Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleArticles, Neurobiology of Disease

Intrabodies Binding the Proline-Rich Domains of Mutant Huntingtin Increase Its Turnover and Reduce Neurotoxicity

Amber L. Southwell, Ali Khoshnan, Denise E. Dunn, Charles W. Bugg, Donald C. Lo and Paul H. Patterson
Journal of Neuroscience 3 September 2008, 28 (36) 9013-9020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2747-08.2008
Amber L. Southwell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Khoshnan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise E. Dunn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles W. Bugg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald C. Lo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul H. Patterson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The anti-Htt intrabodies reduce mHDx-1-induced toxicity and aggregation in cell culture. A , The epitopes in HDx-1 for the various intrabodies are depicted. B , To quantify mHtt toxicity, HEK293 cells were cotransfected with mHDx-1-GFP and intrabody at various intrabody/Htt ratios and incubated for 48 h. Cells were stained with EthD-2 to identify dead cell nuclei, fixed, and stained with DAPI to identify all cell nuclei. The number of dead cells was normalized to total cell number. All of the intrabodies reduce mHDx-1-induced cell death in a saturable, dose-dependent manner, with maximal effects at different intrabody/Htt ratios (1:1 for VL12.3, 2:1 for Happ1 and Happ3, and 4:1 for MW7). C , Aggregation was determined by counting GFP foci and normalizing to total cell number. *Different from VL12.3 at p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. The point labeled as 0 on the intrabody:Htt axis corresponds to the value for HDx-1 + CVL.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Protective effects of anti-Htt intrabodies against mHDx-1-induced neurodegeneration in corticostriatal brain slice explants. Corticostriatal brain slices were biolistically transfected with plasmid expression constructs encoding YFP, mHDx-1 (N1–66 with 73 Q), and the indicated intrabody. The number of healthy medium spiny neurons in the striatal region of each slice was scored visually 4–5 d after slice preparation and transfection. A , Slices were transfected with YFP + CVL; YFP + CVL + mHDx-1; YFP + mHDx-1 + VL12.3; or YFP + mHDx-1 + Happ1. *Different from YFP + CVL at p < 0.01. B , Slices were transfected with YFP + CVL; YFP + vector (Vec) + mHDx-1; YFP + CVL + mHDx-1; or YFP + mHDx-1 + MW7. *p < 0.01. The data in A and B are from independent experiments.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    VL12.3 increases the level of nuclear HDx-1. ST14A cells were cotransfected with mHDx-1-GFP with 103Q and intrabody at optimal ratios. A , At 48 h after transfection, cells were fixed, stained for the appropriate intrabody and cell nuclei, and analyzed by confocal microscopy. B , Mean whole-cell fluorescence intensity (int.) and mean nuclear fluorescence intensity of HDx-1 were compared. Whereas MW7, Happ1, and Happ3 have no effect on HDx-1 localization, VL12.3 significantly increases nuclear HDx-1. *Different from HDx-1 at p < 0.01.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    All of the anti-Htt intrabodies reduce insoluble HDx-1, whereas only the anti-PRR intrabodies also reduce soluble HDx-1. HEK293 cells were cotransfected with intrabody and mHDx-1 (76 kDa) or wtHDx-1 (40 kDa) at the optimal ratio for each intrabody. A , At 48 h after transfection, cells were lysed with detergent. The soluble protein fraction was recovered, and the insoluble fraction was treated with urea. Samples were then separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted for HDx-1. Nontransfected cells were used as a negative control (NEG). B , Quantification of bands shows that reduction of HDx-1 by PRR-binding intrabodies is significantly greater for the mutant form of Htt. Chemiluminescence densitometry was used to compare the levels of soluble mHDx-1 and wtHDx-1. Each band was normalized to the level of β-tubulin (54 kDa) in that sample. Bands for HDx-1 + intrabody (iAb) were then normalized to the level of soluble HDx-1 for that blot. n = 4 independent experiments, and values for each blot were used to compile a mean. *p < 0.01.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Anti-PRR intrabodies increase mHDx-1 turnover. A–C , ST14A cells were transfected with mHDx-1-SNAPtag 97Q ( A , B ) or wtHDx-1-SNAPtag 25Q ( C ) and intrabody at the optimal ratio for each intrabody. DAF green fluorescent SNAP substrate was added to cultures at 24 h after transfection. Some cultures were then fixed and stained with Toto-3 iodide nuclear marker, whereas others were incubated an additional 24 h to allow turnover of labeled HDx-1. Mean fluorescence intensity of cells at 24 h was compared with intensity at 48 h to determine the percentage of labeled HDx-1 remaining. VL12.3 has no effect on mHDx-1 or wtHDx-1 turnover, whereas MW7, Happ1, and Happ3 significantly increase the rate of mHDx-1 turnover. n = 4; *p < 0.01.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Material
    • supplemental material - Supplemental Figure 1
    • supplemental material - Supplemental Figure 2
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (36)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 36
3 Sep 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intrabodies Binding the Proline-Rich Domains of Mutant Huntingtin Increase Its Turnover and Reduce Neurotoxicity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Intrabodies Binding the Proline-Rich Domains of Mutant Huntingtin Increase Its Turnover and Reduce Neurotoxicity
Amber L. Southwell, Ali Khoshnan, Denise E. Dunn, Charles W. Bugg, Donald C. Lo, Paul H. Patterson
Journal of Neuroscience 3 September 2008, 28 (36) 9013-9020; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2747-08.2008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Intrabodies Binding the Proline-Rich Domains of Mutant Huntingtin Increase Its Turnover and Reduce Neurotoxicity
Amber L. Southwell, Ali Khoshnan, Denise E. Dunn, Charles W. Bugg, Donald C. Lo, Paul H. Patterson
Journal of Neuroscience 3 September 2008, 28 (36) 9013-9020; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2747-08.2008
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

