Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 19 March 2008, 28 (12) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Role of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in Neurite Outgrowth

William J. Brackenbury, Tigwa H. Davis, Chunling Chen, Emily A. Slat, Matthew J. Detrow, Travis L. Dickendesher, Barbara Ranscht, and Lori L. Isom

(see pages 3246–3256)

The β1 subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel participates in homophilic and heterophilic cell adhesion and increases neurite outgrowth in vitro, in addition to modulating electrical excitability. It interacts with several other cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), and these CAMs activate two signaling pathways: one that involves fyn kinase and one that involves the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR). To determine whether the β1 subunit relies on these same signaling pathways, Brackenbury et al. examined the growth of dissociated cerebellar neurons on β1-expressing and control cell lines. β1 expression enhanced neurite outgrowth from wild-type neurons, as expected, and FGFR antagonists did not diminish this effect. But β1 expression did not enhance outgrowth from Fyn null neurons, suggesting that fyn kinase, but not FGFR, is involved in β1 potentiation of neurite growth. Examination of axon growth in β1 null mice suggested that β1 is involved in axon fasciculation in vivo.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Effects of NMDA Receptor Lateral Diffusion on Synaptic Plasticity

Jiang Zhao, Yi Peng, Zhuo Xu, Rong-qing Chen, Qin-hua Gu, Zheng Chen, and Wei Lu

(see pages 3060–3070)

Synaptic plasticity depends on the receptors present at the synapse; the response to a stimulus can change if the receptors change. For example, the subunit composition of NMDA receptors (NMDARs) influences whether long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) is produced by a given stimulus. Zhao et al. show that the composition of synaptic NMDARs can change as a result of lateral diffusion of NMDARs in the membrane. When only synaptic NMDARs were blocked, EPSC amplitude recovered after washout. But when both synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDARs were blocked, EPSCs did not recover. This suggests that the recovery after synaptic block depended on diffusion of extrasynaptic NMDARs into the synapse. The decay time of spontaneous and evoked NMDAR-mediated EPSCs was longer after recovery, suggesting a change in the subunit composition of synaptic receptors. This change was paralleled by a change in synaptic plasticity: a stimulus that normally produced LTP instead induced LTD.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

A stimulus (arrows) that induced LTP in control rat hippocampal slices (green) also induced LTP after recovery from reversible block of NMDA receptors (AP-5; red), but induced LTD after irreversible block (MK-801; black). See the article by Zhao et al. for details.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Olfactory Learning in Drosophila

Michael J. Krashes and Scott Waddell

(see pages 3103–3113)

Learning often requires multiple training sessions spaced over time. This is true of aversive, but not appetitive, olfactory conditioning in Drosophila. When an odor is paired with sucrose, flies learn to follow that odor after a single training session, whereas 5–10 sessions are required to avoid an odor paired with shock. Despite this difference, Krashes and Waddell now report that appetitive long-term memory (LTM) involves many of the same neural processes previously shown to underlie aversive LTM. Like aversive LTM, appetitive LTM requires protein synthesis and activation of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) in mushroom bodies (MBs). Both require activity in DPM and MB α′β′ neurons for consolidation and require MB αβ neurons for retrieval. The main difference between aversive and appetitive LTM appears to be that appetitive LTM requires the radish gene, which is expressed in mushroom body αβ neurons and produces a protein of unknown function.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

Endocannabinoids and Epilepsy

Anikó Ludányi, Loránd Erőss, Sándor Czirják, János Vajda, Péter Halász, Masahiko Watanabe, Miklós Palkovits, Zsófia Maglóczky, Tamás F. Freund, and István Katona

(see pages 2976–2990)

CB1 endocannabinoid receptors are expressed on presynaptic terminals, where they decrease transmitter release and are thought to help control hyperexcitability. In this week's Journal, Ludányi et al. present evidence of decreased endocannabinoid signaling in people with intractable epilepsy. Compared to controls, hippocampi removed from epileptic brains had dramatically reduced levels of CB1 mRNA. Levels of the CB1-associated protein cannabinoid receptor interacting protein 1a and of diacylglycerol lipase, which synthesizes an endocannabinoid, were significantly reduced in sclerotic hippocampi (i.e., those with principal cell loss), but not in nonsclerotic epileptic hippocampi. Immunostaining indicated that CB1 expression was reduced throughout sclerotic and nonsclerotic hippocampi. Ultrastructural analysis revealed that in epileptic dentate gyrus, a smaller fraction of glutamatergic terminals expressed CB1 than in controls, whereas the fraction of GABAergic terminals with CB1 was comparable across samples. These results support the hypothesis that loss of cannabinoid signaling in glutamatergic neurons contributes to epilepsy in humans.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (12)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 12
19 Mar 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 19 March 2008, 28 (12) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 19 March 2008, 28 (12) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.