Abstract
Glutamatergic mossy fibers of the hippocampus sprout in temporal lobe epilepsy and establish aberrant synapses on granule cells from which they originate. There is currently no evidence for the activation of kainate receptors (KARs) at recurrent mossy fiber synapses in epileptic animals, despite their important role at control mossy fiber synapses. We report that KARs are involved in ongoing glutamatergic transmission in granule cells from chronic epileptic but not control animals. KARs provide a substantial component of glutamatergic activity, because they support half of the non-NMDA receptor-mediated excitatory drive in these cells. KAR-mediated EPSCKAs are selectively generated by recurrent mossy fiber inputs and have a slower kinetics than EPSCAMPA. Therefore, in addition to axonal rewiring, sprouting of mossy fibers induces a shift in the nature of glutamatergic transmission in granule cells that may contribute to the physiopathology of the dentate gyrus in epileptic animals.
Introduction
In both human patients and animal models of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), glutamatergic fibers sprout and establish novel synapses that lead to an enhanced glutamatergic excitatory drive, which may contribute to seizure generation (Ben-Ari and Represa, 1990; Nadler, 2003). Glutamate acts on three main types of ionotropic receptors: AMPA receptors (AMPARs), NMDA receptors (NMDARs), and kainate receptors (KARs) receptors. Classically, the activation of AMPA receptors is responsible for most of the glutamatergic excitatory drive on central neurons. However, recent studies indicate that KAR-operated synapses play a more important role than initially thought in glutamatergic transmission (Castillo et al., 1997; Vignes and Collingridge, 1997; Cossart et al., 1998; Frerking et al., 1998; Li and Rogawski, 1998; DeVries and Schwartz, 1999; Li et al., 1999). Despite this important role, it is not known whether glutamatergic fibers establish KAR-operated synapses after sprouting to aberrant targets in chronic epileptic rats. Sprouting of mossy fibers is one of the best-documented examples of seizure-triggered reactive plasticity in human patients and animal models of TLE (Represa et al., 1989, 1993; Sutula et al., 1989; Isokawa et al., 1993; Mello et al., 1993; Franck et al., 1995; Okazaki et al., 1995; Buckmaster and Dudek, 1999). This sprouting leads to the formation of a functional recurrent excitatory circuit between granule cells (GCs) (Tauck and Nadler, 1985; Wuarin and Dudek, 1996; Molnar and Nadler, 1999; Lynch and Sutula, 2000; Buckmaster et al., 2002; Scharfman et al., 2003), which accounts for, in part, the enhanced ability of the hippocampus to generate epileptiform activities in hippocampal slices from animal models and from patients with TLE (Patrylo and Dudek, 1998; Hardison et al., 2000; Gabriel et al., 2004).
In the control hippocampus, several observations have shown that KAR-mediated synaptic transmission is strongly associated to the presence of mossy fiber terminals: (1) the stratum lucidum (the target zone of mossy fibers on CA3 pyramidal neurons) contains among the highest density of KARs in the brain (Monaghan and Cotman, 1982); (2) the stimulation of mossy fibers selectively generate EPSCKA in CA3 pyramidal cells (Castillo et al., 1997; Vignes and Collingridge, 1997; Mulle et al., 1998; Cossart et al., 2002); (3) lesions of the mossy fibers both reduce the density of KARs (Represa et al., 1987) and suppress KAR-mediated synaptic transmission in CA3 pyramidal cells (Cossart et al., 2002); (4) the apparition of EPSCKA in CA3 pyramidal cells is correlated with the postnatal development of mossy fiber synapses (Marchal and Mulle, 2004). Furthermore, the binding profile of radioactive kainate is correlated to mossy fiber sprouting in animal models of TLE and in patients with epilepsy (Represa et al., 1987, 1989). Therefore, we asked whether the formation of aberrant mossy fiber synapses onto granule cells would trigger the expression of functional KAR-operated synapses in chronic epileptic rats.
We report that EPSCKAs are involved in evoked, spontaneous, and miniature glutamatergic synaptic transmission in dentate GCs from epileptic but not control rats. EPSCKAs provide a substantial component of glutamatergic transmission in GCs from epileptic rats, because they represent half of the glutamatergic excitatory drive. The EPSCKAs that display a slow kinetics when compared with EPSCAMPA are generated by recurrent mossy fiber synapses. Accordingly, blockade of KARs significantly reduces mossy fiber network-driven activities.
Materials and Methods
All experiments were approved by the Institut National de la Santé etde la Recherche Médicale Animal Care and Use Committee.
Pilocarpine treatment. Adult male Wistar rats (200–450 g; Janvier Breeding Center, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) were injected intraperitoneally with pilocarpine hydrochoride (325–340 mg/kg) 30 min after a low dose of cholinergic antagonist scopolamine methyl nitrate (1 mg/kg, i.p.). Approximately 60% of the rats experienced class IV/V seizures (Racine, 1972). After 3 h of status epilepticus, diazepam (8 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally. After a seizure-free period of several weeks, the rats experienced spontaneous seizures. Only rats that experienced many spontaneous seizures, which were expected to display a high degree of mossy fiber sprouting (Tauck and Nadler, 1985), were selected for recordings (2–8 months after the pilocarpine injection; mean, 4.55 ± 0.44 months; chronic epileptic rats, n = 36). Some rats were also used 4–5 d after the status epilepticus (poststatus epilepticus rats, n = 2). Agematched rats (n = 20) were used as controls.
