Abstract
Hearing, touch and proprioception are thought to involve direct activation of mechano-electrical transduction (MeT) channels. In Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons (TRNs), such channels contain two pore-forming subunits (MEC-4 and MEC-10) and two auxiliary subunits (MEC-2 and MEC-6). MEC-4 and MEC-10 belong to a large superfamily of ion channel proteins (DEG/ENaCs) that form nonvoltage-gated, amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels. In TRNs, unique 15-protofilament microtubules and an electron-dense extracellular matrix have been proposed to serve as gating tethers critical for MeT channel activation. We combined high-pressure freezing and serial-section immunoelectron microscopy to determine the position of MeT channels relative to putative gating tethers. MeT channels were visualized using antibodies against MEC-4 and MEC-2. This nanometer-resolution view of a sensory MeT channel establishes structural constraints on the mechanics of channel gating. We show here that MEC-2 and MEC-5 collagen, a putative extracellular tether, occupy overlapping but distinct domains in TRN neurites. Although channels decorate all sides of TRN neurites; they are not associated with the distal endpoints of 15-protofilament microtubules hypothesized to be gating tethers. These specialized microtubules, which are unique to TRNs, assemble into a cross-linked bundle connected by a network of kinked filaments to the neurite membrane. We speculate that the microtubule bundle converts external point loads into membrane stretch which, in turn, facilitates MeT channel activation.
Introduction
The skin is endowed with a rich array of touch receptor cells, each of which is thought to express ion channels activated by force or displacement. Functionally analogous channels underlie our sense of hearing. Because they activate with submillisecond latencies (Corey and Hudspeth, 1979; Walker et al., 2000; O'Hagan et al., 2005), these so-called mechano-electrical transduction or MeT channels are believed to both sense force and carry receptor currents. Understanding the mechanics of channel activation remains a challenge that will require a combination of approaches, including quantitative ultrastructural analysis.
The touch receptor neurons (TRNs) of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans are ideally suited for this analysis. They are readily identifiable in living animals and in electron micrographs of animal cross-sections and mediate avoidance of low-intensity touches (Chalfie and Sulston, 1981; Chalfie et al., 1985). Genetically encoded Ca2+ sensors (Suzuki et al., 2003) and whole-cell patch clamp recording (O'Hagan et al., 2005) have been used to measure TRN responses in vivo. Four membrane proteins, including two pore-forming subunits (MEC-4 and MEC-10) and two accessory proteins (MEC-2 and MEC-6) are known to be subunits of the native MeT channel (O'Hagan et al., 2005). In heterologous cells, they coimmunoprecipitate one another and form nonvoltage-gated, amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels (Chelur et al., 2002; Goodman et al., 2002). UNC-24, a membrane protein related to MEC-2 (Barnes et al., 1996) may also contribute to the complex (Zhang et al., 2004). Saturating mechanical stimuli activate 14–25 MeT channels in PLM neurons (O'Hagan et al., 2005), a pair of TRNs which innervate the posterior half of the body surface. Because a single PLM neuron is sufficient to confer touch sensitivity in its receptive field (Chalfie and Sulston, 1981; Chalfie et al., 1985), this figure suggests a remarkable conclusion: Activation of <25 MeT channels can initiate a behavioral response.
Genetic evidence suggests that proper activation of MeT channels relies on 15-protofilament (15pf) microtubules and an electron-dense, lectin-binding extracellular matrix (ECM) (Ernstrom and Chalfie, 2002; Goodman and Schwarz, 2003). A widely discussed model based on analysis of interactions between the genes encoding the MeT channel (mec-4, mec-10, mec-2, mec-6) and those encoding TRN-enriched tubulins (mec-7 and mec-12) and secreted ECM proteins (mec-1, mec-5, and mec-9) posits that MeT channels localize to junctions between the distal endpoints of 15pf microtubules and the plasma membrane and form the core of a trans-cellular mechanotransduction complex in which channels open in response to differential displacement of microtubules and the ECM (Huang and Chalfie, 1994; Huang et al., 1995; Gu et al., 1996). The structural details of the proposed in vivo interactions remain unknown.
In the present study we used serial-section immunoelectron microscopy (SS-IEM) of adult C. elegans hermaphrodites to examine, in three dimensions and with nanometer resolution, the organization of MeT channels and their position relative to the TRN cytoskeleton and ECM and interpret these results in the context of previous genetic and physiological analysis of these cells. To minimize fixation-induced osmotic shock and maximize preservation of ultrastructure and protein antigens, we fixed animals using high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution (McDonald and Auer, 2006). We analyzed the longitudinal and circumferential position of MeT channels (visualized with anti-MEC-2 and anti-MEC-4 antibodies) with respect to 15pf microtubules, the electron-dense ECM, and the secreted ECM protein, MEC-5. We report that MeT channels and MEC-5 occupy overlapping, but distinct immunofluorescence domains in TRN neurites and that, although MeT channels decorate all sides of TRN neurites, they do not localize to junctions between the plasma membrane and distal endpoints of 15pf microtubules. These microtubules assemble into a cross-linked bundle connected to the plasma membrane by a network of kinked filaments. These structural data constrain functional models that can be tested in future physiological, genetic and anatomical studies of this mechanoreceptor neuron.
