Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleNeurobiology of Disease

D2 Dopamine Receptors Colocalize Regulator of G-Protein Signaling 9-2 (RGS9-2) via the RGS9 DEP Domain, and RGS9 Knock-Out Mice Develop Dyskinesias Associated with Dopamine Pathways

Abraham Kovoor, Petra Seyffarth, Jana Ebert, Sami Barghshoon, Ching-Kang Chen, Sigrid Schwarz, Jeffrey D. Axelrod, Benjamin N. R. Cheyette, Melvin I. Simon, Henry A. Lester and Johannes Schwarz
Journal of Neuroscience 23 February 2005, 25 (8) 2157-2165; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2840-04.2005
Abraham Kovoor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petra Seyffarth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jana Ebert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sami Barghshoon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ching-Kang Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sigrid Schwarz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey D. Axelrod
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin N. R. Cheyette
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melvin I. Simon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry A. Lester
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Schwarz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  •   Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Schematic representation (N to C terminus) of the RGS9 constructs. The numbers in parentheses indicate the position of each indicated domain in the original wild-type protein. The numbers at either end of the open boxes represent the span of the wild-type protein used in each construct. A, Schematic representation and domain composition of full-length wild-type RGS9-2. B, The full-length RGS9-2-EGFP fusion construct. The black bar between the RGS9-2 and EGFP represents a flexible spacer/linker with the following sequence: GSGGGSG. C, The DEPless RGS9-2-EGFP fusion construct in which the N-terminal region of RGS9 containing the DEP domain was deleted but was otherwise identical to the full-length RGS9-2-EGFP fusion. D, The RGS9 DEP domain fusion construct. The linker represented by the black bar has the following sequence: GDPPVAT. GGL, G-protein γ-subunit-like domain.

  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Behavioral effects of dopamine agonists in reserpinized or haloperidol-treated mice and distribution of D2DR and RGS9-2 in wild-type striatal neurons. Mice were injected once per day for 3 d with reserpine or haloperidol (see Materials and Methods). Three days after recovery, them ice were injected with dopaminergic agonists. Open bars represent wild-type mice, and filled bars represent RGS9-deficient mice. A, Quantification of abnormal involuntary movements in reserpinized mice after apomorphine (apo; n = 13 and 18 in wild-type and knock-out, respectively), quinpirole (quin; n = 10, 14), or SKF 38393 (SKF; n = 9, 8) injection (# and * indicate significant differences between genotypes; p < 0.01; Wilcoxon rank test). B, Locomotion measured (for 15 min) in the reserpinized mice (from A) immediately before (baseline) and after apo, quin, or SKF injection (*p < 0.01; t test). C, Quantification of AIM in haloperidol-treated mice after quin or SKF injection (n = 10; *p < 0.01; Wilcoxon rank test). D, D2 DR distribution (red; left), RGS9-2 distribution (green; middle), and their overlay (right) in a striatal section. The left and middle panels represent sequential confocal scans of the same field. E, D1DR distribution (red; left), RGS9-2 distribution (green; middle), and their overlay (right) in a striatal section. The left and middle panels represent sequential confocal scans of the same field. Scale bar: (in D) D, E, 10 μm. Error bars represent SEM.

  •   Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effects of the D2-like DR agonist quinpirole (quin) on excitatory currents elicited from medium spiny striatal neurons. A, Representative traces of currents evoked from the same voltage-clamped (-70 mV) striatal medium spiny neuron in response to glutamate (glut; 100 μm; black trace) or glutamate and quinpirole (glut, 100 μm plus quin, 100 μm; gray trace). Left, Wild-type neuron; right, RGS9-deficient neuron. Black bars above the traces represent drug application. B, Glut- and quin-elicited current expressed as a percentage of the current evoked by glut alone (100 μm) from wild-type (open bars) and RGS9-deficient (filled black bars) neurons. The mean ± SEM peak current amplitudes in picoamperes for wild-type cells were: glut alone, 607 ± 81 (n = 9); glut plus 1 μm quin, 488 ± 63 (n = 9); glut plus 10 μm quin, 574 ± 85 (n = 9); glut plus 100 μm quin, 602 ± 108 (n = 9); and for RGS9-deficient cells: glut alone, 316 ± 71 (n = 9); glut plus 1 μm quin, 257 ± 54 (n = 8); glut plus 10 μm quin, 250 ± 52 (n = 6); glut plus 100 μm quin, 155 ± 52 (n = 8). C, Current evoked by NMDA (100 μm; n = 7) or AMPA (10 μm; n = 5) in the presence of quin (100 μm) expressed as a percentage of the current evoked, respectively, by NMDA or AMPA alone from RGS9-deficient neurons. The mean ± SEM peak current amplitudes in picoamperes were as follows: NMDA alone, 442 ± 106; NMDA plus quin, 230 ± 87; AMPA alone, 266 ± 66; AMPA plus quin, 247 ± 28. The # symbol indicates that the quinpirole-sensitive fraction of the current differs significantly from zero. p values using a paired t test are 0.03, 0.04, and 0.008 at 1, 10, and 100 μm quinpirole, respectively. The corresponding p values for the wild-type animals were 0.07, 0.8, and 0.9, respectively. The asterisk indicates that the quinpirole-sensitive fraction of the current differs significantly from the corresponding wild-type sample. p < 0.01; ANOVA. Error bars represent SEM.

