Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

A Mechanism Intrinsic to the Vesicle Fusion Machinery Determines Fast and Slow Transmitter Release at a Large CNS Synapse

Markus Wölfel, Xuelin Lou and Ralf Schneggenburger
Journal of Neuroscience 21 March 2007, 27 (12) 3198-3210; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4471-06.2007
Markus Wölfel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuelin Lou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralf Schneggenburger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Spatial homogeneity of [Ca2+]i elevations produced by Ca2+ uncaging. A, Fluorescence image at 380 nm excitation wavelength of a calyx of Held during Ca2+ uncaging. Pixel binning, 8 × 15; exposure time, 5 ms. The (binned) pixels used for analysis of [Ca2+]i are indicated by circles, and the arrowheads in colors point to pixels located at increasing distances from the tip of the presynaptic pipette. B, [Ca2+]i resulting from ratiometric measurements for a single flash, analyzed separately for the individual pixels shown in A. The four [Ca2+]i measurements immediately after the flash are shown enhanced in the inset. Same color code as in A. C, Plot of the peak [Ca2+]i as a function of pixel number, sorted according to the distance of the pixels from the pipette tip. The coefficient of variation of peak [Ca2+]i between neighboring pixels was 0.04 in this cell. D, Peak [Ca2+]i values from n = 5 similar measurements (gray symbols), normalized to the amplitude of the first (nearest) pixel of each measurement. The average data are also shown (black symbols). Note that post-flash [Ca2+]i amplitudes are constant with increasing distance from the tip of the pipette.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    EPSC deconvolution and presynaptic membrane capacitance both report a fast and a slow component of transmitter release. A1, Presynaptic Ca2+ currents. A2, EPSCs. A3, Transmitter release rates (dotted traces) and integrated release rates (continuous traces for a series of presynaptic depolarizations to 0 mV of different lengths). The experiment was first done in the presence of CTZ (black traces) and subsequently in the additional presence of 2 mm γ-DGG (red traces). The EPSCs in response to 4 and 16 ms depolarizations are also superimposed onto the EPSC evoked by a 64 ms depolarization (see asterisks and gray traces in A2). Note the slowing of the EPSC decay when longer presynaptic depolarizations were applied (see arrowhead in A2). B, Presynaptic membrane capacitance traces, for the same experiment as shown in A. The superimposed pink and gray bars indicate the time windows (30 ms) during which the poststimulus capacitance values were measured. C, Integrated release rate trace as obtained by EPSC deconvolution in response to a 64 ms depolarization. The trace was fitted by a double-exponential + line function (see green fit line), and the fast- and slow components of the fit are drawn separately (dotted and dashed line, respectively). D, Plot of the capacitance jumps (filled symbols) and cumulative transmitter release from EPSC deconvolution (open symbols) as a function of the length of the depolarization, in the absence (black symbols) or presence (red symbols) of 2 mm γ-DGG. This is the same cell as shown in A. Note that both the capacitance jumps and the cumulative release obtained from EPSC deconvolution indicate a fast and a slow component of release. Both datasets were fitted with double-exponential functions (continuous line, deconvolution; dotted line, capacitance). E, Average cumulative release normalized to the value at 8 ms (n = 4 cells). The capacitance jumps for the 32 and 64 ms depolarizations were significantly larger than the ones evoked by the 8 ms depolarization. (**p < 0.01), whereas the difference between 16 and 8 ms depolarizations was less significant (*p = 0.05).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Presynaptic Ca2+ uncaging evokes a fast and a slow release component similar as long presynaptic depolarizations. A, Three different Ca2+ stimuli were applied in the same presynaptic terminal: a Ca2+-uncaging stimulus that elevated [Ca2+]i to 8 μm (black traces) and a short (8 ms) and a long (50 ms) presynaptic depolarization to 0 mV (blue and red traces, respectively). B, EPSCs induced by the presynaptic stimuli shown in A, with identical color code. In the right, the flash-evoked EPSC is shown, together with the spillover current estimated during the EPSC deconvolution analysis (see Materials and Methods). C, Release rates resulting from the deconvolution