Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Functional Specialization in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe

Morgan D. Barense, Timothy J. Bussey, Andy C. H. Lee, Timothy T. Rogers, R. Rhys Davies, Lisa M. Saksida, Elisabeth A. Murray and Kim S. Graham
Journal of Neuroscience 2 November 2005, 25 (44) 10239-10246; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2704-05.2005
Morgan D. Barense
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy J. Bussey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andy C. H. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy T. Rogers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Rhys Davies
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa M. Saksida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabeth A. Murray
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim S. Graham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Three coronal MRI scan slices for one representative patient from the hippocampal (a) and MTL (b) patient groups are shown (arrows highlight regions of significant damage). L, Left; R, right. Reproduced with permission from Lee et al. (2005a).

  •   Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Concurrent object discrimination task. Subjects learned 11 discrimination problems, in which the number of objects was held constant, but the degree of feature ambiguity was varied systematically. Each discrimination problem consisted of four objects, presented in pairs. Two of the four objects were designated correct (targets), and two were designated incorrect (nontargets). In each pair, only one object was a target (shown here on the left). The pairs of objects were presented continuously in a pseudorandom order until the subject selected the target objects for eight consecutive trials. Stimuli, Each object consisted of the conjunction of the following two stimulus features: barcode components (a; individual features shown as letters for illustrative purposes) and bug parts (b; body and legs). Shape and fill were the manipulated features for the blobs stimulus set; body plan and coat pattern were used for the beast stimulus set. For examples of these stimuli, see Figure 3. Ambiguity, There were three feature ambiguity conditions: minimum ambiguity, in which no features were explicitly ambiguous (i.e., each feature was consistently either part of a target or a nontarget); intermediate ambiguity, in which one feature in each object (e.g., legs) was ambiguous; and maximum ambiguity, in which all features were ambiguous (i.e., each feature was simultaneously present in a target and nontarget object).

  •   Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Mean errors to criterion (8 consecutive correct responses) for the two patient groups and two control groups (averaged) for blobs (a), barcodes (b), bugs (c), and beasts (d) are shown. There was no significant difference between the young and old controls. One MTL patient was unable to achieve the criterion of eight consecutive correct for maximum-ambiguity blobs, intermediate-ambiguity barcodes, and maximum-ambiguity barcodes (>140 trials). Objects used in the maximum-ambiguity condition of each stimulus type are shown on each graph. Correct objects are depicted on the left; incorrect objects are on the right. Error bars represent SEM. **p < 0.01 (MTL group vs control).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Structural MRI scan ratings (with SDs) for various brain regions (ordered from anterior to posterior location in the brain), averaged across both hemispheres

    AntTemp Amyg PHG MBCS LBCS MBOS AntHC LatTemp PostHC
    HC1 1* 1 0.75* 0.75 0.25 0 1.5* 1 0.75
    HC2 0 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25 0 2* 0 0.25
    HC3 0 0 0.75* 0.75 0.5 0.25 1.25* 0.5 1
    HC4 0.5 0.25 0 0.75 0.25 0.25 1.5* 0.25 1
    MTL1 2* 2.25* 1.5* 1* 1.25* 2* 1.75* 1.75* 1.75*
    MTL2 2* 3* 2.5* 2.75* 2.5* 2* 3* 1 2.75*
    MTL3 1.75* 2.75* 2.75* 2.75* 2.5* 2.5* 2* 0.5 2*
    HC group mean 0.375 (0.479) 0.438 (0.427) 0.438 (0.375) 0.688 (0.125) 0.313 (0.125) 0.125 (0.144) 1.56* (0.315) 0.438 (0.427) 0.750 (0.354)
    MTL group mean 1.917* (0.144) 2.667* (0.382) 2.250* (0.661) 2.167* (1.01) 2.083* (0.722) 2.167* (0.289) 2.25* (0.661) 1.083 (0.629) 2.167* (0.520)
    Control group mean 0.313 (0.284) 0.375 (0.483) 0.188 (0.188) 0.521 (0.291) 0.271 (0.310) 0.333 (0.289) 0.458 (0.382) 0.458 (0.411) 0.271 (0.361)
    • 0 indicates no visible damage; 3 (4 for anterior hippocampus) indicates complete absence of area. The rating for each individual patient and the mean of each subject group is listed. HC, Hippocampal; AntTemp, anterior temporal cortex; Amyg, amygdala; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus (corresponding to entorhinal cortex); MBCS, medial bank of collateral sulcus (corresponding to the transition between entorhinal and perirhinal cortex); LBCS, lateral bank of collateral sulcus (corresponding to perirhinal cortex); MBOS, medial bank of occipitotemporal sulcus (corresponding to the transition between perirhinal and isocortex); AntHC, anterior hippocampus; LatTemp, lateral temporal cortex (likely to correspond to TE); PostHC, posterior hippocampus.

    • ↵* Significant difference compared with control mean.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (44)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 44
2 Nov 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional Specialization in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Functional Specialization in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe
Morgan D. Barense, Timothy J. Bussey, Andy C. H. Lee, Timothy T. Rogers, R. Rhys Davies, Lisa M. Saksida, Elisabeth A. Murray, Kim S. Graham
Journal of Neuroscience 2 November 2005, 25 (44) 10239-10246; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2704-05.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Functional Specialization in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe
Morgan D. Barense, Timothy J. Bussey, Andy C. H. Lee, Timothy T. Rogers, R. Rhys Davies, Lisa M. Saksida, Elisabeth A. Murray, Kim S. Graham
Journal of Neuroscience 2 November 2005, 25 (44) 10239-10246; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2704-05.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.