Abstract
Transient stimulation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) induces persistent prolonged epileptiform discharges in hippocampal slices via a protein synthesis-dependent process. At present, the signaling process underlying the induction of these epileptiform discharges remains unknown. We examined the possible role of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1 and ERK2) because these kinases can be activated by group I mGluRs, and their activation may regulate gene expression and alter protein synthesis. The group I mGluR agonist (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG; 50 μm) induced activation of ERK1/2 in hippocampal slices. 2-(2-Diamino-3-methoxyphenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (PD98059) (50 μm) a specific inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), suppressed ERK1/2 activation by DHPG. PD98059 or another MEK inhibitor, 1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis[2-aminophenylthio]butadiene (10 μm), also prevented the induction of the prolonged epileptiform discharges by DHPG. In the presence of ionotropic glutamate receptor inhibitors and tetrodotoxin (blockers), DHPG-induced epileptiform discharges were suppressed, whereas ERK1/2 activation persisted. Protein kinase C inhibitors (2-[1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-5-methoxyindol-3-yl]-3-(1H-indol-3-yl) maleimide, 1 μm; or chelerythrine, 10 μm) did not prevent the generation of DHPG-induced epileptiform discharges, nor did they suppress the activation of ERK1/2 by DHPG in slices pretreated with the blockers. Genistein (30 μm), a broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppressed the DHPG-induced epileptiform discharges and the ERK1/2 activation in the presence of blockers. Induction of DHPG-mediated epileptiform discharges was also suppressed by 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (10 μm), an Src-family tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The study shows that group I mGluRs activate ERK1/2 through a tyrosine kinase-dependent process and that this activation of ERK1/2 is necessary for the induction of prolonged epileptiform discharges in the hippocampus.
Introduction
Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are a group of Ser/Thr-kinases that play pivotal roles in the control of gene expression, cell proliferation, and differentiation (Chang and Karin, 2001). Activated MAPKs phosphorylate a wide range of protein substrates, including membrane-bound, nuclear, and signaling proteins (Grewal et al., 1999). In mammalian cells, one subgroup of MAPKs, the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), is involved in cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation (Pearson et al., 2001) through regulation of gene expression and protein synthesis (Lin et al., 1994; Hazzalin and Mahadevan, 2002).
The signaling mechanisms underlying receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-mediated ERK1/2 activation have been extensively studied. The RTKs include growth factor receptors such as epidermal growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (Johnson and Vaillancourt, 1994; Weiss et al., 1997). Interestingly, recent studies reveal that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) also activate the ERK1/2 cascade (Gutkind, 2000). The signaling mechanisms coupling GPCRs to ERK1/2 are rich and diverse. Transactivation can result from the downstream actions of Gα-protein or Gβγ-protein subunits. In cell-expression systems and peripheral tissue, GPCR stimulation can elicit cell growth (Post and Brown, 1996) and malignant cell proliferation (Young et al., 1986; Gutkind et al., 1991).
In the CNS, metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), a group of GPCRs activated by glutamate, play a role in synaptic plasticity (Bortolotto et al., 1994; Anwyl, 1999; Huber et al., 2000; Watabe et al., 2002). Recent data reveal that mGluRs regulate protein synthesis (Weiler and Greenough, 1993) via translation processes (Huber et al., 2000; Raymond et al., 2000) to bring about long-term modifications of synaptic transmission. A role of ERK1/2 has been proposed in the induction of some forms of these modifications (Roberson et al., 1999).
Endogenous activation of group I mGluRs, a subgroup of mGluRs coupled to the Gαq/11 protein (Masu et al., 1991; Abe et al., 1992), has been shown to contribute to epileptiform burst activity in hippocampal neurons (Lee et al., 2002) and to regulate the excitability of neocortical neurons (Bandrowski et al., 2003). We showed that stimulation of group I mGluRs induces prolonged synchronized discharges in hippocampal slices (Taylor et al., 1995). These prolonged discharges resemble ictal discharges in epilepsy and have two distinct properties: (1) The “prolonged epileptiform discharges,” once induced by group I mGluR agonists, are maintained for hours after agonist washout (Merlin and Wong, 1997). (2) Induction of the prolonged epileptiform discharges is prevented in hippocampal slices in which protein synthesis is blocked by anisomycin or cycloheximide (Merlin et al., 1998). These data suggest that group I mGluR stimulation elicits epileptogenesis in hippocampal slices through a protein synthesis-dependent process.
