Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Inhibitory Interconnections Control Burst Pattern and Emergent Network Synchrony in Reticular Thalamus

Vikaas S. Sohal and John R. Huguenard
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 2003, 23 (26) 8978-8988; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-26-08978.2003
Vikaas S. Sohal
Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305-5122
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John R. Huguenard
Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305-5122
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Effects of PTX and CZP on thalamic oscillations in vitro. a, Top three traces show extracellular recordings of multiunit activity from TC cells during evoked oscillations in vitro in control conditions, with PTX, and after PTX washout. The stimulus artifact is visible at the left of each trace. At the bottom, normalized autocorrelograms of the spike rate are plotted for each condition. In the autocorrelogram, the period corresponds to the location of the first nonzero peak (arrowheads), whereas the synchrony is reflected in the peak-to-trough distance. PTX reversibly slows and synchronizes oscillations. b, Top three traces show multiunit activity from TC cells during evoked oscillations in control conditions, CZP, and after CZP washout, and the bottom shows normalized autocorrelograms for each of these conditions. CZP shortens oscillations without affecting the period.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    PTX increases the number, but not the duration, of RE cell bursts during evoked thalamic oscillations in vitro. a, Intracellular recording from an RE cell (top) and simultaneous extracellular recording from TC cells (bottom) during evoked oscillations in control conditions (left), during application of 50 μm PTX (middle), and after PTX washout (right). The stimulus artifact is visible at the left of each trace. b, Bursts labeled 1, 2, etc. in a are plotted here on an expanded time scale. Again, the left panel shows control traces, the middle panel shows PTX traces, and the right panel shows wash traces. Calibration: top, 1 sec, 25 mV; bottom, 20 msec, 25 mV. Resting membrane potential, -82 mV.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effects of locally applied PTX and bath-applied CZP on thalamic oscillations in vitro. a, Intracellular recording from an RE cell (top), and simultaneous extracellular recording from TC cells (bottom) during evoked oscillations in control conditions (left), after local application of 100 μm PTX to the RE nucleus (middle), and after PTX washout (right). Locally applied PTX reversibly increases the number of RE cell bursts per oscillation. Calibration: 1 sec, 25 mV. Resting membrane potential, -88 mV. b, Intracellular recording from an RE cell (top) and simultaneous extracellular recording from TC cells (bottom) during evoked oscillations in control conditions (left), after bath application of 100 nm CZP (middle), and during subsequent application of 50 μm PTX (right). CZP decreases the number of RE cell bursts per oscillation. The subsequent application the GABAAR antagonist PTX has the opposite effect. Calibration: 1 sec, 25 mV. Resting membrane potential, -62 mV.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Intra-RE inhibition controls the number of RE cell bursts, but not their duration. a, Average change in the number of RE cell bursts per oscillation after bath application of 50 μm PTX (black bar), local application of 100 μm PTX to the RE nucleus (gray bar), or bath application of 100 nm CZP (hatched bar). Blocking intra-RE inhibition significantly increases the number of bursts, whereas CZP, which augments intra-RE inhibition, significantly decreases the number of bursts (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01). b, Average change in the number of spikes per RE cell burst during evoked oscillations in the same three conditions. Pharmacological manipulations of intra-RE inhibition alter the number of spikes per burst by less than one spike, and only in one case are these changes statistically significant. (Number of cells per condition varies between 5 and 14; see Results for details.)

