Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

Gβ5 Is Required for Normal Light Responses and Morphology of Retinal ON-Bipolar Cells

Anjali Rao, Rebecca Dallman, Scott Henderson and Ching-Kang Chen
Journal of Neuroscience 19 December 2007, 27 (51) 14199-14204; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4934-07.2007
Anjali Rao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Dallman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Henderson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ching-Kang Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Gβ5 exists as two splice variants, Gβ5-S and Gβ5-L, which interact with and stabilize the R7 members of the regulators of G-protein signaling (RGSs): RGS6, RGS7, RGS9, and RGS11. Although the role of Gβ5-L and RGS9-1 is established in photoreceptors, the physiological functions of Gβ5-S and other R7 RGS proteins remain unclear. We found that the electroretinogram of Gβ5−/− mice lacks the b-wave component and that Gβ5-S and RGS11 colocalize with Goα at the tips of the ON-bipolar cell dendrites. Unexpectedly, we found a significant reduction in the number of synaptic triads in the outer plexiform layer (OPL) of the Gβ5−/− mice, which is evident at postnatal day 14. Transgenic expression of Gβ5-L in rods failed to rescue the b-wave or the OPL defects. These results indicate that Gβ5-S is indispensable for OPL integrity and normal light responses of the retina.

  • bipolar cells
  • RGS
  • retina
  • Gβ5
  • morphology
  • ERG

Introduction

Gβ5 is the fifth member of the heterotrimeric G-protein β-subunit family (Watson et al., 1994). It exists as two alternatively spliced forms: the photoreceptor-specific long form (Gβ5-L) and the broadly expressed short form (Gβ5-S), which lacks the first exon (Watson et al., 1996). Unlike the other four conventional G-protein β-subunits, Gβ5 interacts with the GGL (G-protein-γ-like) domain found in the R7 members of the regulators of G-protein signaling (RGSs) (Snow et al., 1998). This interaction confers mutual stability to Gβ5 and its partners (Witherow et al., 2000). In retinas of the Gβ5−/− mice, the levels of RGS6, 7, and 11 are downregulated below detection, whereas RGS9-1 falls to ∼3% of the control level (Chen et al., 2003). In the RGS9−/− mice, Gβ5-L is undetectable, whereas Gβ5-S level remains normal (Chen et al., 2000). Recordings from rods of Gβ5−/− (Krispel et al., 2003), RGS9−/− (Chen et al., 2000), and R9AP−/− (RGS9 anchoring protein) (Keresztes et al., 2004) mice, which displayed similar and prolonged recovery of rod photoresponses, have established the role of Gβ5-L/RGS9-1/R9AP as the GTPase accelerating protein complex (GAP) for transducin α-subunit (Gtα). The GAP activity resides in the RGS domain of RGS9-1, whereas Gβ5-L and R9AP confer intracellular stability, membrane affinity, and outer segment targeting modality to the complex (Chen et al., 2003; Martemyanov et al., 2003; Keresztes et al., 2004). Because Gβ5-L expression is restricted to the photoreceptors, we have further characterized the Gβ5−/− animals to study the physiological function of Gβ5-S and other R7 RGS proteins. Here we report that the scotopic and photopic electroretinogram (ERG) b-waves are absent in the Gβ5−/− mice. In addition, we show that Gβ5-S along with RGS11 is expressed at the tips of the ON-bipolar cell dendrites, where ERG b-wave originates. Unexpectedly, we also found that the synapses between photoreceptors and bipolar cells develop abnormally in the absence of Gβ5. These data indicate a hitherto unknown role of Gβ5-S in synaptic formation at the retinal outer plexiform layer (OPL) and suggest a role of Gβ5-S/RGS7 and/or Gβ5-S/RGS11 in normal bipolar cell light responses.

Materials and Methods

Animals.