Materials and Methods
C. elegans strains.
The culture and genetics of wild-type C. elegans Bristol (N2) and its mutants followed Brenner (1974). Wild-type worms were N2 animals provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), or TU2769, a transgenic animal that expresses GFP under the control of the mec-17 promoter (O'Hagan et al., 2005). TU2769 animals have no visible anatomical phenotypes or obvious defects in locomotion and exhibit nearly wild-type touch sensitivity (O'Hagan et al., 2005). Null mutants, mec-2(u37), mec-4(u253), and mec-5(u2020) were provided by Martin Chalfie (Columbia University, NY, New York) and crossed into TU2769 for immunofluorescence studies.
Antibodies.
Polyclonal antibodies against MEC-2 (amino acids 19–118), MEC-4 (amino acids 223–322), and MEC-5 (amino acids 103–203) were generated by genetic immunization in mice at the antibody core of the University of Texas Southwestern (Tang et al., 1992; Chambers and Johnston, 2003) and are available from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). In all experiments, the MEC-2, MEC-4, and MEC-5 antibodies were preadsorbed against total protein homogenate from mec-2(u37), mec-4(u253), and mec-5(u2020) null alleles. Preadsorption reduces background by decreasing the concentration of antibodies that may recognize antigenic sequences of closely related proteins while minimizing the loss of high-affinity antibodies. A rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against MEC-2 was used for double-labeling experiments (Zhang et al., 2004).
Indirect immunofluorescence.
Adult, wild type and mutant nematodes were prepared for immunofluorescence in one of two fixation solutions: 4% paraformaldehyde in 1× PBS, pH 7.2 or Ruvkun-Finney fixative (160 mm KCl, 40 mm NaCl, 10 mm Na2EGTA, 10 mm spermidine HCl, 30 mm NaPIPES, 25% methanol, and 2% paraformaldehyde). Fixed nematodes were subsequently permeabilized following a modified peroxide tube fixation protocol. Briefly, fixed nematodes were washed twice in Tris–Triton solution (TTS; 100 mm Tris, pH 7.4, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mm EDTA), incubated 4 h in TTS plus 1% β-mercaptoethanol at 37°C with mild agitation. The animals were next washed with Borate Buffer solution (BO3B; 25 mm H3BO3, 0.01% Triton X-100, pH 9.5), incubated for 15 min in BO3B plus 10 mm dithiotreitol at 37°C, washed again with BO3B, and incubated 15 min in BO3B plus 0.3% H2O2 at room temperature. Permeabilized nematodes were stored in Antibody Buffer (AbB; 1× PBS, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.05% sodium azide, pH 7.2).
Fixed and permeabilized animals were placed in block buffer (AbB + 5% normal goat serum) for 1 h at room temperature, then in block buffer plus a 1:100 dilution of mouse anti-MEC-2, mouse anti-MEC-4 or mouse anti-MEC-5 sera for 12–15 h at 4°C. Labeled nematodes were washed with AbB 3 times, 10 min each, then incubated in either goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies with a conjugated 568 or 488 nm Alexafluor, respectively (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 2 h at room temperature. Unbound secondary antibody was washed off and nematodes were mounted with Prolong Antifade medium (Invitrogen) and imaged with a Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) Axiocam mounted on a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope with a Zeiss Plan-Neofluar 100×/1.4 numerical aperture (NA) oil objective. Double label experiments used the same labeling protocol as single label experiments. For display purposes only, image contrast was adjusted in Adobe Photoshop CS2, version 9.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). Unless indicated, immunofluorescent puncta were identified on the basis of their intensity compared with background; the size and interpunctum intervals (defined as the edge-to-edge distance between adjacent puncta) were measured with the ImageJ software program (Abramoff et al., 2004). To compare IF puncta with fluorescent beads and simulated IF puncta, we identified IF puncta as peaks in background-subtracted intensity profiles and recorded their length as the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of each peak and the interpunctum interval as the peak-to-peak distance.
Colocalization of immunofluorescent puncta.
Image colocalization was quantified as described by Li et al. (2004). Paired images from double label experiments were prepared and analyzed in parallel using ImageJ. Images were cropped to include only TRNs and processed with the “subtract background” function. Next, the images were converted into 8-bit monochrome format and colocalization of overlapping puncta quantified using Intensity Correlation Analysis (ICA) in the JACoP plugin for ImageJ. The intensity correlation quotient (ICQ) is a metric of the association of pixel intensities (−1 = anti-correlated, 0 = uncorrelated, +1 = correlated).
Serial-section immunoelectron microscopy.
Adult wild-type, N2 nematodes were prepared for immunoelectron microscopy as previously described (Muller-Reichert et al., 2003; McDonald and Auer, 2006). A Leica (Vienna, Austria) AFS freeze substitution apparatus was used to preserve and embed the nematodes in 0.2% glutaraldehyde (GA) and LR-White resin, respectively. Serial, ultrathin sections (50 nm) were cut with a diamond knife on a Leica Ultracut S microtome and collected on Formvar-coated, nickel slot grids. The grids were next floated on 50 μl of block solution (1× PBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 0.1% BSA, 0.1% cold water fish gelatin, 0.01% sodium azide, pH 8.2) for 30 min, transferred to a 50 μl drop of block solution containing a 1:100 concentration of preadsorbed MEC-2, MEC-4, or MEC-5 sera for 1 h. The grids were then washed five times on 50 μl drops containing wash solution (1× PBS, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 8.2) for 5 min followed by flotation on a drop of 1:50 concentration of Goat anti-Mouse Fab′ fragment conjugated to a 15 nm, 10 nm, or 5 nm gold bead in block solution for 30 min (Ted Pella, Redding, CA). Next, unbound secondary antibody was removed with a salt wash (1× PBS, 2.5M NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 8.2) for 5 min followed by five rounds of washing with ddH2O for 5 min each. Grids were postfixed on 2% GA for 5 min. To enhance contrast, labeled sections were poststained in 3.5% uranyl acetate in acetone for 2 s, and then Reynold's lead citrate preparation for 2 min. The grids were imaged on a Jeol (Tokyo, Japan) TEM1230 transmission electron microscope and images acquired with a Gatan 967 slow-scan, cooled CCD camera (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA).
