Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

GluR6/KA2 Kainate Receptors Mediate Slow-Deactivating Currents

Andrea Barberis, Shankar Sachidhanandam and Christophe Mulle
Journal of Neuroscience 18 June 2008, 28 (25) 6402-6406; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1204-08.2008
Andrea Barberis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shankar Sachidhanandam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christophe Mulle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Properties of GluR6- and GluR6/KA2-mediated currents evoked by long glutamate pulses. A, Dependence of the current peak amplitude on GluR6:KA2 cDNA ratio. Currents were elicited by glutamate pulses (1 mm, 100 ms). B, Typical GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 current responses to glutamate (1 mm, 100 ms). GluR6 and KA2 subunits were transfected at the ratio 1:3. C, Dependence of the rectification index (ratio between the current obtained at membrane potential +120 mV and −120 mV) on GluR6:KA2 cDNA ratio. D, Current–voltage (I–V) curves for current mediated by GluR6 (black triangles) and GluR6/KA2 (gray triangles). GluR6 and KA2 cDNAs were transfected at the ratio 1:3. E, F, Typical GluR6-mediated (E) and GluR6/KA2-mediated (F) currents elicited by glutamate (1 mm and 10 μm). G, Dose–response curve for GluR6 (black triangles) and GluR6/KA2 receptors (gray triangles). H, Same traces as in E and F normalized and superimposed. I, Summary of the desensitization kinetics at different [Glu]. *p < 0.05. J, Typical example of GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 current responses to paired-pulse protocol (1 mm, 100 ms pulse length, 1 s gap). K, Time course of the recovery from desensitization (GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 receptors, black and gray triangles, respectively). In paired-pulse experiments, we only compared traces showing the same peak amplitude when evoked by either 1.5 or 100 ms glutamate pulses. τdes, desensitization time constant; fract., fractional.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    GluR6/KA2 decay kinetics depends on stimulation pulse length. A, B, GluR6 currents and GluR6/KA2 currents evoked by either long (100 ms) or brief (1.5 ms) glutamate pulses. C, Paired pulses for GluR6- and GluR6/KA2-mediated currents (1 mm, 1.5 ms pulse length, 300 ms gap). D, Summary of the decay kinetics for GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 currents (black and gray bars, respectively) evoked by increasing glutamate pulse duration. E, Time course of recovery from desensitization for GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 receptors (black and gray squares, respectively) obtained with 1.5 ms pulses superimposed on that obtained with 100 ms pulses (same as that shown in Fig. 1M; black and gray triangles for GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 receptors, respectively). fract., Fractional.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Model simulation. A, Kinetic scheme previously proposed by Robert and Howe (2003). The rate constants used to simulate the behavior of GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 receptors are listed in supplemental Table 1 (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Simulated current traces were obtained by activating 1000 channels at the holding potential of −90 mV. When brief (1.5 ms) pulses were applied, the input waveform was trapezoidal, matching the whole-cell depolarization time course induced by 1.5 ms application of 25 mm potassium concentration saline, as detailed in supplemental Figure 1 (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). B, E, Simulated GluR6- and GluR6/KA2-mediated current evoked by 1 mm, 100 ms glutamate pulse (left) and by 1 mm, 1.5 ms, glutamate pulse (right). C, F, Simulated paired-pulse protocol for GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 receptors [100 ms, 1 mm, 300 ms gap (left) and 1.5 ms, 1 mm, 300 ms gap (right)]. D, G, Simulated GluR6- and GluR6/KA2-mediated current evoked by a synaptic-like glutamate exposure. The synaptic-like glutamate pulse was assumed to be exponential (see supplemental Model Simulations, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). H, Summary of the decay time constants for simulated GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 currents elicited by brief (1.5 ms), long (100 ms), and synaptic-like glutamate pulses. I, Time course of the recovery from desensitization for GluR6 and GluR6/KA2 receptors obtained with 1.5 ms pulses and 100 ms pulses (same color and symbol code as in Fig. 2E). fract., Fractional.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental material
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (25)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 25
18 Jun 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GluR6/KA2 Kainate Receptors Mediate Slow-Deactivating Currents
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
GluR6/KA2 Kainate Receptors Mediate Slow-Deactivating Currents
Andrea Barberis, Shankar Sachidhanandam, Christophe Mulle
Journal of Neuroscience 18 June 2008, 28 (25) 6402-6406; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1204-08.2008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
GluR6/KA2 Kainate Receptors Mediate Slow-Deactivating Currents
Andrea Barberis, Shankar Sachidhanandam, Christophe Mulle
Journal of Neuroscience 18 June 2008, 28 (25) 6402-6406; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1204-08.2008
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.