The Gβ5−/− mice are maintained in a mixed background of C57BL/6 and 129SvEv. The TGβ5L transgenic line was generated by injecting the embryos of C57BL/6 and SJL parents with a DNA construct (see Fig. 1B) containing a C-terminal FLAG-tagged Gβ5-L cDNA placed downstream of a 4 kb rhodopsin promoter and upstream of a mouse protamine polyadenylation signal. Founders were identified by the presence of a 550 bp PCR product using the following primers: RH1.1: 5′-TCA GTG CCT GGA GTT GCG CT and Gβ5-510R: 5′-CTT ATT ATC CAG ACC ACC AC. The TGβ5L−/− mice were generated by breeding the TGβ5L mice with the Gβ5−/− mice and maintained in a mixed background of C57BL/6, 129SvEv, and SJL. The rd1 allele at the Pde6b locus intrinsic to the SJL background was identified by PCR (Pittler and Baehr, 1991) and eliminated. Littermate heterozygotes or age-matched C57BL/6 mice were used as controls. All studied were performed in accordance with the rules and regulations of the National Institutes of Health guidelines for research animals and approved by the institutional animal care and use committee at the Virginia Commonwealth University.

Immunohistochemistry.

The mice were killed by CO2 inhalation followed by cervical dislocation. Eyeballs were enucleated immediately after the mice were killed and immersion fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min and cryoprotected overnight in 30% sucrose in PBS at 4°C. They were embedded in TBS (Richard Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI), and 12 μm cryosections were prepared and stored at −80°C. When staining, sections were thawed, washed, and blocked with 10% goat or donkey serum with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h, followed by overnight incubation at room temperature with appropriate dilutions of primary antibodies (Table 1). Dye-conjugated secondary antibodies were used at 1:100 and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. For reliable detection of Gβ5, RGS7, and RGS11, tyramide signal amplification kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used by following the manufacturer's instructions. After incubation with secondary antibodies, sections were washed three times with PBS for 10 min each and sealed in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), and the fluorescent images were captured using a Zeiss (Thornwood, NY) LSM 510 Meta confocal microscope. For analyses of dendritic morphology of rod bipolar cells in the OPL (see Fig. 2G,H), z-stacks spanning a total of 7 μm were taken and rotated on the x- or y-axis to correct for cutting-angle artifacts. OPL images shown were taken at the superior meridian of retinal sections containing the optic nerve head (ONH).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Sources and dilution of primary antibodies used in immunocytochemistry

Transmission electron microscopy.

The enucleated eyeballs were immersion fixed overnight with 2% paraformaldehyde/2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, at room temperature and processed as described previously (Li et al., 2005). Ultrathin sections (100 nm) were prepared using a Sorvall MT-6000 ultramicrotome. Sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and imaged using a Joel JEM-1230 transmission electron microscope. For quantification of OPL synaptic triads and ribbons in Figure 3C–F, three sets of age-matched control, Gβ5−/−, or TGβ5L−/− animals were used per indicated postnatal age. For rod spherules, 20 random and nonoverlapped 38 × 38 μm transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images between the meridian and the ONH were analyzed per mouse eye. For cone pedicles, triads and ribbons were counted from 20 to 30 cone pedicles per mouse eye. All images were obtained with retinal sections containing the ONH. The difference in each measurement between the genotypes was examined by one-way ANOVA with p values <0.01 considered significant.

Electroretinography.

Mice were dark adapted for 16–24 h and anesthetized using ketamine/xylazine (150 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.). The eyes were dilated with 1% atropine sulfate (Falcon Laboratories, Forth Worth, TX). ERG recordings were performed using the UTAS E-3000 system (LKC Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) under scotopic and photopic (30 cd/m2) conditions as previously described (Li et al., 2005), except that responses from both eyes were recorded simultaneously but analyzed individually. Typically the difference in the A-wave amplitudes between the two eyes of the same animal was <10%. Three to 15 responses were collected and averaged for each stimulus intensity. The interstimulus interval ranges from 5 to 120 s for control and TGβ5L−/− animals. For Gβ5−/− mice, it ranges from 30 to >600 s to ensure full photoreceptor recovery. For intravitreal delivery, 2 μl of 11 mm l-2-amino-4-phosphono-butyric acid (APB) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) dissolved in PBS was injected into the right eye under anesthesia in the dark using pulled-glass pipettes and a pneumatic Picopump. The final APB concentration was estimated to be 2.2 mm assuming an eyeball volume of 10 μl. The left eye was subsequently injected with PBS and served as control. Animals were allowed to recover from eye injections for 40 min in darkness before ERG recordings ensued.

