Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Neurobiology of Disease

Axonal Transport, Amyloid Precursor Protein, Kinesin-1, and the Processing Apparatus: Revisited

Orly Lazarov, Gerardo A. Morfini, Edward B. Lee, Mohamed H. Farah, Anita Szodorai, Scott R. DeBoer, Vassilis E. Koliatsos, Stefan Kins, Virginia M.-Y. Lee, Philip C. Wong, Donald L. Price, Scott T. Brady and Sangram S. Sisodia
Journal of Neuroscience 2 March 2005, 25 (9) 2386-2395; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3089-04.2005
Orly Lazarov
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerardo A. Morfini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward B. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohamed H. Farah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita Szodorai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott R. DeBoer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vassilis E. Koliatsos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Kins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Virginia M.-Y. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip C. Wong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald L. Price
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott T. Brady
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sangram S. Sisodia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Expression and anterograde axonal transport of kinesin-1 and Trk receptor are APP independent. A, Protein extracts of sciatic nerves from wild-type mice (APP WT), mice with either homozygous or heterozygous APP depletion (Hm APP KO and Ht APP KO, respectively), and transgenic mice harboring FAD-linked APPswe (Tg2576 mice). Immunoblots for KHC, dynein, synaptophysin (Syp), neurofilament (NF), and β-tubulin show no differences at steady-state levels between the different genotypes, indicating that fast, slow, anterograde, and retrograde axonal transport are not affected by APP expression. B, Protein extracts prepared from ligated sciatic nerve of Ht APP KO, Hm APP KO, and APP WT mice. APP accumulation is evident in the proximal ligature of sciatic nerve of APP WT mice (22C11 panel, lane 8); reduced accumulation is observed in the proximal ligature of Ht APP KO mouse sciatic nerve (22C11 panel, lane 5). APP expression cannot be detected in the sciatic nerve of APP KO mice (22C11 panel, lanes 1-3). The accumulation level of Trk receptor (Trk panel), kinesin heavy chain (H2 antibodies, KHC panel), kinesin light chain (63-90 antibodies, KLC panel), and PS1 (PS1-NTF antibodies, PS1-NTF panel) at the proximal stump of the ligation site is comparable in sciatic nerve of APP-ablated and wild-type nontransgenic mice (compare lanes 2, 5, 8). I, Intact sciatic nerve; P, proximal stump of ligated sciatic nerve; D, distal stump of ligated sciatic nerve. C, Kinesin-1 expression in longitudinal sections of ligated sciatic nerve as detected by immunolabeling using anti-KHC H2 antibodies. Note kinesin-1 accumulation toward the proximal stump of the ligature.

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Nonspecific binding of AID and GST-KLC1 fusion proteins containing TRs. A, Schematic representation of GST-KLC1 deletion mutants used in GSTpull-down assays. For details, see Materials and Methods. B, Pull-down assays show that all GST-KLC constructs containing two or more TRs bind to in vitro-translated GFP-AID constructs and with lower affinity to the GFP-only control. Neither GST alone nor GST-KLC-CC (both lacking TRs) pulled down GFP-AID or GFP. The fact that TR-containing constructs pulled down both GFP-AID and to a lower extent the highly soluble protein GFP suggests that these are nonspecific protein-protein interactions. C, In addition to GFP-AID, both GFP-ALID1 and GFP-ALID2 were retained to a very similar extent on GST-KLCΔCT. Identical results were obtained with GST-KLC-TR or GST-KLC-CC/TR beads (data not shown). D, Schematic representation of GFP-APP intracellular domain deletion mutants used in GST pull downs (see Materials and Methods). E, GST-KLC-CC/TR binds with similar affinities to GFP-AID and GFP-AID constructs with deletions of the BaSS (G-AIDΔB), PEER (G-AIDΔP), or NPTY (G-AIDΔN) domains of APP. These represent domains that have been shown previously to affect trafficking of APP and map to the domain proposed by Kamal et al. (2000) to bind TR domain in KLC1. F, Beads containing GST-KLC with TR domains also pull down recombinant Fe65 with high affinity, again suggesting nonspecific binding of TR domains to proteins in this assay system. G, GST pull downs with GST fused to the intracellular domain of APP demonstrated binding to the known APP interacting proteins Fe65 and Numb, whereas no binding of KLC1 was observed under identical conditions.