Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Development/Plasticity/Repair

Electrophysiological Differentiation of New Neurons in the Olfactory Bulb

Ottorino Belluzzi, Mascia Benedusi, James Ackman and Joseph J. LoTurco
Journal of Neuroscience 12 November 2003, 23 (32) 10411-10418; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-32-10411.2003
Ottorino Belluzzi
1Università di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Biologia, Sezione di Fisiologia e Biofisica, Centro di Neuroscienze, 46-44100 Ferrara, Italy, and 2Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mascia Benedusi
1Università di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Biologia, Sezione di Fisiologia e Biofisica, Centro di Neuroscienze, 46-44100 Ferrara, Italy, and 2Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Ackman
1Università di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Biologia, Sezione di Fisiologia e Biofisica, Centro di Neuroscienze, 46-44100 Ferrara, Italy, and 2Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph J. LoTurco
1Università di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Biologia, Sezione di Fisiologia e Biofisica, Centro di Neuroscienze, 46-44100 Ferrara, Italy, and 2Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Morphological and electrophysiological properties of migrating neuroblasts along the RMS. a, SVZa from a rat at P89, 5 d after virus injection (rostral is to the right). Scale bar, 100 μm. The inset is a confocal image of migrating neuroblasts in the initial portion of the RMS. Scale bar, 16 μm. b, Voltage-clamp recordings from a cell in the RMS. The cell was held at -70 mV and depolarized to potentials ranging from -60 to 60 mV in normal ACSF (top) and after the addition of the potassium channel blocker TEA (20 mm). c, d, Current-voltage (c) and conductance-voltage (d) relationships of the delayed-rectifier K+ current in migrating neuroblasts (n = 14). The voltage dependencies of gK were described by Boltzmann equations with a midpoint and slope of -8.9 and 13.2 mV and a maximal conductance of 1.0 nS.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Newly generated cells in different layers of the olfactory bulb. a, A newborn eGFP+ PG cell (green) around a glomerulus at P109, 3 weeks after virus injection. Calretinin-labeled (red) and tyrosine hydroxylase-labeled (blue) PG cells outline the glomerulus. Scale bar, 20 μm. b, GFP+ granule cell in the mitral cell layer (red, Nissl staining; P52, 37 d survival). Scale bar, 40 μm. c, GFP+ cells in the granule cell layer (red, TH; magenta, TOPRO3; P52, 37 d survival). Scale bar, 40 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Properties of newborn PG cells compared with those of older neurons of the same type. a, Families of whole-cell currents in response to voltage steps from -50 to 80 mV after 250 msec preconditioning at -120 mV (top) and -50 mV (bottom) (P28, 13 d after virus injection). b, Voltage responses to injected currents (from -40 to 70 pA in steps of 10 pA) from a potential of -70 mV. c, Membrane potential as a function of injected current; average potential during the last 100 msec of the depolarizing pulse. a-c, GFP+ PG cell. d, Families of whole-cell currents in control PG cells in response to the same protocols as in a. e, f, I-V and conductance-voltage relationships of sodium current (○, controls; •, GFP+ cells). Maximal values of gNa were 11.13 nS in controls and 15.85 nS in GFP+ PG cells. The voltage dependencies of gNa were described by Boltzmann equations with midpoints and slopes of -34.4 and 6.76 mV for controls and -37.5 and 6.48 mV for GFP+ PG cells. g, h, I-V and conductance-voltage relationships of A current (○, controls; •, GFP+ cells). Maximal values of gA were 8.82 nS in controls and 10.5 nS in GFP+ PG cells. The voltage dependencies of gA were described by Boltzmann equations with midpoints and slopes of -29.3 and 11.15 mV for controls and -27.4 and 15.1 mV for GFP+ PG cells.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Maturation of voltage-dependent currents in GFP+ cells. The recording from a cell in the positions is indicated by arrows. a, P32, 9 d survival. b, P28, 10 d survival. c, P31, 11 d survival.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Electrophysiological properties of a restricted group of GFP+ cells in the glomerular layer (see Results for explanation). a, Voltage-clamp recordings; depolarizing steps to potentials from -70 to 60 mV after 300 msec preconditioning to -120 mV. b, Current-clamp responses to the injection of depolarizing current pulses showing repetitive action potentials. c, Spontaneous activity at rest, leading to repetitive action potentials. d, Giant depolarizing synaptic potentials, occasionally seen in GFP+ cells. e, Spontaneous synaptic currents blocked by 1 mm kynurenate (recorded at P20, 10 d survival). f, Responses to focal application of GABA and glutamate (both 100 μm; P39, 17 d survival). Decay time constants were 1.64 sec for GABA and 2.33 sec for glutamate. g-i, Current-voltage relationships for INa, IK(V), and IA. INa was measured as peak inward current, IK(V) is the asymptotic current evoked by depolarizing steps from a holding potential of -50 mV in the presence of 0.1 μm TTX, and IA is the peak outward current obtained by subtracting the IK(V) currents from total outward currents evoked by depolarizing steps at identical potentials from a holding potential of -120 mV. j-l, Conductance-voltage relationships obtained by dividing the I-V data shown in g--i by the corresponding driving forces. The g-V relationships could be fitted by Boltzmann equations having the following parameters (amplitude, midpoint, and slope): gNa, 18.3 nS, -39.0 mV, 4.91 mV; gK(V), 8.26 nS, -10.4 mV, 13.7 mV; gA, 16.7 nS, -10.2 mV, 18.6 mV.