Results

Gβ5−/− and TGβ5L−/− mice lack ERG b-waves

The scotopic ERG responses of dark-adapted Gβ5−/− mice exhibited waveforms distinctive to those of the controls, indicating the absence of the b-wave component (Fig. 1A). Photopic ERG, isolated by 0.01 Hz of flickering 80 cd s/m2 flashes, also revealed the absence of a b-wave (data not shown). ERG b-wave originates from the ON-bipolar cells (Stockton and Slaughter, 1989) and may be affected by postsynaptic or presynaptic defects at the OPL (Masu et al., 1995; Mansergh et al., 2005). Gβ5−/− mice have delayed phototransduction recovery because of the absence of the transducin GAP complex in photoreceptors. This defect is not expected to cause the no-b-wave phenotype because ERG b-wave is present in the RGS9−/− mice, which have a phototransduction recovery defect similar to that of Gβ5−/− mice (Lyubarsky et al., 2001). To further confirm this, we created a transgenic mouse line, TGβ5L−/−, in which a FLAG-tagged Gβ5-L is expressed in rods of the Gβ5−/− mice. The tagged Gβ5-L restores the level of RGS9-1 (Fig. 1C) and is found in the outer segments (Fig. 1D). The dominant recovery time constants (τD) for control and Gβ5−/− rods were previously determined by suction recordings to be 260 and 2700 ms, respectively (Krispel et al., 2003). Using double flash ERG recordings, we found comparable τD for the TGβ5L−/− (235 ± 8 ms, n = 15) and the control animals (189 ± 12 ms, n = 17). Despite the rescue of the rod recovery defect, the scotopic ERG responses of the TGβ5L−/− mice revealed a phenotype similar to that of the Gβ5−/− mice (Fig. 1E). The origin of the no-b-wave phenotype of the Gβ5−/− mice is thus determined to be postphotoreceptoral.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

The postphotoreceptoral electroretinographic no-b-wave phenotype of the Gβ5−/− mice. A, Representative scotopic ERG responses of dark-adapted adult control (left) and Gβ5−/− mice (right) to a series of white flashes with indicated intensities in log cd s/m2. B, DNA construct used for the generation of TGβ5L transgenic mice. C, Western blots showing Gβ5 and RGS9-1 levels in 10 μg extracts of control, Gβ5−/−, and TGβ5L−/− mouse retinas. D, Image of a TGβ5L−/− retinal section probed with a Flag antibody showing outer segment localization of the transgenic product. OS, Outer segment; IS, inner segment. Scale bar, 10 μm. E, Representative scotopic ERG responses of dark-adapted control (left) and TGβ5L−/− mice (right), treated or untreated with APB.

To examine whether the b-wave is completely or partially lost in the TGβ5L−/− mice, we compared the ERG responses with and without the treatment of APB, an agonist of the group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (Slaughter and Miller, 1981). As shown in Figure 1E, in control animals APB changes the retinal light responses by eliminating the ERG b-wave of the treated eyes but not in the untreated ones. Similar treatments to the TGβ5L−/− animals cause minimal changes to ERG waveforms (Fig. 1E), suggesting that ERG b-wave is completely lost when Gβ5-S is absent. There is a small positive component immediately following the a-wave in the TGβ5L−/− ERG responses under higher stimulus intensities. This upward potential is also present in APB treated control animals and may reflect the activity of hyperpolarization-activated and cyclic nucleotide gated channels present in the inner segments of the photoreceptors (Fain et al., 1978).

Gβ5−/− mice display abnormal rod bipolar cell morphology

The downregulation of the R7 RGS proteins in Gβ5−/− mouse retinas facilitates the examination of their expression by immunocytochemistry (Fig. 2). We found that Gβ5, RGS7, and RGS11 are localized to the OPL and that the inner plexiform layer contains Gβ5 and RGS7. Additionally, we discovered that Gβ5 and RGS11 colocalize with Goα at the dendritic tips of the ON-bipolar cells (Fig. 2E,F). Attempts to localize RGS6 were hampered by the lack of good antibodies for murine RGS6. However, we found a commercial antibody (Table 1) that stained the cholinergic synaptic terminals of the control and not the Gβ5−/− animals (data not shown). Because the no-b-wave ERG phenotype of the Gβ5−/− mice originates from postphotoreceptoral loss of Gβ5-S, we further investigated the morphology of the rod bipolar cells marked by PKCα and mGluR6. As shown in Figure 2G, OPL of the control mice showed elaborate dendritic branching of rod bipolar cells capped with mGluR6. In contrast, the OPL of the Gβ5−/− mice appears disorganized with shorter dendrites (Fig. 2H), suggesting gross morphological abnormalities. This finding is in contrast to the normal OPL morphology reported for three other mouse lines with known postphotoreceptoral origin of similar no-b-wave phenotype, namely mGluR6−/− (Tagawa et al., 1999), Goα−/− (Dhingra et al., 2000), and nob (Ball et al., 2003).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Localization of Gβ5, RGS7, and RGS11 in the retina and abnormal ON-bipolar cell morphology of the Gβ5−/− mice. A–D, Retinal sections derived from control (A–C) and Gβ5−/− (D) mice probed for Gβ5 (A, D), RGS7 (B), and RGS11 (C). Sources and dilutions of antibodies are shown in Table 1. Scale bar, 10 μm. E, F, Colocalization of Goα with Gβ5 (E) and RGS11 (F) in control retinas. Scale bar, 5 μm. G, H, Retinal sections from age-matched adult control (G) and Gβ5−/− animals (H) colabeled with mGluR6 and PKCα. Scale bar, 10 μm.