  • Re: Is the proline-rich domain of mutant huntingtin involved in the regulation of its stability?
    Amber L Southwell
    Published on: 22 April 2009
  • Is the proline-rich domain of mutant huntingtin involved in the regulation of its stability?
    Alessio Cardinale
    Published on: 19 September 2008
  • Published on: (22 April 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Re: Is the proline-rich domain of mutant huntingtin involved in the regulation of its stability?
    Re: Is the proline-rich domain of mutant huntingtin involved in the regulation of its stability?
    • Amber L Southwell, Graduate Student
    • Other Contributors:
      • Paul Patterson

    We demonstrated that certain intracellular antibodies (intrabodies; iAbs) increase the turnover and lower the levels of soluble mutant huntingtin (mHtt)(Southwell et al., 2008). This was found specifically for iAbs that bind to the proline-rich region (PRR) of mHtt (iAbs Happ1 and 3 and MW7). Another iAb, binding mHtt at an N-terminal epitope (iAb VL12.3), did not lower soluble mHtt levels or increase mHtt turnover. Cardin...

    Show More

    We demonstrated that certain intracellular antibodies (intrabodies; iAbs) increase the turnover and lower the levels of soluble mutant huntingtin (mHtt)(Southwell et al., 2008). This was found specifically for iAbs that bind to the proline-rich region (PRR) of mHtt (iAbs Happ1 and 3 and MW7). Another iAb, binding mHtt at an N-terminal epitope (iAb VL12.3), did not lower soluble mHtt levels or increase mHtt turnover. Cardinale and Biocca (J. Neurosci. e letter, September 19th 2008) propose that the intrinsic tendency of iAbs to be directed to the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) may be responsible for the increased turnover of mHtt in the presence of anti-PRR iAbs.

    Setting aside the fact that the all of the studies cited by Cardinale and Biocca showing iAb targeting to the UPS were done with single chain iAbs rather than with the single domain iAbs predominately used in our studies, we feel that the evidence that the effects of anti-PRR iAbs on mHtt turnover are due to binding the PRR epitope is quite strong. First, as discussed in our paper, if turnover of mHtt was the result of degradation of the iAb/Htt complex, one would expect to see a concurrent reduction of iAb. In reality, we found an increase in iAb protein levels in the presence of the antigen (p. 9018). This could possibly result from increased stability of the properly folded iAb induced by antigen binding. Second, we would also expect to see increased turnover of both wtHtt and mHtt. Although the anti-PRR iAbs do bind wtHtt (Fig. S1), they have no effect on the turnover rate of wtHtt (Fig. 5C). This argues against non- specific iAb binding effects. Third, Cardinale and Biocca suggest that any iAb that binds Htt should increase its turnover, citing Wang et al. 2008, a study showing increased turnover of mHtt by binding of the single chain iAb, EM48, as evidence. Since Wang et al. clearly define the binding site of this iAb to be immediately C-terminal to the PRR (Fig. 3C; Wang et al., 2008), it is possible that EM48 is causing similar effects as the anti-PPR iAbs. Fourth, we see no effect on mHtt turnover by the iAb VL12.3 (Fig. 5B), which binds the N-terminus of Htt (Colby et al., 2004), and is highly effective in protecting cells from mHtt toxicity. Thus, effects on mHtt turnover depend on the epitope to which the iAb binds.

    While we agree that studies to elucidate the pathway of mHtt clearance induced by these various iAbs are warranted (and are currently in progress), we find that the evidence indicating that increased antigen turnover can be epitope-specific is compelling.

    Colby DW, Garg P, Holden T, Chao G, Webster JM, Messer A, Ingram VM, Wittrup KD (2004) Development of a Human Light Chain Variable Domain (VL) Intracellular Antibody Specific for the Amino Terminus of Huntingtin via Yeast Surface Display. Journal of Molecular Biology 342:901-912.

