Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting

John W. Krakauer, Claude Ghez and M. Felice Ghilardi
Journal of Neuroscience 12 January 2005, 25 (2) 473-478; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-04.2005
John W. Krakauer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claude Ghez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Felice Ghilardi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Experiment 1. A-D, Rotation learning (open circles and dashed lines) and relearning (filled circles and solid lines) curves for groups 1-4, respectively. Learning is shown by the progressive reduction in the directional error at peak velocity (in degrees) across cycles. Points, representing the group average with SE for each cycle, are fitted by a double-exponential function. Cycles 2-11, which were used in the analysis, are enclosed by a box. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed no main effect of session (learning vs relearning) on directional error (F(1,40) = 1.13; p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between groups (F(3,40) = 15.54; p < 0.0001) and a significant session × group interaction (F(3,40) = 5.97; p < 0.0018). This interaction was driven entirely by the control group (group 1), which showed a substantial decrease of directional error with relearning. E, Percentage change in rotation learning from the learning to the relearning session. Bars represent mean percentage change and SE for each group. ANOVA revealed an effect of group (F(3,20) = 9.10; p = 0.0005), and post hoc tests showed significant differences (p < 0.0083) between the control group and the other three groups but not among the other three groups.

  •   Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Experiment 2. A-C, Rotation learning and relearning curves with washout. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant effect of session (learning vs relearning) on directional error (F(1,30) = 10.828; p = 0.0026). There was no significant effect of group (F(1,30) = 0.097; p = 0.9075) nor a significant session × group interaction (F(3,30) = 0.439; p = 0.649). D, Percentage change in learning from the learning to the relearning session. ANOVA revealed a main effect of group (F(2,15) = 4.17; p = 0.03). Post hoc tests showed a significant difference (p < 0.016) between the control and the 5 min interference group but not between the control group and the 24 hr interference group (p > 0.05).

  •   Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Experiment 3. A-C, Rotation learning and relearning curves with extended training and washout. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant effect of session (learning vs relearning) on directional error (F(1,30) = 21.16; p < 0.0001). There was no significant effect of group (F(2,30) = 1.87; p = 0.17) nor a significant session × group interaction (F(3,30) = 0.009; p = 0.99). D, Percentage change in rotation learning from the learning to the relearning session. ANOVA revealed no significant difference between groups (F(2,15) = 0.046; p = 0.95).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Experimental conditions

    Learning rotation Learning counter-rotation Relearning rotation
    Experiment 1
    Group 1 (6 subjects) B, B, R R (1 week)
    Group 2 (6 subjects) B, B, R CR (5 min) R (1 week)
    Group 3 (6 subjects) B, B, R CR (2.5 h) R (1 week)
    Group 4 (6 subjects) B, B, R CR (24 h) R (1 week)
    Experiment 2
    Group 5 (6 subjects) B, B, R B, R (48 h)
    Group 6 (6 subjects) B, B, R B, CR (5 min) B, R (48h)
    Group 7 (6 subjects) B, B, R B, CR (24 h) B, R (48 h)
    Experiment 3
    Group 8 (6 subjects) B, B, R, B, R B, R (48 h)
    Group 9 (6 subjects) B, B, R, B, R B, CR (5 min) B, R (48 h)
    Group 10 (6 subjects) B, B, R, B, R B, CR (24 h) B, R (48 h)
    Group 11 (3 subjects) B, B, R, B, R B, CR, B, CR (5 min) B, R (48 h)
    Group 12 (3 subjects) B, B, R, R B, CR (5 min) B, R (48 h)
    Experiment 4
    Group 13 (6 subjects) B, B, R B, R (24 h)
    Group 14 (6 subjects) B, B, R B, R (24 h)
    • B, Baseline; R, rotation; CR, counter-rotation.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (2)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 2
12 Jan 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting
John W. Krakauer, Claude Ghez, M. Felice Ghilardi
Journal of Neuroscience 12 January 2005, 25 (2) 473-478; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-04.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting
John W. Krakauer, Claude Ghez, M. Felice Ghilardi
Journal of Neuroscience 12 January 2005, 25 (2) 473-478; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-04.2005
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.