Slice preparation. Animals were deeply anesthetized with chloral hydrate (350 mg/kg, i.p.) and decapitated. The brain was removed rapidly, the hippocampi were dissected, and transverse 400-μm-thick hippocampal slices were cut using a Leica VT1000S tissue slicer (Leica, Nussloch, Germany). Slices were then transferred for rest (>1 h) in oxygenated normal artificial CSF (ACSF) containing the following (in mm): 126 NaCl, 3.5 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 1.3 MgCl2, 2.0 CaCl2, and 10 d-glucose, pH 7.4.
Patch-clamp recordings. Whole-cell recordings of granule cells were obtained using the “blind” patch-clamp technique in a submerged chamber (ASCF; 30–32°C) in voltage-clamp mode. Tight-seal electrodes (5–8 MΩ) were filled with an internal solution containing the following (in mm): 135 gluconic acid, 135 CsOH, 10 MgCl2, 0.1 CaCl2, 1 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 2 MgATP, 0.4 NaGTP, and 0.5% biocytin, pH 7.25. Whole-cell recordings were performed using an Axopatch 200A amplifier (Molecular Devices, Union City, CA). Data were filtered at 2 kHz, digitized (20 kHz) with a Labmaster interface card (Molecular Devices) to a personal computer, and acquired using Axoscope 7.0 software (Molecular Devices). Signals were analyzed off-line using MiniAnalysis 6.0.1 (Synaptosoft, Decatur, GA). Access resistance ranged between 10 and 20 MΩ, and the results were discarded if the access resistance changed by >20%. The input membrane resistance (Rm) and the membrane capacitance (Cm) were not significantly different in the dentate GCs from control (Cm = 18.4 ± 2.54 pF; Rm 194 ± 17.9 MΩ; n = 14) and epileptic rats (Cm = 17.7 ± 2.29 pF; Rm 181 ± 26.9 MΩ; n = 12; Mann–Whitney U test; p = 0, 777 for Cm and p = 0, 341 for Rm).
Electrical stimulations. Bulk and minimal stimulations were performed via a bipolar NiCh electrode or a monopolar glass electrode (∼1 MΩ; filled with ACSF), positioned in the inner one-third of the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. For minimal stimulations, the stimulus intensity and pulse duration were progressively enhanced to the lowest values that evoked all or no EPSCs (typically between 20 and 30 μs and 30 and 50 V; 0.2 Hz). Minimal EPSCs were accepted if their amplitude exceeded twice the baseline noise and if they occurred at a constant latency <5 ms. The mossy fiber pathway was stimulated antidromically (40–60 μs; 40–60 V; 0.2 Hz) using a bipolar NiCh electrode in the stratum lucidum CA3b as described previously (Okazaki and Nadler, 2001). Evoked responses were recorded in the granule cell layer with extracellular glass recording electrodes (2–3 MΩ; filled with normal ACSF) using a DAM-80 amplifier (low filter, 1 Hz; high filter, 3 KHz; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL).
Glutamate agonist application. Focal applications of kainate (30 μm in ASCF) were performed via a glass pipette connected to a Picospritzer (General Valve, Fairfield, NJ).
Kinetic analysis. The kinetics of synaptic events was analyzed using MiniAnalysis 6.0.1 as reported previously (Cossart et al., 2002) in a double-blind manner. To quantify the contribution of AMPARs and KARs to synaptic transmission in dentate GCs of epileptic rats, we statistically determined limits for decay times of miniature events to segregate between EPSCAMPA and EPSCKA with a 95% confidence interval. For this purpose, we used the Gaussian curve fitting of the histogram plots of decay times of all mEPSCs. The experiments performed in the presence of AMPAR antagonists [100 μm 1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine (GYKI 52466) or 1 μm 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfonyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide (NBQX)] or a KAR blocker [10 μm (2S,4R)-4-methylglutamic acid (SYM 2081)] enabled us to determine the statistical limit to classify miniature events as EPSCKA (see Fig. 3C, right) (decay time, >5.9 ms; p < 0.05) or EPSCAMPA (see Fig. 4C, right) (decay time, <5.5 ms; p < 0.05), respectively. Using these kinetic limits, selected EPSCKAs and EPSCAMPAs fall beyond a 5% confidence interval for pharmacologically isolated EPSCAMPA and EPSCKA, respectively. Furthermore, <5% of the total non-NMDAR-mediated miniature events could not be classified as EPSCAMPA or EPSCKA in our experimental conditions. The charge transfer through the AMPAR- and KAR-mediated EPSC was calculated as described previously (Cossart et al., 2002).
Statistical analysis. All values are given as means ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat 3.1 (Systat Software, Richmond, CA). For comparison between two groups, the unpaired Student's t test was used if the data passed the normality test and the equal variance test; otherwise, the Mann–Whitney rank-sum test was used. For comparison of one group before and after a pharmacological or physiological treatment, the paired Student's t test was used if the data passed the normality test; otherwise, the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. To compare two Gaussian distributions, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was performed. To compare two cumulative probability plots, the χ2 test was performed. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. n refers to the number of cells except when indicated otherwise.