We collected 50 nm sections from five wild type adult C. elegans. These sections contained cross-sections of one ALM, six PLMs, one AVM and one PVM. Approximately one-third of the sections were consecutive. Three groups of consecutive sections were used to construct three-dimensional (3-D) models of MEC-2 and MEC-5 distribution in the TRN: 1) 7.5 μm reconstructed from 151 serial sections labeled with anti-MEC-2, including two adults, one ALM and two PLMs; 2) 20 μm reconstructed from 400 serial sections labeled with anti-MEC-2, including one adult and two PLMs; 3) 1 μm reconstructed from 20 serial sections labeled with anti-MEC-5, including one adult and two PLMs. The remaining sections were nonconsecutive.
Analysis of SS-IEM datasets.
ImageJ (Abramoff et al., 2004) was used to measure the position of gold labels and ECM position in individual immunoelectron micrographs. The coordinate of each label cluster was plotted as (rcosθ, rsinθ) measured in polar coordinates from individual micrographs, where r was the normalized distance from the center of each TRN cross-section and θ was the angle. Neurite profiles were typically elliptical having major and minor axes of 514 ± 132 (mean ± SD, n = 69) and 359 ± 84 nm, respectively. Average ECM density was computed by measuring the angular distribution of detectable, osmophilic ECM, creating an idealized image representing that distribution and computing an average of all such idealized ECM distributions.
Three-dimensional models were generated with Reconstruct (Fiala, 2005). Briefly, all images from consecutive sections were aligned manually and the outline of all subcellular structures traced by hand. Distances between structures were measured in three dimensions using Reconstruct. Average values reported as mean ± SD. Open-source software (Blender3D, http://www.blender3d.org) was used to generate the animations shown in supplemental data (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).
Immunofluorescence simulations.
To simulate the immunofluorescent puncta that arise from our SS-IEM datasets under ideal conditions, we first computed the 2-D distribution of light intensity, I, produced by a point source observed through an aberration-free lens or the Airy disk: I(r,0) = I 0[2J 1(r)/r]2, where r is the radial distance from the optical axis, I 0 is the intensity at r = 0 and J 1 is a first-order Bessel function (Born and Wolf, 1980). The lens we simulated matched the objective used to acquire wide-field immunofluorescent images and had an NA of 1.4. We assumed that light emitted from the point source had a wavelength of 605 nm; the peak of the emission curve for the Alexa Fluor 568 nm-conjugated secondary antibody. A complete simulation was constructed by placing an Airy disk at each position at which a gold bead was detected in each SS-IEM data set and computing the sum of the Airy disks. Both membrane-associated and cytoplasmic beads were included in the simulation. For the purposes of simulations, all beads were assumed to be in the same focal plane because the width of the TRN neurite is much smaller than the theoretical resolution along the optical (z) axis (z-axis resolution ≈ 935 nm, neurite width = 512 nm). We note that the simulation underestimates puncta size because it does not account for dispersion and light scattering, mismatches in refractive index of the immersion oil, glass coverslip, and the mounting media, or for chromatic dispersion.
Results
MeT channels subunits and MEC-5 collagen form distinct puncta in TRN neurites
The partial loss of touch sensitivity conferred by temperature-sensitive mutations in mec-5 is enhanced by mutations in genes encoding MeT channel subunits including mec-2 and mec-4, suggesting that MEC-5 collagen interacts with MeT channel complexes and could act as a gating tether (Gu et al., 1996). Although previous reports have supported this idea (Emtage et al., 2004), both MEC-4 and MEC-5 were visualized using fluorescent fusion proteins. As such fusion proteins are likely to be over-expressed in transgenic C. elegans, we re-examined the distribution of native amounts of MEC-2, MEC-4 and MEC-5 in wild-type animals. We focused on the four lateral TRNs (ALMs and PLMs which innervate the anterior and posterior halves of the body, respectively).
All three antibodies labeled TRN cell bodies and discrete puncta along the length of TRN neurites (Fig. 1 A). Little is known about how such puncta are formed or the patterning process that controls their positioning except that wild-type MEC-5 and MEC-6 are required for their formation (Chelur et al., 2002; Emtage et al., 2004). To learn more, we determined the distribution of interpunctum intervals. In principle, if the underlying patterning process is regular and precise but puncta detection and visualization methods are subject to random noise, the distribution of intervals is expected to be normal (Gaussian). Instead, we found that the distribution of interpunctum intervals was log-normal (Fig. 1 B,C), suggesting that patterning is the result of the product of two (or more) random processes (Limpert et al., 2001). MEC-2 and MEC-4 intervals had similar distributions, including a significant proportion of intervals that were longer than 2 μm. The distribution of MEC-5 intervals was more compact and no interval was longer than 2 μm. On average, MEC-2 and MEC-4 IF puncta were separated by 2.6 ± 2.7 μm (n = 498 intervals) and 1.7 ± 1.9 μm (n = 386 intervals), respectively, whereas MEC-5 IF puncta were separated by only 0.65 ± 0.6 μm (n = 421 intervals).
