Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 27 August 2008, 28 (35) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

A New Striatal Microcircuit

Matthew A. Sullivan, Huanmian Chen, and Hitoshi Morikawa

(see pages 8682–8690)

Cholinergic neurons in the striatum generally fire tonically, but stop firing briefly when the animal receives a reward. The physiological mechanisms responsible for these pauses, which are thought to be important for associative learning, are not clear. This week, Sullivan et al. describe a novel striatal microcircuit that may contribute to pausing. Whole-cell recordings from cholinergic neurons in striatal slices revealed that all of these neurons receive polysynaptic inhibition that requires both GABAA receptors and β2-subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs), but not AMPA receptors, muscarinic AChRs, or D1 or D2 dopamine receptors. Action potentials produced in cholinergic neurons via intracellular stimulation occasionally produced polysynaptic IPSCs in the same and other cholinergic neurons, suggesting that cholinergic neurons are sparsely interconnected via GABAergic interneurons. Although repetitive stimulation of single cholinergic neurons depressed polysynaptic IPSCs, simultaneous, repetitive extracellular stimulation of many cholinergic fibers reliably elicited IPSCs that briefly disrupted tonic firing.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Regulation of Neuronal Polarity by Protein Kinase D

Dong-Min Yin, Yan-Hua Huang, Yan-Bing Zhu, and Yun Wang

(see pages 8832–8843)

The transition of a spherical neuroblast into a mature neuron—with a single axon and morphologically and molecularly distinct dendrites—requires polarized trafficking of axonal and dendritic proteins. Trafficking of protein-containing vesicles from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane is regulated in part by the protein kinase D (PKD) family. Yin et al. now report that two members of this family, PKD1 and PKD2, are both required for the development of neuronal polarity. In control hippocampal cultures, the Golgi was likely to be located near the base of the nascent axon, and post-Golgi vesicles moved mainly toward the axon. Blocking either PKD1 or PKD2 using inhibitors, siRNA, or dominant-negative mutants disrupted the polarized trafficking of vesicles and increased the number of axons per cell. Additional experiments suggested that PKD1 and PKD2 do not interact with the cytoskeleton and that they must be present in the Golgi to exert their effects on neuronal polarity.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Cultured hippocampal neurons normally (left) have a single axon (red) and multiple dendrites (green). Neurons treated with a PKD1 inhibitor (right) develop multiple axons. See the article by Yin et al. for details.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Cognitive and Behavioral Effects of COMT

Francesco Papaleo, Jacqueline N. Crawley, Jian Song, Barbara K. Lipska, Jim Pickel, Daniel R. Weinberger, and Jingshan Chen

(see pages 8709–8723)

Many brain processes require an optimal level of dopamine, with too much or too little dopamine causing impairment. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) helps regulate dopamine levels, and polymorphisms in human COMT have been implicated in cognitive and emotional dysfunction. A widely studied human variation involves a methionine-to-valine substitution, which increases COMT activity and lowers dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Because human populations have high genetic and behavioral diversity, however, establishing a link between COMT alleles and specific phenotypes is difficult. Therefore, Papaleo et al. expressed the human COMT-Val allele in one line of mice and knocked out COMT expression in another. The mice exhibited all the behavioral traits predicted from human studies—impaired recognition and working memory and reduced pain sensitivity in COMT-Val-expressing mice, and increased startle, stress, and anxiety responses in knock-outs. These data provide compelling evidence for a causal link between COMT activity and these phenotypes.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

Deep Brain Stimulation for Addiction

Fair M. Vassoler, Heath D. Schmidt, Mary E. Gerard, Katie R. Famous, Domenic A. Ciraulo, Conan Kornetsky, Clifford M. Knapp, and R. Chris Pierce

(see pages 8735–8739)

Cocaine addicts often relapse after detoxification, especially if presented with the drug or stimuli they associate with drug use, and no effective therapy to prevent relapse exists. Using a rat model of relapse, Vassoler et al. have found evidence that deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell might reduce relapse. Rats first were trained to press a lever to receive intravenous doses of cocaine. After 3 weeks, saline was administered instead of cocaine, and lever pressing decreased significantly (from ∼130 to ∼14 presses per 2 h session). Lever pressing was then reinstated by a single noncontingent injection of cocaine, with larger doses causing larger increases in lever pressing. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell (but not dorsal striatum) greatly reduced the reinstatement of lever pressing. Although implantation of electrodes into the brain is an invasive procedure involving major surgery, these results suggest that deep brain stimulation might be warranted to treat severe, life-threatening cases of cocaine addiction.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (35)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 35
27 Aug 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 27 August 2008, 28 (35) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 27 August 2008, 28 (35) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.