Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS

Integrated Neural Representations of Odor Intensity and Affective Valence in Human Amygdala

Joel S. Winston, Jay A. Gottfried, James M. Kilner and Raymond J. Dolan
Journal of Neuroscience 28 September 2005, 25 (39) 8903-8907; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1569-05.2005
Joel S. Winston
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay A. Gottfried
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James M. Kilner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond J. Dolan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Rationale and experimental hypotheses. a, Previous experiments using pleasant and unpleasant stimuli (Anderson et al., 2003; Small et al., 2003) have shown a main effect of intensity in chemosensory processing, suggesting that the amygdala is preferentially tuned to intensity. However, because these studies did not use valence-neutral stimuli, it remains unclear how the amygdala would respond to the neutral mid-range of valence space (dashed box), which has important implications for interpretation of amygdala coding. In the current study, odors of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant valence were each presented at high and low intensity, permitting a test of two competing hypotheses. b, Hypothesis I: main effect of intensity. Here, the amygdala responses are enhanced to high (vs low)-intensity odors, independent of valence, which would fit with previous findings suggesting the amygdala operates as an intensity detector across the entire valence spectrum. c, Hypothesis II: interaction of intensity and valence. Here, amygdala responses are enhanced only to high-intensity versions of pleasant and unpleasant, but not neutral, odor, implying a greater complexity to amygdala coding involving combined sensitivity to both intensity and valence. Thus, although the diagrams in b and c show equivalent response profiles at the extremes of valence, the inclusion of neutral odor allows the two hypotheses to be distinguished.

  •   Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Experimental design and behavioral data. The experiment corresponded to a three-by-two factorial design. The factors were odor type with three valence levels (pleasant, neutral, or unpleasant) and concentration with two levels (high or low). The plot shows the psychophysical odor space: valence on the abscissa, intensity on the ordinate. Ratings were collected using modified Labeled Magnitude Scales (see Materials and Methods). Both scales are truncated for display. Sl., Slightly; Mod., moderately; Str., strongly. Dark symbols, High-concentration odors; light symbols, low-concentration odors. Error bars show SEM; vertical bars represent error in intensity dimension; horizontal bars represent error in valence ratings.

  •   Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Differential effects of odor valence on intensity coding in the amygdala. Response time courses of amygdala activation for each level of odor concentration and odor type are shown. Data are taken from an unconstrained FIR model and highlight the selective effects of intensity on amygdala activity only at the extremes of odor valence.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (39)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 39
28 Sep 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Integrated Neural Representations of Odor Intensity and Affective Valence in Human Amygdala
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Integrated Neural Representations of Odor Intensity and Affective Valence in Human Amygdala
Joel S. Winston, Jay A. Gottfried, James M. Kilner, Raymond J. Dolan
Journal of Neuroscience 28 September 2005, 25 (39) 8903-8907; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1569-05.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Integrated Neural Representations of Odor Intensity and Affective Valence in Human Amygdala
Joel S. Winston, Jay A. Gottfried, James M. Kilner, Raymond J. Dolan
Journal of Neuroscience 28 September 2005, 25 (39) 8903-8907; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1569-05.2005
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.