Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Neural Coding by Two Classes of Principal Cells in the Mouse Piriform Cortex

Norimitsu Suzuki and John M. Bekkers
Journal of Neuroscience 15 November 2006, 26 (46) 11938-11947; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3473-06.2006
Norimitsu Suzuki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Bekkers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Figure 7.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

SP and SL cells perform different frequency transformations on a naturalistic stimulus. A, A train of five stimuli at 40 Hz was applied to the LOT, mimicking typical in vivo output of the olfactory bulb during a sniff. The mean firing frequency of the resultant postsynaptic APs was measured over a range of stimulus strengths. This panel shows the mean firing frequency for SP cells (red; n = 9) and SL cells (black; n = 6) plotted against stimulus strength, normalized to the strength that first generates one AP on average. The dashed lines are the data for individual cells; the circles show the mean of all cells of that type (±SEM). B, Illustrative postsynaptic responses measured in an SP cell (top; red) and an SL cell (bottom; black) at either twice (left) or four times (right) the stimulus threshold for firing an AP. With the weaker stimulus, the SP cell reliably follows the 40 Hz input train, whereas the SL cell fires at 20 Hz because of the large afterhyperpolarization after each AP. With the stronger stimulus, the SP cell fires an initial burst of APs, whereas the SL cell now fires a single AP on each EPSP. C, Summary data for the same experiment done with layer Ib (Assn) stimulation at 40 Hz (n = 10 for SP and SL). This resembles the response to LOT stimulation (A), except that SP cells tend to burst more strongly after Ib stimulation. D, Illustrative postsynaptic responses to layer Ib stimulation, displayed as in B. E, Simplified canonical circuit of the piriform cortex. Two circuits are shown, differing by the identity of the neuron that first receives LOT input (to layer Ia) from the olfactory bulb (SP cell, top; SL cell, bottom). The response to LOT stimulation then passes to SP and SL cells in the second layer of synaptic processing, the Assn inputs in layer Ib. F, Averaged output of the model in E after two layers of synaptic processing (LOT, and then Assn). The shaded pink band represents the mean AP firing frequency (±1SD) at the output of SP cells; the shaded gray band represents the output of SL cells. The two cell types generate broad, yet distinctive, ranges of AP firing frequencies that depend on the strength of synaptic input.

  View article

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 42 (21)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 42, Issue 21
25 May 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Figure 7.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Figure 7.
Journal of Neuroscience Dec 1969,

Citation Manager Formats

Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Figure 7.
Journal of Neuroscience Dec 1969,
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.