Development/Plasticity/Repair

Dynamic Expression of RGS4 in the Developing Nervous System and Regulation by the Neural Type-Specific Transcription Factor Phox2b

Nicolas Grillet, Véronique Dubreuil, Héloïse D. Dufour and Jean-François Brunet
Journal of Neuroscience 19 November 2003, 23 (33) 10613-10621; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-33-10613.2003

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that members of the family of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS), including RGS4, have a discrete expression pattern in the adult brain (Gold et al., 1997). Here, we describe for RGS4 a distinct, mostly transient phase of neuronal expression, during embryonic development: transcription of RGS4 occurs in a highly dynamic manner in a small set of peripheral and central neuronal precursors. This expression pattern overlaps extensively with that of the paired-like homeodomain protein Phox2b, a determinant of neuronal identity. In embryos deficient for Phox2b, RGS4 expression is downregulated in the locus coeruleus, sympathetic ganglia, and cranial motor and sensory neurons. Moreover, Phox2b cooperates with the basic helix-loop-helix protein Mash1 to transiently switch on RGS4 after ectopic expression in the chicken spinal cord. Intriguingly, we also identify a heterotrimeric G-protein α-subunit, gustducin, as coexpressed with RGS4 in developing facial motor neurons, also under the control of Phox2b. Altogether, these data identify components of the heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathway as part of the type-specific program of neuronal differentiation.

Introduction

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) molecules are a family of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for the α subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins. They increase the kinetics of GTP hydrolysis by Gα subunits, thus fostering the reassociation of an inactive GDP-bound trimeric complex and the termination of both Gα and Gβγ-mediated signaling. One of their main functions is therefore thought to shorten, sharpen, or otherwise attenuate signals transduced by heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (for review, see De Vries et al., 2000; Ross and Wilkie, 2000). Furthermore, the complex interplay of enzyme kinetics and mutual affinities of GPCRs, G-proteins, and RGS proteins, as well as various levels of feedback regulation allow them to act as versatile modulators of G-protein signaling dynamics: they could sharpen not only the termination of signaling but also its onset, maintain the strength of signaling in the presence of an ongoing signal (Ross and Wilkie, 2000), extinguish spontaneous (i.e., receptor-independent) G-signaling (Siekhaus and Drubin, 2003), or translate a continuous stimulus into an oscillatory response (Luo et al., 2001). Many roles have been proposed for RGS proteins in the adult nervous system, based on inactivation in Caenorhabditis elegans, overexpression in cell cultures or correlative expression studies. In contrast, very little is known on possible functions of RGS proteins in differentiating neurons (see Discussion), and, to our knowledge, no RGS expression pattern has been reported so far in the embryonic nervous system of vertebrates.

The paired-like homeodomain protein Phox2b (Pattyn et al., 1997) is required for the early differentiation phase of several classes of neurons, including all noradrenergic neurons, cranial branchial motoneurons, and most relays of the autonomic reflex pathways in mouse (Pattyn et al., 1999, 2000a,b; Dauger et al., 2003) (for review, see Brunet and Pattyn, 2002), and in humans, as suggested by the clinical consequences of PHOX2B mutations (Amiel et al., 2003). Here, in an attempt at dissecting the genetic program of cranial branchial motoneuron (bm) differentiation, we identify RGS4 as a gene lying downstream of Phox2b. More generally, we show that RGS4 expression in the developing nervous system substantially overlaps with that of Phox2b and is controlled by the latter at sites of coexpression and after ectopic expression in the spinal cord. RGS4 thus defines part of a “core” Phox2b-dependent program of neuronal differentiation. Finally, we identify gustducin, a heterotrimeric G-protein α-subunit, as another Phox2b direct or indirect transcriptional target, coexpressed with RGS4 in differentiating facial motoneuronal precursors.

Materials and Methods

Mouse strains. Phox2bLacZ/+ (Pattyn et al., 1999) and Phox2atauLacZ/+ (Jacob et al., 2000) mice were bred, and their progeny genotyped as described previously. For histological analysis on adult tissue, animals were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of Avertine and fixed by transcardial perfusion of 50 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA).

Construction and screening of a rhombomere 4-derived cDNA library. The hindbrains of the embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5) progeny of Phox2bLacZ/+ intercrosses were dissected and treated with fluorescein di-(β-d-galactopyranoside) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) (Nolan et al., 1988). From each hindbrain, the LacZ+ ventral domain of rhombomere 4 (r4) was precisely excised under a green fluorescent protein (GFP) binocular (the rest of the tissue being used for genotyping), and total RNA (∼200 ng) was extracted with hot phenol (Brunet et al., 1991). Individual samples were reverse-transcribed and PCR-amplified for 19 cycles with the SMART PCR kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). Two Phox2bLacZ/+-derived cDNA populations were independently subtracted with two LacZ/Phox2bLacZ-derived cDNA populations by the suppression-subtractive hybridization technique (Diatchenko et al., 1996) using the PCR-Select Subtraction kit (Clontech). They were assayed on virtual Northern blots for enrichment of differentially expressed sequences using Phox2b, Phox2a, Math3, Ebf1, Ebf2, Ebf3, and Islet-1 as probes (Pattyn et al., 2000b) and for depletion of nondifferentially expressed sequences using a PCR-amplified fragment of G3PDH. The most efficiently subtracted cDNA population was used to generate a library of ∼1800 clones by T/A cloning in pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, WI). Replicas were hybridized in parallel in Church buffer at 6.106 dpm/ml with a forward-subtracted (heterozygous minus homozygous) probe and a reverse-subtracted (homozygous minus heterozygous) probe. Two hundred seventy-five differentially hybridizing clones were rescreened by dot-blotting their PCR-amplified inserts in triplicates and hybridizing them with the forward and reverse probes as well as with nonsubtracted Phox2LacZ/+ cDNA. The 25 clones (corresponding to 20 different cDNAs) that behaved like the positive controls Phox2b, Islet-1, and Math3 (i.e., were detected by the forward subtracted probe but neither by the reverse nor the nonsubtracted probes) were kept for further study. Two of them are analyzed in this paper: pGEM-F168 which contained a 653 bp RsaI insert including the 3′ half of the open reading frame of RGS4, and pGEM-F217 that contained a 650 bp RsaI insert corresponding to the 5′ half of the gustducin mRNA.

