Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

GABAergic Neurons Are Less Selective to Stimulus Orientation than Excitatory Neurons in Layer II/III of Visual Cortex, as Revealed by In Vivo Functional Ca2+ Imaging in Transgenic Mice

Kazuhiro Sohya, Katsuro Kameyama, Yuchio Yanagawa, Kunihiko Obata and Tadaharu Tsumoto
Journal of Neuroscience 21 February 2007, 27 (8) 2145-2149; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4641-06.2007
Kazuhiro Sohya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katsuro Kameyama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuchio Yanagawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kunihiko Obata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tadaharu Tsumoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Spectra of emission light (left) and two-photon excitation (TPE) cross section (right) for the three fluorescent dyes. Three curves in the left half schematically show the intensity of fluorescence emitted from each of the dyes as values normalized to the maximum, modified from Fluorescence Spectra Viewer (Invitrogen). The ordinates on the left and right sides apply to the three curves in the left half and TPE cross-section spectra curves in the right half, respectively. Two dashed red curves schematically show TPE cross-section spectra of fura-2 bound and not bound with Ca2+, modified from Xu et al. (1996). The dotted curve for EGFP schematically shows its TPE cross-section spectra, modified also from Xu et al. (1996). The solid curve for SR101 schematically shows its TPE cross-section spectra measured at 780–960 nm excitation wavelength in aqueous solution. TPE cross-section values of Goeppert-Mayer unit (GM) of SR101 were obtained by comparing the measured intensity of fluorescence with that of Rhodamine B, on the following assumptions: the two-photon absorption cross section of Rhodamine B in aqueous solution is the same as that in methanol solution (210 GM at 840 nm two-photon excitation); the two-photon fluorescence quantum efficiency of Rhodamine B is the same as its one-photon fluorescence quantum efficiency (0.7); and the sample refractive index in aqueous solution is the same as that in methanol solution (Albota et al., 1998).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Separate visualization of three groups of cells. A, Visibility or invisibility of cortical cells of wild-type (top) and GAD67-GFP (Δneo; bottom) mice under the conditions indicated at the top. The cortex of the former mice was loaded with fura-2 and SR101, whereas that of the latter was not loaded with any dye. Scale bars in the images in the left column indicate 30 μm and apply to the images in the same row. The plane of the depth was 155 μm in a–c and 150 μm in d–f. B, Distributions of the emitted fluorescence intensity of EGFP-expressing neurons in the visual cortex of GAD67-GFP (Δneo) mice and that of fura-2-loaded neurons in the visual cortex of wild-type mice, at excitation wavelengths of 800 nm (a) and 950 nm (b). Fluorescence intensity was normalized to the maximum value. The PMT gain was constant in the same excitation and emission conditions.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    In vivo imaging of visual cortical neurons and examples of visual responses of neurons and neuropils. A, In vivo images of three focal planes of a GAD67-GFP (Δneo) mouse. The depth from the cortical surface is indicated on the left side of each plane. Each plane covers 190 × 190 μm. Green and red cells represent GABAergic neurons and astrocytes, respectively. B, The plane of the depth of 160 μm is indicated. Scale bar, 30 μm. C, Magnified image of the rectangular area shown in B. Numbers indicate neurons whose responses are shown in D. a–c indicate neuropil areas, in which responses were recorded as shown in D. Scale bar, 10 μm. D, Responses of cells 1–3 and neuropil areas a–c to eight different patterns of visual stimuli, as shown at the top. Each trace represents the average of five sweeps. Calibration bars on the right indicate 5% (−ΔF/F0) and 10 s. E, Polar plots of visual responses of cells 1–3, as indicated.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    A, B, Distribution of OSI of visual responses of GFP-negative and -positive neurons, respectively. The total numbers of cells in A and B are 181 and 28, respectively.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Methods and figure legends
    • supplemental material - Figure 1
    • supplemental material - Figure 2
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 27 (8)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 27, Issue 8
21 Feb 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GABAergic Neurons Are Less Selective to Stimulus Orientation than Excitatory Neurons in Layer II/III of Visual Cortex, as Revealed by In Vivo Functional Ca2+ Imaging in Transgenic Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
GABAergic Neurons Are Less Selective to Stimulus Orientation than Excitatory Neurons in Layer II/III of Visual Cortex, as Revealed by In Vivo Functional Ca2+ Imaging in Transgenic Mice
Kazuhiro Sohya, Katsuro Kameyama, Yuchio Yanagawa, Kunihiko Obata, Tadaharu Tsumoto
Journal of Neuroscience 21 February 2007, 27 (8) 2145-2149; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4641-06.2007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
GABAergic Neurons Are Less Selective to Stimulus Orientation than Excitatory Neurons in Layer II/III of Visual Cortex, as Revealed by In Vivo Functional Ca2+ Imaging in Transgenic Mice
Kazuhiro Sohya, Katsuro Kameyama, Yuchio Yanagawa, Kunihiko Obata, Tadaharu Tsumoto
Journal of Neuroscience 21 February 2007, 27 (8) 2145-2149; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4641-06.2007
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.