Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Corrections

Correction

Journal of Neuroscience 6 April 2005, 25 (14) 3739
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

In the article “Deriving the Glutamate Clearance Time Course from Transporter Currents in CA1 Hippocampal Astrocytes: Transmitter Uptake Gets Faster during Development,” by Jeffrey S. Diamond, which appeared on pages 2906-2916 of the March 16, 2005 issue, Figures 2 and 9 are shown with excessive noise attributable to a graphics problem. Corrected versions of both figures are shown here.

  Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

STCs get faster during development. A, Synaptic currents in response to single and paired (50 ms interval) stimulation, recorded in a P14 astrocyte. B, Responses as in A, recorded from an adult astrocyte. C, Facilitated STCs from A (black trace) and B (gray trace), normalized in amplitude to facilitate comparison of time course. D, Summary data showing that STCs recorded in adult astrocytes (n = 13) exhibited faster rise times, decay times, and centroids than STCs recorded in P12-P14 astrocytes (n = 13).

  Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.

Effects of 10 μm TBOA on NMDAR EPSCs. A, EPSCs recorded from a P14 CA1 pyramidal cell in control (black), in the presence of 10 μm TBOA (gray), and after washout (wash) of TBOA (black dotted line). Vhold = +30 mV. B, Traces in A scaled to the same amplitude. C, As in A but recorded from an adult (P66) pyramidal cell. D, Traces in C scaled to the same amplitude. E, Summary effects of 10 μm TBOA on NMDAR EPSC peak amplitude in P10-P14 (n = 4) and adult (n = 6) pyramidal cells. F, Summary effects of 10 μm TBOA on NMDAR EPSC half-decay time in P10-P14 (n = 4) and adult (n = 6) pyramidal cells. The bars in E and F correspond to control (black), 10 μm TBOA (gray), and wash (white) conditions. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) compared with control.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 14
6 Apr 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Correction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Correction
Journal of Neuroscience 6 April 2005, 25 (14) 3739

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Correction
Journal of Neuroscience 6 April 2005, 25 (14) 3739
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Correction: Pérez and Merchant, “The Synaptic Properties of Cells Define the Hallmarks of Interval Timing in a Recurrent Neural Network”
  • Correction: Stalnaker et al., “Cholinergic Interneurons Use Orbitofrontal Input to Track Beliefs about Current State”
  • Correction: Goda et al., “Drosophila DH31 Neuropeptide and PDF Receptor Regulate Night-Onset Temperature Preference”
Show more Corrections
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.