of the EPSCs shown in B. In the right, the release rate in response to the flash is shown again, together with a line fit (green line) that was used to extrapolate the peak release rate of the slow component (see Materials and Methods). D, Integrated release rate traces. The cumulative release rate trace obtained after Ca2+ uncaging (black trace) was fitted with a double-exponential function (right, green fit line underlying the data trace), giving fast and slow time constants (and amplitudes) of 3.2 ms (812 vesicles) and 28 ms (994 vesicles). The fast and slow exponential components of the fits are drawn separately (dashed black lines, right). The linear component of the fit is displayed as well (dotted line). Note the similarity of the cumulative release for the Ca2+-uncaging stimulus and for the long depolarization (black and red trace, respectively; left).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Submaximal release of fast releasable vesicles. A, Ca2+-uncaging stimuli of different intensities produced a series of presynaptic [Ca2+]i elevations. B, EPSCs. C, Transmitter release rates. D, Cumulative release, all in response to the [Ca2+]i elevations shown in A. Traces with matched colors refer to the same flash. The integrated release rate traces (D) were fitted with double-exponential or double-exponential + line functions, and the fast exponential components of these fits are shown (dashed lines). Note that Ca2+ steps of increasing amplitudes lead to a marked increase of the fast release component.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Differential regulation by Ca2+ of the number of fast and slowly released vesicles. A1, [Ca2+]i was increased to different levels by Ca2+ uncaging (flash at arrowhead), and this was followed after 100 ms by a 50 ms depolarization to 0 mV (horizontal gray bar). [Ca2+]i traces are shown in micromolar (top), as well as normalized to their peak values (bottom). Within the first 50 ms, [Ca2+]i decayed to 88% of its peak value in this cell. A2, The corresponding EPSCs (top) and cumulative release rates (bottom), in the same color code as the traces shown in A1. The dotted lines in the bottom represent the fast components of double-exponential fits to the cumulative release traces. Note that the fast component markedly increased with Ca2+ steps of increasing amplitudes. The numbers in brackets indicate the temporal sequence of Ca2+-uncaging stimuli. B, The number of vesicles released in the fast and slow component, as well as the summed release (cross symbols), and the total release after the 50 ms depolarization is plotted as a function of [Ca2+]i, for the same cell pair as shown in A. Note that the number of vesicles released in the fast component (filled squares) increases on the expense of the number of slowly released vesicles (open squares), whereas the total release after the flash and the 50 ms depolarization (round symbols) was nearly constant. C, The amplitude of the fast and slow release components were normalized to their values in a range of 10–15 μm [Ca2+]i and plotted as a function of [Ca2+]i. Each color represents data from one cell pair (n = 9 pairs); black symbols represent the same cell pair as shown in A and B. The fast component clearly increases with [Ca2+]i steps of increasing amplitudes, whereas the slow component shows a tendency toward smaller amplitude, more than ∼7 μm [Ca2+]i (top and bottom, respectively). D, The data shown in C were averaged for the indicated four ranges of [Ca2+]i. This revealed a significant increase of the fast component with [Ca2+]i (top) and a concomitant decrease of the slow component (middle). The bottom shows the summed release evoked by Ca2+ uncaging, obtained by summing the amplitude values of the fast and the slow exponential component. E, Plot of the total release after the 50 ms depolarizations, for the same four binned [Ca2+]i ranges as shown in D.