Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Local Morphology Predicts Functional Organization of the Dorsal Premotor Region in the Human Brain

Céline Amiez, Penelope Kostopoulos, Anne-Sophie Champod and Michael Petrides
Journal of Neuroscience 8 March 2006, 26 (10) 2724-2731; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4739-05.2006
Céline Amiez
Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Penelope Kostopoulos
Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne-Sophie Champod
Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Petrides
Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Behavioral tasks. a, Visuomotor hand conditional task and motor control task. In both the visuomotor hand conditional and the motor control trials, one of four different colors was presented in a pseudo-random order in successive trials. The color occupied the entire screen. The subjects were instructed to look at the cross in the center of the colored screen during all trials. A written sentence at the beginning of each block of 16 trials indicated to the subjects the type of trial to be performed during that block. The sentence “Do the appropriate movement for each color” instructed the subjects that a block of 16 visuomotor hand conditional trials would follow. During these trials, the subjects had to press the appropriate one of four buttons in response to the presentation of one of the four colors. The arrows indicate the correct button to press depending on the presented color. The subjects were asked to press the top, left, right, and bottom buttons with their middle, index, and ring fingers and thumb, respectively. The sentence “Do the same movement for each color” instructed the subjects that a block of 16 motor control trials would follow. During these trials, the subjects had to press the same mouse button (with their index finger) for all of the colors presented. The duration of the intertrial interval was 1 s. b, Saccadic eye movement task and ocular fixation control task. The sentences “Follow the dot” and “Fixate on the dot” instructed the subject to perform saccadic eye movements or to fixate, respectively. During the saccadic eye movement trials, a dot was presented in one of three possible locations on the screen (i.e., left, center or right) for 750 ms in each location for a total of 22.5 s. The subjects had to perform a saccade to follow the dot to its current location on the screen. During the ocular fixation trials, the subjects had to fixate on the dot presented in the center of the screen for 22.5 s.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The location of the premotor hand region for conditional motor responses is in blue, the location of the saccadic eye movement region (i.e., the FEF) is in red, and the location of the primary motor cortex hand representation is in green in subjects 1 and 2. The foci of activity illustrated result from the subtractions reported in Tables 1–3. These foci are shown on each subject’s left hemisphere: lateral view (top left diagram) and top view (top right diagram). The green arrow indicates the point of the central sulcus in the depth of which the primary hand motor representation is located (i.e., precentral knob). For each subject, horizontal sections at different levels (z coordinate) in standard stereotaxic space are shown. The left horizontal sections are anatomical MRIs, and the right sections are the same ones with the premotor hand conditional (blue) and saccadic eye movement (red) foci displayed. In both subjects, the primary hand motor region is also displayed in green. In subject 1, the blue arrow marks the point of intersection of the SPSd with the caudal end of the SFS, and the yellow arrow marks the point of intersection of the SPSv with the SFS. In subject 2, the red arrow indicates the common point of intersection of the SPSd, the SPSv, and the caudal end of the SFS. Ant, Anterior part of the brain; CS, central sulcus; SF, Sylvian fissure.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The location of the premotor hand region for conditional motor responses is in blue, the location of the saccadic eye movement region (i.e., the FEF) is in red, and the location of the primary motor cortex hand representation is in green in subjects 3–6. The foci of activity illustrated result from the subtractions reported in Tables 1–3. These foci are shown on each subject’s left hemisphere: lateral view (top left diagram) and top view (top right diagram). The green arrow indicates the point of the central sulcus in the depth of which the primary hand motor representation is located (i.e., Broca’s pli de passage moyen). For each subject, horizontal sections at different levels (z coordinate) in standard stereotaxic space are shown. The left horizontal sections are anatomical MRIs, and the right sections are the same ones with the premotor hand conditional (blue) and saccadic eye movement (red) foci displayed. In subjects 3 and 5, the primary hand motor region is also displayed in green. In subjects 4–6, the yellow dotted line indicates the level of the sagittal section (i.e., the x coordinate) illustrated within the yellow dotted box. Note that, in subject 5, the precentral gyrus has receded and therefore the SPSv and the central sulcus blend in certain locations. This can be appreciated by careful inspection of the horizontal section indicated by the orange line and box. Ant, Anterior part of the brain; CS, central sulcus; SF, Sylvian fissure.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    The location of the premotor hand region for conditional motor responses is in blue, the location of the saccadic eye movement region (i.e., the FEF) is in red, and the location of the primary motor cortex hand representation is in green in subjects 7 and 8. The foci of activity illustrated result from the subtractions reported in Tables 1–3. These foci are shown on each subject’s left hemisphere: lateral view (top left diagram) and top view (top right diagram). The green arrow indicates the point of the central sulcus in the depth of which the primary hand motor representation is located (i.e., Broca’s pli de passage moyen). For each subject, horizontal sections at different levels (z coordinate) in standard stereotaxic space are shown. The left horizontal sections are anatomical MRIs, and the right sections are the same ones with the premotor hand conditional (blue) and saccadic eye movement (red) foci displayed. In both subjects, the primary hand motor region is also displayed in green. In both subjects, the yellow dotted line indicates the level of the sagittal section (i.e., the x coordinate) illustrated within the yellow dotted box. Note that (1) on the lateral and top views of subject 8, the red arrow points to the location of the SPSv in the depth of which the saccadic eye movement region is located; (2) on the lateral and top views of subject 7, the blue arrow points to the location of the SPSd in the depth of which the premotor hand region for motor conditional responses is located; and (3) in the top view of subject 7, the asterisk indicates the narrow gyral passage between the SPSd and the SPSv. Ant, Anterior part of the brain; CS, central sulcus; SF, Sylvian fissure.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    The premotor hand region, the saccadic eye movement region (i.e., the FEF), and the primary motor cortex hand representation in the human and monkey frontal cortex. a, The premotor cortex hand region for conditional responses (blue), the saccadic eye movement region (red), and the primary motor cortex hand representation (green) are shown on the cortical surface of the three-dimensional rendering of the left hemisphere of one human brain in standard stereotaxic space. The crosses correspond to the mean locations of activities reported in Tables 1–3. The blue, red, and green regions correspond to an estimate of the size of these regions based on the subject-by-subject analysis. b, On the left hemisphere of a macaque monkey brain, the following are indicated: the location of the dorsal premotor region involved in the performance of hand conditional responses (blue); the saccadic eye movement region (i.e., the classical FEF) in the concavity of the arcuate sulcus (red); and the hand representation of the primary motor cortex (green). c, Schematic representation of the sulcal patterns in the dorsal premotor region of the human brain. Type 1, The SPSd and SPSv approach each other at the caudal end of the SFS, giving the impression of one continuous sulcus; type 2a, the SPSv joins the SFS at a more anterior location than the SPSd; type 2b, the SPSv approaches but does not join the SFS. d, The hand representation of the primary motor cortex (area 4) in the human brain lies within the central sulcus at the level indicated in green in a. Within the central sulcus, the hand representation occupies a distinct morphological feature, a fold known as the precentral knob. A horizontal (left) and a sagittal (right) section through this part of the central sulcus illustrate this distinct morphological feature. CS, Central sulcus; AS, arcuate sulcus; PS, principalis sulcus; S, spur; SPdimple, superior precentral dimple.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Localization of the visuomotor hand conditional region: visuomotor hand conditional task minus motor control task