At present, the signaling process underlying the group I mGluR-induced epileptogenesis is largely unknown. Because of the available evidence indicating the activation of ERK1/2 by group I mGluRs (Peavy and Conn, 1998; Ferraguti et al., 1999; Roberson et al., 1999; Berkeley and Levey, 2003) and the downstream action of ERK1/2 in altering protein synthesis, we performed experiments to test whether activation of the ERK1/2 cascade is necessary for group I mGluR-induced epileptogenesis.
Materials and Methods
Slice preparation and electrophysiology. Four- to 6-week-old mice were used (B6/129PLCβ colony; State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY). Transverse hippocampal slices (400 μm thick) were prepared as described previously (Chuang et al., 2002). During slicing, the hippocampi were submerged in an ice-cold low-Ca2+/high-Mg2+ buffer, consisting of the following (in mm): 124 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 2.5 KCl, 8 MgCl2, 0.5 CaCl2, and 10 d-glucose bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Slices were transferred to an interface chamber (Fine Science Tools, Foster City, CA) perfused with normal solution [artificial CSF (ACSF)] consisting of the following (in mm): 124 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 5 KCl, 1.6 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, and 10 d-glucose bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Slices were maintained at 34.5°C in an interface chamber for at least 60 min before electrophysiological recording. For Western blot experiments in Figures 1 and 2, slices were maintained in adjacent wells of the interface chamber and were collected after electrophysiological recordings as stated in Results. For Western blot experiments in other figures, slices were maintained at 31°C in a slice holding chamber (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) for at least 90 min before drug application.
Microelectrodes were pulled from glass tubes (1 mm outer diameter with glass filament inside, World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) using a micropipette puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). Microelectrodes were filled with 2 m potassium acetate and the resistances were ∼70 MΩ. Signals were amplified (Axoclamp 2B; Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) and recorded simultaneously in a computer running pClamp6 (Axon Instruments) and on a chart recorder (Gould, Valley View, OH).
Drugs. Pharmacological agents were delivered to the hippocampal slices through continuous perfusion. Depending on the flow rate, the final concentration was reached within 15 min. For Western blot experiments using a slice-holding chamber, agents were applied to the chamber directly. Pretreatment of slices with inhibitors (see Results) lasted for 45 min. 6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), 3-(+-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP), (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG), 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (PP2), chelerythrine chloride, and 1-4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis[2-aminophenylthio]butadiene (U0126) were purchased from Tocris (Ellisville, MO). Genistein, genistin, 2-[1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-5-methoxyindol-3-yl]-3-(1H-indol-3-yl) maleimide (Gö6983), and 2-(2-amino-3-methoxyphenyl)-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (PD98059) were from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Antibodies for total and phospho-ERK1/2 were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). The other chemicals were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). PD98059, genistein, genistin, Gö6983, PP2, and U0126 were prepared in DMSO stock solutions. Before drug application, stock solutions were diluted 500 (0.2% DMSO) or 1000 (0.1% DMSO) times in normal ACSF with strong agitation to ensure complete solubility. In control experiments, 0.2% DMSO vehicle perfusion did not affect DHPG-induced responses. In addition, DHPG-induced epileptiform bursts recorded in slices perfused with 0.2% DMSO (for dissolving Gö6983) (see Fig. 3B,C) were indistinguishable from those recorded in ACSF (see Fig. 1 A,B)
Sample preparation. For electrophysiological recording experiments, slices were removed from the interface chamber and frozen immediately on dry ice. For time-course studies, slices were collected at 0, 5, 20, and 90 min after drug treatment from the slice-holding chamber and frozen immediately on dry ice. Each sample containing four to six slices was stored at -80°C until biochemical analysis.