Morphological analysis. Timm staining was performed routinely on sections used for electrophysiological recordings (Tauck and Nadler, 1985; Wuarin and Dudek, 2001). In brief, sections were incubated for 15 min in an Na2S solution and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Slices were resectioned in a cryostat (40 μm thick) and processed with the Timm solution (Represa et al., 1987). For immunofluorescence analysis, rats were deeply anesthetized and perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Hippocampal sections (40 μm thick) were obtained with a vibratome and incubated with either rabbit anti-glutamate receptor 2/3 (GluR2/3; 1:100; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) or vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGLUT1; 1:1000; Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany) followed by goat anti-rabbit cyanine 3-conjugated (1:200; The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). In all cases, no labeling was detected when specific antibodies were replaced with normal rabbit or mouse serum. Semiquantitative analyses of the intensity of immunolabeling were performed on optical sections obtained with an Olympus fluoview-500 laser-scanning microscope (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) using a 20× lens. For each control and pilocarpine animal, fluorescence intensity was measured in the granule cell layer and molecular layer of the dentate gyrus (eight different hippocampal sections from five different animals). The corpus callosum was used as a reference value for background. All images were acquired with the same scanning conditions. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Student's t tests. The identity of recorded cells was assured by the revelation of the biocytin injected through the patch pipette accordingly to the protocol used previously (Cossart et al., 2002). Only well defined granule cells were considered in the present study.
Chemicals. Drugs were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) (TTX, 4-AP, biocytin, pilocarpine hydrochloride, and scopolamine methyl nitrate), Tocris Neuramin (Bristol, UK) [GYKI 52466, SYM 2081, bicuculline, NBQX, CNQX, d-APV, 2-(2,3-dicarboxycyclopropyl)-glycine (DCGIV), forskolin (FSK), and kainate], and Roche (Basel, Switzerland) (diazepam).
Results
Sprouting of mossy fibers in chronic epileptic rats
As in previous studies (Sutula et al., 1988; Mello et al., 1993; Represa et al., 1993; Okazaki et al., 1995; Buckmaster et al., 2002), an extensive sprouting of mossy fibers was observed in the dentate gyrus of chronic epileptic rats months after the pilocarpine injection and the inaugurating status epilepticus. Using Timm staining to reveal mossy fiber boutons, both the granule cell layer and the inner one-third of the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus were labeled in chronic epileptic rats (Fig. 1E), whereas only the hilar polymorph layer was labeled in controls (Fig. 1A). Because mossy fibers are glutamatergic (Henze et al., 2000), antibodies to VGLUT1, which specifically stain glutamatergic terminals (Fremeau et al., 2004), were also used to assess mossy fiber sprouting (Fig. 1B,F). Instead of the uniform staining with fine spots observed in control slices (Fig. 1B, inset), larger and brighter spots (Fig. 1F, inset) were observed in regions corresponding to recurrent mossy fiber terminal zones (i.e., the dentate granular and inner molecular layers) but not in other regions in which sprouting did not take place. According to this, we found a significant increase in VGLUT1 immunoreactivity in the inner molecular layer and the granular layer (by 152.4 ± 15.4%; unpaired t test; p = 0.001) but not in other regions (i.e., the outer molecular layer p = 0.76). The bigger spots displayed similar features than those observed in the CA3 stratum lucidum (data not shown) and may correspond to the newly formed mossy fiber synapses that are of larger size than other glutamatergic synapses and are highly enriched in clear, round synaptic vesicles (Represa et al., 1993). Therefore, the dentate gyrus from chronic epileptic rats displays sprouting of glutamatergic mossy fibers in our experimental conditions.
Kainate receptor-mediated synaptic events in granule cells from chronic epileptic but not control rats
In control GCs, low-frequency stimulations (0.033 Hz) in the inner one-third of the molecular layer evoked a synaptic current with a rapid decay in the continuous presence of antagonists of GABAA (10 μm bicuculline) and NMDA (40 μm d-APV) receptors (Fig. 1C, left). This current was mediated by AMPA receptors, because it was completely blocked by the AMPAR antagonist GYKI 52466 (Fig. 1C, middle) (100 μm; n = 5), even when repetitive stimulations were applied (Fig. 1C, right) (10 stimuli at 30 Hz). In dentate GCs from chronic epileptic rats (n = 5), low-frequency stimulations (0.033 Hz) of recurrent mossy fibers in the inner one-third of the molecular layer evoked a synaptic current with a fall composed of both a rapid and a slow component (Fig. 1G, left) (n = 5). Application of GYKI 52466 (100 μm) blocked the rapid component but not the slow component (Fig. 1G, middle). The slow component was mediated by KARs, because it was subsequently blocked by the mixed AMPAR/KAR antagonist CNQX (Fig. 1G, right) (50 μm). Therefore, stimulation in the inner one-third of the dentate molecular layer evoked KAR-mediated synaptic responses in dentate granule cells from epileptic rats but not control rats.
We next tested whether KARs can be activated by the spontaneous release of glutamate (Cossart et al., 2002) in dentate GCs from epileptic rats. Dentate GCs were recorded at the reversal potential for GABAergic currents (Vh =–70 mV), a potential at which NMDAR-mediated currents are also abolished by Mg2+ block (Ascher and Nowak, 1988). In dentate GCs from epileptic rats, the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs was significantly higher than that in control rats (compare Fig. 1D,H) (1.65 ± 0.54 Hz, n = 18 and 0.41 ± 0.06 Hz, n = 17, respectively; Mann–Whitney; p = 0.021) as reported previously (Wuarin and Dudek, 2001). Visual inspection of EPSCs revealed the presence of events with fast and slow kinetics in GCs from epileptic rats, whereas only fast events were observed in control cells (compare Fig. 1D,H). The fast events recorded in control GCs were mediated by AMPARs, because they were all blocked by GYKI 52466 (Fig. 1D) (100 μm; n = 5). The slow EPSCs recorded in GCs from epileptic rats were mediated by KARs, because they were resistant to GYKI 52466 (Fig. 1H) (100 μm; n = 5) and fully abolished by the mixed AMPAR/KAR antagonist CNQX (50 μm; n = 5; data not shown). In control GCs, the nonobservation of slow EPSCKA could result from the low frequency of spontaneous synaptic activity in these cells. To address this, we artificially increased the spontaneous synaptic activity in control cells using 4-AP (50–100 μm), a potassium channel antagonist, in the continuous presence of bicuculline (10 μm) and d-APV (40 μm). In the presence of 4-AP, the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs recorded in control GCs was drastically increased (Fig. 2A–C) (from 0.41 ± 0.08 to 1.61 ± 0.32 Hz; n = 5; Mann–Whitney; p = 0.008) and was not significantly different from that observed in GCs from epileptic rats (Fig. 2C) (n = 18; Mann–Whitney; p = 0.146). In these conditions, all non-NMDAR-mediated EPSCs were fully abolished by AMPAR antagonists NBQX (Fig. 2A,B)(1 μm; n = 3) (Bureau et al., 1999; Cossart et al., 2002) or GYKI 52466 (100 μm; n = 2). Thus, KARs contribute to the spontaneous and evoked synaptic transmission in granule cells from chronic epileptic rats but not control rats.
