Abstract
Broad action potentials (APs) and dopamine (DA) D2 receptor (D2R)-mediated inhibition are widely used to identify midbrain DA neurons. However, when these measures are taken alone they do not predict DA content in ventral tegmental area (VTA) neurons. In fact, some VTA neuronal properties correlate better with projection target than neurotransmitter content. Here we report that amygdala (AMYG)-projecting VTA DA neurons have brief APs and lack D2R agonist (quinpirole; 1 μm) autoinhibition. However, they are hyperpolarized by both the GABAB agonist baclofen (1 μm) and the κ-opioid receptor agonist U69593 [(+)-(5α,7α,8β)-N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]benzeneacetamide; 1 μm]. Furthermore, we show that accurate prediction of DA content in VTA neurons is possible when the projection target is known: in both nucleus accumbens- and AMYG-projecting neural populations, AP durations are significantly longer in DA than non-DA neurons. Among prefrontal cortex-projecting neurons, quinpirole sensitivity, but not AP duration, is a predictor of DA content. Therefore, in the VTA, AP duration and inhibition by D2R agonists may be valid markers of DA content in neurons of known projection target.
Introduction
Many midbrain neurons fire in response to unexpected rewards and reward-predictive cues and in a pattern consistent with a reward prediction error signal (Hyland et al., 2002; Bayer and Glimcher, 2005; Roesch et al., 2007; Schultz, 2007). These firing patterns have been attributed to dopamine (DA) neurons. These in vivo studies generally use two properties to identify substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) neurons as DAergic: action potential (AP) duration and dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) agonist-induced inhibitions. However, in the VTA, physiological studies in which neurotransmitter content has been directly determined indicate that these measures are not reliable markers for DA content either in vivo or in vitro (Johnson and North, 1992; Ungless et al., 2004; Margolis et al., 2006b; Luo et al., 2008).
Midbrain DA neurons were first investigated in the SNc. Grace and Bunney (1980) and Grace and Onn (1989) confirmed that long-duration APs are a property of SNc DA neurons by cytochemically identifying neurons after both in vivo and in vitro intracellular recordings. In addition, DA, but not non-DA, neurons in the SNc are inhibited by activation of somatodendritic D2Rs (Bunney et al., 1973a,b; Groves et al., 1975; Aghajanian and Bunney, 1977; Lacey et al., 1987, 1989). These properties have made it possible to reliably identify SNc DA neurons in vivo.
Although the SNc and VTA are anatomically contiguous structures, there are important differences between them. In the SNc, 88% of the neurons are DAergic (Margolis et al., 2006b) (but see Nair-Roberts et al., 2008), and all of these neurons send collaterals to multiple brain regions (Fallon, 1981; Prensa and Parent, 2001). In contrast, only 60% of VTA neurons are DAergic (Swanson, 1982; Margolis et al., 2006b; Nair-Roberts et al., 2008), and few VTA neurons project to more than one forebrain region (Deniau et al., 1980; Fallon, 1981; Swanson, 1982; Margolis et al., 2006a). Learning and performance of behavioral tasks are also differentially influenced by SNc and VTA (Alderson et al., 2006; Ikemoto et al., 2006; El-Amamy and Holland, 2007).
In addition to their distinct anatomy and behavioral function, the earliest studies of VTA neurons indicated that AP duration and D2R sensitivity might not generalize to identify neurons as dopaminergic in this brain region (Johnson and North, 1992). In fact, studies of VTA neurons that use direct methods to determine neurotransmitter content have not identified consistent electrophysiological properties that can predict DA content (Jones and Kauer, 1999; Korotkova et al., 2003; Margolis et al., 2003, 2006b; Ungless et al., 2004; Luo et al., 2008).
Because individual VTA neurons project to only one forebrain target, we tested the hypothesis that AP duration and D2R-mediated inhibition are correlates of projection target. We examined VTA neurons projecting to the nucleus accumbens (NAc), prefrontal cortex (PFC), or amygdala (AMYG). We show here that AP duration correlates with DA content in NAc- and AMYG-projecting neurons, but not PFC-projecting neurons, and D2R inhibition correlates well with DA content only among PFC-projecting neurons.
