Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleArticles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

High-Resolution Maps of Real and Illusory Tactile Activation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Individual Monkeys with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Optical Imaging

Li M. Chen, Gregory H. Turner, Robert M. Friedman, Na Zhang, John C. Gore, Anna W. Roe and Malcolm J. Avison
Journal of Neuroscience 22 August 2007, 27 (34) 9181-9191; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1588-07.2007
Li M. Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory H. Turner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Friedman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Na Zhang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John C. Gore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna W. Roe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malcolm J. Avison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Anatomic images for studying SI. a , A high-resolution coronal image is collected to locate somatosensory cortices and to guide placement of three oblique slices parallel to the SI (locations indicated by rectangles, overlaid on coronal scout image). This oblique orientation was used for both high-resolution anatomical and functional imaging. b , Major landmarks (such as central and lateral sulci) used to identify SI are visible on squirrel monkey brain. c , In three images acquired with T2* weighting, sulci and vascular structures appear dark. Both central and lateral sulci are readily identified in the most superficial slice. Scale bar, 10 mm. a, Anterior; m, medial.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    fMRI of digit topography in two monkeys. a–c , f , g , Single-condition activation maps of vibrotactile stimulation of D4 ( a ), D3 ( b ), and D2 ( c ) in monkey 1, and D2 ( f ) and D1 ( g ) in monkey 2. The significance levels of the activation-associated changes in BOLD signal in a–c and f and g are indicated by their respective color bars and corresponding p value ranges. Focal activation is observed in area 3b in all five images, and area 1 activation is also apparent in a and g . d , h , Composite maps of a–c in monkey 1 and f–g in monkey 2, respectively (different colors represent different digit activations: D4, blue; D3, green; D2, red; D1, orange). Two inserts show the enlarged view of the composite fingerpad maps. Scale bars: (in d ) a–d , (in h ) f–h , 5 mm; insets, 1 mm. e , Fingerpad topography in area 3b closely matches the known somatotopic map of squirrel monkey area 3b and area 1 [from Sur et al., (1982)]. i , The raw signal time course (signal amplitude in scanner arbitrary units) for a single run using block design (five cycles of 20 frames of stimulus/20 frames of baseline, corresponding to five 30 s blocks of stimulus and baseline) from D4 activation in area 3b ( a ). j , Time course of mean percentage signal for five blocks from the same run. The mean percentage signal changes (±SD; k ) were highly reproducible and stable across three different sessions (days) in the same monkey (left), across three runs within the same session (same day) in one monkey (middle), and across seven different monkeys (right). In monkey 1, activations of D4 ( a ) and D3 ( b ) are thresholded at p < 10−7 and D2 at p < 10−8. In monkey 2, activations of D1 and D2 are thresholded at p < 10−8. a, Anterior; m, medial.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effect of different image thresholds on the location and size of BOLD fMRI activation. a–h , Area of D1 activation in case 1 ( a–c ) and D3 activation in case 2 ( e–g ) decrease with increasing stringency of thresholding (p < 10−4; p < 5 × 10−5; and p < 10−5), but composite overlays ( d , h ) confirm that essential topography and the centroid of activation are unchanged. i , The activation area increases with increasing p value threshold for D1 in case 1 and D3 in case 2 (area relative to area at p < 10−5, defined as 100%). Compared with the activation areas at p < 10−5, areas measured at p < 5 × 10−5 increased 67.5% for D1 and 81.7% for D3; areas measured at p < 10−4 sizes increased 73.5% for D1 and 135.9% for D3. Scale bars, 1 mm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Optical imaging of area 3b and area 1 in response to digit stimulation in the same squirrel monkeys imaged with fMRI. a–c , e , f , Focal activations were obtained in single condition optical images in response to D4 ( a ), D3 ( b ), and D2 ( c ) stimulation in monkey 1, and to D2 ( e ) and D1 ( f ) stimulation in monkey 2. Stronger activations in area 3b and weaker ones in area 1 are seen in monkey 1 ( a–c ). The approximate border between areas 3b and 1 is indicated by the dotted line in d and g . Small color dots ( a–g ) indicate the electrode penetration locations for electrophysiological recording. Digits recorded are indicated by color code: D4, blue; D3, green; D2, red; and D1, orange. Summary overlays of a–c in monkey 1 and e–f in monkey 2 are shown in d and g , respectively. Scale bars, 1 mm. m, Medial; p, posterior.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Effect of thresholding level on the location and size of activation revealed by optical imaging. a , d , Raw single-condition images of activations in response to D3 ( a ) and D4 ( d ) stimulation (sum of 53 trials) are clipped at two SDs and displayed. b , e , Activation areas are defined by outlining pixels for which the signal change was significant at p < 10−5(red), p < 10−4(green), and p < 10−3(blue) for D3 ( b ) and D4 ( e ), respectively. c , f , Activations derived at various thresholds are overlaid for comparison of activation size. Activation area as a function of threshold p values (normalized to the activation area at p < 10−5 = 100%) is shown in g . Scale bar, 1 mm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Comparison of somatotopic maps of fingerpads generated by fMRI, intrinsic optical imaging, and electrophysiology in the same animal. a–e , fMRI and optical maps were coregistered using landmarks (e.g., central and lateral sulci) visible on the cortical surface and identifiable vascular markers (black arrows) in both the T2*-weighted structural MR ( a , b , d ) and optical blood vessel images ( c , e ). g , h , j , k , Comparison of the composite activation maps obtained from fMRI ( g , j ) and optical imaging ( h , k ) for digits D2 (red), D3 (green), and D4 (blue) in monkey 1, and for D2 (red) and D1 (orange) in monkey 2, respectively. b–e are generated from monkey 1. Somatotopic maps of digits obtained from fMRI and optical imaging were overlaid in f (monkey 1) and i (monkey 2) for comparison. Green dots ( h , k ) indicate the electrode penetration locations where corresponding digit representation were identified. Scale bars: a , 5 mm; b–k , 1 mm. In monkey 1 ( g ), activations of D4 (blue) and D3 (green) are thresholded at p < 10−7 and D2 (red) at p < 10−8. j , In monkey 2, activations of D1 (orange) and D2 (red) are thresholded at p < 10−8.