To determine whether the contribution of KARs to spontaneous synaptic transmission in GCs occurred before or after the onset of chronic epilepsy, we recorded spontaneous non-NMDAR-mediated EPSCs in 4- to 5-d-poststatus epilepticus rats that did not express behavioral seizures and showed no evidence of mossy fiber sprouting using Timm staining (data not shown). The frequency of spontaneous EPSCs recorded in GCs from 4- to 5-d-poststatus epilepticus rats was not significantly different from that recorded in control GCs (0.45 ± 0.17 Hz, n = 5 and 0.41 ± 0.06 Hz, n = 17, respectively; Mann–Whitney; p = 1.00) (supplemental Fig. S1A,C, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material), as reported previously (Wuarin and Dudek, 2001). Visual inspection of EPSCs revealed the presence of events with fast kinetics only that were all blocked by the AMPAR antagonist GYKI 52466 (100 μm; n = 5; data not shown). As in control GCs, the nonobservation of slow EPSCKA in GCs from 4- to 5-d-poststatus epilepticus rats could result from the low frequency of spontaneous synaptic activity in these cells. Therefore, we increased the spontaneous synaptic activity in GCs from 4- to 5-d-poststatus epilepticus rats using 4-AP (100 μm) in the continuous presence of bicuculline (10 μm) and d-APV (40 μm). In the presence of 4-AP, the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs was drastically increased (from 0.45 ± 0.17 to 4.57 ± 1.22 Hz; n = 5; paired t test; p = 0.028) (supplemental Fig. S1 A, C, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). In these conditions, all non-NMDAR-mediated EPSCs were fully abolished by AMPAR antagonists NBQX (1 μm; n = 3) (supplemental Fig. S1 A, B, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) or GYKI 52466 (100 μm; n = 2). In conclusion, KARs contribute to synaptic transmission in granule cells from chronic epileptic rats but not control rats or 4- to 5-d-poststatus epilepticus rats.
Kinetics of mEPSCAMPA and mEPSCKA in granule cells from epileptic rats
We next characterized the kinetics of pharmacologically isolated mEPSCAMPA and mEPSCKA to subsequently determine their contribution to synaptic activity in the absence of any antagonist (Cossart et al., 2002). Miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs) were recorded in the presence of TTX (1 μm), bicuculline (10 μm), and d-APV (40 μm) to isolate non-NMDAR-mediated glutamatergic events. There was no significant difference between the frequencies of miniature glutamatergic events recorded in dentate GCs from control rats and those from chronic epileptic rats (0.25 ± 0.09 Hz for controls, n = 14 and 0.27 ± 0.06 Hz for epileptic rats, n = 12; Mann–Whitney; p = 0.487). However, we observed a significant shift toward slower values when comparing the cumulative probability plots of decay times of all mEPSCs recorded in GCs from epileptic and control rats (Fig. 3D) (χ2 test; p < 0.001). In GCs from control rats (n = 14), all miniature events displayed a fast kinetics (Fig. 3A) and clustered in one area of the graph in scatter plots of 10–90% rise times versus decay times (Fig. 3B). The histogram of the decay times of miniature events revealed that fast events belonged to one population, because their distribution was best fitted by one Gaussian curve (Fig. 3C, left). All of these events were mediated by AMPARs, because they were fully blocked by NBQX (Fig. 3A) (1 μm; n = 9) or GYKI 52466 (100 μm; n = 5; mEPSCAMPA; r = 1.29 ± 0.07 ms; τ = 3.26 ± 0.18 ms; n = 14).