Materials and Methods
All experiments conformed to National Institutes of Health and Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center animal care policy standards.
Retrograde tracer injections.
Male Sprague Dawley rats (27–29 d) were anesthetized with isoflurane. A 1 μl Hamilton syringe was stereotaxically placed in the PFC [from bregma (in mm): anteroposterior, +2.6; mediolateral (ML), ±0.8; ventral (V), −4.0 from skull surface], the NAc (anteroposterior, +1.5; ML, ± 0.8; V, −6.7), or AMYG (anteroposterior, −1.0; ML, ±4.5; V, −8.0). Neuro-DiI (7% in ethanol; Biotium) was slowly injected, 0.3–1.0 μl per side. A small set of AMYG injections were completed in older (mean, 200 ± 5 g; range, 180–240 g) rats (anteroposterior, −2.2; ML, ±4.8; V, −8.5). After recordings, all injection sites were histologically confirmed (supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Animals with improper injection placements or significant diffusion outside of the target regions were rejected.
Slice preparation and electrophysiology.
A subset of recordings were made in control male Sprague Dawley rats (25–40 d). Most recordings in retrogradely labeled neurons were made blind to injection site, 6–8 d after surgery. A subset of data shown in Figure 1 was obtained from a previous study (Margolis et al., 2006b). Horizontal brain slices (150 μm thick) were prepared using a vibratome (Leica Instruments). Slices were prepared in ice-cold Ringer's solution (in mm: 119 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.3 MgSO4, 1.0 NaH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 26.2 NaHCO3, and 11 glucose saturated with 95% O2–5% CO2) and allowed to recover at 35°C for at least 1 h. Slices were visualized under a Zeiss Axioskop with differential interference contrast optics and infrared, and epifluorescent illumination to visualize DiI-labeled neurons. Whole-cell recordings were made at 33°C using 2.5–4 MΩ pipettes containing the following (in mm): 123 K-gluconate, 10 HEPES, 0.2 EGTA, 8 NaCl, 2 MgATP, 0.3 Na3GTP, and 0.1% biocytin (pH 7.2, osmolarity adjusted to 275). Liquid junction potentials were not corrected during recordings.
Recordings were made using an Axopatch 1-D (Molecular Devices), filtered at 2 kHz and collected at 5 kHz using IGOR Pro (WaveMetrics). In control animals, VTA neurons were selected in an unbiased manner from throughout the VTA by superimposing a grid on the slice, numbering each grid location, and using a random number generator to choose the grid location for recording. The closest healthy cell to the randomly generated grid location was patched. In all cases, APs were collected by holding the cell in current clamp at I = 0, and only spontaneously occurring APs were measured within the first 2 min of gaining whole-cell access. Neurons were required to be firing spontaneously and stably for at least 2 min with firing rates >0.25 Hz to be included in the firing data.
Agonists, antagonists, ATP, GTP, and all other chemicals were obtained from Sigma or Tocris Bioscience.
Identification of DA neurons.
Slices were fixed immediately after recording in 4% formaldehyde and then stored at 4°C in PBS. Slices were preblocked for 2 h at room temperature in PBS plus 0.2% BSA and 5% normal goat serum, then incubated at 4°C with a rabbit anti-tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) polyclonal antibody (1:100). Slices were then washed thoroughly in PBS with 0.2% BSA before being agitated overnight at 4°C with Cy5 anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:100) and FITC streptavidin (6.5 μl/ml). Sections were rinsed and mounted on slides using Bio-Rad Fluoroguard Antifade Reagent mounting media and visualized under a Zeiss LSM 510 META microscope. Primary antibodies were obtained from Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents, secondary antibodies from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, and all other reagents from Sigma.
A hyperpolarization in response to bath application of the κ-opioid receptor (KOP-R) agonist (+)-(5α,7α,8β)-N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]benzeneacetamide (U69593; 1 μm) was also taken as an indication that a neuron was DA (Margolis et al., 2003) except in experiments testing AMYG-projecting neurons for KOP-R sensitivity, in which immunocytochemical identification was required.
