Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Impact of Photon Noise on the Reliability of a Motion-Sensitive Neuron in the Fly's Visual System

Jan Grewe, Jutta Kretzberg, Anne-Kathrin Warzecha and Martin Egelhaaf
Journal of Neuroscience 26 November 2003, 23 (34) 10776-10783; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-34-10776.2003
Jan Grewe
1Department of Neurobiology, Universität Bielefeld, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany, and 2Salk Institute-Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, La Jolla, California 92037-1099
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jutta Kretzberg
1Department of Neurobiology, Universität Bielefeld, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany, and 2Salk Institute-Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, La Jolla, California 92037-1099
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne-Kathrin Warzecha
1Department of Neurobiology, Universität Bielefeld, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany, and 2Salk Institute-Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, La Jolla, California 92037-1099
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Egelhaaf
1Department of Neurobiology, Universität Bielefeld, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany, and 2Salk Institute-Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, La Jolla, California 92037-1099
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Visual stimuli for the smallest (σ = 4; top) and the largest (σ = 64; bottom) noise level. On the left, the same frame of the motion sequence is shown. For the first frame, a number of dots are placed randomly on the screen, and in subsequent frames the dots are shifted in the preferred direction of the H1 cell (indicated by the arrows). As shown, each dot has its own brightness. Properties of a sample dot are shown on the right. The noise sequence applied to this dot during presentation was made up of randomly drawn brightness values drawn from a Gaussian distribution centered at the mean brightness (127 on the eight-bit scale) and a SD of σ = 4, 8, 16, 32, or 64, defining the noise level (shown for σ = 4 and 64). This distribution was truncated at mean ± 2σ. Although the brightness variations over time are quite small (top), modulations covering the full brightness range are possible at the largest noise level (σ = 64).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Averaged discrimination of reference and test responses as a function of the noise level added to the stimuli and the temporal resolution of the measure of discrimination as developed by Victor and Purpura (1997). Data are based on a set of 11 H1 neurons recorded in 11 different flies. Transects b and c are shown in more detail in b and c. b, Mean discrimination of reference and test responses at the maximum noise level (σ = 64) in dependence of the temporal resolution was used for data analysis. The error bars show the SD of percentage correct decisions across the 11 cells. The shaded area represents the domain of uncertainty (see Materials and Methods). c, As in b, but the noise amplitude was varied at the “best” temporal resolution (15.625 msec).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Mean discrimination performance as a function of the noise correlation and the temporal resolution of the measure of discrimination as developed by Victor and Purpura (1997). The experiments were performed at the maximum noise level (σ = 64). The average performance is based on 10 H1 recordings in another set of 10 different flies than those on which the data shown in Fig. 4 are based. The transections refer to sections shown in b-d. b, The average discrimination performance at 100% noise correlation expressed in percentage correct decisions as a function of the temporal resolution was used for data analysis. Error bars show the SD across the 10 H1 recordings. The shaded area shows the domain of uncertainty (see Materials and Methods). c, Same data as in b but the noise correlation was varied at the “best” temporal resolution. The temporal resolution was 15.625 msec. d, Same data as in c but at a temporal resolution used for data analysis of 500 msec. e, Mean discrimination performance at 100% noise correlation and a noise level of σ = 16 as a function of the temporal resolution for four H1 recordings of four different flies. The error bars represent the SD of performance levels. Shown in gray is the domain of uncertainty, which represents the performance levels that are likely to be the result of internal noise and photon noise but not of the added external noise.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Data analysis for a single cell example. a, The raster plots show 750 msec sections of 10 responses to reference (left) and test (right) stimulus at the maximum noise level (σ = 64). A common spike pattern can be seen in all responses despite differences in timing of individual spikes. Although all reference responses were elicited by the same stimulus, they do not seem to be more similar to each other compared with the test responses that were evoked by stimuli, which were statistically equivalent but differed in the noise sequence added on the stimuli. The way of analyzing more subtle changes in the temporal structure of the responses is sketched by the lines drawn between the highlighted reference response and all other reference and test responses: (1) each reference response is compared with all other reference responses (solid lines) with two different measures of similarity (see Materials and Methods), and the average similarity within the reference responses is calculated; (2) the mean similarity of each reference response to all test responses is determined (dashed lines), and the average similarity between reference and test responses is calculated. b, If the external noise affects the responses, the reference responses should be more similar to each other compared with the test responses. With this assumption, we tried to classify the individual reference responses on the basis of the similarity values estimated with the measure developed by Victor and Purpura (1997) (see Materials and Methods). The percentage of correct classifications is plotted as a function of added noise level for this single cell example. The shaded area represents the domain of uncertainty (see Materials and Methods). Discrimination performances falling into this range are likely to be a consequence of chance. A significant effect of the added noise on the responses can be assumed if the actual percentage correct value is outside the domain of uncertainty. c, Same data as in b but the responses were compared using the measure developed by Kretzberg et al. (2001).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Mean firing rate of H1 in response to reference and test stimuli at the five noise levels (σ = 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64) used in the experiments. The box and whisker diagrams represent the distribution of mean firing rates, averaged over all presentations of each stimulus type. All diagrams are based on the same 11 H1 neurons recorded in 11 different flies. The horizontal lines in the boxes represent the lower, median, and upper quartile of the data. The whiskers extending vertically from the boxes show the extent of the rest of the data. The distributions were tested for significant differences using a Wilcoxon's test for paired samples. An α value, shown above each pair of distributions, larger than 5% denotes a nonsignificant difference.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 23 (34)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 23, Issue 34
26 Nov 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Photon Noise on the Reliability of a Motion-Sensitive Neuron in the Fly's Visual System
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Impact of Photon Noise on the Reliability of a Motion-Sensitive Neuron in the Fly's Visual System
Jan Grewe, Jutta Kretzberg, Anne-Kathrin Warzecha, Martin Egelhaaf
Journal of Neuroscience 26 November 2003, 23 (34) 10776-10783; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-34-10776.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Impact of Photon Noise on the Reliability of a Motion-Sensitive Neuron in the Fly's Visual System
Jan Grewe, Jutta Kretzberg, Anne-Kathrin Warzecha, Martin Egelhaaf
Journal of Neuroscience 26 November 2003, 23 (34) 10776-10783; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-34-10776.2003
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • insect vision
  • reliability
  • photon noise
  • motion vision
  • equivalent noise
  • visual motion processing

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.