In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Staged embryos (vaginal plug was recorded as E0.5), or brains and lumbar dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) of adult animals were processed for in situ hybridization or by combined in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry on 12-μm-thick cryosections or whole-mount in situ hybridization as described (Tiveron et al., 1996). BrdU (Sigma) was injected intraperitoneally (6 mg/mouse) into pregnant mice 1 hr before removing the embryos. Antisense RNA probes were synthesized from pKS-mRGS4 (resulting from the subcloning of the coding sequence of RGS4 from pCR2.1-mRGS4) (Nomoto et al., 1997), pKS-cRGS4 (see infra), pKS-mGust (resulting from the subcloning of the pGEM-F217 insert), and EGFP (Clontech), using a DIG-RNA labeling kit (Roche Products, Hertforshire, UK). Anti-Phox2a (Tiveron et al., 1996), anti-Phox2b (Pattyn et al., 1997), and anti-BrdU (Sigma) antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry.

Cloning of a chicken RGS4 cDNA. A cDNA phage library was made from 2 μg of polyA(+) RNA from stage HH23-24 chick hindbrains using the SMART cDNA library construction kit (Clontech). Of 1.6 105 pfu screened with the insert of pGEM-F168, two clones were isolated and sequenced. They were identical (GenBank accession number AY297457) and showed most identity, at the amino acid level, to mouse RGS4 (69% overall and 84% within the RGS domain; the next closest mouse relative being mRGS5 with 49% overall identity). A 474 bp PstI-ApaI cDNA fragment was subcloned into pKS to create the plasmid pKS-cRGS4.

Expression vectors and electroporation in chicken embryos. The coding regions of mouse Mash1 (Cau et al., 1997) and mPhox2b (Pattyn et al., 1997) were cloned into the pCAGGS vector that drives expression by a cytomegalovirus-actin hybrid promoter (Koshiba-Takeuchi et al., 2000). GFP was expressed from the pCAGGS-AFP vector (Momose et al., 1999). Chick embryos 44- to 52-hr-old (HH 12-14) were electroporated in ovo essentially as described (Dubreuil et al., 2000). The expression vectors were used at 1 mg/ml except for pCAGGS-AFP (0.8 mg/ml). Coinjection of pCAGGS-AFP was used to visualize the transfected area. Embryos were allowed to develop at 38°C for 20 or 48 hr, then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in gelatin, and analyzed on transverse sections at the transfected level. Correct expression of all constructs was verified by in situ hybridization with the appropriate probes. In all cases, expression of the transfected gene was coextensive with that of GFP.

Results

Identification of RGS4 as a candidate Phox2b-regulated gene in facial motoneurons

To identify genes expressed in facial motoneuron precursors under the control of Phox2b, we used a differential cloning strategy. We prepared total RNA from the ventral part of r4, containing the facial branchial motoneuronal (FBM) precursors, which were dissected from either heterozygous or homozygous Phox2b mutant E10.5 embryos (see Material and Methods). First-strand cDNA was synthesized, amplified by PCR, and subjected to suppression subtractive hybridization (Diatchenko et al., 1996; Gurskaya et al., 1996). Two independently generated Phox2b+/- cDNA populations were subtracted with Phox2b-/- cDNA and tested by “virtual Northern” analysis for the depletion and enrichment of, respectively, the housekeeping gene G3PDH and Phox2b or genes known to be activated by Phox2b such as MATH3 and Ebf1 (Pattyn et al., 2000b) (data not shown). The cDNA population that proved the most efficiently enriched was T/A cloned, and 1800 clones were screened with subtracted cDNA populations, both “forward” (i.e., heterozygous minus homozygous) and “reverse” (i.e., homozygous minus heterozygous). A total of 25 independent clones (corresponding to 20 distinct genes) were selected (see Material and Methods for details). Two of these are the subject of the present report: one containing a 653 bp RsaI cDNA fragment of RGS4, the other, a 650 bp fragment of gustducin.

