Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
THIS WEEK IN THE JOURNAL

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 18 August 2004, 24 (33) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded ImageCellular/Molecular

FMRP and the Polyribosome

Giovanni Stefani, Claire E. Fraser, Jennifer C. Darnell, and Robert B. Darnell

(see pages 7272-7276)

Fragile X mental retardation syndrome affects one of every 4000 males as a result of silencing of a gene encoding an RNA-binding protein. The FMR1 gene product, fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), associates with polyribosomes in non-neuronal cells, suggesting that its normal function is regulation of protein translation. However, FMRP association with polyribosomes has not been demonstrated in brain tissue. Now, Stefani et al. report that in cortical extracts from mice, FMRP cosediments with polyribosomes. Furthermore, in cultured neuroblastoma cells, puromycin, which specifically disrupts active translating ribosomes, disrupted large FMRP-polyribosome complexes. These studies support the idea that FMRP regulates protein translation, but many questions remain. For example, how does it affect translation and is the net effect of FMRP enhanced or depressed translation? The authors suggest that FMRP might affect translation of mRNAs already engaged in polyribosomes, perhaps making them suitable for regulation of protein synthesis-dependent synaptic plasticity.

Embedded ImageDevelopment/Plasticity/Repair

Sprouting Mossy Fibers In Vitro

Ryuta Koyama, Maki K. Yamada, Shigeyoshi Fujisawa, Ritsuko Katoh-Semba, Norio Matsuki, and Yuji Ikegaya

(see pages 7215-7224)

In patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, mossy fiber (MF) axons of dentate granule cells sprout recurrent branches that meander to the inner molecular layer and form functional excitatory synapses with granule cell dendrites. The resulting excitatory feedback loops are thought to enhance the development of chronic, unprovoked seizures. Several animal models of seizures induce sprouting, suggesting that it is activity-dependent. This week, Koyama et al. examine the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in MF sprouting in organotypic slice cultures of hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. They found that activation of l-type calcium channels led to expression and extracellular release of BDNF that then acted via TrkB receptors on granule cells to trigger sprouting. Focal application of BDNF beads in the hilus induced sprouting, but bath application did not, suggesting that the trophic effect is attributable to enhanced axon branching rather than chemoattraction.

Embedded ImageBehavioral/Systems/Cognitive

The Channel to Direction Selectivity

Ander Ozaita, Jerome Petit-Jacques, Béla Völgyi, Chi Shun Ho, Rolf H. Joho, Stewart A. Bloomfield, and Bernardo Rudy

(see pages 7335-7343)

Directionally selective retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) activate in response to light stimuli in a preferred direction. The prevention of RGC firing in the opposite direction is thought to originate from GABAergic input from starburst amacrine cells. Starburst amacrine cells are unusual in several ways: they apparently lack action potentials, their distal dendrites are larger than proximal segments, and their dendrites can act independently. This week, Ozaita et al. provide evidence that Kv3-type voltage-dependent potassium channels combine with the features of amacrine cells to allow direction selectivity. Kv3 channels usually enhance fast spiking in neurons because they activate quickly and deactivate quickly on repolarization. However, in amacrine cells these channels appear to act as a voltage-dependent shunt. The radial symmetry of the starburst cells, and the shunt provided by a higher proximal dendritic expression of Kv3, provides a mechanism by which single dendrites respond better to light stimuli moving centrifugally rather than centripetally.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

A starburst amacrine cell in mouse retina visualized after injection with biocytin. Note the characteristic dendritic arborization. See the article by Ozaita et al. for details.

Embedded ImageNeurobiology of Disease

Understanding Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinsonism

Izhar Bar-Gad, Shlomo Elias, Eilon Vaadia, and Hagai Bergman

(see pages 7410-7419)

Many successful therapies develop before the underlying mechanisms are understood. Such is the case for the treatment of Parkinsonism with high-frequency “deep brain stimulation” (DBS). Because DBS had similar effects to local ablation, total inhibition of neuronal firing seemed at first to be a likely mechanism. In this week's Journal, Bar-Gad et al. revisit this issue using microstimulation of the globus pallidus (GP) in an MPTP-injected monkey. They simultaneously stimulated and recorded from the GP, and optimized their recording to minimize stimulus artifacts. Their results suggest a complex response of units in the GP to low-frequency and high-frequency stimulation. Low-frequency stimulation often evoked triphasic responses in neurons whereas high-frequency stimulation “locked” neuronal firing to the stimulus in most neurons. Although the authors could not separate segments within the GP, their results clearly indicate that DBS disrupts activity in a manner distinct from ablation, perhaps by effectively “jamming” the abnormal activity characteristic of movement disorders such as Parkinsonism.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 24 (33)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 24, Issue 33
18 Aug 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 18 August 2004, 24 (33) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 18 August 2004, 24 (33) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.