Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Excitatory Synaptic Transmission Persists Independently of the Glutamate–Glutamine Cycle

Kaiwen Kam and Roger Nicoll
Journal of Neuroscience 22 August 2007, 27 (34) 9192-9200; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1198-07.2007
Kaiwen Kam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Nicoll
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    MSO causes an acute decrease in synaptic transmission that appears to be independent of glutamate–glutamine cycle inhibition. A, fEPSPs recorded in stratum radiatum of CA1 in rat hippocampal slices (n = 9) are inhibited by MSO (10 mm); however, glutamine (Gln; 4 mm) does not prevent the effect. B, Input–output relationships in slices incubated in MSO (40 mm; n = 11) or control solution (n = 9) for >4 h are not significantly different (p > 0.05 for all fiber volley amplitudes). Representative traces at three fiber volley amplitudes are shown to the right for a control slice (top) and a MSO incubated slice (bottom). FV, Fiber volley. Calibration: 0.5 mV, 10 ms.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    MeAIB produces a rapidly reversible acute depression of synaptic transmission. A, Depression of fEPSPs recorded in stratum radiatum of CA1 is observed after MeAIB (25 mm) application (n = 7). B, Incubation in MeAIB (25 mm) for more than 4 h does not change the input–output curve (control, n = 16; MeAIB, n = 14; p > 0.05 for all fiber volley amplitudes). Representative traces in control slices (top) and MeAIB-incubated slices (bottom) are shown to the right. FV, Fiber volley. Calibration: 0.5 mV, 10 ms.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Increasing extracellular glutamine enhances synaptic transmission and vesicular glutamate content in hippocampal slice. A, Input–output relationship of the AMPA-mediated fEPSPs in hippocampal slices incubated in 4 mm glutamine (n = 16) compared with a 4 mm sucrose osmotic control (n = 15) are statistically greater at all fiber volley amplitudes (p < 0.05). Sample fEPSPs at different fiber volley amplitudes from each group are shown to the right. Calibration: 0.5 mV, 10 ms. B, Input–output curve of NMDA-mediated fEPSP in 4 mm glutamine-incubated slices (n = 13) is significantly enhanced over control slices (n = 12). Representative traces from three fiber volley amplitudes are shown to the right for glutamine-incubated (top) and control (bottom) slices. Calibration: 0.1 mV, 10 ms. C, Inhibition of evoked EPSCs by the low-affinity AMPA receptor antagonist γ-DGG (0.5 mm) is reduced in 4 mm glutamine-incubated slices (n = 12) relative to control (n = 10; * p < 0.05). However, the high-affinity antagonist CNQX (400 nm) produces similar inhibition in both control (n = 7) and glutamine-incubated slices (n = 6; p > 0.05). Inset, Sample traces before (black traces) and after (gray traces) γ-DGG and CNQX application. Calibration: 25 pA, 10 ms.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Prolonged incubation in glutamine increases quantal amplitude through a system A-dependent mechanism. A, Quantal amplitude does not change in slices incubated in glutamine (Gln; 4 mm) for <4 h. Cumulative distribution function of amplitudes are not different between glutamine (n = 7) and control slices (n = 9; p > 0.05, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). Sample recordings from control (top) and glutamine-incubated (bottom) cells. Calibration: 10 pA, 100 ms. B, After more than 4 h of glutamine incubation, quantal amplitude is increased. Cumulative distribution function of amplitudes are significantly increased in glutamine (n = 8) slices over control slices (n = 7; p < 0.05, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). Sample recordings from control (top) and glutamine-incubated (bottom) cells are shown. Calibration: 10 pA, 100 ms. C, Glutamine enhancement relies on system A transporters. Cumulative distribution function of amplitudes is reduced in slices incubated in glutamine and MeAIB (n = 18) relative to slices incubated in glutamine alone (n = 18; p < 0.05, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). Sample recordings from glutamine-incubated (top) and glutamine-incubated (bottom) cells. Calibration: 10 pA, 100 ms.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Glutamine enhances quantal amplitude in dissociated hippocampal culture with the same time course as in hippocampal slices. A, Cumulative distribution function of amplitudes is not different between 4 mm glutamine (Gln)-incubated (n = 18) and control cultures (n = 20; p > 0.05, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). Sample recordings from control (top) and glutamine-incubated (bottom) cells. Calibration: 10 pA, 100 ms. B, Cumulative distribution function of amplitudes is different between 4 mm glutamine-incubated (n = 15) and control cultures (n = 14; p < 0.05, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). Sample recordings from control (top) and glutamine-incubated (bottom) cells. Calibration: 10 pA, 100 ms. C, Current evoked by sucrose (500 mm) does not differ between cultures incubated in 4 mm glutamine (<4 h, n = 19; >4 h, n = 16) relative to control coverslips (<4 h, n = 16; >4 h, n = 16; p > 0.05). Inset, Representative traces show sucrose-evoked currents. Black bars indicate application of 500 mm sucrose. Calibration: 400 pA, 1 s.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Glutamine enhancement of synaptic transmission is activity-dependent. A, Time course of glutamine enhancement shows that population activity does not increase appreciably until 1 h after application. Sample traces in control (top) and 4 mm glutamine (Gln)-incubated (bottom) slices at baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after glutamine application. Calibration: 0.5 mV, 10 ms. B, Application of hyperkalemic solution results in an immediate increase in fEPSP slope in the presence of 4 mm glutamine (n = 11) relative to control (n = 6) and produces an enhancement over baseline after 60 min. C, Immediate enhancement by 4 mm glutamine (n = 7) after hyperkalemic stimulation is lessened by addition of 25 mm MeAIB (n = 8), whereas the persistent enhancement after 60 min is abolished. D, Recovery of synaptic transmission after intense hyperkalemic stimulation does not differ in the presence of 40 mm MSO and 25 mm MeAIB (n = 7) relative to control (n = 5) slices.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 27 (34)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 27, Issue 34
22 Aug 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Excitatory Synaptic Transmission Persists Independently of the Glutamate–Glutamine Cycle
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Excitatory Synaptic Transmission Persists Independently of the Glutamate–Glutamine Cycle
Kaiwen Kam, Roger Nicoll
Journal of Neuroscience 22 August 2007, 27 (34) 9192-9200; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1198-07.2007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Excitatory Synaptic Transmission Persists Independently of the Glutamate–Glutamine Cycle
Kaiwen Kam, Roger Nicoll
Journal of Neuroscience 22 August 2007, 27 (34) 9192-9200; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1198-07.2007
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.