trials × four directions spanning 135° in 45° increments are shown; trials at each of the four directions are separated by tick marks. The total duration is 500 msec, and the stimulus waveform is shown below.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    ISI patterns of evoked responses. A, B, Distributions of ISI values for consecutive ISIs numbers (1–6) occurring after stimulus onset. A and B were accumulated separately for responses after quiescent (Fig. 2 A) and single spike (Fig. 2 B) SA, respectively. The ordinate axes represent frequency (number of ISIs/100 μsec bin/number of trials) and are shown on different scales. The abscissa in A has an expanded scale to show differences between its distribution curves. C, Mean ISI values (±SEM) after quiescent (▪) and single spike (○) SA. For each ISI number, values were significantly different between the two conditions (p < 0.001). ISIs accumulated for all spontaneously occurring bursts (▴) are shown for comparison. D, First spike latencies are plotted versus fourth ISI values for all quiescent (black) and single spike (red) SA trials.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    State-dependent population responses. Evoked response PSTHs were accumulated by separation of responses on a trial-by-trial basis according to classification of SA occurring 150 msec before the stimulus. A,No SA. B, Grouped discharge. C, Two or more single spikes. D, One spike.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    State-dependent single-unit responses. A, C, E, The first 10 consecutive ISI values after stimulus onset for trials with no SA (A), grouped discharge SA (C), and more than or equal to five single spikes (E). Each graph shows seven trials from a separate unit. B,D,F, The same data as in A,C, and E, respectively, plotted in raster format. G, PSTHs were accumulated on the basis of the timing of the first spike only for all trials with no SA (gray) and all trials with single spike SA (black). H, Raster plots of ON and OFF responses of a unit to 10 whisker deflection trials at the same deflection angle. The dotted line is placed to facilitate comparison of OFF response latencies when preceded by tonic versus no activity. No activity preceded the ON response on any trial.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Mean effects of APV on RT activity. A, PSTHs accumulated over 22 units and all deflection angles, under control conditions (open histogram) and during APV application (filled histogram). B, PSTHs for all 22 units at directions evoking their maximal ON responses.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Effects of NMDA on single-unit responses. A, B, Responses of two single units to 40 stimulus trials under control conditions, during NMDA iontophoresis, and after recovery. Conventions are the same as in Figure 1.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Mean effects of NMDA on RT responses. A, PSTHs were accumulated over 12 units and all deflection angles, under control conditions and during NMDA microiontophoresis. Reductions in ON responses (NMDA response divided by control response) are shown as a function of the NMDA-induced increase in the recorded unit's SA (B), and the amplitude of iontophoretic current applied (C). Each symbol represents a single unit.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 23 (12)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 23, Issue 12
15 Jun 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
State-Dependent Processing of Sensory Stimuli by Thalamic Reticular Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
State-Dependent Processing of Sensory Stimuli by Thalamic Reticular Neurons
Jed A. Hartings, Simona Temereanca, Daniel J. Simons
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 2003, 23 (12) 5264-5271; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-05264.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
State-Dependent Processing of Sensory Stimuli by Thalamic Reticular Neurons
Jed A. Hartings, Simona Temereanca, Daniel J. Simons
Journal of Neuroscience 15 June 2003, 23 (12) 5264-5271; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-05264.2003
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • TRN
  • inhibition
  • T-type calcium current
  • whisker
  • burst
  • tonic
  • vigilance

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.