Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
ARTICLE, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Behavioral Effects of High-Strength Static Magnetic Fields on Rats

Thomas A. Houpt, David W. Pittman, Jan M. Barranco, Erin H. Brooks and James C. Smith
Journal of Neuroscience 15 February 2003, 23 (4) 1498-1505; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-04-01498.2003
Thomas A. Houpt
1Departments of Biological Science and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Pittman
2Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan M. Barranco
1Departments of Biological Science and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin H. Brooks
2Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Smith
2Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Tight-circling activity induced by magnetic field exposure. Rats were restrained for 30 min within the bore of a 14 T magnet in either head-up orientation (A) or head-down orientation (B). On release from restraint, rats oriented head-up circled counterclockwise, whereas rats oriented head-down circled clockwise.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    CTAs induced by a single pairing of G+S intake with a 30 min restraint within magnetic fields of different strengths. For the 24 hr two bottle preference test after the pairing of G+S with magnetic exposure (A), a significant CTA against G+S was observed only after pairing with 14 T exposure. The CTA extinguished after 3 d of two bottle preference tests (B). *p < 0.05 versus 0 T (sham) exposure. Data for 9.4 T exposure are replotted from Nolte et al. (1998).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    CTAs induced by a single pairing of G+S intake with restraint within 14 T magnetic fields for 0–30 min. Significant CTA was observed after ≥1 min of exposure to the magnetic field on the first 24 hr two bottle preference test (A); the CTAs persisted for several days of preference testing (B). *p < 0.05 versus 0 min exposure.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Acquisition of CTAs across three pairings of G+S with 30 min restraint within 7, 9.4, or 14 T magnetic fields. Intake during 10 min access to G+S was not different between sham- and 7 T-exposed rats across the 3 conditioning days (A). Rats exposed to 9.4 T decreased intake compared with sham-exposed rats on the third day of conditioning (i.e., after two pairings; B). Rats exposed to 14 T decreased intake on the second day of conditioning (i.e., after one pairing;C). *p < 0.05 versus sham-exposed rats. Data for 9.4 T exposure are replotted from Nolte et al. (1998).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    CTAs induced by three pairings of G+S intake with restraint within 7, 9.4, or 14 T magnetic fields for 0–30 min. Significant CTAs were observed in all magnet-exposed rats on the first 24 hr two bottle preference test (A). Over subsequent 24 hr two bottle test days, the CTA of 7 T-exposed rats extinguished on the second day (B), whereas the CTAs of 9.4 T- and 14 T-exposed rats persisted for 8 d of preference testing (C, D). *p < 0.05 versus sham-exposed rats; †p < 0.05 versus 7 T-exposed rats. Data for 9.4 T exposure are replotted from Nolte et al. (1998).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    CTAs induced by a single pairing of G+S with 14 T restraint in head-up or head-down orientations. After 10 min of access to G+S, rats were restrained in either a head-up orientation (black squares) or head-down orientation (black circles) for 30 min within the 14 T magnetic field. Although rats circled in opposite directions on release from restraint (with head-up rats circling counterclockwise and head-down rats circling clockwise), there was little difference in the CTA acquisition of the two groups. Control rats were sham-exposed while head-down for 30 min (white circles).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Effects of magnetic field exposure on locomotor activity

    FieldDurationNumber of rats% CirclingMean circles% RearingMean rears
    Experiments 1a and 2
     0 T30 min2251913.8  ± 0.5
     7 T30 min17472.4  ± 0.6*592.8  ± 0.9*
     14 T30 min17712.6  ± 0.4*00*†
    Experiment 1b
     14 T0 min600  ± 01004.8  ± 0.8
     14 T1 min600  ± 01001.8  ± 0.7*
     14 T5 min8505.0  ± 2.5672.3  ± 0.5*
     14 T10 min14572.9  ± 0.7432.2  ± 0.5*
     14 T20 min8632.8  ± 0.5131*
     14 T30 min17712.6  ± 0.400*
    Experiment 3
     0 T Down30 min1200834.9  ± 1.1
     14 T Down30 min15736.1  ± 2.7332.0  ± 0.3*
     14 T Up30 min13778.4  ± 2.5541.6  ± 0.3*
    • Locomotor activity of rats after magnetic field exposure was scored for tight circling and rearing by a blind observer from videotape records. Rats were sham exposed (0 T) or exposed to 7 or 14 T magnetic fields for 0–30 min. Shown are the number of rats tested, the percentage of rats displaying circling or rearing, and the mean ± SEM number of circles or rears counted for those rats that showed any circling or rearing (i.e. non-zero means). In experiments 1a and 2, rats were exposed head-up to a 7 or 14 T magnetic field for 30 min; both exposures induced circling and suppressed rearing. In experiment 1b, rats were exposed head-up to 14 T for 0–30 min; significant circling was induced by ≥5 min of exposure, and rearing was significantly suppressed after ≥10 min of exposure. In experiment 3, rats were restrained in either the head-up or head-down orientation within a 14 T magnetic field for 30 min. Circling was induced and rearing was suppressed in both groups, but the direction of circling depended on the rats' orientation within the field (Fig. 1).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 23 (4)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 23, Issue 4
15 Feb 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Behavioral Effects of High-Strength Static Magnetic Fields on Rats
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Behavioral Effects of High-Strength Static Magnetic Fields on Rats
Thomas A. Houpt, David W. Pittman, Jan M. Barranco, Erin H. Brooks, James C. Smith
Journal of Neuroscience 15 February 2003, 23 (4) 1498-1505; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-04-01498.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Behavioral Effects of High-Strength Static Magnetic Fields on Rats
Thomas A. Houpt, David W. Pittman, Jan M. Barranco, Erin H. Brooks, James C. Smith
Journal of Neuroscience 15 February 2003, 23 (4) 1498-1505; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-04-01498.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • conditioned taste aversion
  • vestibular
  • circling
  • rearing
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • magnet

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

ARTICLE

  • Distinct Developmental Modes and Lesion-Induced Reactions of Dendrites of Two Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons
  • Functional Dissociation among Components of Remembering: Control, Perceived Oldness, and Content
  • Single-Cell Microarray Analysis in Hippocampus CA1: Demonstration and Validation of Cellular Heterogeneity
Show more ARTICLE

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
  • Generation of Intensity Selectivity by Differential Synaptic Tuning: Fast-Saturating Excitation But Slow-Saturating Inhibition
  • Episodic Reinstatement in the Medial Temporal Lobe
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.