Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention

J. Michelle Kincade, Richard A. Abrams, Serguei V. Astafiev, Gordon L. Shulman and Maurizio Corbetta
Journal of Neuroscience 4 May 2005, 25 (18) 4593-4604; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0236-05.2005
J. Michelle Kincade
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Abrams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serguei V. Astafiev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gordon L. Shulman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Corbetta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    a, Examples of the three cueing conditions in the experiment. Each trial began with a central fixation point surrounded by a diamond. The cue display then appeared for 100 ms. After an ISI, the target letter (T or L) appeared in either the left or right location for 150 ms. During the behavioral (Beh.) experiment, ISIs were either 50 or 600 ms, corresponding to cue-target SOAs of 150 and 700 ms, where as, in the fMRI experiment, the ISI and SOA were 2060 and 2160 ms, respectively. Participants made a two-alternative forced-choice decision regarding the identity of the letter (T vs L). b, Group-averaged RT data from the behavioral session. c, Group-averaged RT data from the fMRI session.

  •   Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Cue period. Voxels with a significant interaction of cue type (exogenous, endogenous, and neutral) by time in a group ANOVA, corrected for multiple comparisons, are shown. Because no voxels showed a significant interaction in right ventral frontoparietal regions (IFG and TPJ), ROIs for these regions were determined from the voxelwise map of the interaction of validity by time during the target period in the endogenous condition (ROIs defined by black outlines). Group-averaged time courses are shown for four dorsal-frontal parietal regions that showed significant cue type by time interactions in the voxel-level map and for the two ventral ROIs defined from the target period.

  •   Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Cue period. Voxels in the lateral occipital cortex (LO) and the anterior fusiform (Fus) with a significant interaction of cue type (exogenous and endogenous) by time in a group ANOVA, corrected for multiple comparisons, are shown. Group-averaged time courses are also shown.

  •   Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Target period. Voxels with a significant interaction of cue type (exogenous and endogenous) by validity by time in a group ANOVA, corrected for multiple comparisons (FEF, SMG, and insula), are shown. For comparison, the regions in the IFG and SMG defined by the interaction of validity by time in the endogenous condition are also shown (black outline). Group-averaged time courses are also shown for the cue type by validity by time interaction ROIs, with the exception of the right IFG shown from the validity by time in the endogenous condition only.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Cue period

    Cue period: cue type (endo/exo/neut) by time Cue period: cue type (endo/exo) by time
    xyzz-score xyzz-score
    Occipital
    L LO −33 −86 −1 5.67 −33 −84 −5 5.30
    −36 −67 −11 4.73 −38 −68 −10 3.28
    L LO/MT −43 −72 1 4.13 −44 −71 1 3.70
    R LO 33 −84 1 6.30 33 −84 1 5.69
    40 −67 −10 5.19 38 −69 −7 4.27
    37 −76 −6 4.50
    L cuneus −16 −93 8 4.18 −14 −92 10 4.03
    R cuneus 3 −83 13 3.26 14 −90 8 4.25
    R fusiform 46 −43 −19 3.97
    L ITG −62 −53 −11 3.81
    Parietal
    L vIPS −27 −59 34 3.78
    R vIPS 31 −61 33 3.97 33 −63 35 3.53
    L ant IPS −38 −50 46 3.84 −38 −50 50 3.61
    R ant IPS 36 −49 49 4.56 32 −50 53 4.00
    30 −50 39 4.46 38 −50 42 3.25
    25 −51 49 4.17 26 −45 44 3.62
    L pos IPS/SPL −19 −60 52 4.50 −23 −57 54 3.90
    −13 −59 51 3.15
    R pos IPS/SPL 16 −63 47 4.24
    L precuneus −7 −78 25 4.73 −6 −79 25 3.51
    −1 −78 43 4.01 −1 −78 45 3.70
    R precuneus 8 −69 28 3.65
    10 −73 37 3.40
    5 −49 50 4.52 2 −49 48 3.78
    Frontal
    L precentral −47 −5 37 3.31
    −36 −5 35 3.39
    R precentral 44 −11 44 4.00
    L SFS −29 −4 49 3.66
    L SFS/PreCS (FEF) −26 −12 42 4.94 −28 −4 48 3.55
    R SFS/PreCS (FEF) 24 −12 54 4.56
    38 −11 54 3.46
    33 −15 40 3.70
    R SMA 11 −16 60 3.87 −2 −16 55 3.72
    R IFG 34 47 −4 3.80
    • Talairach coordinates and z-scores for voxelwise interaction of cue type (endogenous, exogenous, and neutral) by time (left) and cue type (endogenous and exogenous) by time (right) are shown. LO, Lateral occipital complex; MT, middle temporal complex; neut, neutral; pos, posterior; PreCS, precentral sulcus; SFS, superior frontal sulcus; SMA, supplementary motor area; SPL, superior parietal lobule; vIPS, ventral extension of IPS.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Target period

    Target: endogenous condition validity (valid/invalid) by time Target: cue type (endo/exo) by validity (valid/invalid) by time
    Regions xyzz-score xyzz-score
    R pos IPS/SPL 14 −68 46 3.84
    R ang/SOG 33 −78 28 4.47
    L SMG (TPJ) −57 −43 31 4.02
    R SMG (TPJ) 51 −51 26 4.04 54 −48 30 3.66
    L ant insula −32 14 −1 3.7
    R ant insula 35 18 7 3.56
    R IFG 48 12 12 4
    L SFS/PreCS −25 −13 45 4.12
    L SFS/PreCS −25 −11 55 3.25
    R SFS/PreCS 26 −6 60 3.64 27 −7 60 3.78
    R SMA 9 2 56 4.07
    • Talairach coordinates and z-scores for voxelwise interaction of validity by time for the endogenous condition (left) and cue type (endogenous and exogenous) by validity by time (right) are shown. ang, Angular gyrus; pos, posterior; PreCS, precentral sulcus; SFS, superior frontal sulcus; SMA, supplementary motor area; SOG, superior occipital gyrus; SPL, superior parietal lobule.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (18)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 18
4 May 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention
J. Michelle Kincade, Richard A. Abrams, Serguei V. Astafiev, Gordon L. Shulman, Maurizio Corbetta
Journal of Neuroscience 4 May 2005, 25 (18) 4593-4604; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0236-05.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention
J. Michelle Kincade, Richard A. Abrams, Serguei V. Astafiev, Gordon L. Shulman, Maurizio Corbetta
Journal of Neuroscience 4 May 2005, 25 (18) 4593-4604; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0236-05.2005
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Episodic Reinstatement in the Medial Temporal Lobe
  • Musical Expertise Induces Audiovisual Integration of Abstract Congruency Rules
  • The Laminar Development of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.