Native MeT channels and MEC-5 collagen decorate TRN neurites. A , Indirect immunofluorescence labeling of PLM in wild-type animals. Similar results were observed in 22, 18, and 15 neurites labeled with anti-MEC-2, anti-MEC-4, and anti-MEC-5 antibodies, respectively. Anterior is to the left. Scale bar, 10 μm. B , Probability distributions (pdfs) of interpunctum intervals for MeT channel subunits (MEC-2 and MEC-4) and MEC-5 collagen. Smooth curves were fit to the data according to a log-normal distribution. Fitting parameters were as follows (peak, width in μm): MEC-2 (0.2, 2.15), MEC-4 (0.2, 2.34), and MEC-5 (0.263, 0.84). C , Cumulative probability distribution functions for the data shown in B .
Double-labeling experiments revealed that, whereas MEC-2 and MEC-4 IF puncta were colocalized (Fig. 2 B), MEC-2 and MEC-5 IF puncta frequently occupied distinct domains of lateral neurites (Fig. 2 C). We quantified the extent of colocalization using an intensity-based measure of the covariance of pixel intensities in the two channels (Li et al., 2004). Samples colabeled with polyclonal antibodies raised against MEC-2 in mouse (this study) and rabbit (Zhang et al., 2004) served as a control for the values expected for colocalized proteins (Fig. 2 A). This analysis strongly supports the conclusion that MEC-2 colocalizes with MEC-4 but not with MEC-5 (Fig. 2 D). Together, our analysis of immunofluorescent puncta implies that, in wild-type animals: (1) the MeT channel subunits (MEC-2 and MEC-4) are patterned by a mechanism that is distinct from the one that governs the patterning of the ECM protein, MEC-5 and (2) MEC-5 is unlikely to be a subunit of the sensory MeT complex in vivo.
The MEC-2 channel subunit colocalizes with MEC-4 but not with MEC-5. Indirect immunofluorescence double labeling of TRNs with antibodies specific for the following: A , two distinct domains of MEC-2; B , MEC-2 and MEC-4; and C , MEC-2 and MEC-5. D , Quantification of colocalization in the double-label experiments. Intensity correlation quotient values are as follows (average ± SD, n indicates double-labeled neurites): MEC-2/MEC-2 (0.3 ± 0.06; n = 8), MEC-2/MEC-4 (0.28 ± 0.02; n = 8), and MEC-2/MEC-5 (0.11 ± 0.03; n = 8). *p < 0.01, Student's t test. Scale bar, 10 μm.
Circumferential distribution of MeT channels, MEC-5 collagen, and ECM
We used serial-section immunoelectron microscopy (SS-IEM), to determine the in vivo localization of MeT channel complexes and MEC-5 collagen with nanometer resolution. To maximize the chances of detecting MeT channels and MEC-5 collagen both of which are patterned on a micron-scale (Fig. 1 B,C), we cut thin (50 nm) cross-sections and retained serial sections sufficient to reconstruct micron-scale segments of five TRN neurites. TRN neurites innervate the cuticle, are positioned within 150 nm of the inner surface of the cuticle and, in adult animals, they are engulfed by and embedded within the hypodermis (Fig. 3 A,B). Each neurite is coated by an electron-dense material (Fig. 3 B) which is believed to comprise a specialized ECM needed for touch sensation (Du et al., 1996). In general, the apical or cuticle side was more likely to be coated by this electron-dense material than was the basal side (Fig. 3 B).
Nanoscale position of the MEC-2 and MEC-4 MeT channel subunits and MEC-5 collagen in wild-type TRNs. A , Schematic cross-section showing the relative positions of the cuticle (gray), four muscle quadrants (green), hypodermis (brown), PLM (green), PLN (blue), and ECM (purple). Structures not to scale. Adapted from WormAtlas (Altun and Hall, 2005). B , Electron micrograph showing a cross-section through the cuticle (gray), ECM (purple), PLM (blue), and PLN (green). Cuticle (apical) side is up. Scale bar, 200 nm. C , Immunoelectron micrographs of thin sections labeled with anti-MEC-2 (top), anti-MEC-4 (middle), and anti-MEC-5 (bottom). Insets are digitally magnified (2×) views of each label cluster. Filled arrowheads indicate gold beads; open arrowhead indicates a mitochondrion in PLM. Scale bar, 200 nm. D , Circumferential position of MEC-2 (top), MEC-4 (middle), and MEC-5 (bottom). Symbol size is proportional to the number of gold beads in a cluster in each section; the smallest symbol corresponds to a single gold bead and the largest symbol corresponds to four gold beads. The average ECM density for the labeled sections is shown as a grayscale annulus around the neurite cross-section. E , MEC-5 collagen but not MeT channel subunits exhibit an apical bias. *p < 0.01, χ2 test. The number of labels in each category is indicated in parentheses.