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    3D plots of fMRI and OIS activations. a–h , Four pairs of statistical activation maps of fMRI (top) and OIS (bottom) runs are shown: D3 and D4 from animal 1 ( a–d ) and D1 and D2 from animal 2 ( e–h ). Each pair of fMRI and OIS maps are aligned and displayed with the same field of view. The x- and y-axis indicate the aligned imaging plane in mm scale, and the z-axis indicates the t value associated with the mean difference between stimulus and baseline conditions in both fMRI and OIS maps. The mesh is color coded to reflect t value (blue, t ≤ 0; yellow/red, t > 0). For fMRI maps, corresponding p values were t = 5, p = 5 × 10−7; t = 8, p = 10−14; t = 10, p = 10−20; and t = 15, p = 10−35, respectively. For optical images, corresponding p values were t = 2, p = 0.02; t = 3, p = 10−3; and t = 4, p = 10−4, respectively. Arrows indicate activation center locations. Coordinates corresponding to t value peaks were used to calculate offsets between locations of fMRI and OIS activations.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    fMRI reveals the representation of funneling illusory stimuli in area 3b. Two cases are shown (case 1, left; case 2, right). a , b , e , f , For each case, stimulation of single digits D3 ( a , b ) and D4 ( e , f ) generated single focal activations organized somatotopically in area 3b ( a and e within the blue outline shown in a , shown expanded in b , f ). c , d , Stimulation of paired adjacent digits (D3+D4) generated a single focal activation in area 3b, located between the sites of activation during stimulation of D3 ( b ) and D4 alone ( f ) (corresponding activation centers are indicated by red dashed lines). Activation is also evident in area 1 ( c , d ) during simultaneous stimulation of D3+D4 in this case. The color scale from red to yellow (case 1, p < 10−7 to p < 10−15; case 2, p < 10−10 to 10−13; see respective color bar scales) in each activation map indicates the significance level. Scale bars, 1 mm. p, Posterior; l, lateral.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Comparison of amplitudes of regional fMRI signal change during single and simultaneous stimulation of adjacent ( a–c ) and nonadjacent (d–f) digits. Spatially shifted (centered) activation was observed in area 3b ( a ) during simultaneous stimulation of adjacent digits (D1+D2) whereas two separate activations are obtained at each site (D2 and D4) during simultaneous stimulation of nonadjacent digits (D2+D4) ( d ). Quantitative analysis of the percentage signal change at sites corresponding to individual activation of D1 alone, D2 alone, and D1+D2 ( a ), or D2 alone, D4 alone, and D2+D4 ( d ) are shown in b and c (adjacent digit pair) and e and f (nonadjacent pair), respectively. The strongest percentage BOLD signal changes were obtained at D1 or D2 activation sites during individual stimulation of adjacent D1 ( b , white columns) or D2 ( b , dark columns), and at D2 or D4 activation sites during individual stimulation of nonadjacent D2 ( e , white columns) or D4 ( e , dark columns). In contrast, the strongest percentage BOLD signal change ( c , middle black column) is observed at the midway location (regions analyzed are shown as white boxes in a and d ) during simultaneous stimulation of adjacent digits D1+D2 whereas comparable percentage signal changes ( e , f ) were obtained at D2 and D4 locations ( d ) during simultaneous stimulation of nonadjacent digits D2+D4. The color scale from red to yellow in each activation map indicates the significance level from p = 10−7 to 10−15 in both a and d . Scale bar, 1 mm.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 27 (34)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 27, Issue 34
22 Aug 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High-Resolution Maps of Real and Illusory Tactile Activation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Individual Monkeys with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Optical Imaging
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
High-Resolution Maps of Real and Illusory Tactile Activation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Individual Monkeys with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Optical Imaging
Li M. Chen, Gregory H. Turner, Robert M. Friedman, Na Zhang, John C. Gore, Anna W. Roe, Malcolm J. Avison
Journal of Neuroscience 22 August 2007, 27 (34) 9181-9191; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1588-07.2007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
High-Resolution Maps of Real and Illusory Tactile Activation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Individual Monkeys with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Optical Imaging
Li M. Chen, Gregory H. Turner, Robert M. Friedman, Na Zhang, John C. Gore, Anna W. Roe, Malcolm J. Avison
Journal of Neuroscience 22 August 2007, 27 (34) 9181-9191; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1588-07.2007
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Episodic Reinstatement in the Medial Temporal Lobe
  • Musical Expertise Induces Audiovisual Integration of Abstract Congruency Rules
  • The Laminar Development of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.