Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Specificity in the Projections of Prefrontal and Insular Cortex to Ventral Striatopallidum and the Extended Amygdala

Sheila M. Reynolds and Daniel S. Zahm
Journal of Neuroscience 14 December 2005, 25 (50) 11757-11767; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3432-05.2005
Sheila M. Reynolds
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel S. Zahm
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Representative examples of each of the six pairs of injections of retrograde tracers evaluated in this study. A, CPu and AcbC. B, CPu and AcbS. C, CPu and the dorsolateral subdivision of the BST. D, BST and AcbS. E, CeA and AcbS. F, CeA and BST. Photomicrographs corresponding to A–C are shown directly below the respective panels.

  •   Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    A1–C3, Photomicrographs showing single- and double-labeled cells in orbital cortex of a CPu–AcbC case visualized by immunofluorescence with single-band filters (A1, A2), immunofluorescence with a dual-band filter (B), and confocal microscopy (C1–C3). Double-labeled cells (asterisks) are yellow. A double-labeled neuron in which the two fluorophores were unevenly exhibited appear slightly yellow (caret in C3). Note that B is not a merged image but rather shows, with the dual-band filter, the same field illustrated in A1 and A2 with single band filters. Alternatively, C3 is the merged image of C1 and C2.

  •   Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Plots of retrograde labeling in the prefrontal cortex produced in representative cases for each of the following injection pairs: A, CPu–AcbC; B, CPu–AcbS; C, BST–AcbS; D, CeA–BST. DBL, Double-labeled neurons; AC, anterior cingulate; PrC, precentral cortex; PL, prelimbic; IL, infralimbic; DP, dorsal peduncular; AI, agranular insular; VO, ventral orbital; LO, lateral orbital; DLO, dorsolateral orbital.

  •   Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Plots of retrograde labeling in the insular cortex at anterior, middle, and posterior levels in representative cases for the following injection pairs: A, CPu–AcbC; B, CPu–AcbS; C, BST–AcbS; D, CeA-BST. DBL, Double-labeled neurons; GI, granular insular; DI, dysgranular insular; AI, agranular insular.

  •   Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Mean (±SEM) retrograde single labeling in prefrontal and insular cortices produced by homotypic and heterotypic pairs of tracer injections in ventral striatal and extended amygdala sites. Within the medial prefrontal cortex, ventral striatal and extended amygdala displayed distinguishing characteristics in the amount of retrograde labeling (A) (F(4,35) = 5.53; p < 0.005), dorsoventral distribution of labeling (B)(F(12,143) = 12.10; p < 0.001), and anteroposterior labeling distribution within prelimbic (C)(F(4,71) = 6.37; p < 0.001) and infralimbic (D)(F(4,71) = 7.79; p < 0.001) cortices. E, AcbC-induced labeling dominated the lateral prefrontal cortex compared with all other sites examined (F(4,35) = 5.92; p = 0.001). F, CPu and AcbC injections produced the most labeling in orbital cortex (F(4,35) = 10.16; p < 0.001), which followed a medial-to-lateral gradient (G) (F(2,35) = 43.67; p < 0.001). Retrograde labeling in the insular cortex was strongest after AcbC and CeA injections (H) (F(4,35) = 6.42; p < 0.001), localized mainly within the agranular insular cortex (I) (F(2,107) = 38.87; p < 0.001), and displayed different anteroposterior labeling distributions for striatal versus extended amygdala injection sites (J)(F(8,107) = 4.05; p < 0.001). AC, Anterior cingulate; PrC, precentral cortex; PL, prelimbic; IL, infralimbic; DP, dorsal peduncular; GI, granular insular; DI, dysgranular insular; AI, agranular insular; VO, ventral orbital; LO, lateral orbital; DLO, dorsolateral orbital. #p < 0.05 compared with CeA; *p < 0.05 compared with CPu; **p < 0.05 compared with the highest bar for each site; †p < 0.05 compared with posterior; ‡p < 0.05 compared with AcbC; *** p < 0.05 compared with VO.