Data analysis.
At least 10 APs from each neuron were averaged together, and the resulting trace was measured between when the membrane potential (Vm) crossed threshold (when the slope of the Vm first exceeded 5 V/s) to when the Vm recrossed the threshold after the AP peak.
Results are presented as mean ± SEM where appropriate. Differences between NAc, PFC, and AMYG projection populations were tested using a one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni t test for pairwise multiple comparisons. Drug effects were statistically evaluated by comparing the last eight baseline data points to the last eight data points during drug application using Student's unpaired t test. p < 0.05 was required for significance in all analyses.
Results
AP duration correlates with D2R inhibition
A significant correlation between AP duration and D2R-mediated inhibition in VTA neurons has recently been reported in vivo (Roesch et al., 2007). Therefore we asked whether this correlation exists in vitro. We measured spontaneously occurring APs and pharmacological responses in current-clamp mode in VTA neurons from control rats. DA neurons were identified by filling recorded cells with biocytin and then immunocytochemically processing them for TH content. Among randomly selected neurons, we confirmed a significant positive correlation between longer AP duration and the presence of D2R agonist inhibition (Spearman rank order correlation, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1). However, consistent with previous in vitro data (Johnson and North, 1992), neither AP duration nor D2R sensitivity correlated with TH content.
Action potential duration correlates with projection target
To examine whether AP duration sorts by projection target, we injected the fluorescent retrograde tracer DiI into one of three VTA projection targets: the NAc, PFC, or AMYG. One week later, we recorded from retrogradely labeled neurons (for injection sites, see supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material; for recording locations, see supplemental Fig. 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). We found that the AP durations of TH(+) VTA neurons vary with projection target (Fig. 2; supplemental Table 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Among TH(+) VTA neurons, AMYG-projecting cells exhibited the briefest AP durations, and they were significantly shorter than those of NAc-projecting cells. The APs of TH(+) VTA neurons projecting to the PFC were also significantly briefer than NAc-projecting TH(+) neurons, but tended to be longer than those of AMYG-projecting neurons.
We also examined TH(−) VTA neurons. These included both Ih(+) and Ih(−) neurons in each of the three projection populations. Among NAc-projecting neurons, the mean AP durations of both Ih(−) and Ih(+) TH(−) neurons were significantly shorter in duration than those of TH(+) neurons. There was a relatively small overlap in the distributions of NAc-projecting TH(+) and either type of TH(−) neurons (Fig. 2B; supplemental Table 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). The AP durations of AMYG-projecting TH(−) neurons were also shorter than AMYG-projecting TH(+) neurons (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the distributions of AP durations among all three types of PFC-projecting neurons were similar (Fig. 2B; supplemental Table 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Importantly, the AP durations of AMYG-projecting TH(+) neurons were briefer than many NAc- or PFC-projecting TH(−) neurons.
Inhibition by D2R activation sorts by projection target
Given that randomly selected neurons with short duration AP neurons are not inhibited by D2R activation, we hypothesized that AMYG-projecting neurons should not be inhibited by D2R agonists. Indeed, none of the seven tested AMYG-projecting TH(+) neurons were hyperpolarized by 1 μm quinpirole. Further, only 3 of 23 AMYG-projecting neurons were significantly hyperpolarized by quinpirole; in fact, there was a slight trend among AMYG-projecting TH(+) neurons for quinpirole to be depolarizing (supplemental Table 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). As a positive control, the GABAB agonist baclofen (1 μm) yielded a robust hyperpolarization in neurons not hyperpolarized by quinpirole (five of six neurons) (Fig. 3Ai). In addition, there was no response to the D2R antagonist sulpiride (10 μm) in these cells (1.0 ± 1.1 mV; n = 3), ruling out the possibility that this lack of hyperpolarization in response to quinpirole was caused by tonic activation of D2Rs by endogenously released DA. In contrast, most PFC- (78%) and NAc- (69%) projecting TH(+) neurons did exhibit significant hyperpolarizations in response to quinpirole (Fig. 3B,C; supplemental Table 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).