Expression of RGS4 in cranial motoneuronal precursors

We first examined the expression of RGS4 in the Phox2b+ ventral r4 region from which we cloned it. During the time window of neuroepithelial Phox2b expression, the pMNv domain of r4 gives rise to two populations of neuronal precursors: FBM precursors (Ericson et al., 1997; Pattyn et al., 2000b) and the small population of inner ear efferent (IEE) precursors (Simon and Lumsden, 1993; Tiveron et al., 2003). After exit from the neuroepithelium, Phox2b+ postmitotic FBM precursors undergo a unique pattern of migration, caudally through r5 and then radially to the pial surface of r6 (Auclair et al., 1996; Pattyn et al., 1997), whereas the IEE precursors (also Phox2b+) migrate contralaterally and dorsally in r4 (Fritzsch, 1996; Tiveron et al., 2003). At E10.5, RGS4 expression was detectable in ventral r4 (Fig. 1A), in a subpopulation of Phox2b+ precursors localized at the border between the ventricular zone, which they had probably just exited, and the mantle layer (Fig. 1B,C). As confirmed by double RGS4/BrdU labeling those cells had already undergone their last S phase (Fig. 1C). However, the more superficially located, thus presumably older postmitotic precursors, had already lost RGS4 expression (Fig. 1B,C). This pattern was unchanged at E11.5 (data not shown), that is after all IEEs are born (A. Pattyn, personal communication) and have started their migration (Tiveron et al., 2003), and while FBMs are still being generated (Taber Pierce, 1973; Pattyn et al., 1997). No signal could be detected in those FBMs which have, by then, started their migration through r5 (Fig. 1D), or in migratory IEEs (data not shown). Therefore, RGS4 is very transiently expressed in FBM precursors (and possibly IEEs) concomitant with or immediately subsequent to cell cycle exit and is downregulated before their postmitotic migration. Remarkably, 2 d later, when a sizable contingent of FBM precursors had reached the pial surface after their radial migration through r6, they switched on RGS4 again (Fig. 1E). RGS4 expression was virtually extinguished again by E15.5 (data not shown) but expressed at strong levels in facial motoneurons throughout adult stages (Fig. 1F).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Expression of RGS4 in hindbrain motoneurons examined by in situ hybridization (A, F, G) or in situ hybridization combined with anti-Phox2b (B, D, E) or anti-BrdU (C) immunohistochemistry. A, Flat-mount of the hindbrain at E10.5 showing expression in the ventral column of r2-r4 and in the anlage of the trochlear nucleus, in the isthmus (arrowhead). B, C, (and inset showing a higher magnification), Cross-section through r4 at E10.5, showing that RGS4 is expressed in a subset of postmitotic facial motoneuronal precursors situated in between the mantle layer and the ventricular zone. D, A parasagittal section (anterior to the right) at E12.5 shows that RGS4 is extinguished before motoneuronal precursors have started to migrate through r5. E (and inset at higher magnification), Parasagittal section (anterior to the right) at E13.5 showing that RGS4 is switched on in facial motoneuronal precursors as they settle in the facial nucleus anlage. F, G, Coronal sections through an adult brain showing high level of expression of RGS4 in the facial (F) and trigeminal (G) motor nuclei.

In the medulla at E10.5, RGS4 expression was not confined to FBM precursors but was also detected in the motoneuronal column of r2 and r3, that is, in the precursors of the trigeminal motor nucleus (Fig. 1A). Just like in FBMs, expression was very transient, but the trigeminal nucleus expressed strong levels of RGS4 in postnatal life (Fig. 1G). Caudally to r4, only an occasional RGS4+ cells was detected in the pMNv domain (data not shown).

In the isthmic region, RGS4 was detected in the trochlear nucleus, located in r1 (Fig. 1A) but not the nearby oculomotor nucleus, located in the caudal mesencephalon (data not shown).

No expression was detected in embryonic spinal motoneuronal precursors, whether somatic or visceral, at least until E15.5 (data not shown).

Other sites of RGS4 expression in the embryonic CNS

Apart from cranial motor neurons, RGS4 expression was detected in several classes of differentiating central neurons. In the rostral hindbrain, the precursors of the locus coeruleus (LC) (the main noradrenergic center of the brain) switched on RGS4 at E10.5 (Fig. 2A,B) simultaneously with Phox2b (data not shown), that is soon after Phox2a (Fig. 2B), itself the earliest postmitotic marker known for the LC (Pattyn et al., 1997). At E13.5 the locus coeruleus had lost RGS4 expression (Fig. 2C) but had recovered it by postnatal stages (Fig. 2D) (Gold et al., 1997; Ni et al., 1999), although we did not determine the exact timing of re-expression. Just dorsal to the LC, RGS4 was expressed in another population of neurons that we did not identify (Fig. 2A).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Biphasic expression of RGS4 in the locus coeruleus examined by in situ hybridization (A) or in situ hybridization combined with anti-Phox2a immunohistochemistry (B-D). A, Flat-mount of the metencephalon at E10.5 showing expression in the locus coeruleus (arrowhead) and in a neighboring population of interneurons (asterisk). B, Transverse section through the first rhombomere at E10.75 showing that LC precursors, which are born dorsally and start expressing Phox2a as soon as they exit the neuroepithelium (arrowheads), switch on RGS4 soon after, as they migrate ventrally. C, Parasagittal section through the LC at E13.5 showing that RGS4 is extinguished at this stage. D, Coronal section (medial to the right) through an adult brain showing that mature LC neurons express RGS4. IV, IVth ventricle.

It is notable that numerous sites of adult expression, such as the cortex (Gold et al., 1997) were undetectable embryonically, at least until E15.5 (data not shown).

RGS4 expression in the developing peripheral nervous system

In contrast to its very restricted central distribution, RGS4 was broadly expressed in the peripheral nervous system in complex spatiotemporal patterns.

Autonomic ganglia

RGS4 was first switched on in most sympathoblasts as early as their arrival at the dorsal aorta, at approximately E10.5 (Fig. 3A). At E13.5, a majority of cells were found positive in the superior cervical (SCG) and stellate ganglia (SG) (Fig. 3B) (data not shown) and fewer in the trunk sympathetic chain (data not shown). Positive cells, rather than being dispersed in a salt and pepper pattern, tended to be clustered (Fig. 3B) (data not shown). This pattern also prevailed in most of the prevertebral chain with the exception of two ganglionic masses ventrolateral and caudal to the celiac ganglion, which were almost entirely RGS4+ (Fig. 3C,D).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Expression of RGS4 in visceral ganglia, examined by in situ hybridization (A) or in situ hybridization combined with anti-Phox2b (B, D-F) or anti-Phox2a (C) immunohistochemistry. A, RGS4 is switched on as soon as E10.5 in the aggregating sympathoblasts on each side of the dorsal aorta (da). B, Parasagittal section at E13.5 showing abundant RGS4-positive cells in the superior cervical ganglion (SCG). At this stage expression is lost in the nodose-petrosal complex (gIX-X). C, D, Transverse (C) and parasagittal (D) sections at E13.5 showing expression of RGS4 in a prevertebral Phox2a+/Phox2b+ cell mass below and lateral to the celiac ganglion. E, RGS4 expression in sublingual parasympathetic ganglia at E13.5. F, RGS4 expression in a small subset of enteric neurons at E13.5.

