Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 2008, 28 (40) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Spontaneous and Evoked Release Activate Different Receptors

Deniz Atasoy, Mert Ertunc, Krista L. Moulder, Justin Blackwell, ChiHye Chung, Jianzhong Su, and Ege T. Kavalali

(see pages 10151–10166)

In resting neurons, single vesicles spontaneously fuse to the presynaptic membrane, releasing neurotransmitter that produces miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs). mEPSC amplitude is routinely used to estimate the number of vesicles released per action potential and the total number of vesicles per synapse. The validity of these measures depends on the assumption that spontaneous release activates the same postsynaptic receptors as evoked released—an assumption questioned this week by Atasoy et al. The authors applied (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo [a,d] cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801), an antagonist that binds only to activated NMDA receptors, to rat hippocampal neurons in vitro. Applying MK-801 along with tetrodotoxin to block spiking quickly eliminated mEPSCs by blocking all available receptors. Nonetheless, subsequent stimulation evoked EPSCs. Conversely, applying MK-801 during stimulation blocked evoked EPSCs, but not subsequent mEPSCs. Additional experiments and computer models suggested that spontaneous and evoked release activate receptors with different opening probabilities that are distributed in different subregions of the synapse.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

GluR1 Shapes Dendritic Growth

Lei Zhang, Joachim Schessl, Markus Werner, Carsten Bonnemann, Guoxiang Xiong, Jelena Mojsilovic-Petrovic, Weiguo Zhou, Akiva Cohen, Peter Seeburg, Hidemi Misawa, Aditi Jayaram, Kirkwood Personius, Michael Hollmann, Rolf Sprengel, and Robert Kalb

(see pages 9953–9968)

During spinal cord development, motor neuron dendrites grow into neuropil, where they contact axons and form synapses, which leads to additional, activity-dependent arborization. Expression of the GluR1 AMPA receptor subunit in motor neurons is high during dendritic arborization and synaptic development; but expression decreases after connections have formed and dendritic structure stabilizes, suggesting that GluR1 may play a role in this process. In support of this hypothesis, Zhang et al. show that reducing GluR1 expression (via RNA inhibition or knock-out) reduced dendritic growth and branching. In knock-out mice, dendritic changes were accompanied by reductions in the number of premotor interneurons innervating motor neurons, and also in behavioral strength and endurance. Knock-out mice had more type I and fewer type II muscle fibers than controls, possibly resulting from changes in motor neuron firing. Nonetheless, no changes in electrical properties were found, suggesting the changes are subtle or GluR1 effects are activity independent.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Reducing GluR1 expression in spinal motor neurons (bottom cells) reduces dendritic growth and branching compared to controls (top cells). See the article by Zhang et al. for details.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Amygdala Encodes State Value on a Continuous Scale

Marina A. Belova, Joseph J. Paton, and C. Daniel Salzman

(see pages 10023–10030)

One role of the amygdala is to encode the positive or negative value of stimuli or conditions. Some amygdala neurons fire more when presented with positive stimuli, whereas others respond more to negative stimuli. Belova et al. extend this understanding of value coding by showing that individual amygdala neurons provide a continuous representation of value across different stimuli and different task states. They recorded from amygdala neurons in monkeys trained to associate different visual cues with a large liquid reward, a small liquid reward, or an aversive air puff. For all neurons, responses to stimuli associated with small rewards tended to fall between those associated with large rewards and those that signaled punishments. This suggests that amygdala neurons do not use binary coding of positive versus negative value, but rather code a value continuum from positive to negative.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

CaMKIV Overexpression Enhances Memory

Hotaka Fukushima, Ryouta Maeda, Ryousuke Suzuki, Akinobu Suzuki, Masanori Nomoto, Hiroki Toyoda, Long-Jun Wu, Hui Xu, Ming-Gao Zhao, Kenji Ueda, Aya Kitamoto, Nori Mamiya, Taro Yoshida, Seiichi Homma, Shoichi Masushige, Min Zhuo, and Satoshi Kida

(see pages 9910–9919)

Local changes in phosphorylation and protein distribution can mediate short-term synaptic changes, but long-lasting changes require gene transcription. One pathway proposed to link synaptic activity to altered gene expression involves calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV (CaMKIV). In this model, synaptic activity increases intracellular calcium levels, calcium binds to calmodulin, and the complex activates CaMKIV. CaMKIV then phosphorylates cAMP responsive element-binding protein (CREB), which binds to DNA and promotes transcription of specific plasticity-related genes. In this issue, Fukushima et al. provide strong evidence for a role of CaMKIV in plasticity, by demonstrating that increasing CaMKIV in forebrain of transgenic mice increased CREB activity, improved long-term recognition memory and fear conditioning, and increased long-term potentiation. Like in humans, CaMKIV expression decreased in aged mice, and decreased CaMKIV levels correlated with impaired learning. Intriguingly, memory deficits were erased by overexpression of CaMKIV in aged mice, making them perform similarly to younger wild-type mice.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (40)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 40
1 Oct 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 2008, 28 (40) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 1 October 2008, 28 (40) i
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.