Rod synaptic triads in the OPL of the Gβ5−/− mice fail to develop properly

The morphological defects at the OPL of the Gβ5−/− mice could result from maintenance failure, developmental defect, or both. We found that Gβ5-S is detectable in retinal extracts as early as postnatal day 1 (P1), with a sharp increase from P7 to P10 and plateaus to the adult level at P21 (Fig. 3A). The expression profile of Gβ5-S is consistent with the notion that it plays a role in retinal development. In addition, we found that the typical three to four tiers of rod synaptic triads of normal OPL at P21 are reduced to one or two in aged-matched Gβ5−/− mice (Fig. 3B, top vs bottom). The rod synaptic triads of the control animals typically possess three postsynaptic elements consisting of two lateral dendrites of the horizontal cells and a central one/two ON-bipolar cell dendrites and a presynaptic ribbon (Kolb, 1977). In contrast, most of the rod spherules in the Gβ5−/− mice lack the central bipolar cell dendritic element (Fig. 3B, bottom). By analysis of OPL in the wild-type and Gβ5−/− mice, we found that the number of rod spherules between the two genotypes are similar (12 ± 0.38 and 12 ± 0.34 for WT and Gβ5−/− mice, respectively, over a 38 × 38 μm OPL area), but the percentage of rod termini with normal synaptic triads in P21 Gβ5−/− mice are reduced approximately fivefold compared with those of age-matched control animals (Fig. 3C). The percentage of control rod termini with triads increased steadily from 8.6 ± 2.9% at P13 to 34.1 ± 1.6% at P21. However, regardless of the age of the Gβ5−/− animals, the numbers were consistently below the level of the P13 control animals. A small but statistically significant reduction in the percentage of rod termini with ribbons beyond P15 was noted in Gβ5−/− and TGβ5L−/− mice (Fig. 3D,F). Furthermore, we found ∼2 ± 0.08 and 1 ± 0.14 synaptic triads per cone pedicle for wild-type and Gβ5−/− mice, respectively (Fig. 3E) (p = 0.0009). The numbers of ribbons per cone pedicle for wild-type and Gβ5−/− mice were 4 ± 0.23 and 3 ± 0.13, respectively (p = 0.0004). These data indicate that synaptic connection between bipolar cells and photoreceptors are abnormal in the Gβ5−/− animals. Transgenic expression of a tagged Gβ5-L in rods of the Gβ5−/− animals restored normal photoreceptor recovery but failed to rescue the OPL morphological defect as the number of OPL synaptic triads remains low in adult TGβ5L−/− animals (Fig. 3F).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Abnormal OPL ultrastructure of the Gβ5−/− mice. A, Western blot analyses of 10 μg retinal extracts of control mice at indicated postnatal ages showing relative levels of Gβ5-S and Gβ5-L in reference to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) level. B, TEM images of the OPL of the control (top) and Gβ5−/− (bottom) mice. Scale bar, 5 μm. RS, Rod spherule; CP, cone pedicle. Asterisk denotes abnormal structures found in the Gβ5−/− retina. Representative OPL synapses are shown in insets. C, D, The averaged percentage of rod spherules with normal synaptic triads (C) and ribbons (D) at indicated postnatal days. Error bars are SEM (n = 3). E, The averaged number of synaptic triads and ribbons found per cone pedicle per section in adult control and Gβ5−/− mice, n = 3. F, The averaged percentage of rod spherules with triads and ribbons in adult TGβ5L−/− mice compared with age-matched Gβ5−/− and control animals, n = 3.