Similar to our findings for PFC-projecting, but not NAc-projecting, VTA DA neurons (Margolis et al., 2006a), AMYG-projecting TH(+) neurons were hyperpolarized by the KOP-R selective agonist U69593 (1 μm) (Fig. 3Aii).
To examine the possibility that the unique and unexpected properties of AMYG-projecting DA neurons are related to the developmental stage of our rats [postnatal day 33 (P33)–P35 when they were killed] (Grace et al., 2007), we repeated our AP duration and quinpirole experiments in AMYG-projecting VTA neurons in older rats (200 ± 5 g at surgery). Recordings were completed 8–9 d after surgery. Consistent with our findings in younger animals, quinpirole did not hyperpolarize any of the seven tested AMYG-projecting neurons, including four confirmed as TH(+). Furthermore, the AP durations of TH(+) AMYG-projecting DA neurons were consistently shorter (1.95 ± 0.09 ms; n = 5) than other VTA DA neurons, yet still longer than those of TH(−) AMYG-projecting neurons (supplemental Table 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Therefore there were no changes in these properties in the VTA over the course of adolescence.
Discussion
We show here that AP duration and D2R agonist responses in VTA neurons sort by projection target. In vivo recordings typically presume TH content based on AP duration and D2R agonist response. However, our results show that the use of these criteria to identify VTA DA neurons will lead to a sample that not only includes a significant number of non-DA neurons but, equally important, excludes many DA neurons. In particular, when using both of these markers, DA neurons that project to the NAc will be overrepresented in the sample, whereas AMYG-projecting DA neurons will be uniformly excluded.
The majority of recordings reported here were from adolescent rats. Although neural properties in older rats may be different, our in vitro data are consistent with previous in vivo studies in adult rats in which researchers used antidromic stimulation to identify projection target and conduction velocity to identify putative DA neurons for both NAc-projecting (Yim and Mogenson, 1980) and PFC-projecting (Shepard and German, 1984) VTA neurons. Specifically, Mogenson and colleagues showed that AP duration sorts with presumed DA content among NAc-projecting VTA neurons (Maeda and Mogenson, 1982), and that 89% of putative DA neurons and 40% of putative non-DA neurons that project to the NAc are inhibited by D2R activation (Yim and Mogenson, 1980). These numbers are similar to our proportions of NAc-projecting quinpirole-responsive neurons (Fig. 3). Although there are no published in vivo data on the properties of AMYG-projecting VTA neurons to which we can compare our findings, the consistencies between the properties measured at two developmental time points here suggest stable neural properties in this projection. Our data are also consistent with a recent in vivo report of “novel” rat VTA neurons including TH(+) neurons with shorter duration APs and TH(−) neurons inhibited by quinpirole (Luo et al., 2008). It is important to note that the exact values determined for AP duration of different populations of neurons will depend strongly on the experimental conditions; electrode properties, filter settings, and amplifier design will all affect AP duration measurements. Regardless, the consistencies between our work and in vivo studies indicate that the relative patterns described in this report are likely to hold for other preparations.
Our results differ sharply from those recently reported in mouse VTA. For instance, in the mouse, D2R-mediated hyperpolarizations are not present in PFC-projecting neurons (Lammel et al., 2008), but are present in AMYG-projecting VTA neurons (Ford et al., 2006; Lammel et al., 2008). We show here that in the rat PFC-projecting but not AMYG-projecting neurons are hyperpolarized by D2R agonists. In the mouse, the AP durations of NAc-projecting neurons are shorter than those in AMYG-projecting neurons (Lammel et al., 2008), unlike our current findings in the rat. The Ih is absent in mouse PFC-projecting VTA DA neurons (Lammel et al., 2008), but is large in rat PFC-projecting DA neurons (Margolis et al., 2006a). Also in the mouse, many NAc-projecting neurons, but not AMYG-projecting neurons, are inhibited by KOP-R agonists (Ford et al., 2006). In the rat AMYG-projecting DA neurons are inhibited by KOP-R agonists (Fig. 3Aii), but NAc-projecting DA neurons are not (Margolis et al., 2006a). These differences indicate that the properties of different populations of VTA DA neurons do not generalize between species. Importantly, they also indicate that different subpopulations of VTA neurons will be isolated in the mouse and the rat if AP duration and D2R agonist responses are used as identification criteria. Therefore the emerging differences between mice and rats caution against generalizing findings between species, in particular with respect to VTA neuronal properties.
