Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
A schematic illustration of the task.
- Figure 2.
Corrected recognition (hit rate–false alarm rate) as a function of feature or conjunction condition for the 1 and 8 s ISIs for Experiment 1 (a) and Experiment 2 (b). Error bars represent SEM.
Tables
WAIS-III WMS-III Age Sex Edu Etiology MTL Lesion VIQ GM AD VD WM Description 48* M 14 Anoxia Bi H 111 59 52 72 96 76 F 12 Anoxia Bi H 107 59 64 65 83 52* M 17 Anoxia Pacemaker 134 70 67 75 88 75 M 18 Anoxia Bi H 113 75 80 72 102 54* F 12 Anoxia Bi H, PRC, R amg 83 52 55 56 91 46* F 14 Anoxia Bi H 90 45 52 53 93 49* M 14 Enceph Bi H, PRC, ERC, amg 92 45 55 56 85 61 F 12 Enceph Bi H, PRC, ERC, PHG, R amg 106 69 77 68 111 76* F 18 Enceph Bi H, PRC, ERC, amg, temporal pole 135 45 58 53 141 42** M 16 Anoxia Bi H, PRC, ERC, L fusiform 86 49 52 53 93 -
Edu, Education in years; VIQ, verbal intelligence quotient; GM, general memory index; AD, auditory delay index; VD, visual delay index; WM, working memory index; Enceph, encephalitis; Bi, bilateral; H, hippocampus; PRC, perirhinal cortex; ERC, entorhinal cortex; amg, amygdala; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; R, right; L, left; WAIS-III, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, third edition; WMS-III, Wechsler Memory Scale, third edition.
-
↵*Patients tested in both experiments.
-
↵**Patient tested only in experiment 2.
-
