Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Passing Potassium with and without Gap Junctions

Michael G. Kozoriz, Dave C. Bates, Stephen R. Bond, Charles P. K. Lai and David M. Moniz
Journal of Neuroscience 2 August 2006, 26 (31) 8023-8024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2500-06.2006
Michael G. Kozoriz
Graduate Program in Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dave C. Bates
Graduate Program in Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen R. Bond
Graduate Program in Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles P. K. Lai
Graduate Program in Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Moniz
Graduate Program in Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Editor's Note: These short reviews of a recent paper in the Journal, written exclusively by graduate students or postdoctoral fellows, are intended to mimic the journal clubs that exist in your own departments or institutions. For more information on the format and purpose of the Journal Club, please see http://www.jneurosci.org/misc/ifa_features.shtml.

Glia, originally thought to play a passive role in the CNS, are now recognized as active regulators of CNS activity. For example, astrocytes are essential for the maintenance of extracellular ion concentrations, notably K+, at physiological levels (Orkand et al., 1966). Any deviation of extracellular K+ concentration ([K+]o) from ∼3 mm can affect neural activity. Elevated [K+]o occurs during seizure activity, ischemia, and spreading depression, in which [K+]o can reach 10–50 mm (Walz, 2000; Somjen, 2002), with consequent effects on neuronal excitability and ultimately on cell viability. To limit increased [K+]o, astrocytes are equipped with a variety of K+ uptake mechanisms, including the Na+-K+-ATPase, Na+-K+-2Cl− cotransporters and voltage-activated K+ channels. Furthermore, local elevations in [K+]o shift the K+ equilibrium potential (EK) to more positive values relative to the membrane potential (Vm), thus driving K+ into these cells along an electrochemical gradient. K+ can also be spatially buffered via diffusion through the astrocytic cytoplasm to areas of lower [K+]o, and then K+ is driven back out of the cell at distal sites at which EK is still more negative than the Vm. Spatial redistribution of K+ is believed to be enhanced by gap junction coupling between astrocytes, although the experimental evidence for this mechanism is minimal (Walz, 2000; Kofuji and Newman, 2004). In their recent paper in The Journal of Neuroscience, Wallraff et al. (2006) examined the role of gap junction coupling between astrocytes in K+ buffering and its subsequent physiological effect.

Using hippocampal slices, the authors examined coupling in transgenic mice from which connexin43 (Cx43), the most abundant astrocytic Cx, had been conditionally deleted. Cx43/Cx30 double knock-out (dko) mice were also used because Cx30 is the other major connexin in astrocytes. Dye coupling of the gap junction-permeable tracer biocytin was reduced in the Cx43 knock-out and abolished in the dko [Wallraff et al. (2006), their Fig. 1B,D (http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/26/20/5438/F1)]. Importantly, the morphology and density of dko astrocytes labeled with GFAP were similar to wild-type (wt) [Wallraff et al. (2006), their Fig. 2B,D (http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/26/20/5438/F2)]. The dko astrocytes had a slightly more negative resting membrane potential and a greater membrane resistance than wt, likely attributable to the lack of gap junction coupling. To detect the current passing through gap junctions (Igj), whole-cell currents (Ic) were recorded in wt and dko cells before and after coupling was ablated by a low HCO3−/low pH solution. Wt Ic was reduced by 50% when coupling was blocked, and dko Ic was decreased by 20% [Wallraff et al. (2006), their Fig. 3D (http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/26/20/5438/F3)], a difference that the authors attributed to Igj. Although low HCO3−/low pH abolished coupling, the 20% decrease in Ic in the dko preparation represents a modification in conductance that was independent of Igj. It would be interesting to see whether gap junctional blockers such as carbenoxolone produce Ic profiles similar to the low HCO3−/low pH solution.

To test the involvement of gap junctions in limiting extracellular K+ accumulation, the authors used antidromic stimulation of CA1 pyramidal neurons to increase [K+]o. The slices were treated with GABA and glutamate receptor blockers to inhibit synaptic activity, and [K+]o was measured with a K+-sensitive electrode in the middle of the CA1 subfield. Compared with wt, a larger [K+]o response was generated in dko slices after maximal stimulation (elicited by either paired-pulse or high-frequency trains) but not during low-to-moderate stimulation [Wallraff et al. (2006), their Fig. 4D,E (http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/26/20/5438/F4)]. During maximal stimulation, [K+]o climbed as high as 17 mm in dko slices, whereas wt slices hit a “ceiling” at 12 mm. The rate of decay of [K+]o after stimulation was also slower in the dko mice [Wallraff et al. (2006), their Fig. 5B,D (http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/26/20/5438/F5). Together, these data suggest a deficiency in K+ clearance in the absence of gap junctions, but only when K+ levels are high.