Samples were homogenized with a motor-driven tissue grinder (15 strokes, 1 sec per stroke; pellet pestle; VWR Scientific, West Chester, PA) in an appropriate volume of ice-cold homogenization buffer containing the following (in mm): 50 Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 EGTA, 1 EDTA and protease inhibitors [0.1 aprotinin, 0.1 leupeptin, 0.1 4-2(-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride, 5 benzamidine, and 5β-mercaptoethanol (BME)] and phosphatase inhibitors (4 4-nitrophenyl phosphate; 2 sodium pyrophosphate, and 1 sodium orthovanadate). The homogenate was then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C to remove debris. The supernatant was transferred to a clean, prechilled centrifuge tube. One aliquot was used for Bradford Assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) to determine protein concentration. 5× SDS sample buffer (50% glycerol, 25% BME, and 12% SDS, in 310 mm Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) was immediately added to the rest of the supernatant. Samples were boiled for 5 min and stored for future use.
Western blot. Equal sample amounts (10 μg per lane) were subjected to electrophoresis in 8% SDS-PAGE gels (1.5 mm Novex Tris-Glycine; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Gels were then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for 2.5 hr at a constant voltage of 25 V (Novex Mini-Cell; Invitrogen). The membrane was stained with Ponceau S briefly to verify the quality of transfer. The membrane was blocked in 5% nonfat milk dissolved in TBS-Tween 20 (TBST) buffer (containing the following: 20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 15 mm NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 hr at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. After blocking, the membrane was probed with primary antibody (phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) antibody (rabbit polyclonal IgG); 1:1000 diluted in 5% nonfat milk; Cell Signaling Technology) for 2 hr at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. After incubation, the membrane was washed three times for 5 min each with TBST. The membrane was then incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody in TBST (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology) for 1 hr. The membrane was washed again three times for 5 min each with TBST. Then the membrane was treated with LumiGLO (Cell Signaling Technology) and developed. To determine the total amount of ERK1/2, the membrane was stripped in stripping buffer (62.5 mm Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 100 mm BME, 2% SDS) for 1 hr at 60°C and washed twice 10 min each with TBST and reblocked as above. The membrane was reprobed with an ERK1/2 antibody (rabbit polyclonal IgG, 1:1000 diluted in 5% nonfat milk; Cell Signaling Technology). The rest of the procedure was the same as that for phospho-ERK1/2 antibody.
Data analysis. The duration of an individual epileptiform burst was measured from the beginning of the first action potential of the burst to the repolarization of the last action potential of the burst. Burst durations of all epileptiform bursts in a 5 min period for each slice in the various experimental conditions were averaged. Epileptiform bursts with a duration longer than 1.5 sec are referred to as prolonged epileptiform discharges. The anti-phosphorylated-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) and anti-ERK1/2 immunoreactive bands of the same gel were scanned with a desktop scanner (UMAX, Dallas, TX) and quantified with Scion Image software (Scion Image, Frederick, MD). The optical densities (ODs) of anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) bands were normalized to the OD value of their own anti-ERK1/2 bands.
Summary data are reported as means ± SEM. Student's t test was used for the statistical comparison of two sets of data. For analysis of time course data (see Figs. 3A, 5), one-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls test for repeated measures was applied. In all cases, the level of significant difference was p < 0.05.
Results
Stimulation of group I mGluRs induces prolonged epileptiform discharges in hippocampal slices
Intracellular recordings were obtained in CA3 pyramidal cells. DHPG (50 μm), a group I mGluR agonist, elicited neuronal depolarization and clusters of synaptic depolarizations (Fig. 1Ab). Rhythmic short (120-800 msec) epileptiform bursts then appeared (Fig. 1Ac), and their frequency gradually increased with DHPG perfusion (from ∼0.05 to 0.27 Hz). Epileptiform activities were distinguished from spontaneous single cell spiking activities in that epileptiform activities persisted with membrane hyperpolarization and their frequencies were not affected by changes in membrane potential (data not shown). Recordings were generally performed at hyperpolarized levels (-70 mV or more) to selectively record epileptiform activities. In all of the experiments reported here, epileptiform bursts were not observed before the addition of DHPG.
In 20 of 23 slices recorded in DHPG, within 10 min of the occurrence of short epileptiform bursts, prolonged epileptiform discharges (duration, 5.1 ± 0.4 sec; n = 20) (Fig. 1Ad,Ba) appeared abruptly. In the remaining slices, prolonged epileptiform discharges emerged more gradually and with longer and more variable delays. In all cases reported here, activation of short epileptiform bursts by DHPG was always followed by the occurrence of prolonged epileptiform discharges.
