Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 5 July 2006, 26 (27) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Typing Nociceptors

Xin Fang, Laiche Djouhri, Simon McMullan, Carol Berry, Stephen G. Waxman, Kenji Okuse, and Sally N. Lawson

(see pages 7281–7292)

Nociceptive sensory neurons of the dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) are generally divided into two main subclasses: those that bind the plant isolectin-B4 (IB4) and those that express the nerve growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase A (trkA). However, this week Fang et al. argue that the situation is more complex after assessing a large sample of rat lumbar DRG neurons in vivo. The authors typed the DRGs in terms of size and staining intensity for IB4 and trkA, with results similar to those reported previously. They also filled individual neurons with fluorescent dye and determined their responsiveness to noxious and mechanical stimuli. Strongly IB4+ neurons were all C-type nociceptors, but approximately one-third of IB4+ neurons also expressed trkA. IB4+ neurons expressed the voltage-activated sodium channel Nav1.9 that may contribute to the electrophysiological properties that result in their broader action potentials and slow conduction velocities.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Regenerating a Cerebellum

Reinhard W. Köster and Scott E. Fraser

(see pages 7293–7304)

The cerebellum arises from the anterior hindbrain according to signals from isthmic cells of the midbrain–hindbrain boundary (MHB). In this week's Journal, Köster and Fraser follow the remarkably plastic regeneration of cerebellar neurons after ablation. To track the neurons, the authors used transgenic zebrafish that expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) in cerebellar precursor neurons of the upper rhombic lip. With in vivo time-lapse confocal microscopy, the authors watched these cells migrate toward the MHB, turn ventrally, and settle at the anteroventral base of rhombomere 1. When the cerebellum was ablated at 36 h after fertilization, GFP-labeled cells regenerated within a few days, and the fish were swimming and capturing prey normally at day 6. The regenerating cerebellar cells, derived from the remaining dorso-anterior hindbrain, expressed rhombic lip marker genes, and migrated and positioned themselves normally. The regeneration was dependent on FGF that originated in the remaining isthmic cells.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

The Goals of Single Prefrontal Neurons

Aldo Genovesio, Peter J. Brasted, and Steven P. Wise

(see pages 7305–7316)

If you're having trouble setting goals, Genovesio et al. may be able to tell you where the problem resides. The authors examined prefrontal cortex (PF) neuronal activity in the encoding of previous and future goal selection. Monkeys were presented with three options for spatial goal selection, in the form of shapes on a video screen. In each trial, a complex visual cue accompanied the goals. On disappearance of the cue, the monkeys made a saccadic eye movement to the chosen goal. In each subsequent trial, the monkeys were trained to select a new spatial goal when the visual cue changed and to maintain the present goal when the visual cue was repeated. The authors found that discrete PF neuron populations were activated for previous versus future goals. Failure of these distinct networks that allow us to distinguish past and future goals means omissions, perseverations, and endless rechecking of previous tasks; sound familiar?

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

Restorative Dopamine Treatment in Hemiparkinsonian Rats

Jackalina M. Van Kampen and Christopher B. Eckman

(see pages 7272–7280)

This week, Van Kampen and Eckman take a new angle on dopamine therapy: restoration rather than the usual chemical replacement approach. The authors examined the neurogenic effects of dopamine D3 receptor activation in hemiparkinsonian adult rats. The number of dopamine neurons in the SNC was greatly reduced 2 weeks after unilateral treatment with 6-hydroxydopamine. Subsequent intraventricular infusion of the D3 receptor agonist 7-hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT) led to proliferation of cells, some of which matured into dopaminergic neurons. After 8 weeks of treatment, the number of dopamine neurons and their nigrostriatal projections had recovered to ∼75% of those on the contralateral side. The rats displayed substantial behavioral recovery as well, as tested after a 3 d drug washout to prevent acute effects of the agonist. Using drug-induced rotational analysis, the authors observed improved locomotor asymmetry after 4–8 weeks of treatment with 7-OH-DPAT. Treated rats also improved their performance on a skilled reaching task.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

The D3 agonist 7-OH-DPAT stimulated proliferation of cells in the subventricular zone as shown by bromodeoxyuridine immunolabeling (red) after intraventricular treatment (*) with saline (A) or 7-OH-DPAT (B). See Van Kampen and Eckman for details.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 26 (27)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 26, Issue 27
5 Jul 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 5 July 2006, 26 (27) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 5 July 2006, 26 (27) i
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.