Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 9 August 2006, 26 (32) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

A Sparse View of Cortical Activity

Jack Waters and Fritjof Helmchen

(see pages 8267–8277)

This week, Waters and Helmchen examined the ups and downs of neuronal activity, using in vivo whole-cell recording from L2/3 neocortical pyramidal neurons in anesthetized rats. Spontaneous activity in these cells drove 10–20 mV membrane excursions between subthreshold “Up states” and hyperpolarized “Down states.” Although depolarizing excitatory synaptic potentials might be expected to open glutamate-activated ion channels and increase membrane conductance (i.e., decrease input resistance), the input resistance of layer 2/3 cells actually increased during Up states. Constant current injections confirmed a voltage-dependent increase in the membrane input resistance with depolarization, attributable to intrinsic membrane channels that cause anomalous rectification. Under the conditions of their experiments, spontaneous activity was 90% excitatory, but sparse. Using a compartmental model of L2/3 cells to control the rate of activity and synchrony of synaptic inputs, the authors predict that as few as 10 or as many as 100 activated synapses are required to fire an action potential.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

The Transactivator Trap Screen Strikes Again

Amir H. Kashani, Zilong Qiu, Linda Jurata, Soo-Kyung Lee, Samuel Pfaff, Sandra Goebbels, Klaus-Armin Nave, and Anirvan Ghosh

(see pages 8398–8408)

Calcium often serves as a link connecting neural activity to gene transcription. Kashani et al. used a transactivator trap screen to identify mediators of calcium-dependent gene transcription, a method that previously led them to identify CREST, a calcium-regulated transcriptional activator. The authors screened pools of rat cortical cDNA library by transfection into cortical neurons and then looked for activation of a reporter gene after depolarization and calcium influx. Here they report on LMO4, a 165 aa nuclear LIM-domain-only protein that is expressed in cortex during the early postnatal period. LMO4 activation required L-type voltage-gated channels and NMDA receptors, as well as activation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase IV and mitogen-activated protein kinase. LMO4 interacted with CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) and the coactivators CLIM1 and CLIM2. Conditional deletion of lmo4 in the forebrain disrupted segregation of thalamocortical afferents into barrel domains in the somatosensory cortex. ⇓

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

DiI crystals injected into the thalamus of wild-type (WT) and conditional lmo4 null mice (LMO4 cKO) show that thalamic axons failed to segregate in the mutant mice. See the article by Kashani et al. for details.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

An Approach to the Complexity of Neural Circuits

Jonathon Shlens, Greg D. Field, Jeffrey L. Gauthier, Matthew I. Grivich, Dumitru Petrusca, Alexander Sher, Alan M. Litke, and E. J. Chichilnisky

(see pages 8254–8266)

This week, Shlens et al. try to simplify the study of neuronal networks, a potential boon for the mathematically challenged neuroscientist. The authors examined the network of ON and OFF parasol retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the macaque monkey retina. Their 512-electrode recordings allowed them to sample most, if not all, of the parasol RGCs in a 3–5 mm circle of peripheral retina. To reduce the number of possible input patterns for n cells from ∼2n, the authors applied two constraints. Each input pattern contacts only two cells, establishing pairwise connectivity, and all connected cells must be adjacent. The number of possible patterns was thus reduced to around n2. An analysis of multi-neuron firing patterns indicated that the pairwise and adjacent interactions could account for the experimental results. In principle, this means that by recording from pairs of neighboring cells in a network one can understand the function of the entire circuit (sort of).

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

An Odd Couple: mGluR4 and Medulloblastoma

Luisa Iacovelli, Antonietta Arcella, Giuseppe Battaglia, Simonetta Pazzaglia, Eleonora Aronica, Paola Spinsanti, Alessandra Caruso, Enrico De Smaele, Anna Saran, Alberto Gulino, Mara D’Onofrio, Felice Giangaspero, and Ferdinando Nicoletti

(see pages 8388–8397)

Glutamate receptors don't seem like your everyday target for new anti-cancer drugs. However, biology can be stranger than fiction. In this week's Journal, Iacovelli et al. examined the expression of the group III metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR4, which is normally expressed on various nerve terminals as well as in cerebellar granule cell precursors. Because the childhood tumor medulloblastoma originates from progenitor cells in the cerebellar external granule layer, the authors looked for mGluR4 expression in the tumor cells. The receptor was expressed in 75% of a sample of medulloblastomas and in several medulloblastoma cell lines. The mGlur4-positive allosteric modulator PHCCC [N-phenyl-7-(hydroxyimino)cyclopropachromen-1a-carboxamide] reduced DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in cell lines and reduced tumor growth in nude mice implanted with medulloblastoma cells. The antigrowth activity of mGluR4 activation appeared to be mediated by inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and decreased activity of the phosphoinositol-3-kinase pathway.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 26 (32)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 26, Issue 32
9 Aug 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 9 August 2006, 26 (32) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 9 August 2006, 26 (32) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.