When prolonged epileptiform discharges first appeared, they coexisted with the short epileptiform bursts. With continued DHPG exposure, prolonged epileptiform discharges gradually dominated and eventually the rhythm of the population events was determined mainly by the occurrence of prolonged epileptiform discharges (Fig. 1Ad,f,Ba). For any given preparation, the duration of epileptiform activities elicited by DHPG fell into two distinct, nonoverlapping groups (Fig. 1Af,Ba). The mean durations of epileptiform bursts recorded in all slices (n = 20) after 15 min and after 25 min of DHPG perfusion were plotted in Figure 1Bb. Because of the occurrence of prolonged epileptiform bursts at 25 min after DHPG perfusion, the mean duration of epileptiform bursts was significantly longer than that measured at 15 min.
ERK1/2 phosphorylation is necessary for the induction of prolonged epileptiform discharges
The effect of DHPG perfusion on ERK1/2 activation was examined using Western blots. Slices were placed in the interface recording chamber, and after ∼1 hr of perfusion with control solution, four to six slices were collected for Western blot analysis of ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Remaining slices in the chamber were then exposed to DHPG, and intracellular recordings were performed to monitor the neuronal activities. Approximately 1 hr after the appearance of prolonged epileptiform discharges, additional slices were collected for Western blot analysis. Figure 1C shows that, after the exposure to DHPG and the elicitation of prolonged epileptiform discharges, ERK1/2 phosphorylation increased significantly (300 ± 54% of control; n = 6; p < 0.01) (Fig. 1Cb).
A specific MEK inhibitor, PD98059, was used to examine the role of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in epileptiform discharges. Hippocampal slices were pretreated with PD98059 (50 μm) for 45 min before exposure to DHPG. Under this condition, the perfusion of slices with DHPG elicited short epileptiform bursts (Fig. 2Aa). With continued perfusion, the frequency of the short epileptiform bursts increased as in the control condition without PD98059 treatment (Fig. 2Ab). However, unlike events observed under the control condition, the emergence of short epileptiform bursts was not followed by the appearance of prolonged epileptiform discharges (Fig. 2Ad). Because of the absence of prolonged epileptiform discharges, the mean burst duration measured at 25 min was not longer than that obtained at 15 min after DHPG perfusion (n = 5) (Fig. 2B). In fact, the burst duration became shorter because of the independent action of DHPG on accelerating the short epileptiform bursts, as observed under the control condition (see above; see also Merlin et al., 1998).
When PD98059 was applied after prolonged epileptiform discharges were already elicited by DHPG, the MEK inhibitor did not affect the occurrence of ongoing events (duration: before PD98059, 5.1 ± 0.3 sec; after PD98059, 5.0 ± 0.6 sec; n = 4; p = 0.77) (Fig. 2C). The results suggest that although ERK1/2 activation is necessary for the initiation of prolonged epileptiform discharges, ERK1/2 activation is not required for the maintenance of the discharges.
Results obtained with PD98059 were supplemented by using another MEK inhibitor, U0126 (10 μm), observed by other investigators to be effective in suppressing ERK1/2 activation in hippocampal slices (Roberson et al., 1999). Figure 2D shows that after the pretreatment of slices with U0126 (10 μm; 45 min) DHPG elicited short epileptiform bursts but not prolonged epileptiform discharges.
Western blot analysis showed that PD98059 suppressed the basal level of ERK1/2 phosphorylation by 64% (Fig. 2Ea,c). In addition, pretreatment of slices with PD98059 prevented the increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation by DHPG (PD98059, 36 ± 12% of control, n = 6; PD98059 plus DHPG, 39 ± 4% of control, n = 6; p = 0.8) (Fig. 2Ec). Similar effects of U0126 on ERK1/2 phosphorylation were also observed (Fig. 2Eb,c).