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Intracellular Ca2+ dependence of the fast and the slow component of transmitter release. Time constants of release (A), peak release rates (B), and amplitudes of the fast (C) and the slow (D) component of release are plotted against the amplitude of the [Ca2+]i steps produced by Ca2+ uncaging. A shows the time constants estimated from the exponential fit analysis, in which various combinations of exponential and line functions were fitted to integrated release rate traces (see Materials and Methods). Each black symbol is chosen according to the fit function that described the data best (open squares, line; open circles, single exponential; open diamonds, single exponential + line). Note that, above ∼4 μm [Ca2+]i, most cumulative release traces were best fitted by double-exponential or double-exponential + line functions, and the corresponding parameters obtained from the fast and the slow exponential component are shown as filled and open triangles, respectively. In A–D, the logarithmized datasets were fitted with line functions (see red and pink lines), giving slope values as indicated. The data in the range of 10–15 μm [Ca2+]i are shown additionally as red average data points. The predictions of the models shown in E and F are also shown (symbols connected by lines, in colors). Predictions obtained from single-exponential fits of the simulated release traces are shown by open circles, and those obtained by double-exponential and double-exponential + line fits are shown by triangles. E, F, [Ca2+]i waveforms (top) used for the model calculations of the cumulative release rates (bottom), according to a one-pool model (E) or a two-pool model (F). G, The allosteric model of Ca2+ binding and vesicle fusion used for the simulations. The state “F” represents the fused state. For the parameter set and for details on the simulations, see Materials and Methods.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Submaximal release of fast-released vesicles during trains of AP-like depolarizations. A1, Presynaptic Ca2+ current (top) and EPSCs (bottom) in response to 100 Hz trains of presynaptic depolarization, followed by a long (50 ms) depolarization to 0 mV. The trains consisted of depolarizations to 0 mV, with durations of 1, 1.5, or 2 ms, aimed at imposing various release probabilities during the trains. A2, Integrated release rate traces for the EPSCs shown in A1. Note that the release response consists of a fast component tightly locked to each presynaptic depolarization, but that, in addition, a slow release component builds up. The cumulative fast release, estimated by analyzing release within 2 ms after each depolarization, is shown by the dotted lines. B1, The EPSC amplitude (top) and the cumulative EPSC amplitude (bottom) are plotted against time during the 100 Hz train (same cell as shown in A1). Note that, despite different first and second EPSC amplitudes, the later EPSC amplitudes converge to similar values for the three different release probabilities (see arrow in the top). As a consequence, the cumulative EPSC amplitude is larger for high release probabilities after a few stimuli. B2, Same analysis as in B1 but now based on the estimated number of vesicles released rapidly (within 2 ms) after each presynaptic depolarization, based on EPSC deconvolution. In the bottom of B1 and B2, the cumulative plots were fitted with lines between the 10th and the 20th stimuli, and the fit lines were back-extrapolated to the beginning of the train. The values for the extrapolated y-axis intercept are indicated in each panel. In B2, the estimated number of remaining fast-released vesicles as tested by a final 50 ms depolarization (see A2, arrowhead) is also indicated (filled triangles, bottom).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental figure
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 27 (12)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 27, Issue 12
21 Mar 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Mechanism Intrinsic to the Vesicle Fusion Machinery Determines Fast and Slow Transmitter Release at a Large CNS Synapse
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Mechanism Intrinsic to the Vesicle Fusion Machinery Determines Fast and Slow Transmitter Release at a Large CNS Synapse
Markus Wölfel, Xuelin Lou, Ralf Schneggenburger
Journal of Neuroscience 21 March 2007, 27 (12) 3198-3210; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4471-06.2007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
A Mechanism Intrinsic to the Vesicle Fusion Machinery Determines Fast and Slow Transmitter Release at a Large CNS Synapse
Markus Wölfel, Xuelin Lou, Ralf Schneggenburger
Journal of Neuroscience 21 March 2007, 27 (12) 3198-3210; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4471-06.2007
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • The Cellular Electrophysiological Properties Underlying Multiplexed Coding in Purkinje Cells
  • The GARP Domain of the Rod CNG Channel’s β1-subunit Contains Distinct Sites for Outer Segment Targeting and Connecting to the Photoreceptor Disc Rim
  • The phosphoprotein Synapsin Ia regulates the kinetics of dense-core vesicle release
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.