In GCs from epileptic rats (n = 12), we observed slow, miniature events (mEPSCslow) in addition to the fast events (mEPSCfast) (Fig. 3A). mEPSCs clustered within two separated areas of the graph in scatter plots of 10–90% rise times versus decay times (Fig. 3B). The histogram of the decays of miniature events revealed that mEPSCfast and mEPSCslow belonged to two distinct populations, because it was best fitted by two statistically different Gaussian curves (Fig. 3C, middle) (Kolmogorov–Smirnov; p < 0.005). Bath applications of AMPAR antagonists (1 μm NBQX, n = 6; or 100 μm GYKI 52466, n = 5) selectively suppressed the fast events (Fig. 3A) as shown by the histogram of the decay times (compare Fig. 3C, middle and right) and the cumulative probability plot of the decay times (Fig. 3D) as well as the plot of 10–90% rise times versus decay times (Fig. 3B). The miniature events that remained in the presence of AMPAR antagonists were mediated by KARs, because they were fully abolished by the mixed AMPAR/KAR antagonist CNQX (Fig. 3A) (50 μm; mEPSCKA, r = 2.53 ± 0.28; τ = 9.83 ± 0.82; n = 11). mEPSCKA and mEPSCslow (recorded in the absence of the AMPAR antagonist) represented the same population of events, because the Gaussian curve fitting the mEPSCKA distribution and the one fitting mEPSCslow were not significantly different (compare Fig. 3C, right and middle) (Kolmogorov–Smirnov; p > 0.1). In keeping with this, the group of events obtained when plotting 10–90% rise times versus decay times of mEPSCKA overlapped that of mEPSCslow but not that of mEPSCfast (Fig. 3B). To pharmacologically isolate mEPSCAMPA in GCs from epileptic rats, we used bath application of SYM 2081 (n = 5), a compound that selectively desensitizes KARs (DeVries and Schwartz, 1999; Li et al., 1999). SYM 2081 (10 μm) blocked the slow events (Fig. 4A) as shown by the histogram (Fig. 4C) and the cumulative probability plot of the decay times of miniature events (Fig. 4D) as well as the plot of 10–90% rise times versus decay times (Fig. 4B). In the presence of SYM 2081, the remaining fast miniature events were mediated by AMPARs, because they were fully abolished by GYKI 52466 (Fig. 4A) (100 μm; mEPSCAMPA; r = 1.20 ± 0.28; τ = 3.15 ± 0.31; n = 5). mEPSCAMPA and mEPSCfast (recorded in the absence of the KAR antagonist) represented the same population of events, because the Gaussian curve fitting the mEPSCAMPA distribution and the one fitting mEPSCfast were not significantly different (compare Fig. 4C, left and right) (Kolmogorov–Smirnov; p > 0.1). In keeping with this, the group of events obtained when plotting 10–90% rise times versus decay times of mEPSCAMPA overlapped that of mEPSCfast but not that of mEPSCslow (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the kinetics of mEPSCAMPA recorded in control GCs and those pharmacologically isolated in GCs from epileptic rats were not significantly different because of the following: (1) the Gaussian curve fitting the distribution of mEPSCAMPA in the presence of SYM 2081 in GCs of epileptic rats and the one fitting mEPSCAMPA in control GCs were not significantly different (compare Figs. 3C, left, 4C, right) (Kolmogorov–Smirnov; p > 0.1); (2) in cumulative probability plots, the distribution of mEPSCs recorded in GCs from epileptic rats in the presence of SYM 2081 was not significantly different from that recorded in control GCs (Fig. 4D) (χ2 test; p > 0.1); and (3) they had similar rise and decay time mean values (unpaired t test; p = 0.776 for 10–90% rise time and p = 0.667 for decay time) (supplemental table, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).
We conclude that in GCs from epileptic rats but not control rats, the quantal release of glutamate generates slow mEPSCKA in addition to fast mEPSCAMPA.
Kainate receptors provide half of the spontaneous and miniature glutamatergic currents in granule cells from epileptic rats
To quantify the contribution of AMPARs and KARs to synaptic transmission in dentate GCs from epileptic rats, we statistically determined limits for decay times to segregate EPSCAMPA and EPSCKA in the absence of AMPAR or KAR antagonists (see Materials and Methods). The mean rise and decay time values of EPSCAMPA and EPSCKA selected using these decay time limits were not significantly different from those of pharmacologically isolated events (n = 12; paired t test; mEPSCAMPA, p = 0.150 for 10–90% rise time and p = 0.646 for decay time; mEPSCKA, p = 0.428 for 10–90% rise time and p = 0.610 for decay time) (supplemental table, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).
Using the kinetic limits, we found that the frequencies were 0.15 ± 0.05 and 0.12 ± 0.02 Hz for mEPSCKA and mEPSCAMPA, respectively (n = 12). Thus, mEPSCKA represented half of the miniature non-NMDA glutamatergic synaptic events (50.8 ± 6.63%; n = 12). We extended this analysis by calculating the mean charge carried by KARs and AMPARs in digitally averaged mEPSCKA and mEPSCAMPA. We observed that, as reported previously in other cell types (Frerking and Nicoll, 2000; Cossart et al., 2002), the mean charge transferred during EPSCKA was significantly higher than that during EPSCAMPA (n = 12; Mann–Whitney; p = 0.014). Considering the frequency of synaptic events and the charge transferred, we estimated that KARs provided as much as half of the total current mediated by non-NMDARs in dentate GCs from pilocarpine-treated rats (56.2 ± 5.98%; n = 12). We next determined the contribution of KARs to the spontaneous activity. The same limits for decay times were used to segregate between spontaneous EPSCKA and EPSCAMPA. We found that a significant part of non-NMDAR-mediated spontaneous events recorded in GCs from pilocarpine-treated rats was mediated by KARs (45.48 ± 6.81%; n = 18). Considering the frequency and the charge transferred, we estimated that half (52.0 ± 6.73%; n = 18) of the non-NMDAR-mediated spontaneous glutamatergic drive on dentate GCs was mediated by KARs in pilocarpine-treated rats.
Therefore, KARs are major contributors to miniature and spontaneous synaptic transmission in granule cells from chronic epileptic rats. We then determined whether EPSCKAs were generated by recurrent mossy fibers in these cells.