Stimulation of group I mGluRs directly activates ERK1/2
Group I mGluR-induced ERK1/2 activation can result from (1) the intense neuronal firing and the resulting Ca2+ entry through activated ionotropic glutamate receptors (English and Sweatt, 1996) and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Bading et al., 1993) or (2) the action of intracellular signals turned on by group I mGluR stimulation (Peavy and Conn, 1998; Roberson et al., 1999). To distinguish between the different modes of ERK1/2 activation, we pretreated slices with NMDA and non-NMDA receptor inhibitors (CPP and CNQX; 20 μm each) and tetrodotoxin (TTX; 0.3 μm) to suppress neuronal firing and reduce the activation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. DHPG was applied after the pretreatment with and in the presence of these blockers. ERK1/2 phosphorylation was examined under this condition. Figure 3A shows that ERK1/2 phosphorylation was stimulated by DHPG in the presence of the blockers. ERK1/2 phosphorylation peaked (at 5 min in DHPG, 167 ± 12% of control; n = 8; p < 0.01) within 20 min after DHPG application. Phosphorylation activity declined to baseline (112 ± 7% of control; n = 8; p = 0.12) at 90 min after continuous DHPG perfusion.
Tyrosine kinase activation links group I mGluR stimulation to ERK1/2 phosphorylation
After G-protein-coupled receptor activation, the protein kinase C (PKC)- and tyrosine kinase-dependent pathways are two major signaling processes leading to ERK1/2 activation (Gutkind, 2000). Previous studies in hippocampal slices have shown that PKC activation is involved in the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 by group I mGluRs (Roberson et al., 1999). We examined whether PKC signaling is also involved in mediating the ERK1/2 activation underlying the generation of prolonged epileptiform discharges.
In the presence of Gö6983 (1 μm), a PKC inhibitor (Gschwendt et al., 1996), DHPG added to the perfusing solution elicited short epileptiform bursts and prolonged epileptiform discharges (Fig. 3B). The duration of the prolonged epileptiform discharges recorded in the presence of Gö6983 was not significantly different from that observed in control experiments (in control, 5.1 ± 0.4 sec, n = 20; in Gö6983, 4.8 ± 0.8 sec, n = 4; p > 0.05). Because of the presence of prolonged epileptiform bursts after 25 min of DHPG perfusion, the mean duration of all epileptiform bursts measured at 25 min was significantly longer than that recorded at 15 min (Fig. 3C).
To examine the effects of Gö6983 on ERK1/2 activation, slices were incubated in Gö6983 (1 μm; 45 min) in the presence of CNQX, CPP, and TTX (blockers), before addition of DHPG. After DHPG treatment for 5 min, slices were harvested for Western blot analysis. ERK1/2 phosphorylation by DHPG persisted in the presence of Gö6983 (in blockers, 167 ± 12%, n = 8; in blockers plus Gö6983, 166 ± 9%, n = 5; p = 0.94) (Fig. 3D). The data suggest that the signaling cascade for group I mGluR-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation and prolonged epileptiform discharges is independent of PKC activation.
Figure 3E shows that pretreatment of slices for 45 min with chelerythrine (10 μm), another broad-spectrum PKC inhibitor, also did not prevent the induction of the prolonged epileptiform discharges by DHPG (n = 5) (see also Chen et al., 1998).
An alternative common transduction pathway for ERK1/2 phosphorylation is via tyrosine kinases (Gutkind, 2000). We studied the effects of the broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor, genistein (Akiyama et al., 1987), on the DHPG-elicited responses. Slices were perfused with genistein (30 μm) for 45 min before agonist application. Under this condition DHPG elicited short epileptiform bursts accelerating as in control condition without genistein pretreatment, but prolonged epileptiform discharges were no longer observed (n = 8) (Fig. 4A). In another set of experiments (n = 6), genistein, applied after the appearance of the DHPG-induced prolonged epileptiform discharges, did not affect the occurrence of these events (duration: before genistein, 4.4 ± 0.4 sec; after genistein, 3.8 ± 0.6 sec; n = 6; p = 0.25) (Fig. 4B).
We tested the specificity of the action of genistein using its analog genistin, which is inactive against tyrosine kinase (Hamakawa et al., 1999). After the pretreatment of slices with genistin (30 μm; 45 min), DHPG perfusion elicited short epileptiform bursts followed by the timely appearance of prolonged epileptiform discharges. A plot of epileptiform burst mean durations elicited after genistin pretreatment by DHPG at 15 and 25 min (n = 4) (Fig. 4C) shows that the mean duration was significantly longer at 25 than at 15 min because of the emergence of prolonged epileptiform discharges.