At the same stage (E13.5) most parasympathetic ganglia, which have just formed, expressed RGS4 at high level: sublingual (Fig. 3E), submandibular, paracardiac, and pulmonary (data not shown). However, the most rostral ones (ciliary, sphenopalatine, and otic) contained very few positive cells (data not shown).

In the enteric nervous system, RGS4 was very transiently detected in a sparse subset of Phox2b+ migrating precursors at E10-E10.5 (data not shown). Later on, at E11.5 no expression was detected, and at E13.5 only rare Phox2b+ cells were found to express RGS4 (Fig. 3F).

Cranial and spinal sensory neurons

All Phox2a+/Phox2b+ neuronal precursors destined to form the distal ganglia of the VIIth, IXth, and Xth nerves (respectively the geniculate, petrosal, and nodose ganglia), switched on RGS4 soon after their delamination from the epibranchial placodes (Fig. 4A-C). Expression had virtually faded out by E13.5 (Fig. 3B).

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Expression of RGS4 in sensory ganglia examined by in situ hybridization (A, D, E) or in situ hybridization combined with anti-Phox2a immunohistochemistry (B, C). A, Whole-mount E10 embryo showing expression in trigeminal (V), geniculate and acoustic (VII-VIII), glosopharyngeal (IX), and vagal (X) cranial ganglia and in the nascent dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Expression in the LC has just started (arrowhead). B, Transverse section close to the otic vesicle showing expression of RGS4 in the acoustic (gVIII) ganglion and the geniculate ganglion (gVII), which also expresses Phox2a. C, Transverse section at E10.5 showing Phox2a+ cells delaminating from the glossopharyngeal placode (pIX) and switching on RGS4 as they aggregate to form the ganglion anlage (gIX). D, Parasagittal section at E13.5 showing a widespread expression, albeit at variable levels, of RGS4 in the DRGs. E, Section through an adult DRG showing strong expression in a subset of small-diameter (see inset) DRG neurons.

At E10, the otic placode-derived sensory precursors also expressed RGS4 (Fig. 4A,B) as did the trigeminal ganglion (Fig. 4A), both of which never express Phox2 genes. Finally, all DRGs expressed high levels of RGS4 in a salt and pepper pattern from E10.5 (Fig. 4A) until E13.5 (Fig. 4D). Expression had faded out in the vast majority of cells at E15.5 (data not shown). Postnatally, expression occurred at high level in a subset of small diameter neurons (Fig. 4E).

Phox2b controls the expression of RGS4

We then examined the extent to which RGS4 expression depends on Phox2b in the territories where they are coexpressed. In ventral r4 of Phox2b mutants, at E10.5 a reduced population of postmitotic neurons is produced which display none of the phenotypic markers of motoneurons (Pattyn et al., 2000b) but, rather, differentiates into serotonergic neurons (which normally do not arise in r4) (Pattyn et al., 2003; Tiveron et al., 2003). Accordingly, RGS4 was completely undetectable in the postmitotic progeny of mutant ventral r4 (Fig. 5A-D), as it was in fact throughout r2 and r3 (Fig. 5C,D). Therefore RGS4 is directly or indirectly under the control of Phox2b in trigeminal and facial motoneuronal precursors. Similarly, in LacZ/Phox2bLacZ embryos, RGS4 was undetectable in the precursors of the LC (Fig. 5C,D, arrowhead), which are still present at this stage and express Phox2a (Fig. 5E,F) (Pattyn et al., 2000a). More surprisingly, RGS4 expression was also abolished in the anlage of the trochlear nucleus (Fig. 5C,D, asterisk), although no other aspect of the development of this Phox2a-dependent nucleus has been found so far to require Phox2b.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Dependence of RGS4 expression on Phox2b studied by in situ hybridization on transverse sections through r4 (A, B), r1 (E, F) or the thoracic region (G, H) and a flat-mount of the hindbrain (C, D) at E10.5. Expression of RGS4 in facial motoneuronal precursors in ventral r4 at E10.5 (A, C), in precursors of the trochlear (C, asterisk) and trigeminal (C, black arrow) motor nuclei and the locus coeruleus (C, arrowhead, E) and in forming sympathetic ganglia (G) is abrogated in Phox2bLacZ/LacZ mutants (B, D, F, H). Inset, In situ hybridization with LacZ on an adjacent section shows the presence of sympathetic precursors at E10.5 in Phox2b homozygous mutants. da, Dorsal aorta.

In the peripheral nervous system of E10.5 Phox2bLacZ/LacZ mutants, RGS4 expression was extinguished in the aggregating sympathoblasts (Fig. 5G,H) that are still present at this stage (Fig. 5H, inset) (Pattyn et al., 1999). In the delaminating geniculate, petrosal and vagal ganglionic precursors RGS4 were downregulated but not extinguished (Fig. 6A,B), possibly reflecting the fact that the early development of these ganglia only partially depends on Phox2b (Pattyn et al., 1999) and also requires its paralog Phox2a (Morin et al., 1997). In line with this, a similar downregulation of RGS4 was observed in the epibranchial-derived ganglia of Phox2atauLacZ/tauLacZ mutants (Jacob et al., 2000) (Fig. 6C,D). We could not monitor RGS4 in parasympathetic ganglia because they never form in Phox2b mutants (Pattyn et al., 1999). Finally, RGS4 expression was predictably intact in DRGs (Fig. 6) (data not shown) and in the trigeminal and octaval ganglia (Fig. 6A,B) that never express Phox2b.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Dependence of RGS4 expression on Phox2a and Phox2b in cranial ganglia. Side view of whole-mount E10.5 embryos hybridized with an RGS4 probe. The RGS4 signal in the nodose (X), petrosal (IX) and geniculate (VII) ganglia is diminished in null mutants for both, Phox2b (B) and Phox2a (D) compared with heterozygotes (A, C, respectively). Note that in Phox2a mutants, as expected, the signal is intact in the sympathetic chain (which does not depend on Phox2a for differentiation) (asterisk) but disappears at the level of the LC (which does not form in Phox2a mutants) (Morin et al., 1997) (arrowhead). ov, Otic vesicle.

