Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Degradation of Head Direction Cell Activity during Inverted Locomotion

Jeffrey L. Calton and Jeffrey S. Taube
Journal of Neuroscience 2 March 2005, 25 (9) 2420-2428; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3511-04.2005
Jeffrey L. Calton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey S. Taube
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Diagram of recording track and position of a rat over the course of a single trial. The rat begins on one side of the floor surface (A). To initiate a trial, the animal approaches and ascends the outer wall (B). When the animal reaches the junction between the wall and ceiling, it pitches backward 90° to move across the ceiling (C) in an upside-down orientation. When the rat reaches the far wall (D), it descends into the reward compartment of the floor (E) for a food reward. The current floor compartment then becomes the start compartment, and the animal reverses direction for the next trial.

  •   Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Representative firing rate × HD tuning curves across each of the four surfaces. HD is shown on the abscissa, the firing rate is plotted as a solid line relative to the left ordinate, and the number of samples at each directional bin is plotted as a dotted line relative to the right ordinate using a logarithmic scale. A, Tuning curves from three different HD cells categorized as CD. Note the present but degraded directional specificity while the animal was traversing the ceiling in an inverted orientation. B, Tuning curves from three HD cells categorized as CND. Note the absence of directional specificity while the animal was traversing the ceiling. Plots are constructed using 6° directional bins. deg., Degree.

  •   Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Firing rate × HD × time plot for two consecutive trials. Time is represented on the abscissa with the distance between tic marks indicating 5 s. The HD of the animal is indicated as a dotted gray line using the left ordinate, whereas the firing rate of the recorded cell is plotted as the black line on the right ordinate. The label under each panel indicates the current surface being traversed and the general direction of locomotion relative to the preferred direction of the cell. This cell had a preferred direction of ∼0° (east). Note the influence of HD on the firing rate on the floor and when the animal ascends and descends the walls (compare panels labeled preferred and nonpreferred). In contrast, when the animal was locomoting on the ceiling, the firing rate of the cell was generally not affected by HD. The firing rate trace was smoothed by averaging each value across five points forward and backward in time. The HD trace was not smoothed. deg., Degree.

  •   Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Frequency distributions of mean vector lengths obtained from Rayleigh analysis of directional tuning. Mean vector length is a measure of directional specificity, with increasing values indicating cellular activity dependent on the HD of the animal. The filled bars indicate cells showing significant (p < 0.05) directional specificity on that surface, whereas the open bars indicate cells failing to show directional specificity on that surface.

  •   Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Firing rate × HD tuning curve of a representative HD cell plotted as a function of whether the animal was ascending a wall, locomoting inverted across the ceiling, or descending a wall. Note that the directional specificity is maintained when the animal descended, although the cell was nondirectional on the ceiling. deg., Degree.

  •   Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Scatter diagrams showing the amount of angular shift of preferred directions between different surfaces. While traversing the walls, cells tended to show preferred directions similar to the floor (top row). In contrast, preferred directions tended to shift randomly while the animal was locomoting in an inverted position (bottom left panel). Cells showed stable tuning when the east and west compartments of the floor surface are compared (bottom right panel). The angular position of each filled circle represents the shift of preferred direction for individual cells between the two surfaces. For each comparison, only angular shifts from the cells showing maintenance of directional tuning on both surfaces are shown. The dotted arrow denotes an angular shift of zero, and the solid arrow denotes the observed mean vector angle. The length of the solid arrow denotes the mean vector length; a length of 1.0 (no variability in shift scores) is represented by a vector spanning the radius of the circle.

  •   Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Mean values (± SEM) of directional characteristics across each of the four surfaces. For each statistic, the directional characteristic was degraded on the ceiling relative to the other three surfaces. Means from each surface were calculated only from cells categorized as directional on that surface. One and two cells had background firing rates of zero on the east and west walls, respectively. Because a zero background rate for these cells would have resulted in an infinite signal/noise ratio, these cells were assigned background values equal to the lowest values within their respective condition for the purpose of calculating the signal/noise ratio. Comparisons were relative to the floor condition using the Wilcoxon signed rank test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Occurrence of CD and CND HD cells during inverted locomotion in each animal

    Rat 1 CD CD CD CD CND CND
    Rat 2 CND CND CD
    Rat 3 CD
    Rat 4 CND CND CND CD
    Rat 5 CD CD CD CND CND
    • For each rat, cells are shown in chronological order of recording. Underlines indicate the three pairs of cells that were recorded simultaneously.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 25 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 25, Issue 9
2 Mar 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Degradation of Head Direction Cell Activity during Inverted Locomotion
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Degradation of Head Direction Cell Activity during Inverted Locomotion
Jeffrey L. Calton, Jeffrey S. Taube
Journal of Neuroscience 2 March 2005, 25 (9) 2420-2428; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3511-04.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Degradation of Head Direction Cell Activity during Inverted Locomotion
Jeffrey L. Calton, Jeffrey S. Taube
Journal of Neuroscience 2 March 2005, 25 (9) 2420-2428; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3511-04.2005
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Episodic Reinstatement in the Medial Temporal Lobe
  • Musical Expertise Induces Audiovisual Integration of Abstract Congruency Rules
  • The Laminar Development of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.