  •   Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Mean (±SEM) double labeling produced by injection pairs throughout prefrontal and insular cortices. CPu–AcbC pairs produced significantly more double labels than any other injection pair in the medial prefrontal cortex (A)(F(5,17) = 11.60; p < 0.001), lateral prefrontal cortex (B) (F(5,17) = 2.61; p = 0.08), and orbital cortex (C) (F(5,17) = 9.31; p < 0.001), where CPu–AcbC double labels were found along a strong medial-to-lateral gradient (D) (F(2,8) = 39.97). In the agranular insular cortex, both CPu-AcbC and CeA-BST pairs produced strong double labeling (E) (F(5,17) = 7.26; p < 0.005) that differed strikingly in distribution along the anterior–posterior axis (F)(F(2,17) = 10.70; p < 0.005). PrC, Precentral cortex; AC, anterior cingulate; PL, prelimbic; IL, infralimbic; DP, dorsal peduncular; AI, agranular insular; VO, ventral orbital; LO, lateral orbital; DLO, dorsolateral orbital. *p < 0.05 compared with CPu-AcbC group, **p < 0.05 compared with VO.

  •   Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Photomicrographs of retrograde labeling produced in the insular cortex by a CeA–AcbC injection pair. A, Distribution of single labeling in the rostral insular cortex produced by CeA (black) and AcbC (brown) injections. B, Enlargement of A. C, Posterior insular level. D, Enlargement of C. Note that the distributions of retrogradely labeled neurons produced by the two injections interdigitate and that double-labeled neurons are negligible.

  •   Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Mean percentage overlap (±SEM) and percentage of double labeling (±SEM) produced by each injection pair. A, CPu–AcbC and CeA–BST pairs showed significantly greater overlap in prefrontocortical retrograde labeling distributions compared with CPu–BST, CPu–AcbS, or CeA–AcbS pairs (F(5,35) = 6.70; p < 0.001), but only CPu–AcbC pairs also showed greater double labeling (F(5,35) = 27.96; p < 0.001). B, In the insular cortex, both CPu–AcbC and CeA–BST pairs produced high overlap (F(5,35) = 5.81; p < 0.001; p < 0.05) and double labeling (F(5,35) = 6.34; p < 0.001) compared with CPu–AcbS and CeA–AcbS pairs. *p < 0.05 for overlap; **p < 0.05 for overlap and double labeling.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Stereotaxic coordinatesa for injection sites

    AP ML DV
    CPu +0.7 -2.0 -5.0
    AcbC +1.5 -1.4 -6.5
    AcbS +1.0 -1.0 -6.7
    BST -0.4 -1.8 -6.7
    CeA -2.5 -4.3 -6.7
    • AP, Anteroposterior; ML, mediolateral; DV, dorsoventral.

    • ↵ a In millimeters relative to bregma, using flat-skull techniques.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Injection sites illustrated in Figure 1

    Case CPu AcbC AcbS BST CeA
    CPu—AcbC (2.0 ± 0.1) (Fig. 1A)
        04109 CTβ FG
        04114 FG CTβ
        04129 FG CTβ
    CPu—AcbS (1.7 ± 0.3) (Fig. 1B)
        03160 FG CTβ
        03291 CTβ FG
        04108 FG CTβ
    CPu—BST (2.1 ± 0.1) (Fig. 1C)
        04040 CTβ FG
        04054 FG CTβ
        04111 FG CTβ
    BST—AcbS (1.2 ± 0.1) (Fig. 1D)
        03296 FG CTβ
        03308 FG CTβ
        03310 FG CTβ
    CeA—AcbS (4.7 ± 0.2) (Fig. 1E)
        04014 CTβ FG
        04073 FG CTβ
        04119 CTβ FG
    CeA—BST (3.5 ± 0.1) (Fig. 1F)
        04013 CTβ FG
        04024 FG CTβ
        04026 CTβ FG
    • Values in parentheses are the mean ± SEM (in mm) between the two injection centers (n = 3).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (50)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 50
14 Dec 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Specificity in the Projections of Prefrontal and Insular Cortex to Ventral Striatopallidum and the Extended Amygdala
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Specificity in the Projections of Prefrontal and Insular Cortex to Ventral Striatopallidum and the Extended Amygdala
Sheila M. Reynolds, Daniel S. Zahm
Journal of Neuroscience 14 December 2005, 25 (50) 11757-11767; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3432-05.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Specificity in the Projections of Prefrontal and Insular Cortex to Ventral Striatopallidum and the Extended Amygdala
Sheila M. Reynolds, Daniel S. Zahm
Journal of Neuroscience 14 December 2005, 25 (50) 11757-11767; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3432-05.2005
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Laminar Development of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex
  • Individual Differences in Amygdala-Medial Prefrontal Anatomy Link Negative Affect, Impaired Social Functioning, and Polygenic Depression Risk
  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.