Together, these data show that the Phox2b-dependent neuronal precursors that express RGS4 do so under the control of Phox2b.

Conversely, we asked whether Phox2b could ectopically trigger RGS4 expression. Electroporation of Phox2b in the spinal cord of stage 12-15 chicken embryos did not induce RGS4 20 hr after electroporation (hae) (Fig. 7A,A′). We reasoned that Phox2b might require a cofactor to induce RGS4. Because Phox2b genetically interacts with the basic helix-loop-helix gene Mash1 during the differentiation of several RGS4-expressing neuronal types, i.e., the LC, cranial motor neurons, and sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglionic cells (Pattyn et al., 2000b; Goridis and Rohrer, 2002; Tiveron et al., 2003), we tested whether coelectroporation of Mash1 with Phox2b could induce RGS4. This was indeed the case at 20 hae (Fig. 7B,B′), but this expression had faded out by 48 hae (Fig. 7D,D′), despite the ongoing expression of Phox2b in electroporated cells (data not shown) (Dubreuil et al., 2002). Mash1 electroporated on its own did not induce RGS4 (Fig. 7C,C′). Therefore, Phox2b, in cooperation with Mash1, is an instructive factor for RGS4 expression.

Figure 7.
Figure 7.

Phox2b can ectopically and transiently induce RGS4 expression. Transverse sections through the spinal cord of a chick embryo 20 hr after electroporation (20 hae) of Phox2b (A, A′) or Mash1 (C, C′) or 20 hae and 48 hae of Phox2b and Mash1 (B, B′, D, D′, respectively) hybridized with GFP (A-D) or cRGS4 (A′-D′). Note that cRGS4 is expressed first in the notochord (A′-C′), then at approximately E4 switches to the floorplate (D′), in a manner suggestive of homeogenetic induction. This expression is not observed in mouse.

Gustducin is transiently expressed in differentiating facial motor neurons

Strikingly, among the genes isolated in our differential screen, we found another molecule involved in the heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathway: the G-protein α-subunit gustducin which, so far, has been reported to be expressed specifically in taste receptor cells (McLaughlin et al., 1992) and a few other presumably chemoreceptive cell types (Hofer et al., 1996) and required for bitter and sweet taste transduction (Wong et al., 1996). On flat-mounts of the hindbrain at E10.5 we verified that gustducin was indeed expressed in FBM precursors emerging from ventral r4 and lasted until they reached the r5/r6 border (Fig. 8A,B′). Atypically, expression was detectable not only in the cell bodies but also in the axons converging toward the r4 facial exit point (Fig. 8A,B, arrowhead). Cross-sections through r4 and combined immunohistochemistry for Phox2a (which marks postmitotic bm/vm neurons) showed that gustducin expression starts, like RGS4, in facial postmitotic precursors in the mantle layer (Fig. 8B′). Gustducin expression in FBM precursors was completely abolished in a homozygous Phox2b null background (Fig. 8C).

Figure 8.
Figure 8.

Gustducin expression in FBM precursors and its dependence on Phox2b studied by in situ hybridization on a flat-mount of the hindbrain (A) or on transverse sections through r4 (B, C) at E11. (A, B′) Expression of Gustducin in the FBM precursors of heterozygote mutants and their axons (A, B, arrowhead) starts in r4 and continues during their migration through r5. Immunohistochemistry for Phox2a confirms that Gustducin expression is restricted to postmitotic FBM precursors (B′). C, Gustducin expression is abolished in Phox2bLacZ/LacZ mutants.

Discussion

Regulators of heterotrimeric G-protein signaling have been the focus of intense biochemical and cell biological studies that have steadily increased the scope of their proposed physiological functions. As GAPs for Gq and Gi classes of Gα subunits, they can impact on the vast array of Gα and Gβγ-linked effectors. In addition, many RGS proteins have non-RGS domains, which makes them effectors in their own right (and not mere regulators) of GPCR signaling (for review, see Hepler, 1999; Burchett, 2000). Moreover, the RGS domain itself could have non-GAP roles, such as the RGS domain of axin, which binds APC within the β-catenin degradation complex (for review, see De Vries et al., 2000). Therefore, biochemical evidence opens the possibility of a dizzying variety of roles that in vivo experiments will be required to sort out. To this date, developmental roles for very few RGS proteins have been documented. Exceptions include loco, a Drosophila homolog of RGS12, required for early embryonic development (Pathirana et al., 2001) and terminal differentiation of glial cells (Granderath et al., 1999) and Xrgs4a, a Xenopus homolog of RGS4, suggested, on the basis of gain-of-function experiments, to act on early embryonic patterning by modulating Xwnt-8 signaling (Wu et al., 2000).

Here, we provide the first account of the expression of a RGS gene during the ontogeny of the nervous system (summarized in Table 1), several aspects of which are highly evocative of developmental roles.

View this table:
Table 1.

Summary of the expression of RGS4 in the developing nervous system

Dynamic expression of RGS4 in differentiating neurons

Striking features of embryonic RGS4 expression are the very discrete set of neuronal types involved and the extremely dynamic pattern of expression, both attesting to a tight transcriptional regulation during development. In several cell types, RGS4 is switched on and off, time and again during neuronal differentiation. One of the most extreme examples is provided by facial motoneuronal precursors that switch on RGS4 as they exit the ventricular zone, switch it off soon after, as they start migrating caudally, switch it back on as they settle in the anlage of the facial nucleus, then largely downregulate it, and finally re-express it at high levels throughout postnatal life. A biphasic expression pattern is observed in the LC, with an early transient expression followed by a late stable re-expression. In DRGs, widespread expression primarily fades out by E15.5, and postnatal expression in small-diameter neurons is likely to correspond to a re-expression. We cannot formally exclude, however, that it represents the continuation of expression in the small subset of cells detected at E15.5 and their progeny.