Discussion

Gβ5 is essential for normal development of OPL synapses between photoreceptors and bipolar cells

We found, unexpectedly, abnormalities in the OPL of the Gβ5−/− mice, with short bipolar cell dendrites and reduction in number of synaptic triads at photoreceptor terminals. It has been reported that the ON-bipolar cells project neuroepithelial processes into the outer nuclear layer (ONL) until P7, followed by retraction of these processes from P7 to P9 (Morgan et al., 2006). The synaptic connections between photoreceptors and bipolar cells take shape between P10 to P14, during which ERG a-wave gradually develops and b-wave becomes recordable at the end of this period (Takada et al., 2004). The presence of Gβ5-S over this critical period and the failure of Gβ5−/− mice to increase the number of synaptic triads strongly suggest a role of Gβ5-S in normal OPL synaptic development. This conclusion is further supported by similar OPL morphological defects found in the adult TGβ5L−/− mice, in which recovery of rod phototransduction appears normal but the ERG b-wave is missing. Intriguingly, the reduction of synaptic triads is more severe at rod spherules than at cone pedicles. It remains to be determined whether all types of cone ON-bipolar cells or just a subset are affected. Systematic restoration of Gβ5-S in selective retinal layers or inducible expression at different developmental stages may thus provide valuable insight into the cellular origin of this OPL phenotype.

A role of Gβ5-S and R7 RGS proteins in the mGluR6 pathway of the ON-bipolar cells?

In the dark, glutamate released from photoreceptor terminals nearly saturates the mGluR6 metabotropic glutamate receptor located at the tips of the ON-bipolar cell dendrites (Sampath and Rieke, 2004). Activated mGluR6 couples to Goα (Nawy, 1999; Dhingra et al., 2000) and through an unknown mechanism closes cation channels resulting in membrane hyperpolarization. Upon illumination, the release of glutamate dwindles allowing ON-bipolar cells to reopen the channels and depolarize their membranes. This depolarization appears as a light-induced positive-going corneal potential in ERG and is referred to as the b-wave, which immediately follows the photoreceptor-driven negative potential (a-wave). All R7 RGS proteins, when complex with Gβ5-S, accelerate the hydrolysis of GTP by Goα in vitro (Hooks et al., 2003). Because Gβ5-S, RGS11, and RGS7 are present at the OPL, where ERG b-wave originates, it is not unreasonable to speculate that Gβ5-S/RGS7 and/or Gβ5-S/RGS11 participates in the mGluR6 signaling pathway by acting as the GAP for Goα. It is reported that failure to deactivate Goα abolishes the light responses of rod ON-bipolar cells (Sampath and Rieke, 2004). The absence of both scotopic (Fig. 1A) and photopic ERG b-waves in the Gβ5−/− mice, in which all R7 RGS proteins are downregulated (Chen et al., 2003), is consistent with the notion that sustained mGluR6 and Goα signaling abolishes light responses of ON-bipolar cells. The speculation that Gβ5-S/RGS7 and/or Gβ5-S/RGS11 regulates GTP hydrolysis of Goα is apparently at odds with the notion that Ret-RGS1 is the physiological GAP for Goα in the ON-bipolar cells (Dhingra et al., 2004).

Are the two phenotypes of the Gβ5−/− mice reported here related? Lack of ERG b-wave does not necessarily cause morphological defects, exemplified by the normal OPL appearance of the Goα−/− (Dhingra et al., 2000), mGluR6−/− (Tagawa et al., 1999), and nob animals (Ball et al., 2003). On the other hand, the OPL abnormality may be responsible for the observed no-b-wave phenotype. Whether the lack of ERG b-wave in Gβ5−/− mice reflects synaptic abnormality, sustained mGluR6/Goα signaling, or both remains to be determined. A detailed characterization of other R7 RGS knock-out or tissue-specific Gβ5 knock-out animals will be informative. Furthermore, it is interesting to determine whether RGS7 and RGS11 coexist in the same cells. The two novel phenotypes reported here signify the importance of Gβ5-S and the R7 RGS proteins in the CNS and the usefulness of the Gβ5−/− mice to help unveil their physiological functions.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant EY013811 (C.K.C.). Transmission electron microscopy was performed at the Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy Microscopy Facility, supported in part by funding from NIH–National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant 5P30NS047463. Confocal microscopy was performed at the Massey Cancer Center, supported in part by NIH Grant 1P30CA16059. We thank Judy Williamson for assistance with electron microscopy and Lawrence Lanberg for ultramicrotomy.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Ching-Kang Jason Chen, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Box 980614, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 E. Marshall Street, Room 2–032b, Richmond, VA 23298. cjchen{at}vcu.edu

