Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Corrections

Correction

Journal of Neuroscience 14 September 2005, 25 (37) 8587
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

In the article “Regular Exercise Prolongs Survival in a Type 2 Spinal Muscular Atrophy Model Mouse,” by Clément Grondard, Olivier Biondi, Anne-Sophie Armand, Sylvie Lécolle, Bruno Della Gaspera, Claude Pariset, Hung Li, Claude-Louis Gallien, Pierre-Paul Vidal, Christophe Chanoine, and Frédéric Charbonnier, which appeared on pages 7615–7622 of the August 17, 2005 issue, the blots corresponding to exon 5 and exon 7 have been inverted in Figure 5B,C. The correct version of Figure 5, as well as the legend, is printed here.

  Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Effects of training on the expression pattern of SMN2 in type 2 SMA-like mice. a, RT-PCR analysis of exons 4–8 of SMN2 transcripts showed that the exon 7-containing transcripts were increased in spinal cords of trained mice (T; n = 13) in comparison with those of untrained mice (S; n = 12). The 615-nucleotide (nt)-long transcripts are full-length SMN transcripts, whereas 561-nt transcripts lack exon 7, and the 465-nt transcripts lack both exons 5 and 7. Transcripts lacking only exon 5 were not detected in these experiments. M, Length markers. b, Hybridization of the RT-PCR products by an exon 7-specific primer highlighting the exercise-induced increase of full-length SMN transcripts. c, Hybridization of the RT-PCR products by an exon 5-specific primer showing that the splicing pattern of exon 5 remained unchanged after exercise. d, RT-PCR and Southern blot of GAPDH. e, Central genomic organization of the SMN2 transgene and localization of the primers used for PCR and Southern blot (supplemental Table 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). E, Exon; gray boxes, alternative exons; arrows, primers used for RT-PCR (P3, P6) and real-time RT-PCR (P4, P7); black bars, primers used as probes for hybridization of the Southern blots (PE5, PE7). f, Quantification of exon 7-containing transcripts by real time RT-PCR. g-i, Immunodetection of SMN protein (clone 2B1) in the spinal cord of untrained (h) and trained (i) type 2 SMA-like mice in comparison with control (g). Scale bars, 20 μm.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (37)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 37
14 Sep 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Correction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Correction
Journal of Neuroscience 14 September 2005, 25 (37) 8587

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Correction
Journal of Neuroscience 14 September 2005, 25 (37) 8587
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Correction: Pérez and Merchant, “The Synaptic Properties of Cells Define the Hallmarks of Interval Timing in a Recurrent Neural Network”
  • Correction: Stalnaker et al., “Cholinergic Interneurons Use Orbitofrontal Input to Track Beliefs about Current State”
  • Correction: Wang et al., “T394A Mutation at the μ Opioid Receptor Blocks Opioid Tolerance and Increases Vulnerability to Heroin Self-Administration in Mice”
Show more Corrections
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.