Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
THIS WEEK IN THE JOURNAL

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 5 January 2005, 25 (1) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded ImageCellular/Molecular

Neuroligin 1 and SynCAM: The Same and Different

Yildirim Sara, Thomas Biederer, Deniz Atasoy, Alexander Chubykin, Marina G. Mozhayeva, Thomas C. Südhof, and Ege T. Kavalali

(see pages 260-270)

Cell adhesion molecules are considered to be organizers at nascent synaptic contacts. But which ones, and how specific are such transsynaptic interactions? Neuroligin-1 (NL1) and SynCAM can induce “synapses” with neuronal axons when either molecule is expressed in “postsynaptic” non-neuronal cells. This week, Sara et al. show that the synaptogenic characteristics of these molecules are similar in artificial synapses but differ when expressed in neurons. They first cocultured hippocampal neurons with human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells transfected with NL1 or SynCAM. Presynaptic terminals were functional in neurons cocultured with cells expressing NL1 or SynCAM but not other adhesion molecules. Likewise, coexpression with glutamate receptors in HEK293 cells revealed spontaneous and evoked synaptic responses. However, when overexpressed in neurons, only NL1 increased the number of synapsin-labeled puncta, whereas only SynCAM enhanced the frequency of spontaneous miniature EPSCs at 7 d in vitro. Although the underlying mechanisms are not yet clear, the results point to distinct signaling mechanisms for these two synaptogenic molecules.

Embedded ImageDevelopment/Plasticity/Repair

A Sequence of Transcription Factors in Cortical Progenitor Cells

Chris Englund, Andy Fink, Charmaine Lau, Diane Pham, Ray A. M. Daza, Alessandro Bulfone, Tom Kowalczyk, and Robert F. Hevner

(see pages 247-251)

During development, differentiating neurons and glia express a variety of transcription factors that orchestrate this process. This week, Englund et al. examine transcription factors expressed by cells destined to become cortical pyramidal neurons. These neurons can arise directly from radial glial but also may pass through a transitional phase as intermediate progenitor cells (IPCs). Radial glial cells undergo mitosis at the ventricular surface, whereas IPCs divide within the ventricular zone (VZ) or subventricular zone (SVZ) and produce a strictly neuronal population. Using these geographical guidelines, the authors identified dividing cells in the VZ and SVZ that expressed IPC markers. IPCs were characterized by expression of Tbr2, a T-zone transcription factor, and by concurrent downregulation of Pax6, which is expressed by radial glia. Projection neurons expressed a different T-zone factor, Tbr1. Thus a Pax6→ Tbr2→ Tbr1 expression sequence marks cells as they pass from radial glia to IPC to neurons.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Expression of the transcription factors Pax6 (green), Tbr2 (red), and Tbr1 (blue) in embryonic day 14.5 mouse fore-brain (coronal section). Within the cortex, each transcription factor is expressed sequentially at different stages in the differentiation of cortical projection neurons. See the article by Englund et al. for details.

Embedded ImageBehavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Squirrelvision: Orientation Tuning without Columns Stephen D. Van Hooser, J. Alexander F. Heimel, Sooyoung Chung, Sacha B. Nelson, and Louis J. Toth

(see pages 19-28)

In most mammals, including primates and tree shrews, the primary visual cortex is organized into columns in which the orientation preference of neurons remains constant. The preference changes smoothly along the topographical surface of the cortex, creating an orientation map. However, rodents and lagomorphs (i.e., rabbits) seemed to have paid no attention to this organizing principal. Van Hooser et al. hypothesized that the lack of a map in rodents might be attributable to reduced visual acuity or to a visual system too simple or too small. Using the gray squirrel, they found that none of these possibilities applied. Try as they might with imaging and single-unit recordings, the authors were unable to detect an orientation map or columnar organization. Nevertheless, single neurons definitely displayed orientation preference and a retinotopic map. It seems that a columnar organization of functional response properties is not a universal feature of the primary visual cortex.

Embedded ImageNeurobiology of Disease

APH-1a Helps γ-Secretase Stick Together

Guojun Ma, Tong Li, Donald L. Price, and Philip C. Wong

(see pages 192-198)

Intramembraneous cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) involving the γ-secretase complex results in pathological accumulations of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides in Alzheimer's disease. γ-Secretase is also important for proteolysis of other proteins, such as Notch. APH-1, a seven-membrane-spanning member of the complex, exists in four separate isoforms. This week, Ma et al. examine the role of the 1a isoforms in γ-secretase function. They first report that an Aph-1a null mouse was embryonic lethal by embryonic day 11 (E11). Morphologically, the phenotype resembled Notch1, nicastrin, or presenilin knock-outs, consistent with a critical role for APH-1 in embryonic Notch signaling. In primary and immortalized fibroblasts from E9.5 knock-out mice, levels of the γ-secretase complex, its components, and Aβ peptides decreased, whereas APP accumulated. Even the early nicastrin/APH-1a subcomplex was absent, indicating the importance of APH-1 in assembly of the complex. Although APH-1a was critical during embryogenesis, expression of any of the isoforms rescued γ-secretase activity in vitro.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (1)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 1
5 Jan 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 5 January 2005, 25 (1) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 5 January 2005, 25 (1) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.