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ball SL,
    2. Pardue MT,
    3. McCall MA,
    4. Gregg RG,
    5. Peachey NS
    (2003) Immunohistochemical analysis of the outer plexiform layer in the nob mouse shows no abnormalities. Vis Neurosci 20:267–272.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Chen CK,
    2. Burns ME,
    3. He W,
    4. Wensel TG,
    5. Baylor DA,
    6. Simon MI
    (2000) Slowed recovery of rod photoresponse in mice lacking the GTPase accelerating protein RGS9-1. Nature 403:557–560.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Chen CK,
    2. Eversole-Cire P,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Mancino V,
    5. Chen YJ,
    6. He W,
    7. Wensel TG,
    8. Simon MI
    (2003) Instability of GGL domain-containing RGS proteins in mice lacking the G protein beta-subunit Gbeta5. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6604–6609.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Dhingra A,
    2. Lyubarsky A,
    3. Jiang M,
    4. Pugh EN Jr.,
    5. Birnbaumer L,
    6. Sterling P,
    7. Vardi N
    (2000) The light response of ON bipolar neurons requires G[alpha]o. J Neurosci 20:9053–9058.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Dhingra A,
    2. Faurobert E,
    3. Dascal N,
    4. Sterling P,
    5. Vardi N
    (2004) A retinal-specific regulator of G-protein signaling interacts with Galpha(o) and accelerates an expressed metabotropic glutamate receptor 6 cascade. J Neurosci 24:5684–5693.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Fain GL,
    2. Quandt FN,
    3. Bastian BL,
    4. Gerschenfeld HM
    (1978) Contribution of a caesium-sensitive conductance increase to the rod photoresponse. Nature 272:466–469.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Hooks SB,
    2. Waldo GL,
    3. Corbitt J,
    4. Bodor ET,
    5. Krumins AM,
    6. Harden TK
    (2003) RGS6, RGS7, RGS9, and RGS11 stimulate GTPase activity of Gi family G-proteins with differential selectivity and maximal activity. J Biol Chem 278:10087–10093.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Keresztes G,
    2. Martemyanov KA,
    3. Krispel CM,
    4. Mutai H,
    5. Yoo PJ,
    6. Maison SF,
    7. Burns ME,
    8. Arshavsky VY,
    9. Heller S
    (2004) Absence of the RGS9.Gbeta5 GTPase-activating complex in photoreceptors of the R9AP knockout mouse. J Biol Chem 279:1581–1584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kolb H
    (1977) The organization of the outer plexiform layer in the retina of the cat: electron microscopic observations. J Neurocytol 6:131–153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Krispel CM,
    2. Chen CK,
    3. Simon MI,
    4. Burns ME
    (2003) Prolonged photoresponses and defective adaptation in rods of Gbeta5−/− mice. J Neurosci 23:6965–6971.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Li S,
    2. Chen D,
    3. Sauve Y,
    4. McCandless J,
    5. Chen YJ,
    6. Chen CK
    (2005) Rhodopsin-iCre transgenic mouse line for Cre-mediated rod-specific gene targeting. Genesis 41:73–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Lyubarsky AL,
    2. Naarendorp F,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Wensel T,
    5. Simon MI,
    6. Pugh EN Jr.
    (2001) RGS9-1 is required for normal inactivation of mouse cone phototransduction. Mol Vis 7:71–78.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Mansergh F,
    2. Orton NC,
    3. Vessey JP,
    4. Lalonde MR,
    5. Stell WK,
    6. Tremblay F,
    7. Barnes S,
    8. Rancourt DE,
    9. Bech-Hansen NT
    (2005) Mutation of the calcium channel gene Cacna1f disrupts calcium signaling, synaptic transmission and cellular organization in mouse retina. Hum Mol Genet 14:3035–3046.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Martemyanov KA,
    2. Lishko PV,
    3. Calero N,
    4. Keresztes G,
    5. Sokolov M,
    6. Strissel KJ,
    7. Leskov IB,
    8. Hopp JA,
    9. Kolesnikov AV,
    10. Chen CK,
    11. Lem J,
    12. Heller S,
    13. Burns ME,
    14. Arshavsky VY
    (2003) The DEP domain determines subcellular targeting of the GTPase activating protein RGS9 in vivo. J Neurosci 23:10175–10181.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Masu M,
    2. Iwakabe H,
    3. Tagawa Y,
    4. Miyoshi T,
    5. Yamashita M,
    6. Fukuda Y,
    7. Sasaki H,
    8. Hiroi K,
    9. Nakamura Y,
    10. Shigemoto R,
    11. et al.