Single EPSCKA evoked by minimal stimulation shows pharmacological and physiological features of recurrent mossy fiber synapses in granule cells from epileptic rats
Minimal stimulations were performed in the inner one-third of the molecular layer to stimulate single recurrent mossy fibers in the presence of a high-divalent cation concentration (8 mm Ca2+), 10 μm bicuculline, and 40 μm d-APV. All-or-none EPSCs (Fig. 5A) with slow kinetics similar to mEPSCKA could be evoked in GCs from epileptic rats (supplemental table, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). These EPSCs were mediated by KARs, because they were resistant to applications of NBQX (1 μm) but fully blocked by CNQX (Fig. 5A,B) (50 μm; n = 5). Fast EPSCAMPA (fully blocked by 1 μm NBQX) could also be evoked (n = 2; data not shown).
To ensure that minimally evoked EPSCKAs were specifically generated by mossy fibers, we relied on the well established sensitivity of mossy fiber EPSCs to the metabotropic GluR2/3 (mGluR2/3) agonist DCGIV (Kamiya et al., 1996). In pilocarpine-treated animals, this agent also reduced synaptic transmission at recurrent mossy fiber synapses (Feng et al., 2003). Applications of DCGIV (1 μm) enhanced significantly the failure rate of the minimal eEPSCKA (Fig. 5C,D) (from 64.5 ± 3.12% in control to 92.6 ± 1.39% in the presence of DCGIV; washout, 69.7 ± 3.89%; n = 6; paired t test; p < 0.001). In contrast, the amplitude of the eEPSCKA was not changed (Fig. 5C) (control, 4.04 ± 0.54 pA; DCGIV, 3.71 ± 0.19 pA; n = 6; paired t test; p = 0.549). We also relied on the selective form of frequency facilitation expressed both by control and recurrent mossy fiber EPSCs (Salin et al., 1996; Feng et al., 2003). We found that increasing the frequency of stimulation from 0.2 to 1 Hz reduced the failure rate of the minimal eEPSCKA from 78.8 ± 7.96% at 0.2 Hz to 51.2 ± 7.68% at 1 Hz (Fig. 5E,F) (n = 5; paired t test; p = 0.037). Enhancing further the frequency of stimulation from 1 to 10 Hz did not decrease further the failure rate (Fig. 5E,F) (failure rate at 10 Hz, 51.9 ± 11.2%; paired t test; p = 0.928). Therefore, EPSCKA evoked in the granule cells from epileptic rats displayed specific pharmacological and physiological features of mossy fiber synapses.
Recurrent mossy fibers generate both EPSCKA and EPSCAMPA in granule cells from epileptic rats
To further identify mEPSCs generated by recurrent mossy fibers in GCs from epileptic rats, we tested the effect of FSK, an adenylyl cyclase activator, which has been shown to selectively enhance synaptic transmission at mossy fiber synapses (Weisskopf et al., 1994). Miniature non-NMDAR-mediated EPSCs were recorded in the presence of TTX (1 μm), bicuculline (10 μm), and d-APV (40 μm). Bath application of FSK (10 μm) induced a gradual and long-lasting increase in the frequency of mEPSCs to 380 ± 59% of control (Fig. 6A,B) (paired t test; p = 0.016; n = 5) without significant change in amplitude (see Fig. 6D for the distribution) (116 ± 18% of control; paired t test; p = 0.508; n = 5). The frequency analysis of mEPSCKA and mEPSCAMPA using our kinetic limits showed that both were significantly enhanced 20 min after FSK application (Fig. 6A,C) (to 433 ± 75% of control, paired t test, p = 0.035 for mEPSCKA; to 350 ± 48% of control, paired t test, p = 0.009 for mEPSCAMPA; n = 5 for each). Thus, mEPSCKAs are highly sensitive to FSK application, and this further supports the mossy fiber origin of these events. These results also suggest that mossy fibers generate EPSCAMPA, as reported previously (Okazaki and Nadler, 2001).
To confirm that recurrent mossy fibers generated EPSCAMPA in addition to EPSCKA, we selectively stimulated dentate GCs using focal pressure application of the nonhydrolysable glutamate agonist KA to the molecular layer while recording from a distant GC (Fig. 7A) (Wuarin and Dudek, 1996). Methylene blue was routinely added to the agonist solution to visualize the flow during pressure application and evaluate the spatial extent of the stimulation. Distribution of the ink typically indicated a diffusion of ∼150 μm from the tip of the pipette. We also used a high divalent cation-containing medium (Ca2+ 8 mm), which blocked polysynaptic activities (Berry and Pentreath, 1976), to avoid unspecific spread of activity. Pressure application of KA (30 μm; 20–50 ms duration) directly on the recorded GC in the presence of d-APV (40 μm) and bicuculline (10 μm) generated an inward current that lasted for several seconds (typically ∼60 s) (Fig. 7A). Focal applications of KA with a micropipette placed in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus from a pilocarpine-treated rat, but at a distance of ≥300 μm from the recorded cell, increased the frequency of EPSCs (in 7 of 28 GCs) without underlying current (Fig. 7B). This effect lasted between 30 and 60 s (i.e., in the same range as the current evoked when applying KA directly on the recorded cell) (Fig. 7A). The frequency analysis of EPSCAMPA and EPSCKA showed that both were significantly enhanced (Fig. 7C,D) (to 264 ± 58% of control, paired t test, p = 0.04 for EPSCAMPA; to 244 ± 35% of control, paired t test, p = 0.004 for EPSCKA; n = 7 for each). Similar stimulations in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus from control rats failed to change the frequency of EPSCs in distant recorded dentate GCs (n = 20; data not shown) as described previously (Wuarin and Dudek, 1996). Therefore, the recurrent mossy fibers generated EPSCAMPA in addition to EPSCKA in dentate granule cells from epileptic rats.