These data are compatible with RGS4 having distinct roles in differentiating and in mature neurons. It is noteworthy that the postnatal expression of RGS4 (Gold et al., 1997; present study) although far from ubiquitous, is much wider than the developmental one.

RGS4 is regulated by Phox2b

The very discrete embryonic expression of RGS4 considerably overlaps with that of the homeodomain protein Phox2b, specifically in sympathoadrenal and parasympathetic ganglionic cells, a fraction of enteric neuronal precursors, the locus coeruleus, epibranchial placode-derived ganglia, and trigeminal, facial and trochlear motor neurons. Strikingly, in the locus coeruleus, in which Phox2b is switched on after Phox2a and under its strict control, the embryonic phase of RGS4 expression coincides with the transient expression of Phox2b (Fig. 2) (Pattyn et al., 2000a). Moreover, at all these sites, RGS4 is under the control of Phox2b, as evidenced by its loss in Phox2bLacZ/LacZ embryos. Finally, Phox2b can ectopically induce RGS4 in the spinal cord. This induction was fully detectable after 20 hr, arguing that Phox2b does not transactivate RGS4 through a complex cascade of transcriptional events. Remarkably, induced expression of RGS4 was transient, thus mimicking the dynamic of the endogenous RGS4 expression and arguing that Phox2b itself participates in the extinction of RGS4, either directly or by promoting a postmitotic stage of motoneuronal differentiation incompatible with the maintenance of RGS4 expression. Altogether, these data suggest that RGS4 is a relatively direct or proximal transcriptional target of Phox2b, a determinant of neuronal identity. Clearly, other regulators must be invoked to explain the downregulation of RGS4 in many structures even as Phox2b expression is maintained, or why among cranial bm/vm motoneuron precursors, which all depend on Phox2b, only some express RGS4.

Possible roles of RGS4 in the developing nervous system

The present survey does not reveal any straightforward and general correlate between ontogenetic events and RGS4 upregulation or downregulation. Moreover, no published data are available on the roles of RGS proteins in developing neurons to suggest functional hypotheses. In fact, very little in vivo data are available on the embryonic functions of the heterotrimeric Gq and Gi proteins themselves, through which RGS proteins are thought to exert their main actions. Of relevance to neural development is Drosophila Gαq whose gain-of-function leads to ectopic midline crossing of commissural axons (Ratnaparkhi et al., 2002). No study of neural development has been reported so far in knock-outs of Gi and Gq family genes in mouse, except for an abnormal maintenance of Purkinje cell polyinnervation and consequent ataxia in Gαq-/- mutants (Offermanns et al., 1997). In vitro assays for growth cone guidance have recently implicated signaling through heterotrimeric G-proteins (Xiang et al., 2002; Chalasani et al., 2003; Guirland et al., 2003) and in vivo, the chemokine SDF-1, signaling through the GPCR CXCR4 is required for neuronal precursor migration and axonal guidance (Zou et al., 1998; Bagri et al., 2002; David et al., 2002; Zhu et al., 2002). It is therefore plausible that such related phenomena as axonal navigation and neuronal migration would be affected by RGS proteins, similar to what has been shown, in vitro, for lymphocyte migration (Bowman et al., 1998; Reif and Cyster, 2000). In this context, we note that in at least one instance, changes in the expression of RGS4 did correlate with cell movements; FBM precursors first expressed RGS4 after arrival in the mantle layer of r4 where they change direction from a lateral to a caudal migration; they downregulated it during their caudal migration, then went again through a burst of expression when they settled near the pial surface of r6. Conceivably, these transient upregulations of RGS4 could modulate the responsiveness of neuronal precursors to chemotactic cues at the transition between migratory states. Our differential screening strategy also isolated a heterotrimeric G-protein α-subunit, gustducin, which turns out to be a specific (if transient) marker, among cranial motoneurons for FBMs and, like RGS4 is under the control of Phox2b. This finding further strengthens the notion that the heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathway is developmentally regulated during the early phases of neuronal differentiation, in a class-specific manner.

Other roles of RGS proteins could be to foster specific differentiation stages of developing neurons, as proposed for RGS6 (Liu et al., 2002) on the basis of its effect on nerve growth factor-induced differentiation of the PC12 cell line [although this action is dependent on a GGL domain (absent from RGS4), and independent of any interaction with G-proteins]. In this respect, it is notable that, among bm/vm neurons, RGS4 expression was primarily restricted to the facial and trigeminal nuclei, two purely branchial motor nuclei. Transient expression of RGS4 is therefore the first marker which differentiates branchial motor neurons (with the possible exception of precursors of the nucleus ambiguus) and visceral motor neurons. We also note that RGS4 revealed an unexpected heterogeneity among sympathoadrenal precursors, particularly evident in the abdominal region in which expression was mostly confined to one large ganglionic or paraganglionic prevertebral mass. This mass is in a position compatible with that reported for the organ of Zuckerkandl, the main location of extra-adrenal chromaffin tissue (Ober, 1983).

In conclusion, out study shows that RGS4 is transcribed in a highly regulated manner in subclasses of developing neurons, partially under the control of a determinant of neuronal identity, Phox2b. This is suggestive of developmental roles that inactivation of the gene by homologous recombination should help decipher.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by grants from the European Community (QGL2-CT-2001-01467), Association Française contie les Myopathies, Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, and the French Ministry of Research (ACI2002). We thank K. Kiuchi for the gift of the mRGS4 cDNA.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to J-F. Brunet, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 8542, Département de Biologie, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: jfbrunet{at}biologie.ens.fr.

  • V. Dubreuil's present address: Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, D-01307 Dresden, Germany.

  • Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/03/2310613-09$15.00/0

References

  1. ↵
    Amiel J, Laudier B, Attié-Bitach T, Trang H, de Pontual L, Gener B, Torchet D, Simonneau M, Vekemans M, Munnich A, Gaultier C, Lyonnet S ( 2003) Polyalanine expansion and frame shift mutations of the paired-like homeobox gene PHOX2B in congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (Ondine's curse). Nat Genet 33: 459-461.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Auclair F, Valdès N, Marchand R ( 1996) Rhombomere-specific origin of branchial and visceral motoneurons of the facial nerve in the rat embryo. J Comp Neurol 369: 451-461.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Bagri A, Gurney T, He X, Zou YR, Littman DR, Tessier-Lavigne M, Pleasure SJ ( 2002) The chemokine SDF1 regulates migration of dentate granule cells. Development 129: 4249-4260.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bowman EP, Campbell JJ, Druey KM, Scheschonka A, Kehrl JH, Butcher EC ( 1998) Regulation of chemotactic and proadhesive responses to chemoattractant receptors by RGS (regulator of G-protein signaling) family members. J Biol Chem 273: 28040-28048.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Brunet J-F, Pattyn A ( 2002) Phox2 genes - from patterning to connectivity. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12: 435-440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Brunet J-F, Shapiro E, Foster SA, Kandel ER, Iino Y ( 1991) Identification of a peptide specific for Aplysia sensory neurons by PCR-based differential screening. Science 252: 856-859.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Burchett SA ( 2000) Regulators of G-protein signaling: a bestiary of modular protein binding domains. J Neurochem 75: 1335-1351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Cau E, Gradwohl G, Fode C, Guillemot F ( 1997) Mash1 activates a cascade of bHLH regulators in olfactory neuron progenitors. Development 124: 1611-1621.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. ↵
    Chalasani SH, Sabelko KA, Sunshine MJ, Littman DR, Raper JA ( 2003) A chemokine, SDF-1, reduces the effectiveness of multiple axonal repellents and is required for normal axon pathfinding. J Neurosci 23: 1360-1371.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Dauger S, Pattyn A, Lofaso F, Gaultier C, Goridis C, Gallego J, Brunel J-F ( 2003) Phox2b controls the development of peripheral chemoreceptors and afferent visceral pathways. Development, in press.
  11. ↵
    David NB, Sapede D, Saint-Etienne L, Thisse C, Thisse B, Dambly-Chaudiere C, Rosa FM, Ghysen A ( 2002) Molecular basis of cell migration in the fish lateral line: role of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and of its ligand, SDF1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 16297-16302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    De Vries L, Zheng B, Fischer T, Elenko E, Farquhar MG ( 2000) The regulator of G-protein signaling family. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40: 235-271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Diatchenko L, Lau YF, Campbell AP, Chenchik A, Moqadam F, Huang B, Lukyanov S, Lukyanov K, Gurskaya N, Sverdlov ED, Siebert PD ( 1996) Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 6025-6030.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Dubreuil V, Hirsch M-R, Pattyn A, Brunet J-F, Goridis C ( 2000) The Phox2b transcription factor coordinately regulates neuronal cell cycle exit and identity. Development 127: 5191-5201.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. ↵
    Dubreuil V, Hirsch MR, Jouve C, Brunet J-F, Goridis C ( 2002) The role of Phox2b in synchronizing pan-neuronal and type-specific aspects of neurogenesis. Development 129: 5241-5253.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Ericson J, Rashbass P, Schedl A, Brenner-Morton S, Kawakami A, van Heyningen V, Jessell TM, Briscoe J ( 1997) Pax6 controls progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in response to graded Shh signaling. Cell 90: 169-180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Fritzsch B ( 1996) Development of the labyrinthine efferent system. Ann NY Acad Sci 781: 21-33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Gold SJ, Ni YG, Dohlman HG, Nestler EJ ( 1997) Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins: region-specific expression of nine subtypes in rat brain. J Neurosci 17: 8024-8037.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Goridis C, Rohrer H ( 2002) Specification of catecholaminergic and serotonergic neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 531-541.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Granderath S, Stollewerk A, Greig S, Goodman CS, O'Kane CJ, Klambt C ( 1999) loco encodes an RGS protein required for Drosophila glial differentiation. Development 126: 1781-1791.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    Guirland C, Buck KB, Gibney JA, DiCicco-Bloom E, Zheng JQ ( 2003) Direct cAMP signaling through G-protein-coupled receptors mediates growth cone attraction induced by pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. J Neurosci 23: 2274-2283.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Gurskaya NG, Diatchenko L, Chenchik A, Siebert PD, Khaspekov GL, Lukyanov KA, Vagner LL, Ermolaeva OD, Lukyanov SA, Sverdlov ED ( 1996) Equalizing cDNA subtraction based on selective suppression of polymerase chain reaction: cloning of Jurkat cell transcripts induced by phytohemaglutinin and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. Anal Biochem 240: 90-97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Hepler JR ( 1999) Emerging roles for RGS proteins in cell signalling. Trends Pharmacol Sci 20: 376-382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Hofer D, Puschel B, Drenckhahn D ( 1996) Taste receptor-like cells in the rat gut identified by expression of alpha-gustducin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 6631-6634.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Jacob J, Tiveron M-C, Brunet J-F, Guthrie S ( 2000) Role of the target in the pathfinding of facial visceral motor axons. Mol Cell Neurosci 16: 14-26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Koshiba-Takeuchi K, Takeuchi JK, Matsumoto K, Momose T, Uno K, Hoepker V, Ogura K, Takahashi N, Nakamura H, Yasuda K, Ogura T ( 2000) Tbx5 and the retinotectum projection. Science 287: 134-137.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Liu Z, Chatterjee TK, Fisher RA ( 2002) RGS6 interacts with SCG10 and promotes neuronal differentiation. Role of the G gamma subunit-like (GGL) domain of RGS6. J Biol Chem 277: 37832-37839.