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Kinesin-1 and APP do not cofractionate or coimmunoprecipitate from brain lysate. A, Subcellular fractionation of mouse brain was performed as described previously (Morfini et al., 2002) to generate three vesicle fractions (V0, V1, and V2) and a cytosolic fraction (Cyt). Under the conditions of fractionation, KHCs and KLCs are found in all fractions, but KLCs exhibit differences in stoichiometry and isoform composition. In contrast, APP immunoreactivity is associated primarily with V0 and V1 fractions, with only trace amounts in V2 and low levels in the cytosol. V2 contains high levels of KHC, KLC1, KLC2, synaptophysin (P38), and synapsin I. This suggests that kinesin-1 and APP do not cofractionate in mouse brain. B, Immunoprecipitates of kinesin-1 from mouse brain show that Coomassie blue-stained levels of kinesin-1 heavy chain are obtained (CB), but no band corresponding to APP was seen. Immunoblots of whole-brain lysate show that kinesin-1 heavy chain (H2) is readily resolved from APP (22C11) in this gel system. These are distinguishable even when a mixture of both antibodies (H2+22C11) is used for immunoblotting. C, Immunoprecipitation of kinesin-1 from mouse brain using antibodies against either kinesin-1 heavy chains (SUK4 or H2) or light chains (63-90, L1, L2, or KLC-All) precipitated both KHC and KLC subunits (Pfister et al., 1989; Stenoien and Brady, 1997). Nevertheless, APP could not be detected in immunoprecipitates using kinesin-1 antibodies. Brain lysate (L) was a positive control. Negative controls, i.e., protein G beads without primary antibodies (B) or with normal mouse IgG show immunoprecipitation specificity. Similarly, kinesin-1 subunits were not detectable in immunoprecipitates with APP antibodies [Ct-APP and JH; see KHC (H2) for kinesin-1 heavy chain, KLC (63-90) for kinesin-1 light chain]. Antigens in immunoprecipitates were visualized using specific antibodies against kinesin-1 subunits (H2 or 63-90) or APP (22C11 or Ct-APP). D, Immunoblot analysis showed detectable amounts of the scaffolding protein JIP3/SYD in kinesin-1 immunoprecipitates (H2 IPP). Conversely, anti-JIP3 antibodies (SYd IPP) coprecipitate small but detectable amounts of KHC. Immunoprecipitations with normal mouse (NM IPP) or normal rabbit (NR IPP) IgGs were used as negative controls. Note the relative levels of JIP3/SYD compared with original protein input. E, Immunodepletion of kinesin-1 and APP from mouse brain lysate exhibits different depletion patterns. Immunodepletion of KHC from lysate with H2 comparing IPs and corresponding supernatant samples shows a gradual reduction in the level of both KHC (H2) and KLC (63-90) in the pellet (lanes 1-4) and the supernatant (lanes 13-16) after depletion cycles. In contrast, no change in APP level could be detected (Ct-APP, lanes 1-4 and 13-16, respectively). Similarly, a reduction in APP level was observed after depletion using APP-specific antibodies AB5352 (Ct-APP, pellet, lanes 9-12; supernatant, lanes 21-24), but no change in the level of kinesin-1 could be detected (KHC, lanes 9-12, 21-24; KLC, lanes 9-12, 21-24).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    PS1 is not cotransported with APP in the same vesicular compartment by fast axonal transport. A, Top, Schematic diagram of sciatic nerve double ligation and nerve segments examined for protein expression. Bottom, Expression level of APP and PS1 in nerve segments at varying distances from the site of ligation in sciatic nerve of nontransgenic mice. APP expression level increases toward the site of ligation, whereas it decreases away from the distal ligature (CT15 panel, lanes 1-5). In contrast, PS1 expression level is comparable in intact sciatic nerve and nerve segments at varying distances from the site of ligation (PS1-NTF panel, lanes 1-7). B, APP and PS1 immunoreactivity in cryostat sections of the proximal and distal ends of ligated sciatic nerve. A, B, APP is detected using CT15 antibodies. Note the accumulation of APP proximal to the ligature (A), whereas weak immunoreactivity is observed at the distal stump (B). C, D, PS1 immunoreactivity as detected by affinity-purified αPS1-NTF antibodies; C, proximal stump; D, distal stump. Note that neither accumulation at the proximal stump nor reduced immunoreactivity at the distal stump can be detected. E, Specificity of immunostaining for PS1 was confirmed using αPS1-NTF antibodies preincubated with GST-PS1-NTF (see Materials and Methods). F, Immunostaining of mouse sciatic nerve cryostat sections using