Anti-MEC-4 and anti-MEC-2 antibodies decorated two structures in wild-type TRNs, the plasma membrane and the 15pf microtubules, whereas anti-MEC-5 antibodies decorated the space in between TRN neurites and the surrounding hypodermal cell (Fig. 3 C) (supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Approximately half of the MeT channel labels were associated with the plasma membrane: 51% (n = 49) and 44% (n = 36) of anti-MEC-2 and anti-MEC-4 labels, respectively). These labels were distributed around the circumference of the TRN neurite without any obvious bias for either the apical or basal aspect of the neurite (Fig. 3 D,E). In some cases, clusters of gold labels were associated with the plasma membrane. Half of the membrane-associated anti-MEC-4 labels were doublets, whereas approximately one-fifth of the membrane-associated anti-MEC-2 labels contained clusters of 2 or 3 gold beads. Anti-MEC-5 antibodies were significantly more likely to be found on the apical side of TRN neurites (Fig. 3 D,E) (supplemental Video 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Like our immunofluorescence findings, these data argue against an obligatory physical interaction between MeT channels and MEC-5 collagen.
The remaining MeT channel labels were associated with 15pf microtubules distributed throughout the cytoplasm (supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Intracellular labels were not associated with vesicles in TRN neurites and vesicles were not detected in any of our five SS-IEM reconstructions, which covered a total length of 63 μm (data not shown). The lack of vesicles in adult TRN neurites was not attributable to an inability to resolve membranes in TRNs, however, because plasma membranes and other membrane-bound organelles such as mitochondria were readily detected (Fig. 3 C, bottom). Nor was the lack of vesicles attributable to an inability to detect synaptic vesicles generally, because many were detected in neurons in the ventral nerve cord (supplemental Fig. 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). We note, in addition, that the space between 15-pf microtubules (∼10 nm) is too small to accommodate even synaptic vesicles which are 30–35 nm in diameter in electron micrographs of conventionally prepared samples (White et al., 1986; Nonet et al., 1999) and 34 ± 4 nm (n = 14) in samples prepared using HPF-FS (this study). Together, these observations suggest that few, if any vesicles are present in wild type TRN neurites in adult animals.
Efficiency and specificity of serial-section immunoelectron microscopy
As expected from the micron-scale interpunctum spacing observed using immunofluorescence (Fig. 1), gold beads were detected in a minority of thin sections labeled with either anti-MEC-4 or anti-MEC-2 antibodies (85 of ∼2500 sections or ∼3%). Labels were not present in sections flanking those bearing membrane-associated anti-MEC-4 and anti-MEC-2 labels (Fig. 4), suggesting that MeT channels are not concentrated into extended patches. This finding is consistent with the observation that the majority of IF puncta were the same size as the image of single fluorescent beads smaller than the theoretical diffraction limit (see Fig. 6 B). Consistent with the shorter interpunctum intervals of MEC-5 IF puncta (Fig. 1), gold beads were detected approximately twice as often in thin sections labeled with anti-MEC-5 antibodies (26 of 300 or ∼ 9%). Although anticipated from the distribution of IF puncta, the sparseness of labeling at the electron microscopic level raised concerns regarding both the efficiency and specificity of labeling in thin sections. Also, thin sections were embedded in a plastic resin (LR White) that may limit antibody penetration (Griffiths and Hoppeler, 1986; Lucocq, 1994); however, Micheva and Smith (2007) report that antibodies can penetrate LR White sections as thick as 200 nm. In the worst case, only those antigens on the surface of each thin section are available to be labeled and our sampling interval is equal to the thickness of each section or 50 nm. We evaluated the impact of the 50 nm sampling interval by using our SS-IEM datasets to simulate immunofluorescence images and by analyzing these simulated images using the same methods we used to analyze experimental immunofluorescence images. To compare experimental and simulated immunofluorescence images, we compiled histograms of interlabel intervals. Consistent with the idea that most if not all channel complexes detected by immunofluorescence were detected by SS-IEM, the cumulative distribution functions derived from these histograms were indistinguishable (see Fig. 6 C).
Sequential immunoelectron micrographs of 50 nm sections labeled with anti-MEC-2 (top) and anti-MEC-4 (bottom). Scale bar, 200 nm.
We examined specificity in three ways. First, we reasoned that if the antibodies are specific for their target proteins, then they should fail to label TRNs in null mutants. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that, although TRN neurites were intact and grossly normal in mec-4, mec-2 and mec-5 null mutants, they were not labeled by antibodies directed against the respective gene products (supplemental Fig. 3, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Second, we compared the density of gold beads in TRNs with that in the surrounding hypodermal cell, which does not express mec-4 or mec-2 and presents a much larger cross-sectional area than the TRN neurite, and found that labeling density was 8.5-fold higher in TRNs than in hypodermal cells. Third, qualitatively similar results were obtained with three different nanogold-conjugated secondary antibodies, a result which argues against the idea that the labeling pattern is attributable to nonspecific labeling by the secondary antibody.
Nanoscale position of membrane-associated MeT channels and 15pf microtubules
TRN neurites are filled with a cross-linked bundle of microtubules. Individual microtubules are 10–20 μm long on average and are staggered throughout the entire length of each TRN neurite (Chalfie and Thomson, 1979). We identified distal endpoints of 15pf microtubules by virtue of the absence of a microtubule cross-section in the subsequent (more distal) section. Distal endpoints were more likely to occur at the periphery of the microtubule bundle than at its center (Fig. 5 A,B). Approximately half (134 of 270) of the distal endpoints appeared to make direct contact with the plasma membrane; such contact sites were characterized by a diffuse patch of electron-dense filamentous material and present at a longitudinal frequency of 4.1 ± 1 μm−1 (n = 5 TRN segments). It has been suggested that MeT channels localize to these junctions (Gu et al., 1996). As noted previously (Emtage et al., 2004), this seems unlikely because the average longitudinal frequency of distal endpoints exceeds that of MEC-2 and MEC-4 IF puncta by 10-fold. [The average frequencies of MEC-2 and MEC-4 IF puncta are 0.3 ± 0.1 μm−1 (n = 22 neurites) and 0.38 ± 0.07 μm−1 (n = 18 neurites), respectively.]
