Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS

Stargazin Reduces Desensitization and Slows Deactivation of the AMPA-Type Glutamate Receptors

Avi Priel, Alexander Kolleker, Gai Ayalon, Moshe Gillor, Pavel Osten and Yael Stern-Bach
Journal of Neuroscience 9 March 2005, 25 (10) 2682-2686; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4834-04.2005
Avi Priel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Kolleker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gai Ayalon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moshe Gillor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pavel Osten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yael Stern-Bach
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Stargazin/γ2 enhances surface expression and reduces desensitization of GluR1 in oocytes. A, Enhancement of GluR1 whole-cell currents by γ2 depends on the amount of cRNA injected and on the incubation time. GluR1 cRNA was injected at different amounts (0.1-5 ng/oocyte), as indicated, without (black bars) or with (gray bars; 1 ng/oocyte) γ2 cRNA, and whole-cell currents in response to 1 mm glutamate plus 0.1 mm CTZ were measured 1.5 and 3 d after injection. In each case, enhancement in whole-cell current after coexpression with γ2 is indicated above the gray bars (n = 14; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for GluR1 (5 ng) injected with 5 or 10 ng of γ2, indicating that γ2 was not a limiting factor at these expression conditions. B, Surface biotinylation assay (performed 2 d after injection) on oocytes injected with GluR1 (0.5 ng) without (-) or with (+γ2; 1 ng) γ2 shows that γ2 mainly enhances GluR1 surface expression and moderately increases total expression. Blots were exposed with anti-GluR1 antibody. C, CTZ enhancement of GluR1 whole-cell currents in response to 1 mm glutamate is lower for oocytes coinjected with γ2. GluR1 (5 or 0.5 ng) was injected, as indicated, without (-) or with (+γ2) stargazin. Currents were measured after 1.5 d without (black bars) or with (gray bars) CTZ. CTZ-dependent current enhancement is indicated above the gray bars. ***p < 0.001. D, Glutamate dose-response (with CTZ) measurements on oocytes injected with GluR1 (5 ng) alone (black circles) and GluR1 (0.5 ng) plus γ 2 (1 ng) (gray circles). The maximum responses (at 3 mm glutamate) and EC50 values were 1090 ± 160 nA, 18.5 ± 0.5 μm (without γ2) and 1400 ± 120 nA, 5.0 ± 0.3 μm (with γ2), respectively (n = 6). At these conditions, responses to 3 mm glutamate of GluR1 (0.5 ng) injected alone were 160 ± 50 nA.

  •   Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Stargazin/γ2 modifies the current profile of AMPA receptors expressed in HEK293 cells. A, B, Superimposed current traces (holding potential, -60 mV) of outside-out patches of GluR1 (A) and GluR2 (B) without (black trace) or with (gray trace) EGFP-tagged γ2. Similar results were obtained with untagged γ2.A, Inset, Western blot of total (T) and surface (S) GluR1 protein expressed with (+γ2) and without (-γ2) γ2 using the surface biotinylation assay [calnexin served as a control (cont) for cell integrity]. C, Deactivation rates in response to a 1 ms application of 3 mm glutamate of GluR1 expressed without (black bar) or with (gray bar) γ2. Each bar is an average (±SEM) of seven cells. ***p < 0.001. Superimposed representative normalized current traces are shown at the top. D, Desensitization recovery rates of GluR1 with and without γ2 measured by two-pulse protocols and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. Each point is an average (±SEM) of five to seven cells.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    The electrophysiological properties of AMPA receptors without γ2 and γ2 mutants

    Construct n Peak current (pA) Steady state/peak (%) τdes (ms)
    GluR1 23 599 ± 130 0.6 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.2
    GluR1 plus γ2 24 1061 ± 194* 9 ± 1** 7.4 ± 0.3**
    GluR1 plus γ2ΔPDZ 9 1183 ± 559 9 ± 2** 8.3 ± 1.1**
    GluR1 plus γ2Δ(265-323) 4 939 ± 447 11 ± 3** 10.0 ± 1.5**
    GluR1 plus γ2Δ(244-283) 5 515 ± 195 14 ± 4** 10.0 ± 2.0**
    GluR2 12 677 ± 279 4 ± 1 9.1 ± 0.4
    GluR2 plus γ2 11 1630 ± 422 27 ± 4** 19.2 ± 1.3**
    GluR2 plus γ2ΔPDZ 4 350 ± 139 14 ± 2** 17.8 ± 1.5**
    • *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001 compared with AMPA receptor expressed without γ2.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (10)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 10
9 Mar 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stargazin Reduces Desensitization and Slows Deactivation of the AMPA-Type Glutamate Receptors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Stargazin Reduces Desensitization and Slows Deactivation of the AMPA-Type Glutamate Receptors
Avi Priel, Alexander Kolleker, Gai Ayalon, Moshe Gillor, Pavel Osten, Yael Stern-Bach
Journal of Neuroscience 9 March 2005, 25 (10) 2682-2686; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4834-04.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Stargazin Reduces Desensitization and Slows Deactivation of the AMPA-Type Glutamate Receptors
Avi Priel, Alexander Kolleker, Gai Ayalon, Moshe Gillor, Pavel Osten, Yael Stern-Bach
Journal of Neuroscience 9 March 2005, 25 (10) 2682-2686; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4834-04.2005
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.