  •   Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Distribution of D2DR and RGS9-2 in transfected CHO and PC12 cells. D2DR distribution is depicted in red, whereas RGS9-2 constructs and EGFP are shown in green. A, D2DR distribution in CHO cells that were transfected with cDNA for D2DR alone. B, RGS9-2 distribution in CHO cells that were transfected with cDNA for the RGS9-2 alone. C, D2DR distribution (red; left) and RGS9-2 distribution (green; right) in CHO cells transfected with cDNA for both D2DR and the RGS9-2. D, EGFP distribution in CHO cells transfected with cDNA for EGFP alone. E, D2DR distribution (red; left) and EGFP distribution (green; right) in CHO cells transfected with cDNA for both D2DR and EGFP. F, DEPless RGS9-2 distribution in CHO cells that were transfected with cDNA for DEPless RGS9-2. G, D2DR distribution (red; left) and DEPless RGS9-2 distribution (green; right) in CHO cells transfected with cDNA for both D2 DR and DEPless RGS9-2. H, RGS9 DEP domain distribution in CHO cells that were transfected with cDNA for the RGS9 DEP domain alone. I, D2DR distribution (red; left) and RGS9 DEP domain distribution (green; right) in CHO cells transfected with cDNA for both D2DR and RGS9 DEP domain. J, D2DR distribution in PC12 cells that were transfected with cDNA for D2DR alone. K, RGS9-2 distribution in PC12 cells that were transfected with cDNA for the RGS9-2 fusion protein alone. L, D2DR distribution (red; left) and RGS9-2 distribution (green; right) in PC12 cells transfected with cDNA for both D2DR and the RGS9-2 fusion construct. M, DEPless RGS9-2 distribution in PC12 cells that were transfected with cDNA for DEPless RGS9-2. N, D2DR distribution (red; left) and DEPless RGS9-2 distribution (green; right) in PC12 cells transfected with cDNA for both D2DR and DEPless RGS9-2. The left and right pictures, respectively, in panels C, E, G, I, L, and N represent confocal scans of the same field. Outlines of cells in which the specific fluorescent signal does not extend to the cell boundary are marked out with a yellow dashed line. Each CHO cell image is representative of the distribution pattern in >90% of cells in at least five observed fields, each containing >50 cells transfected with the relevant constructs. For PC12 cells, each image is representative of the distribution pattern observed in >90% of cells from at least 20 observed fields, each containing at least one cell transfected with the relevant constructs. Scale bar: (in A) A-N, 5 μm.