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Electrophysiological properties of GFP+ cells in the granule cell layer. a, Current-clamp recordings; responses to the injection of squared current pulses ranging from -50 to 40 pA in steps of 10 pA. b, Voltage-clamp recordings; responses to depolarizing voltage steps ranging from -70 to 30 mV after 300 msec preconditioning at -120 mV. c, d, Current-voltage and conductance-voltage relationships for sodium current, measured at the peak after suppression of the outward current with 20 mm TEA. e, f, Current-voltage and conductance-voltage relationships for delayed-rectifier potassium current, measured at the end of 40 msec depolarizing steps.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Synaptic properties of newly generated PG cells. a, Spontaneous excitatory synaptic currents in a newborn cell in the glomerular layer (P27, 12 d survival). This activity was blocked by picrotoxin but not by kynurenate. b, Action potentials in response to stimulation of the ON (P26, 12 d survival). c, Synaptic currents evoked by stimulation of the ON (same cell as b). Note that the delays between the stimulus artifact and the responses shown in b and c suggest a monosynaptic contact between ON and PG cells. d, Responses to focal application of 100 μm GABA and 100 μm glutamate in GFP+ PG cells (P47, 27 d survival). e, Responses to focal GABA application (100 μm) recorded under voltage-clamp conditions in gramicidin perforated patches. The three recordings were obtained at -50, -70, and -90 mV, and their peak amplitudes are shown in f (P47, 27 d survival). f, Linear regression of the peak responses shown in e, indicating a reversal potential at -65.81 mV, corresponding to an intracellular chloride concentration of 9.75 mm. g, Example of dose-dependent GABA-induced currents in GFP+ PG cells (responses to 5, 10, 50, 100, and 200 μm). h, GABA dose-response curves for GFP+ and control PG cells (○, controls; •, GFP+ cells). EC50 were 28 and 27.7 μm, and the Hill coefficients were 1.55 and 1.23 for controls and GFP+ cells, respectively.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Immunohistochemical evidence of the presence of synaptic contacts in a newly generated PG cell. a, Confocal images combined to produce a three-dimensional reconstruction of a synapse on a newborn neuron. The GFP+ PG cell shown (green) is from a P34 animal, 24 d after virus injection (red, synapsin). The center image is a maximum intensity projection with orthogonal “x-z” and “y-z” views on the side to show close apposition of the PG cell process with synapsin puncta from the point indicated by the crossed lines. The image consists of 22 optical sections, each section being 0.9 μm thick. Scale bar, 8 μm. An enlargement of the synaptic contact at the center of the cross lines (arrow) is shown in the bottom right corner. b, GFP+ PG cell in a 121-d-old animal (virus injected at P87). The red dye marks the presynaptic protein SV2. The insets show strong colocalization (yellow) of the marker with GFP. Note that in b1 the synapse may actually be a dendrodendritic one. Arrowheads point to SV2 labeling within and just outside the dendrite terminal with a faint gap that is barely perceptible, dividing the two regions. Scale bars, 20 and 3 μm. c, Expression of the glutamate receptor GluR1 subunit (red) in a GFP+ PG cell (green); coexpression is indicated in yellow. Confocal images combined to produce a maximum intensity projection of a newborn neuron (inset). The PG cell shown is from a P52 animal (37 d survival). The center image is a two-channel single-optical section overlay with orthogonal x-z and y-z views along the indicated lines. The image consists of 24 optical sections, each section being 1 μm thick. Scale bar, 20 μm.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 23 (32)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 23, Issue 32
12 Nov 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Electrophysiological Differentiation of New Neurons in the Olfactory Bulb
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Electrophysiological Differentiation of New Neurons in the Olfactory Bulb
Ottorino Belluzzi, Mascia Benedusi, James Ackman, Joseph J. LoTurco
Journal of Neuroscience 12 November 2003, 23 (32) 10411-10418; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-32-10411.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Electrophysiological Differentiation of New Neurons in the Olfactory Bulb
Ottorino Belluzzi, Mascia Benedusi, James Ackman, Joseph J. LoTurco
Journal of Neuroscience 12 November 2003, 23 (32) 10411-10418; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-32-10411.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • neurogenesis
  • olfactory bulb
  • retrovirus-mediated cell lineage
  • patch clamp
  • ion channels
  • immunohistochemistry
  • stem cells
  • interneurons
  • glutamic acid
  • GABA

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Wnt Effector TCF7l2 Promotes Oligodendroglial Differentiation by Repressing Autocrine BMP4-Mediated Signaling
  • Loss of coiled-coil protein Cep55 impairs neural stem cell abscission and results in p53-dependent apoptosis in developing cortex
  • Evidence for Subcortical Plasticity after Paired Stimulation from a Wearable Device
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.