Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
THIS WEEK IN THE JOURNAL

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 10 August 2005, 25 (32)
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded ImageCellular/Molecular

PARP-1 Activation and Neurotrophins

Leonid Visochek, Ruth A. Steingart, Ina Vulih-Shultzman, Rodica Klein, Esther Priel, Illana Gozes, and Malka Cohen-Armon

(see pages 7420-7428)

The nuclear protein poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is activated in response to DNA nicks and thus promotes DNA repair. The addition of ADP-riboses to acidic amino acid residues modifies the chromatin structure and affects DNA transcription and repair. This week, Visochek et al. provide data indicating that neurotrophins can also trigger PARP-1 activation. Brief exposures of cultured cortical neurons to nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), or neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) or to two “neuroprotective peptides” [NAP and activity-dependent neurotrophic factor-9 (ADNF-9)] induced increases in PARP-1 activity as measured by ADP-ribose polymer immunoreactivity or PARP-1 auto-polyADP-ribosylation. Pharmacological studies indicated that the signaling cascade involved tropomyosin-related kinase receptor phosphorylation, calcium release from intracellular stores, and calcium-dependent kinases. However, neurotrophin treatment did not produce detectable DNA damage. PARP-1 was also implicated in the NGF-mediated neurite outgrowth in pheochromocytoma 12 cells. The histone H1 was polyADP-ribosylated after neurotrophin treatment, potentially rendering DNA accessible to transcription factors and repair enzymes.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Expression of Olig2 (red) in vimentin+ (green) immature astrocytes cultured from a postnatal day 3 mouse SVZ. See the article by Marshall et al. for details.

Embedded ImageDevelopment/Plasticity/Repair

Olig2 and Glial Fate in the SVZ

Christine A. G. Marshall, Bennett G. Novitch, and James E. Goldman

(see pages 7289-7298)

Progenitor cells in the postnatal subventricular zone (SVZ) generate astrocytes and oligodendrocytes as well as the interneurons that travel in the rostral migratory stream (RMS) to the olfactory bulb. Noting that the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Olig2 was expressed in glial lineages in the SVZ, Marshall et al. tested whether Olig2 was the determinant of neuronal versus glial fate. In the forebrain, Olig2 was expressed in astrocytes, particularly those with an immature phenotype, as well as oligodendrocytes. The authors used retroviral gene transduction to express Olig2 and green fluorescent protein (GFP) in SVZ cells. GFP-labeled cells migrated into white matter and cerebral cortex but not the RMS. None of the infected cells expressed neuronal markers, and retroviral transduction of GFP alone revealed cells in the RMS and olfactory bulb. A dominant-negative Olig2 construct did not affect neuronal migration, but glial differentiation was disrupted. Thus Olig2 represses the neuronal fate but is required for glial fates.

Embedded ImageBehavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Blocking Caspases in Neuropathic Pain

Joachim Scholz, Daniel C. Broom, Dong-Ho Youn, Charles D. Mills, Tatsuro Kohno, Marc R. Suter, Kimberly A. Moore, Isabelle Decosterd, Richard E. Coggeshall, and Clifford J. Woolf

(see pages 7317-7323)

Neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injuries may involve decreased inhibition in the spinal cord. This week, Scholz et al. examine slowly accumulating apoptotic cell death in the superficial dorsal horn after several types of partial peripheral nerve injury in rats. A month after the injury, 20% of dorsal horn neurons were lost and GABAergic IPSCs were also decreased in lamina II neurons, consistent with loss of interneurons. Block of afferent activity reduced cell death, indicating that ectopic afferent activity in the injured nerve underlies the prolonged time course of cell death after the injury. Intrathecal treatment with a caspase inhibitor prevented the loss of interneurons and IPSCs and reduced the behavioral hypersensitivity to innocuous touch and cold stimuli. The results suggest that neuroprotection may be a useful strategy for treatment of neuropathic pain.

Embedded ImageNeurobiology of Disease

The Spectrum of FGF Signaling on Oligodendrocytes

Dale Fortin, Eran Rom, Haijun Sun, Avner Yayon, and Rashmi Bansal

(see pages 7470-7479)

Orchestrating the activities of a large family is no easy task. However, this week Fortin et al. try to sort out the diverse actions of the fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) family and its receptors on oligodendrocyte (OL) development. There are 22 members of the FGF-2 family, 18 of which are expressed in the brain. Although FGF-2 activates all four FGF receptors (FGFRs), other family members are more selective. The authors used specific FGF ligands and receptor blocking antibodies to examine purified populations of progenitor OLs or mature OLs. FGF-8 and FGF-17 inhibited final differentiation of OL progenitors through activation of FGFR3, whereas FGF-9 via FGFR3 triggered an increase in process outgrowth of differentiated OLs. FGF-18 activated FGFR2 and FGFR3 and thus had actions on both progenitors and differentiated OLs. Perhaps of interest in myelin pathogenesis, FGF-2 led to proliferation of OL progenitors but caused mature OLs to reenter the cell cycle and downregulate myelin proteins.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (32)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 32
10 Aug 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 10 August 2005, 25 (32)

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 10 August 2005, 25 (32)
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.