Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
A schematic representation of an example of two exposure phases and a test phase from experiments 1 and 2. In the two exposure phases, the open field contains two different objects, whereas in the test phase, two copies of a single object are used.
- Figure 2.
A schematic representation of an example of an exposure and a test phase from experiment 3. In the exposure phase, the open field contains two different objects, whereas in the test phase, two copies of a single object are used.
- Figure 3.
Histological results for the three lesion groups. From left to right, the groups are perirhinal, postrhinal, and fornix. On each section, the largest (stripes) and smallest (semitransparent gray) lesions are shown on standard sections taken from the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (1998).
- Figure 4.
The results from experiment 1, as the mean difference between time spent exploring the objects in the novel and familiar object-place-context combinations, calculated as a proportion of the total time spent exploring both objects. On this measure, a value of zero reveals no difference in exploration of the two objects. Values higher than zero reveal greater exploration of the novel object-place-context combination. Errors bars represent SEM.
- Figure 5.
The results from experiment 2, as the mean difference between time spent exploring the objects in the novel and familiar object-place-context combinations, calculated as a proportion of the total time spent exploring both objects. On this measure, a value of zero reveals no difference in the exploration of the two objects. Values higher than zero reveal greater exploration of the novel object-place-context combination. Errors bars represent SEM.
- Figure 6.
The results from experiment 3 as the mean difference between time spent exploring the objects in the novel and familiar object-place combinations, calculated as a proportion of the total time spent exploring both objects. On this measure, a value of zero reveals no difference in exploration of the two objects. Values higher than zero reveal greater exploration of the novel object-place combination. Errors bars represent SEM.
Tables
- Table 1.
Coordinates of the lesion sites for postrhinal lesions relative to landmarks of ear bar zero (EBZ), bregma (Br), and lambda (Lmd)
Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 EBZ Br Lmd EBZ Br Lmd EBZ Br Lmd AP +0.2 -5.8 +2.0 -1.3 -7.1 +0.7 -1.8 -7.6 +0.4 ML ± 6.1 ± 5.8 ± 5.7 DV +2.8 -8.5 -6.6 +3.8 -7.8 -5.8 +4.2 -6.8 -4.8 -
All measurements are given in millimeters. AP, Anteroposterior; ML, mediolateral; DV, dorsoventral.
-
