Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
THIS WEEK IN THE JOURNAL

This Week in the Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 25 February 2004, 24 (8)
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded ImageCellular/Molecular

cAMP and a Retinal Clock

Chiaki Fukuhara, Cuimei Liu, Tamara N. Ivanova, Guy C.-K. Chan, Daniel R. Storm, P. Michael Iuvone, and Gianluca Tosini

(see pages 1803-1811)

In photoreceptors, an autonomous circadian clock interacts with the light/dark cycle to control aspects of retinal function. The circadian pattern of melatonin synthesis in photoreceptors is regulated by arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AA-NAT). Transcription of AA-NAT is under dual control by CLOCK and BMAL1 transcription factors at an E-box transcriptional site, and by a cAMP:cAMP response element (CRE)-mediated site. Fukuhara et al. now report that the gene for type 1 adenylyl cyclase (AC1) also contains an E-box site, and it too is controlled by the CLOCK:BMAL1 complex. The clock genes exerted rhythmic control of AC1 expression, and thus cAMP synthesis, in the retina as well as in the pineal gland and suprachiasmatic nucleus. Because AC1 is calcium dependent, the nighttime increase in photoreceptor cytoplasmic calcium, induced by the depolarizing dark current, increases cAMP and thus melatonin synthesis. The authors suggest that clock control of cAMP signaling may serve a general role in the integration of circadian signals.

Embedded ImageDevelopment/Plasticity/Repair

p75: Lessons from a Knock-Out That Wasn't a Knock-Out

Christine E. Paul, Emily Vereker, Kathleen M. Dickson, and Philip A. Barker

(see pages 1917-1923)

The p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) remains an enigma. It binds all neurotrophins and can activate seemingly opposing signaling cascades. Several transgenic mouse models have been created to address the function of p75NTR in vivo. An exon III-/- mouse expresses no full-length protein but was later found to produce a spliced isoform lacking the external neurotrophin-binding site. More recently, a mouse with a mutation in exon IV was thought to be entirely p75NTR deficient, but it now appears that its high mortality and severe defects may result in part from an unexpected gain-of-function. Paul et al. identified a 26 kDa protein in exon IV-/- mice that contains the transmembrane and intracellular domains of p75NTR. Transcription of the fragment was driven by a sequence within the inserted pGK-Neo cassette in exon IV. Overexpression of the fragment activated p75NTR-mediated signaling cascades leading to apoptosis. The exon IV-/- mouse, although perhaps not the true null it was thought to be, may still help reveal the complex signaling of p75NTR.

Embedded ImageBehavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Motivation, the Brain, and the Adolescent

James M. Bjork, Brian Knutson, Grace W. Fong, Daniel M. Caggiano, Shannon M. Bennett, and Daniel W. Hommer

(see pages 1793-1802)

What motivates teenagers is a question that can baffle parents and teachers. Physical differences in the motivational circuit of the ventral striatum have been suggested as underlying the tendency of some teens to take risks without fully considering the consequences. Does risk-taking result from an “overactive” motivational circuitry or from a hypoactive circuit that requires high-risk/high-reward incentives? In this week's Journal, Bjork et al. compared teen and adult brain activity in the ventral striatum during a money-motivated game. In all subjects, anticipation of monetary gain (20 cents, $1, or $5) caused activation of the ventral striatum, whereas notification of gain activated the mesial frontal cortex. However, teens aged 12-17 showed less activation in the right nucleus accumbens in anticipation of monetary gain than did young adults. The authors suggest that adolescents show reduced recruitment of motivational reward-directed behavior. Okay, but maybe the authors should have tried $20!

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals in subjects who were anticipating responding for monetary gain. Signals in the ventral striatum were bilaterally enhanced in adults (B) compared with adolescents (A).

Embedded ImageNeurobiology of Disease

Friedreich Ataxia in the Mouse

Delphine Simon, Hervé Seznec, Anne Gansmuller, Nadège Carelle, Philipp Weber, Daniel Metzger, Pierre Rustin, Michel Koenig, and Hélène Puccio

(see pages 1987-1995)

Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) is named for the resulting progressive balance deficits and sensory neuropathy, but it is also associated with diabetes and cardiomyopathy. The disease is most commonly caused by GAA triplet expansion in the first intron of frataxin, leading to reduced transcription. Frataxin is a mitochondrial protein that is involved in iron-sulfur complex (ISC) assembly. Reduced function of the ISC can cause oxidative stress and iron accumulation. Although the cellular effects have been studied in yeast, an animal model would facilitate studies of disease mechanisms. Because frataxin-deficient mice do not survive long enough to allow detailed study, Simon et al. created two conditional, neuron-specific knock-out mice. The mice have a normal life expectancy, but they show ataxia and progressive sensory loss as in FRDA. The death of large sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia appeared to be autophagic rather than apoptotic. These mice should help unravel the pathophysiology of FRDA.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 24 (8)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 24, Issue 8
25 Feb 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • AbstractBrowser.pdf
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in the Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in the Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 25 February 2004, 24 (8)

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in the Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 25 February 2004, 24 (8)
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.