Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 21 May 2008, 28 (21) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Compound Fusion at Ribbon Synapses

Gary Matthews and Peter Sterling

(see pages 5403–5411)

How ribbon synapses in photoreceptors and retinal bipolar cells can release vesicles extremely rapidly has long been a mystery. Diffusion of undocked vesicles to the plasma membrane is too slow to account for the speed of release. Matthews and Sterling now provide electron-microscopic evidence that compound fusion—in which vesicles fuse to each other before fusing with the plasma membrane—occurs at ribbon synapses of goldfish bipolar cells. Stimulated ribbon synapses had significantly fewer vesicles tethered to the ribbon than those in which exocytosis was blocked. Although most vesicles had similar sizes in stimulated and unstimulated synapses, vesicles up to three times larger appeared after stimulation. The largest of these occurred at the base of the ribbon, adjacent to the plasma membrane, whereas normal-sized vesicles predominated at the top of the ribbon. Invaginations of the plasma membrane near ribbon synapses also appeared after stimulation, and like vesicles, these were tethered to the ribbon.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Stereo-pair electron micrographs of a synaptic ribbon fixed during repetitive stimulation. Large membranous structures (black arrow) are connected to the ribbon by electron-dense filaments (white arrowhead). See the article by Matthews and Sterling for details.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Depolarizing GABA Currents, NMDA Receptors, and Synaptogenesis

Doris D. Wang and Arnold R. Kriegstein

(see pages 5547–5558)

In the developing neocortex, GABAergic synapses form before glutamatergic synapses, but GABA is depolarizing due to elevated internal chloride. GABA-mediated depolarization regulates subsequent development of both GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses. To elucidate how GABAergic depolarization affects synaptic development, Wang and Kriegstein made GABA hyperpolarizing in embryonic mice by blocking the chloride transporter NKCC1 in utero. As shown previously, this disrupted postnatal AMPA transmission and reduced dendrite length and branching. At 1–3 postnatal weeks, the frequency of spontaneous GABAergic and AMPAergic postsynaptic currents was reduced in Nkcc1-knockdown mice compared to controls. Furthermore, dendritic spine density decreased and spine length increased in knockdown mice, suggesting fewer glutamatergic synapses were present. Synapse development in mutant mice was rescued by cotransfection of a voltage-independent NMDA receptor (NMDAR), and knockdown of an NMDAR subunit replicated the effects of NKCC1 knockdown. These data suggest that depolarizing GABA currents enable NMDAR activation, which, in turn, is necessary for AMPA synapse formation.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Opioid Attenuation of Human Fear Conditioning

Falk Eippert, Ulrike Bingel, Eszter Schoell, Juliana Yacubian, and Christian Büchel

(see pages 5465–5472)

When pain is paired with an innocuous stimulus, animals learn to fear the innocuous stimulus. But pain also triggers release of endogenous opioids, which dampen pain—does this affect fear conditioning? It has been hypothesized that opioids provide negative feedback that attenuates painful stimuli and thereby tempers fear conditioning. If so, opioid antagonists should enhance conditioning. This week, Eippert et al. provide evidence supporting this hypothesis in humans. The authors monitored fear conditioning using a reaction time task, functional magnetic resonance imaging, skin conductance, and subjective pain ratings in subjects treated with an opioid antagonist or saline. Antagonist-treated subjects demonstrated stronger conditioning (faster reaction times), while controls showed more habituation in brain regions involved in pain processing. Furthermore, brain regions involved in descending pain control (rostral anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and periaqueductal gray) were deactivated when the conditioned stimulus was presented to controls, suggesting inhibition of these regions may be responsible for attenuating conditioning.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

Interconnections of Medium Spiny Neurons

Stefano Taverna, Ema Ilijic, and D. James Surmeier

(see pages 5504–5512)

The two main types of medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the striatum—those that project directly to the substantia nigra and those that project indirectly via the globus pallidus—have opposing effects on thalamic outputs and behavior, but are known to be interconnected. This week, Taverna et al. present a systematic analysis of these GABAergic interconnections, revealing differences between MSN types. Recording from pairs of neurons, they found that when neurons were connected, it was always unidirectionally: no pairs were reciprocally connected. In addition, MSNs that expressed D1 dopamine receptors (D1 MSNs, mostly striatonigral) synapsed primarily onto other D1 MSNs, whereas those that expressed D2 receptors (D2 MSNs, mainly striatopallidal) synapsed onto both types. Furthermore, when the presynaptic cell was a D2 MSN, PSPs were larger than when the presynaptic cell was a D1 MSN, regardless of the postsynaptic cell type. Depletion of dopamine (a model of Parkinson's disease) greatly reduced collateral connections of all types.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (21)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 21
21 May 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 21 May 2008, 28 (21) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 21 May 2008, 28 (21) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.