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Intra-RE inhibition controls RE cell responsiveness. a, Examples of the last EPSPs detected immediately preceding each RE cell burst. Only the final few EPSPs preceding each burst are shown. Traces are shown for each of four consecutive bursts during an evoked oscillation. A circle is superimposed on each trace, centered on the peak of the detected EPSP. The resting membrane potential of this RE cell was -82 mV, and for this cell the spike threshold, i.e., the point at which the membrane potential begins to rise very steeply, was always between -59 and -56 mV. b, The probability that EPSPs of a given amplitude elicited bursts in the RE cell depicted in a, in control conditions (solid black line), PTX (gray line), and CZP (dotted black line). At each membrane potential between 2 and 8 mV, bursts were most frequently elicited in PTX and least often in CZP. c, The average change in the probability that EPSPs <10 mV in amplitude successfully elicit bursts after application of CZP (n = 3 experiments) or PTX (n = 3 experiments).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    CZP desynchronizes RE cell bursts during evoked oscillations in vitro. a, Times of intracellularly recorded RE cell spikes (bars) superimposed on the TC cell extracellular spike rate (ratemeter, line) for one oscillation in control conditions (left) and after CZP application (right). Calibration: 500 msec, 400 spikes/sec. b, Absolute timing difference between each of these RE cell spikes and the nearest burst in the TC cell ratemeter (see Materials and Methods). a and b are plotted on the same horizontal time scale, so each cross in b represents the phase of the intracellular spike located directly above it in a.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Intra-RE inhibition desynchronizes model RE cells. The responses of two model RE cells to identical, 10 Hz trains of EPSCs, are shown when intra-RE inhibition is absent (left) and when the two cells connected by inhibitory synapses with conductances of 100 nS (right). The two RE cells are identical except for their leak conductances, so that the resting membrane potentials of the cells depicted in the top and bottom traces, respectively, are -76 and -73 mV. For the case that includes intra-RE inhibition (right), the GABAAR conductance is plotted below the voltage trace for each RE cell. When intra-RE inhibition is present, it desynchronizes bursting in the two RE cells, by vetoing (*) excitatory input on alternate cycles.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Intra-RE inhibition desynchronizes oscillations in a simulated thalamic network. a, Activity in a network with intra-RE inhibition (left; GABAA conductance on each RE cell, 50 nS) and a network without intra-RE inhibition (right). The top panels show the times at which RE and TC cells at different locations in the networks spike, and the bottom panels shows the summed activity of TC cells throughout each network as a function of time. Activity was initiated in both networks by instantaneously depolarizing two-thirds of the RE cells above their threshold for bursting. b, Summed TC cell activity in networks with postsynaptic GABABRs on TC cells (the GABAA and GABAB conductances on each TC cell are 40 and 20 nS, respectively). As in a, desynchronized spindle-like oscillations occur when intra-RE inhibition is present (left, GABAA conductance on each RE cell = 100 nS). In contrast to a, the epileptiform discharges that occur in the absence of intra-RE inhibition (right, 3.7 Hz) are much slower than the spindle-like oscillations (left, 9.1 Hz).

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Intra-RE inhibition reduces the number of RE cell bursts during oscillations in simulated thalamic networks. a, Membrane potentials for a pair of RE and TC cells located at the center of the network with (left) or without (right) intra-RE inhibition. The resting membrane potentials of the RE and TC cells are -75 and -66 mV, respectively. b1, The membrane potential (top trace), and excitatory (black line) and inhibitory (thick gray line) synaptic conductances (bottom traces) are plotted for the RE cell depicted in a for the period of time labeled b1. The peak of synaptic inhibition occurs shortly after the peak of synaptic excitation, preventing a burst in some cases. The scale bar represents 8 nS of inhibitory conductance or 5 nS of excitatory conductance. b2, The membrane potential (top trace) and excitatory synaptic conductance (bottom trace) are plotted for the RE cell depicted in a for the period of time labeled b2. This RE cell is in the network without intra-RE inhibition. As a result, strong excitation, unopposed by inhibition, reliably elicits bursts. c, Typical bursts from the RE cell when intra-RE inhibition is present (left, black trace; average number of spikes per burst, 3.9) and when intra-RE inhibition is absent (right, gray trace; average number of spikes per burst, 5.3).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 23 (26)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 23, Issue 26
1 Oct 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhibitory Interconnections Control Burst Pattern and Emergent Network Synchrony in Reticular Thalamus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Inhibitory Interconnections Control Burst Pattern and Emergent Network Synchrony in Reticular Thalamus
Vikaas S. Sohal, John R. Huguenard
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 2003, 23 (26) 8978-8988; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-26-08978.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Inhibitory Interconnections Control Burst Pattern and Emergent Network Synchrony in Reticular Thalamus
Vikaas S. Sohal, John R. Huguenard
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 2003, 23 (26) 8978-8988; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-26-08978.2003
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • generalized absence epilepsy
  • spike wave discharge
  • thalamus
  • oscillations
  • computational modeling
  • GABAA receptors

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Laminar Development of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex
  • Individual Differences in Amygdala-Medial Prefrontal Anatomy Link Negative Affect, Impaired Social Functioning, and Polygenic Depression Risk
  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.