Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Calbindin Influences Response to Photic Input in Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

Toshiyuki Hamada, Joseph LeSauter, Maria Lokshin, Maria-Teresa Romero, Lily Yan, Judith M. Venuti and Rae Silver
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 2003, 23 (26) 8820-8826; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-26-08820.2003
Toshiyuki Hamada
Departments of Psychology, 1Columbia University and 2Barnard College, New York, New York 10027, 3Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, State University of New York, New York 13902, 4Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, and 5Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph LeSauter
Departments of Psychology, 1Columbia University and 2Barnard College, New York, New York 10027, 3Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, State University of New York, New York 13902, 4Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, and 5Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Lokshin
Departments of Psychology, 1Columbia University and 2Barnard College, New York, New York 10027, 3Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, State University of New York, New York 13902, 4Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, and 5Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria-Teresa Romero
Departments of Psychology, 1Columbia University and 2Barnard College, New York, New York 10027, 3Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, State University of New York, New York 13902, 4Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, and 5Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lily Yan
Departments of Psychology, 1Columbia University and 2Barnard College, New York, New York 10027, 3Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, State University of New York, New York 13902, 4Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, and 5Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith M. Venuti
Departments of Psychology, 1Columbia University and 2Barnard College, New York, New York 10027, 3Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, State University of New York, New York 13902, 4Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, and 5Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rae Silver
Departments of Psychology, 1Columbia University and 2Barnard College, New York, New York 10027, 3Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, State University of New York, New York 13902, 4Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, and 5Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    There is a circadian rhythm in nuclear CalB content in the SCN. A, Light microscopic (LM; top panels) and electron microscopic (EM; bottom panels) photomicrographs show the changes in localization of CalB-IR as a function of time of day with the nuclei are primarily devoid of CalB during the subjective night (CT22), whereas CalB-IR is seen in both cytoplasm and nucleus during the subjective day (CT6). N, Nucleus; C, cytoplasm. B, Percentage of CalB cells with nuclei devoid of CalB-IR using four different methods. Histograms show the mean ± SEM. C, Histograms show the nuclear versus cytoplasmic ROD of CalB throughout the circadian cycle. Positive values indicate that the staining intensity is greater in the nucleus than in the cytoplasm, and negative values indicate that staining intensity is less in the nucleus than in the cytoplasm. D, Schematic summarizing the temporal relationship between light (600 lux, 30 min)-induced phase shifts of locomotor activity (line graph) and light-induced Per1 mRNA expression in the CalB region (histograms). The phase response curve was determined using a 30 min light pulse (600 lux; 2-5 animals per time point). Histograms depict data as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The role of CalB during the subjective night. A, Schematic depicts the experimental schedule for light pulse administration during subjective night. CT from 0 to 24 hr is indicated as a line above the actogram. Oligodeoxynucleotides and saline were injected into the third ventricle close to the SCN at CT15, and a 30 min light pulse was given at CT19. B-E, Locomotor activity records of individual animals show the effect of CalB-S, saline, VP-AS, and CalB-AS on light-induced phase shifts of locomotor activity rhythm. The phase of the locomotor activity rhythm was assessed visually by drawing a straight line through the onset of activity on successive days before the light pulse and again beginning ∼3 d after the light exposure. The distance between the two lines reveals the magnitude of the phase shift in hours. Scale bars: 3 hr. F, Dose-response of attenuation of photic phase shifting with CalB-AS. G, Quantitative analysis of the phase shift to light after control injections of saline CalB-sense-ODN (CalB-S), CalB-scrambled antisense-ODN (CalB-S-AS), and VP-antisense (VP-AS). Histograms show mean ± SEM. H, Photomicrographs of light-induced expression of Per1 mRNA in the presence of 7.5 nmol of CalB-AS and control injections (saline, CalB-S, 7.5 nmol) during subjective night in representative animals. I, Quantitative analysis of Per1 expression after a subjective night light pulse in each treatment condition. Histograms depict data as mean ± SEM; parentheses give the number of animals per group. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    The role of CalB during the subjective day. A, C, Schematic depicts the experimental schedule for light pulse administration during subjective day. CT from 0 to 24 hr is indicated as a line above the actogram. Oligodeoxynucleotides and saline were injected into the third ventricle close to the SCN at CT2-CT4, and a 30 min light pulse or 8-OH DPAT injection (5 mg/kg) were given at CT6-CT8. B, Sample actograms from animals given CalB-AS pretreatment before a subjective daytime light pulse. Scale bars: 3 hr. D, Representative actogram from an animals that initially received 8-OH-DPAT alone and subsequently received CalB-AS pretreatment, followed by 8-OH-DPAT. E, Effect of CalB-AS on locomotor activity rhythm after light pulse. F, Effect of CalB-AS on locomotor activity rhythm after 8-OH DPAT treatment. G, Photomicrographs of light-induced expression of Per1 mRNA in the presence of 7.5 nmol of CalB-AS and control injections (saline, CalB-S, 7.5 nmol) during subjective day in representative animals. H, Quantitative analysis of Per1 expression after a subjective daytime light pulse in each treatment condition. Histograms depict data as mean ± SEM; parentheses give the number of animals per group.**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    CalB-AS treatment decreases CalB protein and mRNA in the SCN. A, Photomicrographs of CalB and VP mRNA in serial sections demonstrating that 7.5 nmol of CalB-AS, but not saline, administered at CT4-CT6 significantly reduced the expression of CalB mRNA sampled 4 hr later but did not affect the expression of VP mRNA. B, Confocal images of CalB-IR demonstrating that 7.5 nmol of CalB-AS, but not saline, administered at CT2-CT4 significantly decreased the OD of Cy2-labeled CalB protein in the nucleus of SCN cells sampled 4 hr later. Histograms depict data as mean ± SEM; parentheses give the number of animals per group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 23 (26)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 23, Issue 26
1 Oct 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Calbindin Influences Response to Photic Input in Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Calbindin Influences Response to Photic Input in Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
Toshiyuki Hamada, Joseph LeSauter, Maria Lokshin, Maria-Teresa Romero, Lily Yan, Judith M. Venuti, Rae Silver
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 2003, 23 (26) 8820-8826; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-26-08820.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Calbindin Influences Response to Photic Input in Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
Toshiyuki Hamada, Joseph LeSauter, Maria Lokshin, Maria-Teresa Romero, Lily Yan, Judith M. Venuti, Rae Silver
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 2003, 23 (26) 8820-8826; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-26-08820.2003
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • suprachiasmatic nucleus
  • calbindinD28K
  • Per1
  • vasopressin
  • digoxigenin in situ hybridization
  • locomotor activity rhythm

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.