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Luo X, Popov S, Bera AK, Wilkie TM, Muallem S ( 2001) RGS proteins provide biochemical control of agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations. Mol Cell 7: 651-660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    McLaughlin SK, McKinnon PJ, Margolskee RF ( 1992) Gustducin is a taste-cell-specific G-protein closely related to the transducins. Nature 357: 563-569.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Momose T, Tonegawa A, Takeuchi J, Ogawa H, Umesono K, Yasuda K ( 1999) Efficient targeting of gene expression in chick embryos by microelectroporation. Dev Growth Differ 41: 335-344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Morin X, Cremer H, Hirsch M-R, Kapur RP, Goridis C, Brunet J-F ( 1997) Defects in sensory and autonomic ganglia and absence of locus coeruleus in mice deficient for the homeobox gene Phox2a. Neuron 18: 411-423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Ni YG, Gold SJ, Iredale PA, Terwilliger RZ, Duman RS, Nestler EJ ( 1999) Region-specific regulation of RGS4 (Regulator of G-protein-signaling protein type 4) in brain by stress and glucocorticoids: in vivo and in vitro studies. J Neurosci 19: 3674-3680.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Nolan GP, Fiering S, Nicolas JF, Herzenberg LA ( 1988) Fluorescence-activated cell analysis and sorting of viable mammalian cells based on beta-d-galactosidase activity after transduction of Escherichia coli lacZ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 2603-2607.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Nomoto S, Adachi K, Yang LX, Hirata Y, Muraguchi S, Kiuchi K ( 1997) Distribution of RGS4 mRNA in mouse brain shown by in situ hybridization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 241: 281-287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Ober WB ( 1983) Emil Zuckerkandl and his delightful little organ. Pathol Annu 18: 103-119.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Offermanns S, Hashimoto K, Watanabe M, Sun W, Kurihara H, Thompson RF, Inoue Y, Kano M, Simon MI ( 1997) Impaired motor coordination and persistent multiple climbing fiber innervation of cerebellar Purkinje cells in mice lacking Galphaq. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 14089-14094.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Pathirana S, Zhao D, Bownes M ( 2001) The Drosophila RGS protein Loco is required for dorsal/ventral axis formation of the egg and embryo, and nurse cell dumping. Mech Dev 109: 137-150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Pattyn A, Morin X, Cremer H, Goridis C, Brunet J-F ( 1997) Expression and interactions of the two closely related homeobox genes Phox2a and Phox2b during neurogenesis. Development 124: 4065-4075.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  39. ↵
    Pattyn A, Morin X, Cremer H, Goridis C, Brunet J-F ( 1999) The homeobox gene Phox2b is essential for the development of autonomic neural crest derivatives. Nature 399: 366-370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Pattyn A, Goridis C, Brunet J-F ( 2000a) Specification of the central noradrenergic phenotype by the homeobox gene Phox2b. Mol Cell Neurosci 15: 235-243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Pattyn A, Hirsch M-R, Goridis C, Brunet J-F ( 2000b) Control of hindbrain motor neuron differentiation by the homeobox gene Phox2b. Development 127: 1349-1358.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  42. ↵
    Pattyn A, Vallstedt A, Dias JM, Samad OA, Krumlauf R, Rijli FM, Brunet J-F, Ericson J ( 2003) Coordinated temporal and spatial control of motor neuron and serotonergic neuron generation from a common pool of CNS progenitors. Genes Dev 17: 729-737.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Ratnaparkhi A, Banerjee S, Hasan G ( 2002) Altered levels of Gq activity modulate axonal pathfinding in Drosophila. J Neurosci 22: 4499-4508.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Reif K, Cyster JG ( 2000) RGS molecule expression in murine B lymphocytes and ability to down-regulate chemotaxis to lymphoid chemokines. J Immunol 164: 4720-4729.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Ross EM, Wilkie TM ( 2000) GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G-proteins: regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) and RGS-like proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 69: 795-827.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Siekhaus DE, Drubin DG ( 2003) Spontaneous receptor-independent heterotrimeric G-protein signalling in an RGS mutant. Nat Cell Biol 5: 231-235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Simon H, Lumsden A ( 1993) Rhombomere-specific origin of the contralateral vestibulo-acoustic efferent neurons and their migration across the embryonic midline. Neuron 11: 209-220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Taber Pierce E ( 1973) Time of origin of neurons in the brain stem of the mouse. Prog Brain Res 40: 53-65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Tiveron M-C, Hirsch M-R, Brunet J-F ( 1996) The expression pattern of the transcription factor Phox2 delineates synaptic pathways of the autonomic nervous system. J Neurosci 16: 7649-7660.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Tiveron M-C, Pattyn A, Hirsch M-R, Brunet J-F ( 2003) Role of Phox2b and Mash1 in the generation of the vestibular efferent nucleus. Dev Biol 260: 46-57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Wong GT, Gannon KS, Margolskee RF ( 1996) Transduction of bitter and sweet taste by gustducin. Nature 381: 796-800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Wu C, Zeng Q, Blumer KJ, Muslin AJ ( 2000) RGS proteins inhibit Xwnt-8 signaling in Xenopus embryonic development. Development 127: 2773-2784.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  53. ↵
    Xiang Y, Li Y, Zhang Z, Cui K, Wang S, Yuan XB, Wu CP, Poo MM, Duan S ( 2002) Nerve growth cone guidance mediated by G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat Neurosci 5: 843-848.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Zhu Y, Yu T, Zhang XC, Nagasawa T, Wu JY, Rao Y ( 2002) Role of the chemokine SDF-1 as the meningeal attractant for embryonic cerebellar neurons. Nat Neurosci 5: 719-720.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Zou YR, Kottmann AH, Kuroda M, Taniuchi I, Littman DR ( 1998) Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature 393: 595-599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Email
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Dynamic Expression of RGS4 in the Developing Nervous System and Regulation by the Neural Type-Specific Transcription Factor Phox2b
Nicolas Grillet, Véronique Dubreuil, Héloïse D. Dufour, Jean-François Brunet
Journal of Neuroscience 19 November 2003, 23 (33) 10613-10621; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-33-10613.2003
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.