    (1995) Specific deficit of the ON response in visual transmission by targeted disruption of the mGluR6 gene. Cell 80:757–765.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Morgan JL,
    2. Dhingra A,
    3. Vardi N,
    4. Wong RO
    (2006) Axons and dendrites originate from neuroepithelial-like processes of retinal bipolar cells. Nat Neurosci 9:85–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Nawy S
    (1999) The metabotropic receptor mGluR6 may signal through G(o), but not phosphodiesterase, in retinal bipolar cells. J Neurosci 19:2938–2944.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Pittler SJ,
    2. Baehr W
    (1991) Identification of a nonsense mutation in the rod photoreceptor cGMP phosphodiesterase beta-subunit gene of the rd mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:8322–8326.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Sampath AP,
    2. Rieke F
    (2004) Selective transmission of single photon responses by saturation at the rod-to-rod bipolar synapse. Neuron 41:431–443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Slaughter MM,
    2. Miller RF
    (1981) 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid: a new pharmacological tool for retina research. Science 211:182–185.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Snow BE,
    2. Krumins AM,
    3. Brothers GM,
    4. Lee SF,
    5. Wall MA,
    6. Chung S,
    7. Mangion J,
    8. Arya S,
    9. Gilman AG,
    10. Siderovski DP
    (1998) A G protein gamma subunit-like domain shared between RGS11 and other RGS proteins specifies binding to Gbeta5 subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13307–13312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Stockton RA,
    2. Slaughter MM
    (1989) B-wave of the electroretinogram. A reflection of ON bipolar cell activity. J Gen Physiol 93:101–122.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Tagawa Y,
    2. Sawai H,
    3. Ueda Y,
    4. Tauchi M,
    5. Nakanishi S
    (1999) Immunohistological studies of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 6-deficient mice show no abnormality of retinal cell organization and ganglion cell maturation. J Neurosci 19:2568–2579.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Takada Y,
    2. Fariss RN,
    3. Tanikawa A,
    4. Zeng Y,
    5. Carper D,
    6. Bush R,
    7. Sieving PA
    (2004) A retinal neuronal developmental wave of retinoschisin expression begins in ganglion cells during layer formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3302–3312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Watson AJ,
    2. Katz A,
    3. Simon MI
    (1994) A fifth member of the mammalian G-protein beta-subunit family. Expression in brain and activation of the beta 2 isotype of phospholipase C. J Biol Chem 269:22150–22156.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Watson AJ,
    2. Aragay AM,
    3. Slepak VZ,
    4. Simon MI
    (1996) A novel form of the G protein beta subunit Gbeta5 is specifically expressed in the vertebrate retina. J Biol Chem 271:28154–28160.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Witherow DS,
    2. Wang Q,
    3. Levay K,
    4. Cabrera JL,
    5. Chen J,
    6. Willars GB,
    7. Slepak VZ
    (2000) Complexes of the G protein subunit gbeta 5 with the regulators of G protein signaling RGS7 and RGS9. Characterization in native tissues and in transfected cells. J Biol Chem 275:24872–24880.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 27 (51)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 27, Issue 51
19 Dec 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gβ5 Is Required for Normal Light Responses and Morphology of Retinal ON-Bipolar Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Gβ5 Is Required for Normal Light Responses and Morphology of Retinal ON-Bipolar Cells
Anjali Rao, Rebecca Dallman, Scott Henderson, Ching-Kang Chen
Journal of Neuroscience 19 December 2007, 27 (51) 14199-14204; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4934-07.2007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Gβ5 Is Required for Normal Light Responses and Morphology of Retinal ON-Bipolar Cells
Anjali Rao, Rebecca Dallman, Scott Henderson, Ching-Kang Chen
Journal of Neuroscience 19 December 2007, 27 (51) 14199-14204; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4934-07.2007
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.