  •   Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Distribution of m1-mAChR, D1DR, m2-mAChR, and RGS9-2 in transfected CHO cells and effect of RGS9-2 and DEPless RGS9-2 on the deactivation kinetics of D2DR- or m2-mAChR-elicited GIRK currents in Xenopus oocytes. A, m1-mAChR (labeled m1-mR) distribution in cells that were transfected with cDNA for D2DR alone. B, m1-mR distribution (red; left) and RGS9-2 distribution (green; right) in cells transfected with cDNA for both m1-mR and RGS9-2. C, D1DR distribution in cells that were transfected with cDNA for D1DR alone. D, D1DR distribution (red; left) and RGS9-2 distribution (green; right) in cells transfected with cDNA for both D1DR and the RGS9-2. E, m2-mAChR (labeled m2-mR) distribution in cells that were transfected with cDNA for D2DR alone. F, m2-mR distribution (red; left) and RGS9-2 distribution (green; right) in cells transfected with cDNA for both D2DR and RGS9-2. The left and right pictures, respectively, in B, D, and F represent confocal scans of the same field. Outlines of cells in which the fluorescence does not extend to the cell boundary are marked out with a yellow dashed line. Each image is representative of the distribution pattern in >90% of cells in at least five observed fields, each containing >50 cells transfected with the relevant constructs. Scale bar: (in A) A-F, 5 μm. In the Xenopus oocyte experiments, control oocytes were injected with cRNA for m2-mR, GIRK1, and GIRK2 or with cRNA for D2DR, GIRK1, and GIRK2. Some oocytes in each of the control groups were also injected with cRNA for either RGS9-2 or for the DEPless RGS9-2. G, H, Representative normalized traces of deactivation waveforms for dopamine-evoked (dop; D2DR agonist; 100 nm; red trace) and acetylcholine-evoked (m2-mR agonist; 100 nm; black trace) GIRK currents recorded from the oocyte group expressing the appropriate receptor and either RGS9-2 (G) or DEPless RGS9-2 (H). The horizontal bar above the traces represents either dopamine or acetylcholine application. I, Deactivation rate constants, koff (1/τdeactivation), were from exponential fits of the deactivation phase of the GIRK currents. For each receptor, acceleration of deactivation by RGS9-2 was calculated as follows: (individual values for koff in the oocytes injected with RGS9-2 cRNA)/(mean koff in the corresponding control group lacking RGS9-2). Acceleration of deactivation by DEPless RGS9-2 was calculated similarly. All bars are means ± SEM from the same oocyte donor (red open bar, D2DR response; black open bar, m2-mR response; * indicates significant difference; p < 0.05; Student's t test). In the experiment measuring RGS9-2-mediated acceleration of the deactivation kinetics, the mean ± SEM koff values in seconds-1 for the different oocyte groups were as follows: D2DR, 0.057 ± 0.006 (n = 4); D2DR plus RGS9-2, 0.102 ± 0.007 (n = 5); m2-mR, 0.055 ± 0.003 (n = 5); m2-mR plus RGS9-2, 0.078 ± 0.004 (n = 5), and the mean ± SEM steady-state current amplitudes in nanoamperes were: D2DR, 1094 ± 284; D2DR plus RGS9-2, 1125 ± 128; m2-mR, 1460 ± 153; m2-mR plus RGS9-2, 1416 ± 102. In the experiment measuring DEPless RGS9-2-mediated acceleration, the mean ± SEM koff values in seconds-1 were as follows: D2DR, 0.131 ± 0.021 (n = 5); D2DR plus DEPless RGS9-2, 0.211 ± 0.014 (n = 8); m2-mR, 0.123 ± 0.008 (n = 12); m2-mR plus DEPless RGS9-2, 0.225 ± 0.007 (n = 12), and the mean ± SEM steady-state current amplitudes in nanoamperes were: D2DR, 618 ± 43; D2DR plus DEPless RGS9-2, 943 ± 158; m2-mR, 964 ± 90; m2-mR plus DEPless RGS9-2, 953 ± 92. Error bars represent SEM.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (8)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 8
23 Feb 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
D2 Dopamine Receptors Colocalize Regulator of G-Protein Signaling 9-2 (RGS9-2) via the RGS9 DEP Domain, and RGS9 Knock-Out Mice Develop Dyskinesias Associated with Dopamine Pathways
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
D2 Dopamine Receptors Colocalize Regulator of G-Protein Signaling 9-2 (RGS9-2) via the RGS9 DEP Domain, and RGS9 Knock-Out Mice Develop Dyskinesias Associated with Dopamine Pathways
Abraham Kovoor, Petra Seyffarth, Jana Ebert, Sami Barghshoon, Ching-Kang Chen, Sigrid Schwarz, Jeffrey D. Axelrod, Benjamin N. R. Cheyette, Melvin I. Simon, Henry A. Lester, Johannes Schwarz
Journal of Neuroscience 23 February 2005, 25 (8) 2157-2165; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2840-04.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
D2 Dopamine Receptors Colocalize Regulator of G-Protein Signaling 9-2 (RGS9-2) via the RGS9 DEP Domain, and RGS9 Knock-Out Mice Develop Dyskinesias Associated with Dopamine Pathways
Abraham Kovoor, Petra Seyffarth, Jana Ebert, Sami Barghshoon, Ching-Kang Chen, Sigrid Schwarz, Jeffrey D. Axelrod, Benjamin N. R. Cheyette, Melvin I. Simon, Henry A. Lester, Johannes Schwarz
Journal of Neuroscience 23 February 2005, 25 (8) 2157-2165; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2840-04.2005
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Unveiling cortical criticality changes along the prodromal to the overt continuum of alpha-synucleinopathy
  • Atypical Retinal Ganglion Cell Function in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome
  • Basal forebrain-ventral tegmental area glutamatergic pathway promotes emergence from isoflurane anesthesia in mice
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.