Position of distal endpoints of 15pf microtubules and the distance between endpoints and native MeT channels. A , Position of distal endpoints detected in SS-IEM reconstructions of lateral TRN neurites. Dashed line indicates the border between the center and rim of a normalized TRN profile; the center and rim zones have equal areas. B , Fraction of endpoints in the rim and center of the TRN cross-section. *p < 0.0001, χ2 test. C , Fraction of endpoints on the apical and basal sides of the TRN. Numbers in each category indicated in parentheses. D , 3-D digital model of a 7.5 μm fragment of PLM derived from 151 serial sections labeled with anti-MEC-2 antibody. For clarity, only the following structures are shown: the plasma membrane (transparent gray); terminating microtubules (aqua) and their distal endpoints (red); and plasma membrane-associated MeT channels (gold spheres). An animated fly-through of the model is included in supplemental data (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). The distance between each membrane-associated channel and the nearest microtubule endpoint was measured as illustrated. E , Histogram of the distance between plasma membrane-associated MeT channels and the nearest microtubule endpoint. The average and median distances were 347 and 328 nm, respectively. Measurements were made of 271 distal 15pf microtubule endpoints and endpoint-to-channel distances for 14 channels localized in five 3-D models derived from SS-IEM of lateral TRNs (4 PLMs and 1 ALM).
To learn more about the relationship between membrane-associated MeT channels and distal endpoints, we reconstructed segments of five TRNs (three 7.5 μm segments and two 20 μm segments) from SS-IEM data sets labeled with anti-MEC-2 antibodies and generated three-dimensional digital renderings of the following structures: TRN plasma membrane, 15pf microtubules, anti-MEC-2 labels, cuticle, and the PLN plasma membrane. One of these models is shown in Figure 5 D; for clarity only the plasma membrane, anti-MEC-2 labels and terminating microtubules are shown (all microtubules were reconstructed, however). An animated “fly-through,” which demonstrates the spatial relationship between membrane-associated channels and microtubule endpoints, is provided in supplemental data (supplemental Video 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). We found a total of 17 membrane-associated channels in the five reconstructed TRN segments. Three labels were >1 μm away from the nearest microtubule endpoint and were not analyzed further. Of the remaining 14 channels, none were closer than 141 nm to the nearest distal endpoint (Fig. 5 E). On average, 346 ± 178 nm (n = 14) separated MeT channels from the nearest 15pf microtubule distal endpoint. These data indicate that membrane-associated MeT channels are neither localized to junctions between microtubule endpoints and the plasma membrane nor likely to interact directly with such endpoints. Additionally, there was no obvious geometric relationship between membrane-associated MeT channels and en passant microtubules, suggesting that interactions between MeT channels and 15pf microtubules are likely to be indirect.
Evidence that the 15pf microtubule bundle is a structural organelle
Previously we showed that, although native MeT channels can be activated in mec-7 mutant TRNs lacking 15pf microtubules, the pressure required to open half of the channels is increased twofold in mec-7 mutants (O'Hagan et al., 2005). To learn more about how 15pf microtubules might contribute to mechanotransduction, we characterized the cytoskeletal structures connecting all 15pf microtubules into a bundle and the network of links attaching the entire 15pf microtubule bundle to the plasma membrane (see Fig. 7). Inter-microtubule links, which were more numerous than previously described (Chalfie and Thomson, 1979, 1982), were 9.7 ± 2.2 nm in length (Fig. 7 C). Collectively, they attached all of the microtubules within the bundle to each other, suggesting that, like axonemal microtubules, TRN microtubules are constrained to move together as a single structure. In a typical 50 nm section, central microtubules were surrounded by an average of 6 ± 1 microtubules (90 central microtubules from 4 sections), whereas those on the periphery of the bundle were surrounded by only 4 ± 1 microtubules (71 peripheral microtubules from 4 sections). Furthermore, an average of 5 ± 2 links radiated from the surface of each 15pf microtubule (194 microtubules from 5 TRN sections), suggesting that the links hold the microtubules in a hexagonal array. The outward facing side of each peripheral microtubule radiated an average of 3 ± 1 links to a network of structurally distinct filaments that connect the microtubule bundle to the plasma membrane (Fig. 7).
Concordance between MEC-2 immunofluorescent puncta and the distribution of anti-MEC-2 labels in SS-IEM. A , Simulated immunofluorescent image (top) and associated intensity profile (bottom) derived from SS-IEM of a 20 μm segment of PLM. AU, Arbitrary units. B , Histogram of the length (full-width half-maximum) of mouse anti-MEC-2 immunofluorescent (IF) puncta. n = 445 IF puncta measured in 21 TRN neurites. Smooth line is the sum of two Gaussians with centers at 870 nm and 1.44 μm that was fit to the data. Inset shows the average intensity profile of 15 fluorescent microspheres (d = 175 nm) imaged under the same conditions as IF samples; smooth line is a Gaussian fit to the data with a FWHM of 750 nm. C , Cumulative probability distribution of interlabel intervals for experimental and simulated IF puncta; intervals were defined as the peak-to-peak distance for puncta detected from intensity profiles of real and simulated IF images.
