Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
THIS WEEK IN THE JOURNAL

This Week in the Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 8 October 2003, 23 (27)
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded ImageCellular/Molecular

A Two-Pore K+ Channel Complex in C. elegans

sup-9, sup-10, and unc-93 May Encode Components of a Two-Pore K+ Channel that Coordinates Muscle Contraction in Caenorhabditis elegans

Ignacio Perez de la Cruz, Joshua Z. Levin, Claudia Cummins, Philip Anderson, and H. Robert Horvitz

(see pages 9133-9145)

Two-pore domain potassium channels comprise a large family of “leak” channels that contribute to the cell membrane conductance near the resting potential. They are modulated by pH, neurotransmitters, and other factors. Now de la Cruz et al. have identified possible regulatory protein subunits for these channels in Caenorhabditis elegans. Previous genetic studies in C. elegans found that gain of function mutants of sup-9, sup-10, and unc-93 cause a “rubberband,” or uncoordinated (unc) phenotype. The authors cloned sup-9 and sup-10. Sequence analysis revealed that sup-9 encodes a member of the two-pore K+ channel family, whereas SUP-10 and UNC-93 appear to associate with SUP-9, presumably as regulatory subunits. Green fluorescent protein-tagged SUP-10 and UNC-93 colocalized with SUP-9 in muscle cells. The authors speculate that the unc phenotype results from an increased potassium channel activity, because it was mimicked opening chloride channels in wild-type worms with muscimol. The structure of SUP-9 is similar to the mammalian TASK channels. Sup-10 and unc-93 are also conserved in Drosophila and humans, and may represent a new class of regulatory proteins that associate with and influence the activity of two-pore K+ channels in vivo.

Embedded ImageDevelopment/Plasticity/Repair

Sema4D and Inhibition of Axonal Regeneration

The Transmembrane Semaphorin Sema4D/CD100, an Inhibitor of Axonal Growth, Is Expressed on Oligodendrocytes and Upregulated after CNS Lesion

Caroline Moreau-Fauvarque, Atsushi Kumanogoh, Emeline Camand, Céline Jaillard, Gilles Barbin, Isabelle Boquet, Christopher Love, E. Yvonne Jones, Hitoshi Kikutani, Catherine Lubetzki, Isabelle Dusart, and Alain Chédotal

(see pages 9229-9239)

The failure of CNS axons to regenerate after injury stands in contrast to the more robust regeneration of peripheral axons. Oligodendrocytes, the central myelin-forming glial cells, are a major source of inhibitory factors that can prevent neuronal regeneration. Only a handful of these factors, the inactivation of which can enhance neurite outgrowth, have been characterized so far. The article by Moreau-Fauvarque et al. adds the homodimeric transmembrane protein Sema4D to the list of myelin-derived inhibitory factors. First identified in immune cells, the authors report that Sema4D is selectively expressed in mouse CNS white matter by myelinating oligodendrocytes. Using a “stripe” assay, Sema4D repelled mature DRG and granule cell axon growth. Moreover, after spinal cord lesions, the factor was transiently upregulated in oligodendrocytes surrounding the lesion site. These data provide further support for the idea that axon guidance molecules such as the semaphorins can also inhibit axonal regeneration.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

DRG explants were cultured on alternating stripes of Sema4D (asterisks) or laminin (L). As shown in B, the axons avoided Sema4D. See Figure 6 of Moreau-Fauvarque et al. for details.

Embedded ImageBehavioral/Systems/Cognitive

The Musician's Brain

Brain Structures Differ between Musicians and Non-Musicians

Christian Gaser and Gottfried Schlaug

(see pages 9240-9245)

Those of us with little or no aptitude (or, if you like, talent) for playing a musical instrument now have an excuse: our brains aren't built for it. Such is the finding of Gaser and Schlaug in this week's Journal. They found that a subject's musical experience, as a non-musician, an amateur, or a professional, was correlated with gray matter volume in brain areas that are activated while reading and playing music, including auditory, visual-spatial, and motor areas. No wonder some people are better able to identify a tone without reference, read those funny little marks on a page and translate them, fingers flying, into a recognizable melody. But were they born that way, or is it the years of diligent practice that reshaped their cortex? The data suggest the latter: a voxel-by-voxel morphometric analysis showed that brain structural differences increased with the practice intensity and years of training of a musician. Might the musically adroit have some pre-existing disposition, however? This remains to be seen. Some might argue that the subjects, right-handed male keyboardists, are not entirely representative of professional musicians, but the study seems to make one thing clear: your brain (and your talent) won't grow without practice.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 23 (27)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 23, Issue 27
8 Oct 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in the Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in the Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 8 October 2003, 23 (27)

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in the Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 8 October 2003, 23 (27)
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.