    Southwell AL, Khoshnan A, Dunn DE, Bugg CW, Lo DC, Patterson PH (2008) Intrabodies binding the proline-rich domains of mutant huntingtin increase its turnover and reduce neurotoxicity. The journal of neuroscience 28:9013-9020.

    Wang C-E, Zhou H, McGuire JR, Cerullo V, Lee B, Li S-H, Li X-J (2008) Suppression of neuropil aggregates and neurological symptoms by an intracellular antibody implicates the cytoplasmic toxicity of mutant huntingtin. J Cell Biol 181:803-816.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (19 September 2008)
    Page navigation anchor for Is the proline-rich domain of mutant huntingtin involved in the regulation of its stability?
    Is the proline-rich domain of mutant huntingtin involved in the regulation of its stability?
    • Alessio Cardinale, Senior scientist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Silvia Biocca, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Neuroscience and Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

    Southwell et al. propose that the proline-rich region (PRR) of mutant huntingtin (mHtt) regulates its stability. This conclusion, which may have important therapeutic implications for contrasting HD, is drawn by using highly specific intrabodies. They observe a decrease in neurotoxicity and in the aggregation of mHtt associated with a consistent increase of the turnover rate of mHtt.

    The authors exclude the possib...

    Show More

    Southwell et al. propose that the proline-rich region (PRR) of mutant huntingtin (mHtt) regulates its stability. This conclusion, which may have important therapeutic implications for contrasting HD, is drawn by using highly specific intrabodies. They observe a decrease in neurotoxicity and in the aggregation of mHtt associated with a consistent increase of the turnover rate of mHtt.

    The authors exclude the possibility that this destabilizing effect on mHtt is due to the propensity of intrabodies to be diverted to the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) without investigating the mechanism of degradation of mHtt/intrabody complex. From our long-lasting experience on intrabodies, however, we have clear indications that intrabodies are naturally addressed to the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) in mammalian cells. This is true for cytosolic (Cardinale et al., 2001; Cardinale et al., 2003), nuclear (Filesi, unpublished) and, also, for secreted intrabodies (anti-NGF and anti-prion intrabodies) (Cardinale et al., 2004; Filesi et al., 2007). In most of the cases reported, the intrinsic property recognized by proteasomes is part of the antigen neutralization capability. We even exploited this intrinsic feature of antibody fragments for their use as intracellular reporters of proteasome activity in fibroblasts (Cardinale et al., 2003; Cardinale et al., 2004). Therefore, intrabodies (at least in the scFv format), notwithstanding their folding properties and/or in light of the fact that they may hinder some cryptic signals of degradation, are naturally recognized by the ubiquitin ligase enzymes as substrates, ubiquitinated, and degraded (Cardinale and Biocca, 2008). A recent article on an anti-N- terminal mHtt intrabody also supports this conclusion (Wang et al. 2008).

    Specific experiments to study whether the anti-PRR mHtt intrabodies are diverted to proteasomes are necessary. Intrabodies can reduce the specific neurotoxicity of mutant huntingtin by preventing accumulation of mHtt and promoting its clearance, apart from the epitope they are directed to. Biochemical analysis of the mHtt-intrabody complex (i.e., soluble and insoluble protein levels, ubiquitination) in the presence of proteasome inhibitors, both at steady state and in pulse-chase paradigms, could shed light on this important issue.

    References

    Cardinale A, Filesi I, Biocca S. (2001) Aggresome formation by anti-Ras intracellular scFv fragments. The fate of the antigen-antibody complex. Eur. J. Biochem. 268: 268-277.

    Cardinale A, Filesi I, Mattei S, Biocca S. (2003) Evidence for proteasome dysfunction in cytotoxicity mediated by anti-Ras intracellular antibodies. Eur. J. Biochem. 270: 3389-3397.

    Cardinale A, Filesi I, Mattei S, Biocca S. (2004) Intracellular targeting and functional analysis of single-chain Fv fragments in mammalian cells. Methods 34: 171-178.

    Cardinale A, Biocca S. (2008) The potential of intracellular antibodies for therapeutic targeting of protein-misfolding diseases. Trends Mol Med. 14: 373-80.

    Filesi I, Cardinale A, Mattei S, Biocca S. (2007) Selective re- routing of prion protein to proteasomes and alteration of its vesicular secretion prevent PrPSc formation. J. Neurochem. 101: 1516-1526.

    Wang CE, Zhou H, McGuire JR, Cerullo V, Lee B, Li SH, Li XJ. (2008) Suppression of neuropil aggregates and neurological symptoms by an intracellular antibody implicates the cytoplasmic toxicity of mutant huntingtin. J Cell Biol. 181: 803-16.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Neurobiology of Disease

  • Neural network connectivity following opioid dependence is altered by a common genetic variant in the mu-opioid receptor, OPRM1 A118G
  • An Ascending Excitatory Circuit from the Dorsal Raphe for Sensory Modulation of Pain
  • Spinal-Specific Super Enhancer in Neuropathic Pain
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.