To further examine alterations in K+ clearance between wt and dko slices, rises in [K+]o were generated in the stratum pyramidale in the same manner as before, and [K+]o was recorded at various distances from the site of stimulation. Up to 300 μm away from the stratum pyramidale, corresponding to the stratum radiatum, normalized [K+]o remained unchanged between wt and dko slices. Astrocytes in this region have long overlapping processes, and the authors reasoned that K+ can be buffered to neighboring astrocytes independently of gap junctions via “indirect coupling” whereby K+ released from one astrocyte is taken up by another (Fig. 1). However, at a distance of 400–500 μm away, corresponding to the stratum lacunosum moleculare, [K+]o levels were significantly reduced in the dko [Wallraff et al., their Fig. 6B (http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/26/20/5438/F6)]. Astrocytes in this region have short non-overlapping processes and appear to depend on gap junctions to facilitate K+ buffering (Fig. 1). Because the expression of other proteins (e.g., ion channels) may be altered by knocking out Cxs, testing whether gap junction blockers cause a similar impairment in K+ spatial buffering in the wt would be an important control. Furthermore, the authors reported a steep decline in population spike potential as they moved away from the site of stimulation, but direct depolarization of the astrocytic syncytium cannot be ruled out as a potential confounding factor.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Overview of K+ buffering of CA1 neurons in the hippocampus. Neuronal activity in the stratum pyramidale (S.P.) causes a rise in [K+]o that is subsequently taken up by astrocytes in the stratum radiatum (S.R.). K+ is distributed along the long processes of these cells to neighboring S.R. astrocytes by gap junctions and by indirect coupling (a) whereby K+ released from one cell into the extracellular space is taken up by another neighboring astrocyte. In this case, dko astrocytes can still buffer K+ because indirect coupling remains intact. K+ is subsequently distributed via gap junctions (b) in stratum lacunosum moleculare (S.L.M) astrocytes. In this case, K+ buffering is impaired in dko because astrocytes lack preferential organization for indirect coupling.

Last, extracellular field potentials were measured to investigate the potential pathological effect of reduced K+ clearance on neuronal activity. The dko slices developed spontaneous epileptiform events [Wallraff et al., their Fig. 7A,C (http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/26/20/5438/F7)] and experienced seizure-like discharges in the CA1 stratum pyramidale at a higher frequency than the wt slices when exposed to Mg2+-free perfusion media. These findings are in contrast to previous studies that identified gap junction blockers as effective anticonvulsants. However, the pharmacological agents used in other studies were not able to selectively block astrocytic gap junctions, which could indicate that the anticonvulsant effect may be the result of blocked neuronal gap junctions or action on another unidentified target.

Wallraff et al. (2006) have demonstrated that K+ redistribution occurs by both gap junction-dependent and -independent processes, thereby supplying evidence for a pathway that has been postulated for decades. Efficient handling of K+ has relevance to the treatment of pathological conditions, and indeed the authors found an increased susceptibility to epileptiform events in the Cx43/Cx30 dko mice. These findings may extend to other conditions, such as stroke, in which elevated [K+]o occurs. More efficient K+ buffering by astrocytes could curb excessive K+ accumulation and in turn reduce the potential for neuronal damage.

Footnotes

  • We thank Drs. Christian Naus and Claudia Krebs for their helpful comments and support of our Journal Club.

  • Review of Wallraff et al. (http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/26/20/5438)

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Michael G. Kozoriz, Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Centre, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3. Email: kozoriz{at}interchange.ubc.ca

References

  1. ↵
    Kofuji P, Newman EA (2004) Potassium buffering in the central nervous system. Neuroscience 129:1045–1056.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Orkand RK, Nicholls JG, Kuffler SW (1966) Effect of nerve impulses on the membrane potential of glial cells in the central nervous system of amphibia. J Neurophysiol 29:788–806.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Somjen GG (2002) Ion regulation in the brain: implications for pathophysiology. Neuroscientist 8:254–267.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Wallraff A, Kohling R, Heinemann U, Theis M, Willecke K, Steinhauser C (2006) The impact of astrocytic gap junctional coupling on potassium buffering in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 26:5438–5447.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Walz W (2000) Role of astrocytes in the clearance of excess extracellular potassium. Neurochem Int 36:291–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 26 (31)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 26, Issue 31
2 Aug 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Passing Potassium with and without Gap Junctions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Passing Potassium with and without Gap Junctions
Michael G. Kozoriz, Dave C. Bates, Stephen R. Bond, Charles P. K. Lai, David M. Moniz
Journal of Neuroscience 2 August 2006, 26 (31) 8023-8024; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2500-06.2006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Passing Potassium with and without Gap Junctions
Michael G. Kozoriz, Dave C. Bates, Stephen R. Bond, Charles P. K. Lai, David M. Moniz
Journal of Neuroscience 2 August 2006, 26 (31) 8023-8024; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2500-06.2006
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cortical Inhibition, Plasticity, and Sleep
  • Dissociating Hippocampal and Cortical Contributions to Predictive Processing
  • Uncovering the Hippocampal Mechanisms Underpinning Spatial Learning and Flexible Navigation
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.