Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 23 August 2006, 26 (34) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

A Fly Pheromone Receptor

Tal Soo Ha and Dean P. Smith

(see pages 8727–8733)

Insects use pheromone signaling for all sorts of interesting behaviors, yet only a single volatile pheromone has been identified in Drosophila, the lipid 11-cis-vaccenyl acetate (VA). Upon release by males, VA induces aggregation behavior in both sexes. This week, Ha and Smith identify VA’s molecular target on trichoid sensilla, located on the ventral–lateral surface of the antenna. VA activates olfactory neurons on T1-type sensilla. The authors screened the Drosophila odorant receptor (Or) gene family in flies lacking functional T1 sensilla. One gene, Or67d was reduced or absent in the mutants. Misexpression of Or67d in olfactory neurons of non-T1 sensilla conferred sensitivity to VA. LUSH, an extracellular protein expressed by sensillar lymph cells, is required for T1 sensitivity to VA and is also expressed in non-T1 sensilla. The lush1 mutation eradicated VA sensitivity in transgenic flies misexpressing Or67d. Thus, VA sensitivity requires both Or67d and LUSH.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Scanning electron micrograph of trichoid sensilla from the antenna of a wild-type Drosophila. Scale bar 10 μm. See the article by Ha and Smith for details.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Visualizing a Netrin Gradient

Timothy E. Kennedy, Hao Wang, Wallace Marshall, and Marc Tessier-Lavigne

(see pages 8866–8874)

Chemotropic guidance cues can act through gradients formed by graded expression levels or graded distribution. This week, Kennedy et al. visualized the netrin-1 gradient that guides commissural axons within the developing spinal cord. The authors generated antibodies to visualize netrin-1 and netrin-2 in the developing chick spinal cord. At the time when commissural axons began to extend, netrin-1 immunoreactivity was found not only in the floor plate where it is expressed by floor plate cells, but also in the ventral neural epithelium and dorsal spinal cord. Netrin-2 in contrast had a much more restricted pattern limited to neural epithelial cells that express it in the ventral spinal cord, and it was expressed at much lower levels. In mice, netrin-1, which performs the function of both proteins, was expressed in a pattern similar to that of netrin-1 and netrin-2 in chicks. Thus for commissural neuron guidance, the netrin-1 gradient is consistent with its long-range actions.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Contextual Modulation in Human Visual Areas

Hiroshi Ban, Hiroki Yamamoto, Masaki Fukunaga, Asuka Nakagoshi, Masahiro Umeda, Chuzo Tanaka, and Yoshimichi Ejima

(see pages 8804–8809)

When it comes to visual processing, a complex scene, once viewed, is broken into pieces, sent to the contralateral hemisphere, and put back together by higher processing centers. This week, Ban et al. explore the role that the early stage of processing in the primary visual area (V1) has in putting a complex visual scene back together again. The authors presented subjects with quarter arc patterns located in one quadrant of the visual field. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, regions of interest (ROI) in contralateral V1 were activated by quarter arcs in each quadrant. Activity in the ROI for one quadrant was enhanced when a complete circle was presented compared to the arc alone. Interestingly, the response was strongest when two arcs were presented in diagonal (interfield) rather than adjacent (intrafield) quadrants, perhaps best suggesting a complete circle. The authors argue that this phenomenon, called contextual modulation, involves feedback to V1 from higher centers.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

Revisiting the Direct and Indirect Striatal Pathways

Agnes Nadjar, Jonathan M. Brotchie, Celine Guigoni, Qin Li, Shao-Bo Zhou, Gui-Jie Wang, Paula Ravenscroft, François Georges, Alan R. Crossman, and Erwan Bezard

(see pages 8653–8661)

Striatal neurons are often grouped by their projection targets. Neurons of the “direct” pathway innervate the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi), express the D1 dopamine receptor, and corelease dynorphin and substance P with GABA, whereas “indirect” pathway neurons target the external GP (GPe), express D2 receptors, and corelease enkephalin with GABA. This week, Nadjar et al. asked how these projection neurons might change with the loss of dopaminergic inputs. The authors studied four groups of monkeys: normal, parkinsonian, and parkinsonian chronically treated with l-dopa, with and without dyskinesia. The authors injected the GP with the retrograde tracer cholera toxin subunit b (CTb), and then co-immunostained the striatum for CTb and dopamine receptors or opioid peptides. Surprisingly, they found evidence of all four proteins in both pallidal areas. This pattern was not affected by the presence of parkinsonism. The results suggest that striatofugal pathways are not completely segregated in the primate.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 26 (34)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 26, Issue 34
23 Aug 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 23 August 2006, 26 (34) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 23 August 2006, 26 (34) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.