To further define the type of tyrosine kinase involved in the regulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation by group I mGluR activation, we evaluated the action of PP2, an inhibitor of the Src-family tyrosine kinases (see also Zhao et al., 2003). After pretreatment with PP2 (10 μm; 45 min), DHPG was introduced to the slice-perfusing solution. In three experiments, short epileptiform bursts were elicited, but these were not followed by prolonged epileptiform discharges (Fig. 4D). The average burst duration at 25 min did not increase over that measured after 15 min of DHPG exposure. Again, the epileptiform burst duration became significantly shorter because of the increase in burst frequency. On average, there was no significant difference in the short epileptiform burst frequency observed in the presence of either the MEK inhibitors (PD98059; U0126) or the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (genistein; PP2) at 25 min of DHPG.
Signaling pathways underlying DHPG-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation
DHPG-mediated phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was examined under two conditions: in the absence of ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) inhibitors and TTX (ACSF) and in the presence of iGluR inhibitors and TTX (blockers).
As shown previously (Fig. 3A), DHPG elicited increases in phospho-ERK1/2 level in the presence of blockers (Fig. 5Ab,c). In the absence of blockers (ACSF), an additional increase in the peak level of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was induced by DHPG (Fig. 5Aa,c) over that observed in the blockers.
When slices were pretreated with genistein (30 μm; 45 min), DHPG exposure in the presence of blockers no longer caused increases in ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Fig. 5Bb,c). However, with pretreatment with genistein in the absence of blockers (ACSF), ERK1/2 phosphorylation was again elevated by DHPG (Fig. 5Ba,c). In addition, we observed that, although the MEK inhibitors PD98059 and U0126 suppressed the baseline phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Fig. 2E), treatment of slices with genistein did not affect the baseline phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (102 ± 7% of control; n = 4; p > 0.05).
DHPG-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation persisted in slices pretreated with chelerythrine (10 μm) in the presence of blockers (Fig. 5Cb,c). These data are consistent with those obtained in slices pretreated with Gö6983 in the presence of blockers, in which a significant increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation was induced by DHPG (Fig. 3D). Additional data in Figure 5Cc show that with chelerythrine pretreatment, DHPG induced comparable increases in the peak ERK1/2 phosphorylation under the ACSF and blocker conditions.
Discussion
This study shows that ERK1/2 activation is required for the induction of group I mGluR-mediated prolonged epileptiform discharges. ERK1/2 activation as well as the elicitation of prolonged epileptiform discharges appear to be mediated via a tyrosine kinase-dependent signaling pathway.
Signaling pathways underlying group I mGluR-mediated ERK1/2 activation
Consistent with recent data on hippocampal glial cells (Peavy and Conn, 1998), our results point to the activation of tyrosine kinase as a signaling step coupling group I mGluRs to ERK1/2 phosphorylation. In addition, group I mGluRs can be coupled to ERK1/2 via a protein kinase C-dependent pathway (Roberson et al., 1999). This PKC-dependent pathway has been shown to be activated via stimulation of group I mGluRs (Roberson et al., 1999) and of NMDA receptors (English and Sweatt, 1996). Our data suggest that a component of the DHPG-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation is mediated by the elevation of neuronal activities after receptor stimulation. Thus, a component of the DHPG-induced phospho-ERK increase was suppressed in the presence of iGluR inhibitors and TTX (Fig. 5A). This “activity-dependent” component of DHPG-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation is apparently dependent on PKC signaling, because it no longer appeared in slices pretreated with chelerythrine (Fig. 5C).
The lack of effect of PKC inhibitors (Gö6983, chelerythrine) on the induction of group I mGluR-mediated prolonged epileptiform discharges suggests that the PKC-dependent pathway does not play a critical role in this response. It is possible that the PKC- and tyrosine kinase-dependent pathways coupling group I mGluRs to ERK1/2 phosphorylation are differentially engaged to bring about different forms of synaptic modification. The data obtained in slices pretreated with genistein (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) are consistent with this notion. Genistein inhibited the DHPG-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the presence of blockers and prevented the induction of prolonged epileptiform discharges. However, significant stimulation of ERK1/2 by DHPG in genistein-pretreated slices persisted in ACSF (Fig. 5B). Additional data suggest that this latter component of DHPG-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation was not effective in initiating the prolonged epileptiform discharges (Fig. 4A). Separate effects of ERK1/2 phosphorylation dependent on the pathways of activation has been described in other cell types (York et al., 1998; Schmidt et al., 2000; Mochizuki et al., 2001). In addition, recent studies in the hippocampus show that ERK1/2 activation via Rap1 may be specifically involved in the long-term potentiation (LTP) of the CA1 synapses elicited by theta-burst stimulation of the afferent fibers and that different forms of LTP in the CA1 cells may require different pools of p42/44 MAPK (Morozov et al., 2003).