    SPSd regionMNI coordinatest statistic
    xyz
    Left hemisphere
        Subject 1−28−18729.51
    −28−22605.55
        Subject 2−28−10627.79
    −28−10505.06
        Subject 3−28−167011.18
    −22−14485.60
        Subject 4−22−14646.81
        Subject 5−20−18666.51
        Subject 6−26−14513.84
        Subject 7−22−16682.71
        Subject 8−32−6664.04
        Mean ± SD−25.8 ± 3.7−14.4 ± 4.561.5 ± 8.4
    Right hemisphere
        Subject 132−20645.34
        Subject 238−18688.10
        Subject 332−22685.95
    28−20584.50
        Subject 4
        Subject 528−125810.17
        Subject 6
        Subject 734−18583.26
        Subject 820−12744.54
        Mean ± SD30.3 ± 5.7−17.4 ± 464 ± 6.3
    • Data are the maxima of regions showing significant increases in the BOLD signal in each individual subject. All t statistics are significant at p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons. The stereotaxic coordinates are expressed in millimeters within the MNI stereotaxic proportional system that is based on the Talairach and Tournoux (1988) stereotaxic space: x, medial-to-lateral distance relative to the midline (positive, right); y, anterior-to-posterior distance relative to the anterior commissure (positive, anterior); z, superior-to-inferior distance relative to the anterior commissure–posterior commissure line (positive, superior).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Localization of the primary hand motor region in area 4: motor control task minus ocular fixation task

