Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Task design: trials were paired into guess and repetition trials. A cue indicated the dimension to select (shape or color) and was followed by the stimulus presentation. A response was followed by positive (+) or negative (x) feedback, after which the sequence repeated during the repetition trial. Trials were separated by intertrial intervals (not shown) of 2–8 s, during which a central fixation cross was shown.
- Figure 2.
A, B, Performance on repetition trials after receiving negative and positive feedback (FB) indicated by percentages correct (A) and reaction time (B). Results are presented separately for rule type (shape and color), with SEs plotted.
- Figure 3.
Feedback-locked whole-brain contrasts are displayed for 18- to 25-year-olds, 11- to 13-year-olds, and 8- to 9-year-olds, showing effects of negative feedback (FB) > positive FB at p < 0.001 (uncorrected) versus effects of positive FB > negative FB at p < 0.001 (uncorrected). Coordinates are reported in supplemental Tables 1 and 2 (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).
- Figure 4.
ROI activation values for pre-SMA/ACC, left DLPFC, left superior (Sup) parietal cortex, and right caudate for each age group. For the first three regions, an age group (18–25, 11–13, and 8–9) × feedback (negative and positive) interaction was present (all p values < 0.005) (post hoc analyses indicating significant differences between positive and negative feedback, *p values < 0.05; **p values < 0.005). SEs are plotted.
Additional Files
Supplemental Data
Files in this Data Supplement:
- supplemental material - Supplemental Material
