Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
THIS WEEK IN THE JOURNAL

This Week in the Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 3 March 2004, 24 (9)
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded ImageCellular/Molecular

Mossy Fiber LTD: You Can Have it Both Ways

Saobo Lei and Chris J. McBain

(see pages 2112-2121)

Synaptic plasticity takes many molecular forms. In this week's Journal, Lei and McBain explore two types of long-term depression (LTD) at CA3 inhibitory synapses between mossy fibers and stratum lucidum interneurons. Both types require influx of postsynaptic calcium, but whereas calcium-permeable AMPA-type glutamate receptors (CP-AMPARs), when present, are sufficient to induce LTD at some of these synapses, NMDA receptors (NMDARs) are required for LTD at synapses expressing calcium-impermeable (CI)-AMPARs. The authors used a three-pronged approach to determine the site of LTD expression in each case. They measured whether the two forms of LTD altered neurotransmitter release probability, the level of released glutamate fluctuations in the cleft, and/or AMPA receptor trafficking in the postsynaptic membrane. LTD expression appeared to be presynaptic at synapses with CP-AMPARs, whereas postsynaptic mechanisms, possibly calcium-evoked AMPAR endocytosis, mediated LTD evoked by CI-AMPARs and NMDARs. The parallel LTD mechanisms give a familiar answer to the question “presynaptic or postsynaptic?” It depends.

Embedded ImageDevelopment/Plasticity/Repair

The March of the reelin-Positive Cells

Keiko Takiguchi-Hayashi, Mariko Sekiguchi, Shizuko Ashigaki, Masako Takamatsu, Hiroshi Hasegwawa, Rika Suzuki-Migishima, Minesuke Yokoyama, Shigetada Nakanishi, and Yasuto Tanabe

(see pages 2286-2295)

The neocortex is organized into discrete laminar and cortical areas with the help of neurons that express reelin, an extracellular protein that governs neuronal migration. This insight was initially provided by two accidents of nature, the reeler mouse and human congenital lissencephaly, a severe migration disorder resulting in a smooth cortical surface that lacks sulci. Reelin-positive cells reside in the marginal zone (MZ), an area derived from the early cortical plate. However the temporal and spatial origin of these neurons is still in question. This week, Takiguchi-Hayashi et al. use cell-labeling techniques to trace reelin-positive cells back to the time and place from which they arose. They found that reelin-positive cells originate in the caudomedial wall of telencephalic vesicles and then migrate to the MZ, forming a caudomedial-to-rostrolateral gradient. Thus reelin-positive cells are generated extrinsic to the neocortex in an area aptly named the cortical “hem.”

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

LacZ-positive descendants from the caudomedial wall of telencephalic vesicles migrate tangentially on the cortical surface of this embryonic day 13.5 whole mount. See the article by Takiguchi-Hayashi et al. for details.

Embedded ImageBehavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Active Head Motion and the Vestibular Nuclei

Jefferson E. Roy and Kathleen E. Cullen

(see pages 2102-2111)

How can we distinguish between our own self-generated movements and those of the external world? This ability to differentiate between so-called “reafference” and “exafference” is something most of us take for granted. Over 50 years ago, Von Holst and Mittelstaedt hypothesized that the brain generates a sensory expectation based on motor output, compares it with actual sensation, and subtracts the self-generated sensation, creating a perception of the outside world. This week, Roy and Cullen provide evidence for such comparison and cancellation during early vestibular processing. They recorded from “vestibular-only” neurons of the vestibular nucleus while monkeys made head movements. These cells are known to receive direct vestibular afferent input but respond much better to passive movements than to self-generated head movements. A cancellation signal was generated only when the activation of neck proprioceptors matched the motor-generated expectation. Thus this mechanism acts to eliminate self-movements from the subsequent computation of orientation and posture control.

Embedded ImageNeurobiology of Disease

Spinal Cord Bypass Surgery

Lucas Campos, Zhuo Meng, Guoli Hu, David T. W. Chiu, Richard T. Ambron, and John H. Martin

(see pages 2090-2101)

Despite some successes, therapeutic repair of spinal cord injury has eluded us. Now Campos et al. explore an alternate route between brain and body: around, rather than through, an injury. After cutting the T13 motor nerve in rats, they inserted the distal nerve stump to the lumbosacral spinal cord, where it resprouted and grew into gray and white matter. The growth holds functional promise: after spinal cord hemisection at L2/3, the T13 nerve “bridge” facilitated muscle contraction and lessened spasticity and wasting. Because the new circuitry is not impeded by scar formation, the therapeutic strategy may work for chronic as well as acute spinal injury. The motor neurons made functional connections with novel targets: other spinal neurons rather than muscle cells. Presumably it would take extensive training to volitionally control these rerouted motor neurons that normally control abdominal muscles, but there seems reason to be hopeful.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 24 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 24, Issue 9
3 Mar 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • AbstractBrowser.pdf
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in the Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in the Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 3 March 2004, 24 (9)

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in the Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 3 March 2004, 24 (9)
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.