    Precentral knob regionMNI coordinateststatistic
    xyz
    Subject 1−42−30643.98
    Subject 2−34−20704.62
    Subject 3−28−32603.18
    Subject 4−36−29642.34
    Subject 5−40−28663.97
    Subject 6−33−18642.01
    Subject 7−34−28587.20
    Subject 8−50−20545.01
    Mean ± SD−37.1 ± 6.7−25.6 ± 5.462.5 ± 5
    • All t statistics are significant at p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons. The stereotaxic coordinates are expressed in millimeters within the MNI stereotaxic proportional system that is based on the Talairach and Tournoux (1988) stereotaxic space.

    • All t statistics are significant at p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons. The stereotaxic coordinates are expressed in millimeters within the MNI stereotaxic proportional system that is based on the Talairach and Tournoux (1988) stereotaxic space.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Localization of the saccadic eye movement region: saccadic eye movement task minus ocular fixation task

    SPSv regionMNI coordinateststatistic
    xyz
    Left hemisphere
        Subject 1−34−8527.21
    −46−8525.46
        Subject 2−38−8669.48
        Subject 3−40−146210.04
        Subject 4−34−146413.95
        Subject 5−32−16464.75
        Subject 6−38−8485.63
        Subject 7−40−6528.18
        Subject 8−40−6487.09
        Mean ± SD−38 ± 4.2−9.8 ± 3.854.4 ± 7.5
    Right hemisphere
        Subject 124−6566.09
        Subject 24645410.78
        Subject 324−20524.82
        Subject 430−14566.73
        Subject 532−6445.97
        Subject 648−16524.24
        Subject 734−16465.28
        Subject 838−12604.16
        Mean ± SD34.5 ± 9.1−10.8 ± 7.752.5 ± 5.3
    • All t statistics are significant at p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons. The stereotaxic coordinates are expressed in millimeters within the MNI stereotaxic proportional system that is based on the Talairach and Tournoux (1988) stereotaxic space.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 26 (10)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 26, Issue 10
March 8, 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Local Morphology Predicts Functional Organization of the Dorsal Premotor Region in the Human Brain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Local Morphology Predicts Functional Organization of the Dorsal Premotor Region in the Human Brain
Céline Amiez, Penelope Kostopoulos, Anne-Sophie Champod, Michael Petrides
Journal of Neuroscience 8 March 2006, 26 (10) 2724-2731; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4739-05.2006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Local Morphology Predicts Functional Organization of the Dorsal Premotor Region in the Human Brain
Céline Amiez, Penelope Kostopoulos, Anne-Sophie Champod, Michael Petrides
Journal of Neuroscience 8 March 2006, 26 (10) 2724-2731; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4739-05.2006
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • fMRI
  • dorsal premotor cortex
  • human
  • saccades
  • superior precentral sulcus
  • visuomotor conditional task

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
  • Generation of Intensity Selectivity by Differential Synaptic Tuning: Fast-Saturating Excitation But Slow-Saturating Inhibition
  • Episodic Reinstatement in the Medial Temporal Lobe
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.