To test the specificity of these responses, we determined whether spontaneous EPSCKAs could also be generated by mossy cells that may survive the pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus (Scharfman et al., 2001). Using an antibody against GluR2/3 to label mossy cells in the hilar region (Leranth et al., 1996), we found that some glutamatergic hilar mossy cells survived the status epilepticus (33–47%) (supplemental Fig. S2A, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) as described previously (Scharfman et al., 2001). Using the same focal stimulation protocol in the hilus (supplemental Fig. S2B, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material), we observed an increase in the frequency of EPSCs in GCs (n = 7 of 15) (supplemental Fig. S2C, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) during 30–60 s. However, only EPSCAMPA frequency was significantly increased (to 533 ± 211% of control; n = 7; paired t test; p = 0.024); the frequency of EPSCKA was not changed (107 ± 23% of control; n = 7; paired t test; p = 0.855) (supplemental Fig. S2D,E, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). As expected, in control hippocampal slices, similar stimulations in the hilus enhanced the frequency of EPSCAMPA to 439 ± 136% of control (n = 3 of 4 GCs) (data not shown).
Altogether, these experiments showed that recurrent mossy fibers generate both EPSCKAs and EPSCAMPAs in dentate granule cells from pilocarpine-treated rats.
Blockade of kainate receptors reduces synchronized network-driven activities in the dentate gyrus from epileptic rats
Because mossy fiber sprouting leads to the formation of a recurrent excitatory circuit between GCs in epileptic rats (Tauck and Nadler, 1985; Wuarin and Dudek, 1996; Molnar and Nadler, 1999; Buckmaster et al., 2002; Scharfman et al., 2003) that support synchronized burst discharges (Patrylo and Dudek, 1998; Hardison et al., 2000; Okazaki and Nadler, 2001), we then determined whether blockade of KARs could reduce recurrent mossy fiber network-driven activities. To test this hypothesis, synchronized burst discharges were evoked by antidromic stimulation of the mossy fiber pathway in the CA3b area in high potassium containing ASCF (6 mm) in the continuous presence of bicuculline (Fig. 8A) (10 μm) (Patrylo and Dudek, 1998; Hardison et al., 2000) while recording local field potentials in the dentate granular layer. In these conditions, we were able to evoke burst activities in 9 of 10 slices from epileptic rats but in none of the nine control slices tested (Fig. 8B). We used the coastline burst index to quantify the involvement of KARs in burst discharges (Dingledine et al., 1986). Desensitization of KARs using SYM 2081 (10 μm) significantly reduced the coastline burst index in eight of nine tested slices to 56.8 ± 4.58% of control condition (Fig. 8B) (n = 682 bursts; Wilcoxon; p = 0.008) without affecting the initial population spike (100 ± 6.08% of control; n = 9; Wilcoxon; p = 0.82). Thus, KARs are involved in synchronized network-driven activities supported by recurrent mossy fibers in the dentate gyrus from epileptic rats.
Discussion
The main result of this study is that mossy fiber sprouting in epilepsies induces the formation of functional aberrant synapses on GCs of the dentate gyrus that are endowed with an important KAR-mediated synaptic component absent in control cells. Indeed, whereas control GCs have only a fast EPSCAMPA, GCs from epileptic rats have, in addition to fast EPSCAMPA, slower EPSCKA that provide as much as half of the total spontaneous synaptic glutamatergic currents. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first demonstration of formation of novel KAR-operated synapses on aberrant targets in pathological conditions.
Mossy fiber origin of EPSCKA
In the control hippocampus, mossy fiber synapses display both presynaptic- and postsynaptic-specific features (Henze et al., 2000). On the presynaptic side, these synapses are downregulated by the activation of mGluR2/3 receptors (Kamiya et al., 1996) and present a specific form of frequency facilitation (Salin et al., 1996) via the activation of presynaptic KARs (Schmitz et al., 2001); on the postsynaptic side, mossy fiber synapses onto CA3 pyramidal cells selectively generate EPSCKA (Castillo et al., 1997; Cossart et al., 2002). Previous studies have shown that presynaptic features of mossy fibers are preserved after sprouting in the epileptic hippocampus (Feng et al., 2003). We now report that, in addition to these presynaptic features, recurrent mossy fibers also conserve their postsynaptic specificity, because they generate EPSCKA: (1)
EPSCKA are recorded in chronic epileptic rats that showed strong mossy fiber sprouting but not in control or 4- to 5-d-poststatus epilepticus rats that showed no mossy fiber sprouting; (2) in chronic epileptic rats, EPSCKA can be evoked by minimal stimulation in the inner molecular layer of the dentate gyrus, the terminal zone of recurrent mossy fibers; (3) these unitary EPSCKAs show pharmacological and physiological features specific of mossy fiber synapses such as sensitivity to DCGIV and forskolin and frequency-dependent facilitation; (4) EPSCKA can be generated by the focal stimulation of distant GCs but not hilar mossy cells; and (5) blockade of KARs reduce recurrent mossy fiber network-driven activities. These results suggest that the establishment of new KAR-operated synapses in GCs from epileptic rats is triggered by the arrival of mossy fiber axons as shown previously for CA3 pyramidal cells during development (Marchal and Mulle, 2004). This reinforces and extends the unique relationship between mossy fibers and KAR-operated synapses (Monaghan and Cotman, 1982; Represa et al., 1987; Castillo et al., 1997; Vignes and Collingridge, 1997; Mulle et al., 1998; Cossart et al., 2002; Marchal and Mulle, 2004). Postsynaptic KARs, unlike the widespread expression of postsynaptic AMPARs, are expressed in specific cell types (Huettner, 2003; Lerma, 2003). Among principal cells of the control hippocampus, only CA3 pyramidal cells use KARs as postsynaptic mediators of ionotropic glutamatergic transmission (Lerma, 2003). Additionally, our results show that mossy fiber sprouting induces a reorganization of KAR-mediated synaptic transmission in the hippocampus of chronic epileptic rats.