A network of filaments links individual 15 protofilament microtubules to each other and connects the microtubule bundle to the plasma membrane. A , Electron micrographs showing filaments that link 15pf microtubules to one another and to the plasma membrane. Individual microtubules are linked to the majority of their nearest neighbors in the bundle. Filaments linking microtubules to the plasma membrane are more numerous and are organized into a more elaborate network. Scale bars, 150 nm. B , Digital rendering of the filaments and microtubules in four serial sections of PLM reveals the density of filaments and the extent of the connections they make. Microtubule fragments are shown in aqua, and filaments are in black. The panels are rotamers of a single 3-D digital model. C , Distribution of the lengths of inter-microtubules links. A total of 315 links were analyzed in five electron micrographs of a series of consecutive 50 nm sections containing 64 15pf microtubules. D , Distribution of the lengths of filaments linking the microtubule bundle to the plasma membrane. A total of 215 filaments were analyzed in the same electron micrographs as in C .
The filaments linking the microtubule bundle to the plasma membrane were organized into a lattice of polygons. The filaments extended an average of 13.7 ± 3.6 nm (Fig. 7 D) before changing their orientation 92 ± 26° (113 angles from 10 sections). The lattice of filament-like structures filled the cytoplasmic space between the microtubule bundle and plasma membrane. Individual filaments contacted all regions of the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, suggesting that the microtubule bundle is attached to the plasma membrane isotropically. We estimated that an average of 367.4 filaments contacted the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane in each 50 nm section by dividing the average size of the TRN plasma membrane (TRN perimeter 1.396 ± 0.337 μm, 50 TRN cross- sections) by the average distance between pairs of membrane attached filaments (3.8 ± 3.5 nm, 118 filament pairs from 4 sections). Occasionally, a dense aggregation of filament structures contacting the plasma membrane was observed (data not shown). In these instances, individual filaments overlapped and were too numerous to count accurately.
Next, we asked whether or not such filaments could be attached to MeT channels and serve as gating tethers in place of 15pf microtubules. This idea makes two predictions: (1) most, if not all filaments would be positioned within nanometers of a membrane-associated MeT channel; (2) all membrane-associated MeT channels would be contacted by at least one filament. In this scenario, MeT channels could be activated by tether displacement and the lattice of filaments and bundle of 15pf microtubules would act as a mechanical amplifier. However, many (32%, n = 41) membrane-associated MeT channel labels were >5 nm away from one of these filaments. This finding indicates that if such filaments are gating tethers, then they are present in vast excess compared with membrane-associated MeT channels and that approximately one-third of membrane-associated MeT channels are not available to be activated.
Discussion
Previous models of sensory mechanotransduction by C. elegans touch receptor neurons proposed a trans-cellular complex in which displacement of the ECM (or 15pf microtubules), resisted by the 15pf microtubules (or ECM), gates the channel in the plasma membrane (Gu et al., 1996). This model and derivatives that propose that channels are linked to the ECM but not to 15pf microtubules (Emtage et al., 2004; Bounoutas and Chalfie, 2007) make specific predictions about the position of MeT channels in relation to MEC-5 and 15pf microtubule endpoints. We used serial-section immunoelectron microscopy and digital 3-D reconstruction methods to localize native MeT channels in C. elegans touch receptor neurons to establish the structural correlates of channel gating and to test these models. Serial-section immunoelectron microscopy provides a means for testing whether or not genetic interactions are likely to be mediated by physical association in their native environment. Because the rarity of MeT channels limits the use of traditional biochemical tests of physical interaction, this approach is especially critical for analysis of the cellular machinery responsible for sensory mechanotransduction.
Several lines of evidence support the conclusion that MeT channels, MEC-5 collagen and 15pf microtubules do not assemble into a common trans-cellular apparatus responsible for detecting touch in C. elegans TRNs. First, in wild-type animals expressing native levels of all three proteins, MEC-2 colocalizes with MEC-4, but not MEC-5 in immunofluorescent puncta. Second, whereas membrane-associated MeT channel subunits MEC-2 and MEC-4 are distributed essentially evenly around the circumference of TRN neurites, MEC-5 is concentrated principally on the apical side. Considered together, these data argue against the idea that MeT channels are physically linked to MEC-5. Third, all membrane-associated MeT channel subunits analyzed by SS-IEM were >100 nm away from the nearest distal microtubule endpoint. Finally, the average longitudinal frequency of MeT channel IF puncta (0.3–0.4 per μm) differs from that of microtubule endpoints (∼4 per μm) and that of MEC-5 IF puncta (∼1 per μm) by 10- and 4-fold respectively.