Activation of group I mGluRs, in particular mGluR5, causes the desensitization of the receptor through phosphorylation by PKC (Gereau and Heinemann, 1998). In view of this property, the lack of significant effects of PKC inhibitors on the epileptiform bursts, which are observed in the tonic presence of DHPG is somewhat unexpected (Fig. 3). Possibly, maximal activation by DHPG of the cellular events underlying the epileptiform burst can be elicited by the stimulation of a fraction of the available receptors and the associated signaling cascade. Thus, an increase in the available functional receptors by removing the PKC-mediated desensitization during tonic agonist activation would not lead to an increase of the response level (spare receptor theory; Brown and Goldstein, 1986). The validity of this assumption requires additional testing.
ERK1/2 and epilepsy
Our data indicate that of the two forms of epileptiform bursts, only the induction of prolonged epileptiform discharges is sensitive to ERK1/2 inhibitors. Short epileptiform, interictal-like bursts appear to be ERK1/2 independent. It is possible that the cellular events elicited by DHPG for the induction of short epileptiform bursts are mediated by signaling steps involving group I mGluR stimulation and the associated G-protein activation. For example, suppression of the background leak conductance (Guerineau et al., 1994; Chuang et al., 2002) and of the slow afterhyperpolarization (Cohen et al., 1999) in hippocampal pyramidal cells appears to arise from a direct action of G-protein subunits. Generation of prolonged epileptiform bursts may require signaling processes downstream from G-protein activation (Chuang et al., 2001) involving ERK1/2 phosphorylation as an intermediate step.
Previous studies have shown that epileptiform activities in various experimental models are associated with alterations in the level of MAPK phosphorylation (Garrido et al., 1998; Mielke et al., 1999; Tian et al., 2000). In addition, it has been shown that inhibition of the ERK1/2 pathway attenuates the frequency and duration of epileptiform discharges (Murray et al., 1998; Sanna et al., 2000). However, available data also suggested that the suppression of ERK1/2 activities in the pilocarpine-model of epilepsy did not prevent seizures (Berkeley et al., 2002). Thus, it is not clear from these studies whether ERK1/2 activation is necessary for the induction of epileptiform discharges or whether the ERK1/2 activation is the consequence of neuronal activities (Bading et al., 1993; Rosen et al., 1994; English and Sweatt, 1996) associated with epileptiform discharges. In this study, in which prolonged epileptiform discharges were induced by the stimulation of group I mGluRs, ERK1/2 activation was found to be necessary for the induction of these discharges. Three lines of evidence support this inference. (1) Peak activation of ERK1/2 by group I mGluR stimulation (occurring at ∼5 min after agonist application) (Fig. 3A) preceded the appearance of prolonged epileptiform discharges (at least 20 min after agonist application) (Fig. 1A,B). (2) The component of the DHPG-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation necessary for the induction of prolonged epileptiform discharges persisted in slices pretreated with iGluR inhibitors and TTX in which neuronal firing was suppressed (Figs. 3A, 5A). (3) Pretreatment of slices with inhibitors of ERK1/2 activation (PD98059 or U0126) prevented the appearance of prolonged epileptiform discharges (Fig. 2A,B,D). Because these inhibitors suppressed both the basal level of ERK1/2 phosphorylation and the elevation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation by group I mGluR stimulation (Fig. 2E), it is unclear which of their effects blocks the induction of prolonged epileptiform discharges. Additional data suggest that at least the elevation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation is necessary. Genistein did not affect the baseline activity of ERK1/2 significantly, yet the agent blocked the elevation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation after group I mGluR stimulation (Fig. 5Bb,c) and prevented the induction of prolonged epileptiform discharges (Fig. 4 A).
Footnotes
This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS-35481. We thank Todd Sacktor and John Crary for helpful discussion.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Robert K. S. Wong, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Box 29, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203. E-mail: bwong{at}downstate.edu.
Copyright © 2004 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/04/230076-08$15.00/0