Properties of aberrant EPSCKA
The EPSCKAs generated in GCs in chronic epileptic rats share common physiological features with EPSCKA described in CA3 pyramidal cells and CA1 interneurons in the control hippocampus (Cossart et al., 2002). KARs in GCs from epileptic rats can be activated by the quantal release of glutamate, because we were able to pharmacologically isolate miniature EPSCKA and to minimally evoke these events. These unitary events display a slow time course and a small amplitude when compared with EPSCAMPA (Castillo et al., 1997; Vignes and Collingridge, 1997; Frerking et al., 1998; Cossart et al., 2002). Their slow time course is most likely attributable to intrinsic features of KARs as observed in other systems (Lerma, 2003) and not to changes of intrinsic membrane properties of GCs after epilepsy. Accordingly, the kinetics of EPSCAMPA was not significantly different in epileptic and control GCs. Furthermore, we show that focal GC stimulations or minimal stimulations of recurrent mossy fibers evoked either slow KAR- or fast AMPAR-mediated EPSCs but not mixed AMPAR/KAR-mediated EPSCs. These observations suggest that, in epileptic GCs, AMPARs and KARs are likely to be clustered into different mossy fiber synapses in contrast to control CA3 pyramidal cells in which most KARs are colocalized with AMPARs (Cossart et al., 2002).
Implications for temporal lobe epilepsy
Previous studies emphasized the role of KARs in epileptiform activities induced by acute administration of convulsing agents in vitro or in vivo (Ben-Ari, 1985; Gaiarsa et al., 1994; Mulle et al., 1998; Ben-Ari and Cossart, 2000; Smolders et al., 2002; Rogawski et al., 2003) and in particular the effects of kainate administration that trigger a seizure and brain damage syndrome that mimics human TLE (BenAri, 1985). In the present study, we were concerned by the fate of KAR-mediated synaptic transmission in chronic epileptic rats that developed spontaneous behavioral seizures. In animal models and in patients with TLE, mossy fiber sprouting leads to the formation of a functional recurrent excitatory circuit between granule cells (Tauck and Nadler, 1985; Wuarin and Dudek, 1996; Molnar and Nadler, 1999; Buckmaster et al., 2002; Scharfman et al., 2003) that support epileptiform bursts (Patrylo and Dudek, 1998; Hardison et al., 2000; Gabriel et al., 2004). Mossy fiber sprouting occurs as a compensatory mechanism to the death of hilar mossy cells and the resulting loss of glutamatergic inputs in the inner molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. Our results show that the overall frequency of mEPSCs in GCs is not significantly different between control and chronic epileptic animals, suggesting that mossy fiber sprouting quantitatively compensates for the loss of glutamatergic excitatory inputs. Despite this quantitative compensation, we found a profound change between GCs from control and chronic epileptic rats, because only the latter use KARs as postsynaptic mediators of ionotropic glutamatergic synaptic transmission. What could be the functional consequences of this change? Because EPSCKA from recurrent mossy fibers represent half of the glutamatergic currents, activation of KARs in addition to AMPARs (Okazaki et al., 2001) should contribute to the epileptiform bursts supported by the recurrent mossy fiber network. Although additional studies are required to substantiate this, the inhibitory effect of a selective KAR blocker on synchronized activities generated by the recurrent mossy fiber network is in keeping with this hypothesis. These observations, together with previous studies, are compatible with an anti-epileptic strategy based on kainate receptor antagonists. Furthermore, the present observations show that the functional consequences of reactive plasticity on glutamatergic synaptic transmission should not only be evaluated in terms of quantitative changes but also qualitative changes. Indeed, whereas control GCs of the dentate gyrus have only fast EPSCAMPA, GCs from epileptic rats have fast EPSCAMPA and slower EPSCKA. Computing studies have shown that EPSCAMPA and EPSCKA encode different features of afferent activity (Frerking and Ohligre-Frerking, 2002): EPSCKAs, with slow kinetics, generate a large tonic depolarization when activated by afferent inputs, whereas EPSCAMPAs conserve the temporal structure of the signal. Thus, the activation of both AMPARs and KARs at recurrent mossy fiber synapses would greatly modify the computational properties of these cells.
In conclusion, we show that, in addition to axonal rewiring, mossy fiber sprouting induces a reorganization of KAR-mediated synaptic transmission in the hippocampus from chronic epileptic rats together with a shift in the nature of glutamatergic transmission in GCs. This, together with other alterations that occur in the hippocampus (Nadler, 2003), might be important for the pathogenesis of temporal lobe epilepsy.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale. We thank Dr. R. Cossart for helpful comments and Dr. M. Esclapez for help with the pilocarpine-treated rats. J.E. is a fellow of the French “Ministère de la Recherche” and was supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.
Correspondence should be addressed to Valérie Crépel, Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Boîte Postale 13, 13273 Marseille Cedex 9, France. E-mail: crepel{at}inmed.univ-mrs.fr.
DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1469-05.2005
Copyright © 2005 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/05/258229-11$15.00/0