Genetic interaction analysis, in which two mutations have a combined effect not exhibited by either mutation alone, has been critical for establishing functional connections between genes that mutate to produce a touch-insensitive (Mec) phenotype in C. elegans. Such interactions could arise from direct physical associations between gene products, independent contributions to a common cellular function, or both. It is impossible to distinguish among these possibilities using genetic methods alone. Our structural analysis implies that interactions between temperature-sensitive alleles of mec-5 and the genes encoding the four subunits of MeT channels (mec-4, mec-10, mec-2 and mec-6) as well as similar interactions between temperature-sensitive alleles of mec-4 and mec-5 (Huang and Chalfie, 1994; Huang et al., 1995; Gu et al., 1996) do not arise from physical interactions between MEC-5 and MeT channel complexes in adult animals. MEC-5 could act to establish and maintain MeT channel complexes earlier in development, however. In support of this idea, temperature-shift experiments show that mec-5 is needed during the L2 and L3 larval stages (Chalfie and Sulston, 1981). Our data likewise argue against the idea that genetic interactions between MEC-5 collagen and MEC-7 β tubulin (Gu et al., 1996) reflect their incorporation into a common complex incorporating MEC-5, the MeT channels, and 15pf microtubules. Finally, although our data demonstrate that genetic interactions between MEC-2 and MEC-7 β tubulin (Huang et al., 1995; Gu et al., 1996) are not the result of physical association at the plasma membrane, the labeling of microtubules by anti-MEC-2 (supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) suggests that a physical interaction may occur in the TRN cytoplasm.
Previously, we showed that both MEC-4 and MEC-10 are pore-forming subunits of the native MeT channel (O'Hagan et al., 2005). How many of each assembles to build a functional channel? At least two MEC-4 proteins appear to be required, because degeneration caused by gain-of-function mutations in mec-4, although dominant, can be suppressed in trans by loss-of-function alleles of mec-4 (Hong and Driscoll, 1994). Our structural data, which reveal that membrane-associated MEC-4 labels are either single labels or doublets of adjacent labels (no MEC-4 triplets were observed), are consistent with this genetic inference and suggest that exactly two MEC-4 proteins form each channel. Based on a recent 1.9 Å-resolution structure, DEG/ENaC channels appear to be trimers (Jasti et al., 2007). Thus, the simplest model that is consistent with the available data is that native C. elegans MeT channels are composed of two MEC-4 proteins and one MEC-10 protein.
Based on our SS-IEM datasets, which show that membrane-associated labels are separated by an average of 2.4 μm, we estimate that an adult TRN neurite contains on the order of 200 membrane-associated MeT channels. This figure is likely to be an overestimate, however, because a disproportionate number of interlabel intervals are longer than the average. In any case, only a fraction of these channels are activated when point loads are applied to the cuticle, because saturating mechanical stimuli activate 14–25 channels (O'Hagan et al., 2005). This implies that point loads affect only those channels present in the TRN segment directly displaced by the stimulus probe. In support of the idea that transduction is local, we showed previously that mechanoreceptor current amplitude depends not only on force, but also on the force per unit area (pressure) (O'Hagan et al., 2005). In other words, a given force activates a larger fraction of MeT channels when it is delivered to a smaller area.
By virtue of their material properties or thickness relative to channels or both factors, bilayers can modulate channel gating by altering the relative stability of closed and open states (McIntosh and Simon, 2006). We speculate that forces delivered via the lipid bilayer facilitate MeT channel gating in vivo. A critical role for lipids in C. elegans MeT channels is suggested by the finding that MEC-2 binds cholesterol and that at least one mutation that disrupts touch sensation also disrupts cholesterol binding (Huber et al., 2006). Additional support comes from the finding that UNC-24, which has a lipid-transfer domain and is implicated in nonvesicular transfer of lipids (Barnes et al., 1996), colocalizes with MEC-2 in vivo, coimmunoprecipitates with MEC-2 in heterologous cells, and modulates channel activity in Xenopus oocytes (Zhang et al., 2004). For this model to be viable, it is necessary to postulate a mechanism by which pressure applied to the cuticle is converted into membrane stretch. We propose that the 15pf microtubule bundle serves this function and can be viewed as a force-transmitting organelle that converts point loads applied perpendicular to TRN neurites into membrane bending or stretch via the lattice of filaments that radiate from all microtubules in the periphery of the bundle and contact the plasma membrane. Additionally, the microtubule-to-microtubule cross-links could contribute to amplification by increasing the stiffness of the microtubule bundle.
The contribution of the 15pf microtubules to mechanotransduction is likely to be indirect. Here, a useful analogy can be drawn to the outer pillar cells of the mammalian cochlea, which play a critical role in transferring force and displacement from the basilar membrane to the reticular lamina and the mechanosensory hair cells. Their contribution to cochlear mechanics is thought to rely on the stiffness conferred by thousands of cross-linked 15pf microtubules (Tolomeo and Holley, 1997). Mutations that alter the number of outer pillar cells and leave hair cells intact, cause deafness in mice (Shim et al., 2005; Hayashi et al., 2007), underscoring their permissive, but critical role in mammalian mechanotransduction. The present work serves a first step toward the generation of structurally and mechanically realistic models of how force and displacement applied to the skin are delivered to sensory MeT in C. elegans touch receptor neurons.
Footnotes
-
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS47715 (M.B.G.), by fellowships from the McKnight, A. P. Sloan, and Donald B. and Delia E. Baxter Foundations (M.B.G.), and by an American Psychological Association Diversity Program in Neuroscience Postdoctoral fellowship (J.G.C). We thank K. McDonald for a donation of embedded samples of wild-type (N2) animals at the early stages of this research, J. Mulholland and J. Perrino for expert technical assistance, N. Dompe for animating three-dimensional reconstructions, D. Ramot for simulating a random distribution of label in a realistic model TRN, and D. Lenzi, R. S. Lewis, and A. Ricci for comments.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Miriam B. Goodman, B-111 Beckman Center, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305. mbgoodman{at}stanford.edu
References