secondary antibodies only (fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rabbit). Scale bar, 200 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Expression of BACE1 and Aβ is undetectable in mouse sciatic nerve. A, Western blot analysis of Aβ expression in protein extracts of stably transfected APPswe N2a cells (lane 1), APPswe N2a cells and sciatic nerve extract (lane 2), cortex (ctx) of transgenic mice harboring APPswe (lane 3), and ligated sciatic nerve of transgenic mice harboring APPswe (lanes 4-6). I, Intact contralateral nerve; P, segment proximal to the ligature; D, segment distal to the ligature. Accumulation of C-terminal fragments is shown, but no Aβ could be detected at the proximal stump of sciatic nerve of the FAD-linked APPswe variant (lanes 4-6). C-terminal fragments, as well as low levels of Aβ, could be detected in protein extract from the cortex of these mice using an amount of protein equivalent to that of the sciatic nerve extracts (lane 3; note “Aβ long exposure”). Aβ could be detected in N2a cells stably transfected with APPswe. Addition of nerve extract to N2a cells yielded the same level of Aβ as N2a alone (lanes 1 and 2, respectively). B, No specific band corresponding to BACE1 could be detected in protein extracts of ligated mouse sciatic nerve after crush injury. SN-P, Sciatic nerve segment proximal to the crush site; SN-D, sciatic nerve segment distal to the crush site. A band similar to the one observed in nontransgenic mice proximal and distal to the crush injury (BACE1 panel, lanes 2 and 3, respectively) was observed in protein extract of BACE1 KO sciatic nerve (BACE1 panel, lanes 5 and 6, respectively). To confirm our ability to detect BACE1, we examined BACE1 expression in the hippocampus of these mice. BACE1 was detectable in the hippocampus (Hipp) of nontransgenic mice (BACE1 panel, lane 1) but not in the hippocampus of BACE1 KO mice (BACE1 panel, lane 4). APP accumulated at the proximal segment of the crushed injury in the sciatic nerve of both the nontransgenic mice (APP panel, lane 2) and the BACE1 KO mice (APP panel, lane 5), confirming the blockade of fast anterograde axonal transport after the crush injury. As expected, increased expression of APP was observed in the hippocampus of BACE1 knock-out mice compared with nontransgenic mice (APP panel, compare lanes 4 and 1, respectively).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Letter to the Editor by Lawrence Goldstein, Angels Almenar, Adeela Kamal, and Gorazd Stokin

    The Journal does not ordinarily have a Letters to the Editor section. However, a paper published by Lazarov et al. in the March 2, 2005 issue directly challenged findings from previous work by Goldstein and colleagues. Thus in fairness, we asked Dr. Goldstein to reply. His response is published below without editing or review.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Adobe PDF - Letter_to_the_Editor.pdf - Letter to the Editor by Lawrence Goldstein, Angels Almenar, Adeela Kamal, and Gorazd Stokin.
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 9
2 Mar 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Axonal Transport, Amyloid Precursor Protein, Kinesin-1, and the Processing Apparatus: Revisited
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Axonal Transport, Amyloid Precursor Protein, Kinesin-1, and the Processing Apparatus: Revisited
Orly Lazarov, Gerardo A. Morfini, Edward B. Lee, Mohamed H. Farah, Anita Szodorai, Scott R. DeBoer, Vassilis E. Koliatsos, Stefan Kins, Virginia M.-Y. Lee, Philip C. Wong, Donald L. Price, Scott T. Brady, Sangram S. Sisodia
Journal of Neuroscience 2 March 2005, 25 (9) 2386-2395; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3089-04.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Axonal Transport, Amyloid Precursor Protein, Kinesin-1, and the Processing Apparatus: Revisited
Orly Lazarov, Gerardo A. Morfini, Edward B. Lee, Mohamed H. Farah, Anita Szodorai, Scott R. DeBoer, Vassilis E. Koliatsos, Stefan Kins, Virginia M.-Y. Lee, Philip C. Wong, Donald L. Price, Scott T. Brady, Sangram S. Sisodia
Journal of Neuroscience 2 March 2005, 25 (9) 2386-2395; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3089-04.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Sustained Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine are Independent of the Lateral Habenula
  • Striatal Afferent BDNF Is Disrupted by Synucleinopathy and Partially Restored by STN DBS
  • A New Mouse Model Related to SCA14 Carrying a Pseudosubstrate Domain Mutation in PKCγ Shows Perturbed Purkinje Cell Maturation and Ataxic Motor Behavior
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.