Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

Gray Matter Increase Induced by Practice Correlates with Task-Specific Activation: A Combined Functional and Morphometric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Rüdiger Ilg, Afra M. Wohlschläger, Christian Gaser, Yasmin Liebau, Ruth Dauner, Andreas Wöller, Claus Zimmer, Josef Zihl and Mark Mühlau
Journal of Neuroscience 16 April 2008, 28 (16) 4210-4215; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5722-07.2008
Rüdiger Ilg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Afra M. Wohlschläger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Gaser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasmin Liebau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth Dauner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Wöller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claus Zimmer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josef Zihl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Mühlau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Practice-related performance increase. Practice resulted in a significant increase in mirror-reading performance (mean ± SD, p < 0.001).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Practice-related changes in activation and gray matter. A, Clusters of activation and GM changes are displayed at a height threshold of 0.001 uncorrected and an extent threshold of 0.05 corrected. Mirror-reading-specific activation (green), practice-related decrease of activation (red), practice-related increase of activation (blue), and practice-related increase of GM (gray) are superimposed on a surface-rendered MNI template. Compared with normal reading, mirror reading resulted in a differential activation of bilateral dorsal occipital lobe (inferior, middle, and superior occipital gyrus), occipitotemporal cortex (fusiform gyrus), superior parietal cortex (bilateral superior parietal lobule, left intraparietal sulcus, bilateral precuneus, and left somatosensory cortex), medial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (left presupplementary motor area, right middle cingulate cortex, left frontal eye field, and bilateral precentral gyrus), right anterior insula, and cerebellum. The comparison of GM before and after practice shows a significant increase in GM in a subset of the regions (gray) activated in the right occipital cortex during mirror reading (green). B, The middle plot shows the maximum intensity projection of the GM increase. C, The right plot displays the GM signal change (as a percentage) of all voxels of the cluster (we divided the individual mean of the GM values of all voxels of the resulting cluster after practice by the individual mean of the GM values of the same voxels before practice; error bars indicate mean and SEM). The mean relative GM signal increase within the reported cluster was 5.1% (SEM, 1.6%) in the practice group and −0.3% in the control group (SEM, 1.3%).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Mirror reading versus normal reading

    RegionLocalization of peak voxelsHemisphereMNI coordinates (mm)Z values (peak voxel)
    xyz
    Dorsal occipitalInferior occipital gyrus (BA 18/19/37)R36−84−35.97
    42−75−125.52
    L−42−60−125.86
    −36−87−125.46
    Middle occipital gyrus (BA 18/19)R36−8495.69
    L−30−84125.76
    −30−93185.23
    Superior occipital gyrus (BA 19/7)R27−69275.60
    L−24−69335.86
    OccipitotemporalFusiform gyrus (BA 19/37)L−36−48−215.75
    −36−69−125.56
    R39−69−185.71
    33−48−185.68
    ParietalSuperior/inferior parietal lobule (BA 7/40)L−18−63395.66
    −24−66545.27
    R27−57455.45
    24−66515.28
    Intraparietal sulcus (BA 40)L−45−39425.47
    Precuneus (BA7)L−15−75455.18
    R12−69455.24
    Somatosensory cortex (BA 2)L−42−42545.05
    FrontalPre-SMA (BA 6)L−612485.55
    −33545.45
    Middle cingulate cortex (BA 24/32)R918395.16
    Frontal eye field (BA 6)L−30−6515.45
    Precentral gyrus (BA 6/9)L > R−51−3485.29
    519365.12
    LimbicInsula lobeR362495.21
    362105.12
    CerebellumPosterior lobeR > L15−72−215.11
    Vermis (declive/pyramis)R9−72−215.33
    • Note that the table reports all peak voxels surviving a corrected height threshold of p < 0.05. BA, Brodmann area.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Practice effects

    RegionLocalization of peak voxelsHemisphereMNI coordinates (mm)Z value (peak voxel)Corrected p value (cluster)
    xyz
    Decrease of activation (fMRI)
        ParietalSuperior parietal (BA 1/2, hiP2)R42−39544.350.017
    Increase of activation (fMRI)
        OccipitalDorsal occipital (BA 17/18)R9−9004.24< 0.001
        ThalamusAnteriorL−9−6124.010.039
    Gray matter signal increase (VBM)
        OccipitalDorsal occipital (BA 18/19)R29−97195.17*0.003
    • BA, Brodmann area; hiP2, human intraparietal area 2. *p corrected, 0.029.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (16)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 16
16 Apr 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gray Matter Increase Induced by Practice Correlates with Task-Specific Activation: A Combined Functional and Morphometric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Gray Matter Increase Induced by Practice Correlates with Task-Specific Activation: A Combined Functional and Morphometric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Rüdiger Ilg, Afra M. Wohlschläger, Christian Gaser, Yasmin Liebau, Ruth Dauner, Andreas Wöller, Claus Zimmer, Josef Zihl, Mark Mühlau
Journal of Neuroscience 16 April 2008, 28 (16) 4210-4215; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5722-07.2008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Gray Matter Increase Induced by Practice Correlates with Task-Specific Activation: A Combined Functional and Morphometric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Rüdiger Ilg, Afra M. Wohlschläger, Christian Gaser, Yasmin Liebau, Ruth Dauner, Andreas Wöller, Claus Zimmer, Josef Zihl, Mark Mühlau
Journal of Neuroscience 16 April 2008, 28 (16) 4210-4215; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5722-07.2008
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.