We propose that a major step to improve the interpretation of in vivo electrophysiological data collected in the VTA is to sample all VTA neurons, identifying projection target wherever possible (Yim and Mogenson, 1980; Melis et al., 2000). In addition, projection target identification will allow the investigator to determine whether a VTA neuron is DA-containing with much greater reliability (Fig. 4). For instance, our present data suggest that among NAc-projecting neurons the probability is 1.0 that a neuron is TH(+) if its AP duration is greater than the median of the NAc-projecting population. Even among AMYG-projecting neurons with much shorter AP durations overall, the probability is 0.82 that a neuron is TH(+) if its AP duration is greater than the median. Finally, a PFC-projecting VTA neuron that is inhibited by a D2R agonist has a 0.88 probability of being TH(+) based on our current data. Postsynaptic inhibition by a KOP-R agonist may prove to be an even more accurate pharmacological tool for identifying TH(+) neurons among PFC-projecting VTA neurons, because KOP-R agonists inhibited 100% of tested PFC-projecting TH(+) neurons (Margolis et al., 2006a).
One major functional implication of these findings is that local DA release in the VTA, from either dendrites or axon collaterals (Bayer and Pickel, 1990), will differentially modulate neighboring populations of VTA neurons with different projection targets and neurotransmitter content. That is, whereas NAc- and PFC-projecting VTA DA neurons will be directly inhibited by local DA release, AMYG-projecting DA neurons will not. KOP-R agonists will postsynaptically inhibit a different subset of VTA neurons: DA neurons that project to the PFC and AMYG, but not those that project to the NAc (Margolis et al., 2006a). Such combinations of postsynaptic effects provide a mechanism by which distinct subsets of VTA neurons can be activated or inhibited.
Researchers have reported that in rats and monkeys there is a common neural discharge pattern among long-duration AP neurons in the VTA. These neurons fire in response to novel stimuli, unexpected reward, and reward-predictive cues, and in a pattern consistent with a reward expectancy error signal (Hyland et al., 2002; Fields et al., 2007; Schultz, 2007). Experiments using fast scan cyclic voltammetry detection of DA release in the NAc also support the hypothesis that at least some of the neurons exhibiting these firing patterns are DA neurons that project to the NAc (Phillips et al., 2003; Roitman et al., 2004; Day et al., 2007). Our present findings indicate that many neurons with long-duration APs are in fact NAc-projecting DA neurons. However, because most investigators making in vivo recordings during behavioral tasks have excluded neurons that do not have very long-duration APs, firing patterns of VTA DA neurons with shorter duration APs that project to nonstriatal targets are unknown. It is possible that such neurons have firing patterns distinct from those of NAc-projecting DA neurons. In view of the critical roles of DA release in a variety of important functions including working memory (Phillips et al., 2008), learning, motivation, and reinforcement (Fields et al., 2007), and that the dysfunction of midbrain DA neurons contributes to disease states such as schizophrenia (Sesack and Carr, 2002), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Viggiano et al., 2003), and drug addiction (Lüscher and Ungless, 2006), it is essential that we have a more complete understanding of the firing patterns of all classes of VTA DA neurons. Here we show that determining the projection target of VTA neurons increases the accuracy of DA neuron identification in addition to the inherent value of knowing the connectivity of the neuron in question. Consequently, this approach has the potential to provide insight into how different subpopulations of VTA neurons contribute to reward, motivation, and several common disease states.
Footnotes
-
This work was supported by funds provided by the state of California for medical research on alcohol and substance abuse through the University of California, San Francisco. We thank Hagar Lock, Leah Grossman, and Joseph Driscoll for their technical assistance.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Elyssa B. Margolis, Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center, 5858 Horton Street, Suite 200, Emeryville, CA 94608. elyssam{at}gallo.ucsf.edu